Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Exhaustion of Remedies Not Mandated for BID Assessment Claims under Proposition 218

Exhaustion of Remedies Not Mandated for BID Assessment Claims under Proposition 218

Date: Dec 21, 2021
Exhaustion of Remedies Not Mandated for BID Assessment Claims under Proposition 218 Introduction In Hill RHF Housing Partners, L.P. et al. v. City of Los Angeles et al. (2021) 12 Cal.5th 458, the...
Affirmation of Denial of Late Self-Representation and Substitution of Counsel Claims in People v. Wright

Affirmation of Denial of Late Self-Representation and Substitution of Counsel Claims in People v. Wright

Date: Dec 17, 2021
Affirmation of Denial of Late Self-Representation and Substitution of Counsel Claims in People v. Wright Introduction Case: The People v. William Lee Wright, Jr. Court: Supreme Court of California...
Reaffirming the Corpus Delicti Rule and Standards for Wiretap Admissibility in Capital Cases: People v. Gonzalez

Reaffirming the Corpus Delicti Rule and Standards for Wiretap Admissibility in Capital Cases: People v. Gonzalez

Date: Dec 3, 2021
Reaffirming the Corpus Delicti Rule and Standards for Wiretap Admissibility in Capital Cases: People v. Gonzalez Introduction In the landmark case of The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Frank...
Reaffirmation of Death Penalty for Gang-Related Murder in People v. Navarro

Reaffirmation of Death Penalty for Gang-Related Murder in People v. Navarro

Date: Oct 29, 2021
Reaffirmation of Death Penalty for Gang-Related Murder in People v. Navarro Introduction In the landmark case People v. Anthony Navarro, decided on October 28, 2021, the Supreme Court of California...
Clarifying Hirer Liability: Sandoval v. Qualcomm and the Evolution of the Privette Doctrine

Clarifying Hirer Liability: Sandoval v. Qualcomm and the Evolution of the Privette Doctrine

Date: Sep 10, 2021
Clarifying Hirer Liability: Sandoval v. Qualcomm and the Evolution of the Privette Doctrine Introduction Sandoval v. Qualcomm Incorporated is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Extending Statutory Grace Period and Notice Requirements to Existing Life Insurance Policies: Blakely McHugh v. Protective Life Insurance Company

Extending Statutory Grace Period and Notice Requirements to Existing Life Insurance Policies: Blakely McHugh v. Protective Life Insurance Company

Date: Aug 31, 2021
Extending Statutory Grace Period and Notice Requirements to Existing Life Insurance Policies Blakely McHugh et al. v. Protective Life Insurance Company Court: Supreme Court of California Date: August...
Hearsay Limitations in SVPA Probable Cause Hearings Established in Jeffrey Walker v. Superior Court of San Francisco

Hearsay Limitations in SVPA Probable Cause Hearings Established in Jeffrey Walker v. Superior Court of San Francisco

Date: Aug 31, 2021
Hearsay Limitations in SVPA Probable Cause Hearings Established in Jeffrey Walker v. Superior Court of San Francisco Introduction In the landmark case of Jeffrey Walker v. Superior Court of the City...
Affirmation of Conviction in People v. Donte Lamont McDaniel: A Comprehensive Analysis

Affirmation of Conviction in People v. Donte Lamont McDaniel: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Aug 27, 2021
Affirmation of Conviction in People v. Donte Lamont McDaniel: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction People v. Donte Lamont McDaniel (12 Cal.5th 97), decided by the Supreme Court of California on...
People v. Wycoff: Upholding Competency Standards in Criminal Proceedings

People v. Wycoff: Upholding Competency Standards in Criminal Proceedings

Date: Aug 24, 2021
People v. Wycoff: Upholding Competency Standards in Criminal Proceedings Introduction The case of The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Edward Matthew Wycoff (12 Cal.5th 58) adjudicated by the...
Reaffirming Privette: California Supreme Court Limits Landowner Liability for Known Hazards in Independent Contractor Relationships

Reaffirming Privette: California Supreme Court Limits Landowner Liability for Known Hazards in Independent Contractor Relationships

Date: Aug 20, 2021
Reaffirming Privette: California Supreme Court Limits Landowner Liability for Known Hazards in Independent Contractor Relationships Introduction The Supreme Court of California's decision in Gonzalez...
California Supreme Court Affirms Exclusion of Close Family IHSS Providers from Unemployment Insurance Benefits

California Supreme Court Affirms Exclusion of Close Family IHSS Providers from Unemployment Insurance Benefits

Date: Aug 20, 2021
California Supreme Court Affirms Exclusion of Close Family IHSS Providers from Unemployment Insurance Benefits 1. Introduction In the landmark case Tamara Skidgel v. California Unemployment Insurance...
California Supreme Court Clarifies 'Public Works' in Prevailing Wage Law: Exclusion of Rolling Stock Activities

California Supreme Court Clarifies 'Public Works' in Prevailing Wage Law: Exclusion of Rolling Stock Activities

Date: Aug 17, 2021
California Supreme Court Clarifies 'Public Works' in Prevailing Wage Law: Exclusion of Rolling Stock Activities Introduction In the landmark case of John Busker v. Wabtec Corporation et al. (11...
Proposition 64 Does Not Legalize Cannabis Possession in Prisons: Comprehensive Commentary on People v. Goldy Raybon

Proposition 64 Does Not Legalize Cannabis Possession in Prisons: Comprehensive Commentary on People v. Goldy Raybon

Date: Aug 13, 2021
Proposition 64 Does Not Legalize Cannabis Possession in Prisons: Comprehensive Commentary on People v. Goldy Raybon Introduction In the landmark case People v. Goldy Raybon, the Supreme Court of...
ARAM BONNI v. ST. JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM: Defining the Limits of Anti-SLAPP Protections in Physician Retaliation Claims

ARAM BONNI v. ST. JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM: Defining the Limits of Anti-SLAPP Protections in Physician Retaliation Claims

Date: Jul 30, 2021
ARAM BONNI v. ST. JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM: Defining the Limits of Anti-SLAPP Protections in Physician Retaliation Claims Introduction ARAM BONNI, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ST. JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM et...
Pollock v. Tri-Modal: FEHA Statute of Limitations Commences Upon Employee's Knowledge of Promotion Denial

Pollock v. Tri-Modal: FEHA Statute of Limitations Commences Upon Employee's Knowledge of Promotion Denial

Date: Jul 27, 2021
Pollock v. Tri-Modal: FEHA Statute of Limitations Commences Upon Employee's Knowledge of Promotion Denial Introduction In the landmark case of Pamela Pollock v. Tri-Modal Distribution Services, Inc.,...
Reaffirming Evidentiary Standards in Capital Murder: Insights from People v. Douglas Edward Dworak

Reaffirming Evidentiary Standards in Capital Murder: Insights from People v. Douglas Edward Dworak

Date: Jul 16, 2021
Reaffirming Evidentiary Standards in Capital Murder: Insights from People v. Douglas Edward Dworak Introduction People v. Douglas Edward Dworak, 11 Cal.5th 881 (2021), is a pivotal decision by the...
California Supreme Court Equates ‘Regular Rate of Compensation’ with ‘Regular Rate of Pay’ in Labor Code for Premium Pay Calculations

California Supreme Court Equates ‘Regular Rate of Compensation’ with ‘Regular Rate of Pay’ in Labor Code for Premium Pay Calculations

Date: Jul 16, 2021
California Supreme Court Equates ‘Regular Rate of Compensation’ with ‘Regular Rate of Pay’ in Labor Code for Premium Pay Calculations Introduction The case Jessica Ferra et al. v. Loews Hollywood...
Reinforcing Evidentiary Standards for Gang Enhancements: People v. Valencia (2021)

Reinforcing Evidentiary Standards for Gang Enhancements: People v. Valencia (2021)

Date: Jul 2, 2021
Reinforcing Evidentiary Standards for Gang Enhancements: People v. Valencia (2021) Introduction The case of The People v. Jose Luis Valencia and The People v. Edgar Isidro Garcia (2021) presents a...
California Supreme Court Establishes Capacity and Willingness as Considerations in Conservatorship Determinations

California Supreme Court Establishes Capacity and Willingness as Considerations in Conservatorship Determinations

Date: Jun 29, 2021
California Supreme Court Establishes Capacity and Willingness as Considerations in Conservatorship Determinations Introduction The case of Conservatorship of the Person and Estate of K.P. Public...
Narrow Interpretation of Successive Petition Restrictions under Proposition 66

Narrow Interpretation of Successive Petition Restrictions under Proposition 66

Date: Jun 29, 2021
Narrow Interpretation of Successive Petition Restrictions under Proposition 66 Introduction In the case of In re JACK WAYNE FRIEND on Habeas Corpus, the Supreme Court of California addressed...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert