Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Inclusion of Retirement Under Labor Code Sections 202 & 203: McLean v. State of California Introduction In McLean v. State of California, the Supreme Court of California addressed pivotal questions...
Sanctity of Jury Deliberations Affirmed in People v. Sergio Dujuan Nelson Introduction People v. Sergio Dujuan Nelson (1 Cal.5th 513, 2016) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California...
California Supreme Court Validates Percentage-Based Attorney Fees in Common Fund Class Actions Introduction The case Mark LAFFITTE et al. v. ROBERT HALF INTERNATIONAL INC., et al. (1 Cal.5th 480),...
Armstrong v. People: Upholding the 'Demonstrable Reality' Standard for Juror Removal Introduction In People v. Craigen Lewis Armstrong (1 Cal.5th 432, 2016), the Supreme Court of California addressed...
Montebello v. Vasquez et al.: Expanding Anti-SLAPP Protections to Legislative Votes Introduction Montebello v. Vasquez et al. is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of California on August...
The People v. Moran: Upholding Probation Conditions and the Right to Travel Introduction In The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Jeffrey Michael Moran, Defendant and Appellant (1 Cal.5th 398),...
Refined Application of Anti-SLAPP Motions in Mixed Causes of Action: California Supreme Court Overrules Mann Introduction The case of Robert C. Baral v. David Schnitt (1 Cal.5th 376) adjudicated by...
Admitting Dog Trailing Evidence and Joinder of Assault Charges: A Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Bailey Lamar Jackson Introduction The case of The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Bailey...
Reaffirming Trial Court Discretion on Gang Enhancements under Section 1385(a) Introduction The case of The People, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Alexis Alejandro Fuentes, Defendant and Respondent (1...
People v. Simon: Affirming Judicial Standards for Restraints, Joinder of Crimes, and Victim Impact Evidence in Capital Sentencing Introduction People v. Richard Nathan Simon (1 Cal.5th 98),...
Invalidation of California Rule 5.482(c) in Implementing the Indian Child Welfare Act Introduction The case In re ABBIGAIL A. et al. involved a significant legal challenge concerning the application...
Waiver of Right to Counsel and Proceeding in Absentia: Insights from People v. Espinoza, Jr. Introduction People v. Zeferino Espinoza, Jr., 1 Cal.5th 61 (2016), presents a complex scenario involving...
Continuing Duty Under ICWA: Parents' Ability to Challenge ICWA Notice in Subsequent Appeals Introduction The case of In re ISAIAH W. addressed a critical issue pertaining to the application of the...
Three Strikes Reform Act: Petition Requirement Overrides Estrada Presumption for Resentencing Introduction The People v. Patrick Lee Conley (63 Cal.4th 646) is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Reaffirming the Boundaries: People v. Sanchez Establishes New Limits on Expert Testimony Relating to Hearsay Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Marcos Arturo Sanchez, 374 P.3d 320...
People v. Sanchez: New Precedent on Hearsay in Expert Testimony and the Sixth Amendment Introduction In the landmark case The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Marcos Arturo Sanchez, Defendant and...
Clarifying the Reckless Indifference Requirement in Capital Cases: People v. Clark Introduction People v. William Clinton Clark (63 Cal.4th 522, 2016) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Reinforcing Reckless Indifference in Felony-Murder Special Circumstances: In-Depth Commentary on People v. Clark Introduction In the landmark case People v. William Clinton Clark (372 P.3d 811,...
The People v. Edgardo Sánchez: Partial Reversal and Implications for Jury Selection Introduction The People v. Edgardo Sánchez (63 Cal.4th 411) is a landmark case addressed by the Supreme Court of...
Excess Custody Credits Do Not Reduce Parole Period Under Proposition 47: CA Supreme Court Ruling Introduction The case of The People v. Josue Vargas Morales (63 Cal.4th 399) addresses the...