Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Clarifying Seating Requirements: Supreme Court of California Establishes New Precedent on Workplace Accommodations

Clarifying Seating Requirements: Supreme Court of California Establishes New Precedent on Workplace Accommodations

Date: Apr 5, 2016
Clarifying Seating Requirements: Supreme Court of California Establishes New Precedent on Workplace Accommodations Introduction In the landmark case of Nykeya Kilby v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. (63 Cal.4th...
Reinforcement of Confrontation Clause Protections and Jury Selection Standards in People v. Pedro Rangel Jr.

Reinforcement of Confrontation Clause Protections and Jury Selection Standards in People v. Pedro Rangel Jr.

Date: Mar 29, 2016
Reinforcement of Confrontation Clause Protections and Jury Selection Standards in People v. Pedro Rangel Jr. Introduction People v. Pedro Rangel Jr. is a significant decision by the Supreme Court of...
California Supreme Court Upholds Enforceability of Employment Arbitration Agreements

California Supreme Court Upholds Enforceability of Employment Arbitration Agreements

Date: Mar 29, 2016
California Supreme Court Upholds Enforceability of Employment Arbitration Agreements Introduction In Maribel Baltazár v. Forever 21, Inc., et al. (62 Cal.4th 1237, 2016), the Supreme Court of...
Partial Stays and Tolling of Limitation Periods: Insights from Gaines v. Fidelity National

Partial Stays and Tolling of Limitation Periods: Insights from Gaines v. Fidelity National

Date: Feb 26, 2016
Partial Stays and Tolling of Limitation Periods: Insights from Gaines v. Fidelity National Introduction Gaines v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company et al. (62 Cal.4th 1081, 2016) is a seminal...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in BGF Conspiracy Case: Key Insights into Witness Identification and Evidentiary Standards

Affirmation of Death Sentence in BGF Conspiracy Case: Key Insights into Witness Identification and Evidentiary Standards

Date: Feb 23, 2016
Affirmation of Death Sentence in BGF Conspiracy Case: Key Insights into Witness Identification and Evidentiary Standards Introduction In the landmark case of The People vs. Jarvis J. Masters (62...
Affirmation of Joinder and Jury Selection Standards in Capital Murder Cases: People v. O'Malley

Affirmation of Joinder and Jury Selection Standards in Capital Murder Cases: People v. O'Malley

Date: Feb 19, 2016
Affirmation of Joinder and Jury Selection Standards in Capital Murder Cases: People v. O'Malley Introduction People v. James Francis O'Malley (62 Cal.4th 944, 2016) is a landmark decision by the...
Cal. Supreme Court Establishes Borrower Standing to Challenge Void Assignments in Nonjudicial Foreclosures

Cal. Supreme Court Establishes Borrower Standing to Challenge Void Assignments in Nonjudicial Foreclosures

Date: Feb 19, 2016
Cal. Supreme Court Establishes Borrower Standing to Challenge Void Assignments in Nonjudicial Foreclosures Introduction In the landmark case of Ts v. tana YVANOVA, 62 Cal.4th 919 (2016), the Supreme...
PEOPLE v. MENDOZA: Upholding Competency Standards and Capital Punishment Despite Mental Illness Claims

PEOPLE v. MENDOZA: Upholding Competency Standards and Capital Punishment Despite Mental Illness Claims

Date: Feb 12, 2016
PEOPLE v. MENDOZA: Upholding Competency Standards and Capital Punishment Despite Mental Illness Claims Introduction In the landmark case of PEOPLE v. MENDOZA (62 Cal.4th 856, 2016), the Supreme Court...
Louis James Peoples v. The People: Affirmation of Death Sentence and Upholding of Procedural Protections

Louis James Peoples v. The People: Affirmation of Death Sentence and Upholding of Procedural Protections

Date: Feb 5, 2016
Louis James Peoples v. The People: Affirmation of Death Sentence and Upholding of Procedural Protections Introduction In Louis James Peoples v. The People (62 Cal.4th 718, 2016), the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation and Clarification of Lying-in-Wait Special Circumstance in Death Penalty Sentencing

Affirmation and Clarification of Lying-in-Wait Special Circumstance in Death Penalty Sentencing

Date: Feb 5, 2016
Affirmation and Clarification of Lying-in-Wait Special Circumstance in Death Penalty Sentencing Introduction People v. Casares (62 Cal.4th 808, 2016) is a pivotal decision by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Lying-in-Wait Murder Case: People v. Johnson

Affirmation of Death Sentence in Lying-in-Wait Murder Case: People v. Johnson

Date: Jan 22, 2016
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Lying-in-Wait Murder Case: People v. Johnson Introduction In the landmark case The People v. Billy Joe Johnson (62 Cal.4th 600, 2016), the Supreme Court of California...
Rethinking Circumstantial Evidence Instructions in Lying in Wait Special Circumstances: People v. Ramon Sandoval, Jr.

Rethinking Circumstantial Evidence Instructions in Lying in Wait Special Circumstances: People v. Ramon Sandoval, Jr.

Date: Dec 25, 2015
Rethinking Circumstantial Evidence Instructions in Lying in Wait Special Circumstances: People v. Ramon Sandoval, Jr. Introduction The case of The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Ramon Sandoval,...
California Supreme Court Defines CEQA's Scope on Environmental Impact Analyses

California Supreme Court Defines CEQA's Scope on Environmental Impact Analyses

Date: Dec 18, 2015
California Supreme Court Defines CEQA's Scope on Environmental Impact Analyses Introduction In the landmark case of California Building Industry Association v. Bay Area Air Quality Management...
People v. Stevens: Restricting Mental Health Expert Testimony in Establishing MDO Act Qualifying Offenses

People v. Stevens: Restricting Mental Health Expert Testimony in Establishing MDO Act Qualifying Offenses

Date: Dec 11, 2015
People v. Stevens: Restricting Mental Health Expert Testimony in Establishing MDO Act Qualifying Offenses Introduction In People v. Mark Stevens, 62 Cal.4th 325 (2015), the Supreme Court of...
Clarification of Discretionary Approval under Design Immunity: Hampton v. County of San Diego

Clarification of Discretionary Approval under Design Immunity: Hampton v. County of San Diego

Date: Dec 11, 2015
Clarification of Discretionary Approval under Design Immunity: Hampton v. County of San Diego Introduction The case of Randall Keith Hampton et al. v. County of San Diego (62 Cal.4th 340, 2015)...
Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence in People v. Cage: Reinforcing Standards for Premeditation and Lying in Wait

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence in People v. Cage: Reinforcing Standards for Premeditation and Lying in Wait

Date: Dec 4, 2015
Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence in People v. Cage: Reinforcing Standards for Premeditation and Lying in Wait Introduction The case of The People v. Micky Ray Cage (62 Cal.4th 256) presented the...
Defining Associational Connections Under the STEP Act: Insights from People v. Prunty

Defining Associational Connections Under the STEP Act: Insights from People v. Prunty

Date: Aug 28, 2015
Defining Associational Connections Under the STEP Act: Insights from People v. Prunty Introduction The PEOPLE v. Zackery PRUNTY, 355 P.3d 480 (Cal. 2015), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Defining 'Criminal Street Gang' under the STEP Act: Organizational Connections Required – PEOPLE v. Prunty

Defining 'Criminal Street Gang' under the STEP Act: Organizational Connections Required – PEOPLE v. Prunty

Date: Aug 28, 2015
Defining 'Criminal Street Gang' under the STEP Act: Organizational Connections Required – PEOPLE v. Prunty Introduction PEOPLE v. Zackery Prunty is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Supreme Court of California Upholds Death Penalty in Ropati Seumanu Case, Affirming Procedural and Evidentiary Standards

Supreme Court of California Upholds Death Penalty in Ropati Seumanu Case, Affirming Procedural and Evidentiary Standards

Date: Aug 25, 2015
Supreme Court of California Upholds Death Penalty in Ropati Seumanu Case, Affirming Procedural and Evidentiary Standards Introduction In the landmark case of The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v....
Supreme Court of California Upholds Death Penalty Against Ropati Seumanu: Comprehensive Review of Evidentiary and Procedural Issues

Supreme Court of California Upholds Death Penalty Against Ropati Seumanu: Comprehensive Review of Evidentiary and Procedural Issues

Date: Aug 25, 2015
Supreme Court of California Upholds Death Penalty Against Ropati Seumanu: Comprehensive Review of Evidentiary and Procedural Issues Introduction The PEOPLE v. Ropati Seumanu represents a significant...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert