Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Establishing Insurer's Right to Reimburse Defense Costs When No Coverage Exists: Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. MVTransportation

Establishing Insurer's Right to Reimburse Defense Costs When No Coverage Exists: Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. MVTransportation

Date: Jul 26, 2005
Establishing Insurer's Right to Reimburse Defense Costs When No Coverage Exists Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. MVTransportation et al. (36 Cal.4th 643) Supreme Court of California, July 25, 2005...
Appellate Counsel's Authority to Dismiss Dependency Appeals: In re Josiah Z. et al. Analysis

Appellate Counsel's Authority to Dismiss Dependency Appeals: In re Josiah Z. et al. Analysis

Date: Jul 26, 2005
Appellate Counsel's Authority to Dismiss Dependency Appeals: In re Josiah Z. et al. Analysis Introduction The case of In re Josiah Z. et al. addresses a pivotal question in juvenile dependency law:...
Reliability of Eyewitness Identification and Standards for Prosecutorial Conduct Upheld in People v. Jerry Noble Kennedy

Reliability of Eyewitness Identification and Standards for Prosecutorial Conduct Upheld in People v. Jerry Noble Kennedy

Date: Jul 26, 2005
Reliability of Eyewitness Identification and Standards for Prosecutorial Conduct Upheld in People v. Jerry Noble Kennedy Introduction In People v. Jerry Noble Kennedy (36 Cal.4th 595, 2005), the...
Admissibility of Jailhouse Taping and Multiple Prosecution: Insights from People v. Davis

Admissibility of Jailhouse Taping and Multiple Prosecution: Insights from People v. Davis

Date: Jul 22, 2005
Admissibility of Jailhouse Taping and Multiple Prosecution: Insights from People v. Davis Introduction People v. Stanley Bernard Davis is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of California on...
California Supreme Court Upholds Arbitration Clause in Disability Insurance Contracts Despite Service of Suit Clause

California Supreme Court Upholds Arbitration Clause in Disability Insurance Contracts Despite Service of Suit Clause

Date: Jul 19, 2005
California Supreme Court Upholds Arbitration Clause in Disability Insurance Contracts Despite Service of Suit Clause Introduction The case of Antone Boghos v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of...
Establishing Hostile Work Environment through Sexual Favoritism: California Supreme Court Sets New Precedent in Miller v. Department of Corrections

Establishing Hostile Work Environment through Sexual Favoritism: California Supreme Court Sets New Precedent in Miller v. Department of Corrections

Date: Jul 19, 2005
Establishing Hostile Work Environment through Sexual Favoritism: California Supreme Court Sets New Precedent in Miller v. Department of Corrections Introduction In the landmark case of Edna Miller et...
MW Erectors Inc. v. Niederhauser: Clarifying CSLL Section 7031(a) on Contractor Licensure and Recovery

MW Erectors Inc. v. Niederhauser: Clarifying CSLL Section 7031(a) on Contractor Licensure and Recovery

Date: Jul 15, 2005
MW Erectors Inc. v. Niederhauser: Clarifying CSLL Section 7031(a) on Contractor Licensure and Recovery Introduction In the landmark case of MW Erectors, Inc. v. Niederhauser Ornamental and Metal...
Affirmation of Capital Sentencing Procedures in PEOPLE v. WILSON

Affirmation of Capital Sentencing Procedures in PEOPLE v. WILSON

Date: Jul 12, 2005
Affirmation of Capital Sentencing Procedures in PEOPLE v. WILSON Introduction The case of The People v. Robert Paul Wilson (36 Cal.4th 309) was a significant decision by the Supreme Court of...
Section 473(b) Relief Unavailable for Untimely Trial Requests in Mandatory Fee Arbitration under MFAA: Maynard v. Brandon

Section 473(b) Relief Unavailable for Untimely Trial Requests in Mandatory Fee Arbitration under MFAA: Maynard v. Brandon

Date: Jul 12, 2005
Section 473(b) Relief Unavailable for Untimely Trial Requests in Mandatory Fee Arbitration under MFAA: Maynard v. Brandon Introduction In Maynard v. Brandon (36 Cal.4th 364, 2005), the Supreme Court...
Seijas v. The People: Affirmation of Witness Privilege and Preservation of Defendant's Rights

Seijas v. The People: Affirmation of Witness Privilege and Preservation of Defendant's Rights

Date: Jul 8, 2005
Seijas v. The People: Affirmation of Witness Privilege and Preservation of Defendant's Rights Introduction In The People v. Larry Seijas (36 Cal.4th 291, 2005), the Supreme Court of California...
Concealment in Life Insurance Applications: Insights from O'Riordan v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Company

Concealment in Life Insurance Applications: Insights from O'Riordan v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Company

Date: Jul 8, 2005
Concealment in Life Insurance Applications: Insights from O'Riordan v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Company Introduction The Supreme Court of California's decision in O'Riordan v. Federal Kemper...
Clarifying Special Circumstances in Multiple-Murder Capital Cases: People v. Carmen Lee Ward

Clarifying Special Circumstances in Multiple-Murder Capital Cases: People v. Carmen Lee Ward

Date: Jul 1, 2005
Clarifying Special Circumstances in Multiple-Murder Capital Cases: People v. Carmen Lee Ward Introduction In the landmark case The People v. Carmen Lee Ward, 36 Cal.4th 186 (2005), the California...
Enhanced Duty of Care for Bar Proprietors: Delgado v. Trax Bar Grill

Enhanced Duty of Care for Bar Proprietors: Delgado v. Trax Bar Grill

Date: Jul 1, 2005
Enhanced Duty of Care for Bar Proprietors: Delgado v. Trax Bar Grill Introduction Delgado v. Trax Bar Grill (36 Cal.4th 224, 2005) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that...
Admissibility of Financial Motive Evidence in Capital Cases: The People v. Mary Ellen Samuels

Admissibility of Financial Motive Evidence in Capital Cases: The People v. Mary Ellen Samuels

Date: Jun 28, 2005
Admissibility of Financial Motive Evidence in Capital Cases: The People v. Mary Ellen Samuels Introduction The People v. Mary Ellen Samuels (36 Cal.4th 96), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Unconscionability of Classwide Arbitration Waivers in Consumer Contracts: Discover Bank v. Superior Court of Los Angeles

Unconscionability of Classwide Arbitration Waivers in Consumer Contracts: Discover Bank v. Superior Court of Los Angeles

Date: Jun 28, 2005
Unconscionability of Classwide Arbitration Waivers in Consumer Contracts: Discover Bank v. Superior Court of Los Angeles Introduction Discover Bank, Petitioner, v. Superior Court of Los Angeles,...
Affirmation of California's Determinate Sentencing Law in Light of Apprendi, Blakely, and Booker

Affirmation of California's Determinate Sentencing Law in Light of Apprendi, Blakely, and Booker

Date: Jun 21, 2005
Affirmation of California's Determinate Sentencing Law in Light of Apprendi, Blakely, and Booker Introduction The case of The People v. Kevin Michael Black (35 Cal.4th 1238) addresses pivotal issues...
Interpretation of Accomplice Liability and Intent in Methamphetamine Precursor Possession: People v. Perez

Interpretation of Accomplice Liability and Intent in Methamphetamine Precursor Possession: People v. Perez

Date: Jun 21, 2005
Interpretation of Accomplice Liability and Intent in Methamphetamine Precursor Possession: People v. Perez Introduction People v. Perez (35 Cal.4th 1219), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Limits on Punitive Damages under Federal Due Process: Simon v. San Paolo U.S. Holding Company, Inc.

Limits on Punitive Damages under Federal Due Process: Simon v. San Paolo U.S. Holding Company, Inc.

Date: Jun 17, 2005
Limits on Punitive Damages under Federal Due Process: Simon v. San Paolo U.S. Holding Company, Inc. Introduction The landmark case of Simon v. San Paolo U.S. Holding Company, Inc. (35 Cal.4th 1159)...
Establishing Amusement Park Ride Operators as Common Carriers under California Civil Code §§2100 and 2101

Establishing Amusement Park Ride Operators as Common Carriers under California Civil Code §§2100 and 2101

Date: Jun 17, 2005
Establishing Amusement Park Ride Operators as Common Carriers under California Civil Code §§2100 and 2101 Introduction The Supreme Court of California, in the landmark case Johana Gomez v. The...
Application of Civil Code §1954.535 Extends 90-Day Notice Requirement to Section 8 Tenants in All California Jurisdictions

Application of Civil Code §1954.535 Extends 90-Day Notice Requirement to Section 8 Tenants in All California Jurisdictions

Date: Jun 14, 2005
Application of Civil Code §1954.535 Extends 90-Day Notice Requirement to Section 8 Tenants in All California Jurisdictions Introduction The case WASATCH PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, Plaintiff and Respondent,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert