Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Limiting Repetitive Summary Judgment Motions: California Supreme Court Upholds CCP §§437c(f)(2) and 1008

Limiting Repetitive Summary Judgment Motions: California Supreme Court Upholds CCP §§437c(f)(2) and 1008

Date: Jun 10, 2005
Limiting Repetitive Summary Judgment Motions: California Supreme Court Upholds CCP §§437c(f)(2) and 1008 Introduction The case of Philip Le Francois et al. v. Prabhu Goel et al. (35 Cal.4th 1094,...
Six-Month Limitations Period for MMBA Unfair Practice Charges Established in Coachella Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District v. PERB

Six-Month Limitations Period for MMBA Unfair Practice Charges Established in Coachella Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District v. PERB

Date: Jun 10, 2005
Six-Month Limitations Period for MMBA Unfair Practice Charges Established in Coachella Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District v. California Public Employment Relations Board Introduction The...
Establishing Specific Personal Jurisdiction Through Extensive Targeted Advertising and Online Activities: Snowney v. Harrah's Entertainment

Establishing Specific Personal Jurisdiction Through Extensive Targeted Advertising and Online Activities: Snowney v. Harrah's Entertainment

Date: Jun 7, 2005
Establishing Specific Personal Jurisdiction Through Extensive Targeted Advertising and Online Activities: Snowney v. Harrah's Entertainment Introduction In the landmark case of Frank Snowney et al....
No Brady Violation Found in Suppression of Nonmaterial Impeachment Evidence in Jose Salazar Case

No Brady Violation Found in Suppression of Nonmaterial Impeachment Evidence in Jose Salazar Case

Date: Jun 7, 2005
No Brady Violation Found in Suppression of Nonmaterial Impeachment Evidence in Jose Salazar Case Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Jose A. Salazar (2005) 35 Cal.4th 1031, the Supreme...
Revisiting 'Plausible' in Pitchess Discovery: Warrick v. Superior Court

Revisiting 'Plausible' in Pitchess Discovery: Warrick v. Superior Court

Date: Jun 3, 2005
Revisiting 'Plausible' in Pitchess Discovery: Warrick v. Superior Court Introduction Warrick v. Superior Court is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that redefines the standards...
Imperfect Defense of Others: California Supreme Court Precedent in People v. Randle

Imperfect Defense of Others: California Supreme Court Precedent in People v. Randle

Date: May 27, 2005
Imperfect Defense of Others: California Supreme Court Precedent in People v. Randle Introduction People v. Daryl Randle (35 Cal.4th 987) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that...
Clarifying Intent in Felony-Murder Aider and Abettor Cases: People v. Dickey

Clarifying Intent in Felony-Murder Aider and Abettor Cases: People v. Dickey

Date: May 24, 2005
Clarifying Intent in Felony-Murder Aider and Abettor Cases: People v. Dickey Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Dickey (35 Cal.4th 884, 2005), the Supreme Court of California addressed...
Clarification of Dual Conviction Principles in People v. Ozuna Garza

Clarification of Dual Conviction Principles in People v. Ozuna Garza

Date: May 20, 2005
Clarification of Dual Conviction Principles in People v. Ozuna Garza Introduction People v. Ozuna Garza is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California, adjudicated on May 19, 2005. The...
Enhanced Application of the Discovery Rule in Products Liability: Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.

Enhanced Application of the Discovery Rule in Products Liability: Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.

Date: May 10, 2005
Enhanced Application of the Discovery Rule in Products Liability: Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. Introduction Brandi R. Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. is a landmark case decided by the Supreme...
Reeves v. Department of Corrections: Clarifying Worktime Credit Limits for Concurrent Sentences Involving Violent Offenses

Reeves v. Department of Corrections: Clarifying Worktime Credit Limits for Concurrent Sentences Involving Violent Offenses

Date: May 10, 2005
Reeves v. Department of Corrections: Clarifying Worktime Credit Limits for Concurrent Sentences Involving Violent Offenses Introduction Reeves v. Department of Corrections is a landmark decision by...
Enforcement of Weather Conditions Exclusions and the Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine: Julian v. Hartford

Enforcement of Weather Conditions Exclusions and the Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine: Julian v. Hartford

Date: May 6, 2005
Enforcement of Weather Conditions Exclusions and the Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine: Julian v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company Introduction Julian v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance...
Reaffirming Trial Court Discretion in Continuances and Defense Counsel Conflicts: People v. Roldan (35 Cal.4th 646)

Reaffirming Trial Court Discretion in Continuances and Defense Counsel Conflicts: People v. Roldan (35 Cal.4th 646)

Date: Apr 26, 2005
Reaffirming Trial Court Discretion in Continuances and Defense Counsel Conflicts: People v. Roldan (35 Cal.4th 646) Introduction In People v. Roldan (35 Cal.4th 646, 2005), the Supreme Court of...
People v. Guzman: Upholding Statutory Language Over Equal Protection Claims in Mandatory Probation

People v. Guzman: Upholding Statutory Language Over Equal Protection Claims in Mandatory Probation

Date: Mar 22, 2005
People v. Guzman: Upholding Statutory Language Over Equal Protection Claims in Mandatory Probation 1. Introduction People v. Guzman is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that...
Stitely v. The People: Affirmation of Felony-Murder-Rape Conviction in California Supreme Case

Stitely v. The People: Affirmation of Felony-Murder-Rape Conviction in California Supreme Case

Date: Mar 22, 2005
Stitely v. The People: Affirmation of Felony-Murder-Rape Conviction in California Supreme Case Introduction The People v. Richard Stitely (35 Cal.4th 514, 2005) is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Death Penalty in Panah v. People: Upholding Special Circumstances in First-Degree Murder

Affirmation of Death Penalty in Panah v. People: Upholding Special Circumstances in First-Degree Murder

Date: Mar 15, 2005
Affirmation of Death Penalty in Panah v. People: Upholding Special Circumstances in First-Degree Murder Introduction In the landmark case The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Hooman Ashkan Panah,...
Gregory Scott Smith v. The People: Admissibility of Mental Illness as Aggravating Circumstance in Death Penalty Cases

Gregory Scott Smith v. The People: Admissibility of Mental Illness as Aggravating Circumstance in Death Penalty Cases

Date: Mar 11, 2005
Gregory Scott Smith v. The People: Admissibility of Mental Illness as Aggravating Circumstance in Death Penalty Cases Introduction In the landmark case The People v. Gregory Scott Smith (35 Cal.4th...
Cronus Investments v. Concierge Services: FAA Does Not Preempt California's Section 1281.2(c)

Cronus Investments v. Concierge Services: FAA Does Not Preempt California's Section 1281.2(c)

Date: Mar 11, 2005
Cronus Investments v. Concierge Services: FAA Does Not Preempt California's Section 1281.2(c) Introduction Cronus Investments, Inc., along with cross-defendant and appellant Howardjon Colman,...
Refining Death Penalty Eligibility: Insights from People v. Richard John Vieira

Refining Death Penalty Eligibility: Insights from People v. Richard John Vieira

Date: Mar 8, 2005
Refining Death Penalty Eligibility: Insights from People v. Richard John Vieira Introduction People v. Richard John Vieira, 35 Cal.4th 264 (2005), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies: High Court Affirms Mandatory Compliance for Whistleblower Claims

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies: High Court Affirms Mandatory Compliance for Whistleblower Claims

Date: Mar 8, 2005
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies: High Court Affirms Mandatory Compliance for Whistleblower Claims Introduction The Supreme Court of California, in Janet Campbell v. The Regents of the...
People v. Cedric Harrison: Standards for Prosecutorial Conduct and Admissibility of Evidence in Capital Cases

People v. Cedric Harrison: Standards for Prosecutorial Conduct and Admissibility of Evidence in Capital Cases

Date: Mar 4, 2005
People v. Cedric Harrison: Standards for Prosecutorial Conduct and Admissibility of Evidence in Capital Cases Introduction People v. Cedric Harrison, 35 Cal.4th 208 (2005), is a pivotal decision by...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert