Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Revisiting Withdrawals of Guilty Pleas: The People v. Patterson Decision

Revisiting Withdrawals of Guilty Pleas: The People v. Patterson Decision

Date: Mar 28, 2017
Revisiting Withdrawals of Guilty Pleas: The People v. Patterson Decision Introduction The People v. Ron Douglas Patterson, 2 Cal.5th 885 (2017) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Interpretation of Shoplifting Under Proposition 47: The PEOPLE v. Gio

Interpretation of Shoplifting Under Proposition 47: The PEOPLE v. Gio

Date: Mar 24, 2017
Interpretation of Shoplifting Under Proposition 47: The PEOPLE v. Gio Introduction The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Giovanni Gonzales (2 Cal.5th 858) is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme...
Comprehensive Review of Felony-Murder Special Circumstances and Jury Instructions: The PEOPLE v. Donald Lewis Brooks

Comprehensive Review of Felony-Murder Special Circumstances and Jury Instructions: The PEOPLE v. Donald Lewis Brooks

Date: Mar 21, 2017
Comprehensive Review of Felony-Murder Special Circumstances and Jury Instructions: The PEOPLE v. Donald Lewis Brooks Introduction The case of The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Donald Lewis...
Revisiting Harmless Error in Jury Instructions: Insights from People v. Merritt

Revisiting Harmless Error in Jury Instructions: Insights from People v. Merritt

Date: Mar 21, 2017
Revisiting Harmless Error in Jury Instructions: Insights from People v. Merritt Introduction People v. Andre Merritt (2 Cal.5th 819, 2017) presents a pivotal analysis of the appellate standard...
Implicit Mens Rea in Probation Conditions: Analysis of People v. Hall

Implicit Mens Rea in Probation Conditions: Analysis of People v. Hall

Date: Feb 10, 2017
Implicit Mens Rea in Probation Conditions: Analysis of People v. Hall Introduction The case of The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LaQuincy HALL, Defendant and Appellant (2 Cal.5th 494)...
The PEOPLE v. Winbush: Affirmation of Capital Conviction and Implications for Jury Selection Practices

The PEOPLE v. Winbush: Affirmation of Capital Conviction and Implications for Jury Selection Practices

Date: Jan 27, 2017
The PEOPLE v. Winbush: Affirmation of Capital Conviction and Implications for Jury Selection Practices Introduction The PEOPLE v. Grayland Winbush (2 Cal.5th 402) is a landmark decision by the...
Anti-SLAPP Motion Jurisdiction and Fee-Shifting Confirmed in Barry v. State Bar of California

Anti-SLAPP Motion Jurisdiction and Fee-Shifting Confirmed in Barry v. State Bar of California

Date: Jan 6, 2017
Anti-SLAPP Motion Jurisdiction and Fee-Shifting Confirmed in Barry v. State Bar of California Introduction In the landmark case of Patricia J. BARRY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. The STATE BAR OF...
Single Physical Act Doctrine under Penal Code Section 654: Analysis of People v. Corpening

Single Physical Act Doctrine under Penal Code Section 654: Analysis of People v. Corpening

Date: Dec 30, 2016
Single Physical Act Doctrine under Penal Code Section 654: Analysis of People v. Corpening Introduction People v. Corpening is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California, rendered on...
Reaffirmation of Competency Standards and Self-Representation Rights in California's Capital Cases: Analysis of People v. Mickel

Reaffirmation of Competency Standards and Self-Representation Rights in California's Capital Cases: Analysis of People v. Mickel

Date: Dec 20, 2016
Reaffirmation of Competency Standards and Self-Representation Rights in California's Capital Cases: Analysis of People v. Mickel Introduction People v. Andrew Hampton Mickel, 2 Cal.5th 181 (2016), is...
Duress Defense Rejected and Deadly Weapon Enhancement Stricken in People v. Landry

Duress Defense Rejected and Deadly Weapon Enhancement Stricken in People v. Landry

Date: Dec 13, 2016
Duress Defense Rejected and Deadly Weapon Enhancement Stricken in People v. Landry Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Daniel Gary Landry (2 Cal.5th 52, 2016), the Supreme Court of...
Reaffirming Riley: Warrant Required for Cell Phone Searches Incident to Arrest – People v. Macabeo

Reaffirming Riley: Warrant Required for Cell Phone Searches Incident to Arrest – People v. Macabeo

Date: Dec 6, 2016
Reaffirming Riley: Warrant Required for Cell Phone Searches Incident to Arrest – People v. Macabeo Introduction In People v. Macabeo, the Supreme Court of California addressed the constitutionality...
Affirmation of George Williams Jr.'s Conviction: Upholding Evidentiary and Due Process Standards

Affirmation of George Williams Jr.'s Conviction: Upholding Evidentiary and Due Process Standards

Date: Dec 6, 2016
Affirmation of George Williams Jr.'s Conviction: Upholding Evidentiary and Due Process Standards Introduction The case of The People v. George Williams, Jr. adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Establishing Duty of Care for Employers and Premises Owners to Prevent Take-Home Asbestos Exposure for Household Members

Establishing Duty of Care for Employers and Premises Owners to Prevent Take-Home Asbestos Exposure for Household Members

Date: Dec 2, 2016
Establishing Duty of Care for Employers and Premises Owners to Prevent Take-Home Asbestos Exposure for Household Members Introduction The CECILIA KESNER, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ALAMEDA...
Establishing Standards for Death-Qualified Juries and Joint Trial Severance: A Comprehensive Analysis of PEOPLE v. THOMPSON

Establishing Standards for Death-Qualified Juries and Joint Trial Severance: A Comprehensive Analysis of PEOPLE v. THOMPSON

Date: Dec 2, 2016
Establishing Standards for Death-Qualified Juries and Joint Trial Severance: A Comprehensive Analysis of PEOPLE v. THOMPSON Introduction People v. Catherine Thompson is a landmark decision by the...
Horiike v. Coldwell Banker: Establishing the Fiduciary Duty of Associate Licensees in Dual Agency Real Estate Transactions

Horiike v. Coldwell Banker: Establishing the Fiduciary Duty of Associate Licensees in Dual Agency Real Estate Transactions

Date: Nov 22, 2016
Horiike v. Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage Company: Establishing the Fiduciary Duty of Associate Licensees in Dual Agency Real Estate Transactions Introduction The case of Horiike v. Coldwell...
Duty of Care for Health Plans in Delegating Financial Responsibility: Centinela Freeman Emergency Medical Associates v. Health Net of California

Duty of Care for Health Plans in Delegating Financial Responsibility: Centinela Freeman Emergency Medical Associates v. Health Net of California

Date: Nov 15, 2016
Duty of Care for Health Plans in Delegating Financial Responsibility: Centinela Freeman Emergency Medical Associates v. Health Net of California Introduction The landmark case Centinela Freeman...
Preservation of Plea Agreements Amid Legislative Reforms: Harris v. Superior Court (2016)

Preservation of Plea Agreements Amid Legislative Reforms: Harris v. Superior Court (2016)

Date: Nov 11, 2016
Preservation of Plea Agreements Amid Legislative Reforms: Harris v. Superior Court (2016) Introduction In Morris Glen Harris, Jr. v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2016) 1 Cal.5th 984, the...
Reinforcing Juror Impartiality in Capital Cases: Insights from People v. Covarrubias

Reinforcing Juror Impartiality in Capital Cases: Insights from People v. Covarrubias

Date: Sep 9, 2016
Reinforcing Juror Impartiality in Capital Cases: Insights from People v. Covarrubias Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Daniel Sanchez Covarrubias (1 Cal.5th 838, 2016), the Supreme Court...
Clarifying Declarations Against Interest in Capital Punishment: People v. Gary Lee Grimes Decision

Clarifying Declarations Against Interest in Capital Punishment: People v. Gary Lee Grimes Decision

Date: Aug 23, 2016
Clarifying Declarations Against Interest in Capital Punishment: People v. Gary Lee Grimes Decision Introduction The case of The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Gary Lee Grimes, Defendant and...
People v. Vidana: Consolidation of Larceny and Embezzlement into a Single Theft Offense

People v. Vidana: Consolidation of Larceny and Embezzlement into a Single Theft Offense

Date: Aug 19, 2016
People v. Vidana: Consolidation of Larceny and Embezzlement into a Single Theft Offense Introduction People v. Vidana (1 Cal.5th 632), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California on August 18,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert