Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Death Sentence in People v. Michael Allen Williams: A Comprehensive Commentary

Affirmation of Death Sentence in People v. Michael Allen Williams: A Comprehensive Commentary

Date: Jul 12, 1988
Affirmation of Death Sentence in People v. Michael Allen Williams: A Comprehensive Commentary Introduction People v. Michael Allen Williams, 45 Cal.3d 1268 (1988), is a pivotal decision by the...
People v. Keith Rich: Establishing Precedents on Venue Motions and Admissibility of Evidence

People v. Keith Rich: Establishing Precedents on Venue Motions and Admissibility of Evidence

Date: Jul 1, 1988
People v. Keith Rich: Establishing Precedents on Venue Motions and Admissibility of Evidence Introduction People v. Keith Rich (45 Cal.3d 1036, 1988) is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Death Penalty under Felony-Murder Rule in People v. Ainsworth

Affirmation of Death Penalty under Felony-Murder Rule in People v. Ainsworth

Date: Jul 1, 1988
Affirmation of Death Penalty under Felony-Murder Rule in People v. Ainsworth Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Steven King Ainsworth, 45 Cal.3d 984 (1988), the Supreme Court of...
Balancing Jury Instructions and Harmless Error in Eyewitness Identification: People v. Wright (1988)

Balancing Jury Instructions and Harmless Error in Eyewitness Identification: People v. Wright (1988)

Date: Jul 1, 1988
Balancing Jury Instructions and Harmless Error in Eyewitness Identification: People v. Wright (1988) Introduction In People v. Wright (45 Cal.3d 1126, 1988), the Supreme Court of California addressed...
Vicinage Rights Affirmed in Death Penalty Case: People v. Gary Lee Guzman

Vicinage Rights Affirmed in Death Penalty Case: People v. Gary Lee Guzman

Date: Jun 29, 1988
Vicinage Rights Affirmed in Death Penalty Case: People v. Gary Lee Guzman Introduction People v. Gary Lee Guzman is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of California on June 28, 1988. In this...
Robbins v. The People: Affirmation of Death Penalty and Admissibility of Prior Crimes as Evidence of Intent

Robbins v. The People: Affirmation of Death Penalty and Admissibility of Prior Crimes as Evidence of Intent

Date: Jun 28, 1988
Robbins v. The People: Affirmation of Death Penalty and Admissibility of Prior Crimes as Evidence of Intent Introduction Robbins v. The People is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Some Evidence Standard for Parole Rescission Established in In re Gregory Ulas Powell

Some Evidence Standard for Parole Rescission Established in In re Gregory Ulas Powell

Date: Jun 28, 1988
Some Evidence Standard for Parole Rescission Established in In re Gregory Ulas Powell Introduction In the landmark case of In re Gregory Ulas Powell on Habeas Corpus, the Supreme Court of California...
Establishing Standards for Aggravating Factors and Jury Instructions in California Death Penalty Cases: Analysis of People v. Grant

Establishing Standards for Aggravating Factors and Jury Instructions in California Death Penalty Cases: Analysis of People v. Grant

Date: Jun 28, 1988
Establishing Standards for Aggravating Factors and Jury Instructions in California Death Penalty Cases: Analysis of People v. Grant (45 Cal.3d 829) Introduction People v. Richard E. Grant is a...
Reaffirming the Section 654 Prohibition on Double Punishment in Sexual Offense Cases

Reaffirming the Section 654 Prohibition on Double Punishment in Sexual Offense Cases

Date: Jun 24, 1988
Reaffirming the Section 654 Prohibition on Double Punishment in Sexual Offense Cases Introduction The People v. Stephen Michael Siko, 45 Cal.3d 820 (1988), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Death Penalty and Accomplice Testimony in Felony Murder: Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Belmontes

Affirmation of Death Penalty and Accomplice Testimony in Felony Murder: Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Belmontes

Date: Jun 24, 1988
Affirmation of Death Penalty and Accomplice Testimony in Felony Murder: Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Belmontes Introduction People v. Fernando Belmontes (45 Cal.3d 744, 1988) is a landmark...
Lungren v. Deukmejian: Reaffirming Bicameral Confirmation Requirements

Lungren v. Deukmejian: Reaffirming Bicameral Confirmation Requirements

Date: Jun 24, 1988
Lungren v. Deukmejian: Reaffirming Bicameral Confirmation Requirements Introduction Lungren v. Deukmejian is a pivotal decision by the Supreme Court of California, rendered on June 23, 1988. This...
Affirming Death Penalty: Key Legal Principles Established in People v. Babbitt

Affirming Death Penalty: Key Legal Principles Established in People v. Babbitt

Date: Jun 17, 1988
Affirming Death Penalty: Key Legal Principles Established in People v. Babbitt Introduction In People v. Manuel Pina Babbitt, 45 Cal.3d 660 (1988), the Supreme Court of California upheld the death...
Affirmation of Capital Conviction Under Remaining Felony-Murder Special Circumstance in People v. Silva

Affirmation of Capital Conviction Under Remaining Felony-Murder Special Circumstance in People v. Silva

Date: Jun 10, 1988
Affirmation of Capital Conviction Under Remaining Felony-Murder Special Circumstance in People v. Silva Introduction People v. Benjamin Wai Silva (45 Cal.3d 604) is a pivotal Supreme Court of...
Admissibility of Non-English Wiretap and Juror Misconduct Procedures in Siripongs v. The People

Admissibility of Non-English Wiretap and Juror Misconduct Procedures in Siripongs v. The People

Date: Jun 7, 1988
Admissibility of Non-English Wiretap and Juror Misconduct Procedures in Siripongs v. The People Introduction Siripongs v. The People is a pivotal 1988 Supreme Court of California decision that...
Establishing Limits on Death Penalty Jury Instructions: People v. Robert Warren et al.

Establishing Limits on Death Penalty Jury Instructions: People v. Robert Warren et al.

Date: May 27, 1988
Establishing Limits on Death Penalty Jury Instructions: People v. Robert Warren et al. Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Robert Warren et al., decided on May 26, 1988, the Supreme...
Availability of Codefendants as Witnesses in Burglary Cases: People v. Ford (45 Cal.3d 431)

Availability of Codefendants as Witnesses in Burglary Cases: People v. Ford (45 Cal.3d 431)

Date: May 20, 1988
Availability of Codefendants as Witnesses in Burglary Cases: People v. Ford (45 Cal.3d 431) Introduction People v. Ford (45 Cal.3d 431), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California on May 19,...
Odle v. The People: Affirmation of Conviction and Implications for Special Circumstance Findings

Odle v. The People: Affirmation of Conviction and Implications for Special Circumstance Findings

Date: May 20, 1988
Odle v. The People: Affirmation of Conviction and Implications for Special Circumstance Findings Introduction In the landmark case The People v. James Richard Odle (45 Cal.3d 386, 1988), the Supreme...
Comprehensive Analysis of THE PEOPLE v. Darnell Lucky: Consolidation and Penalty Phase Practices in California Death Penalty Cases

Comprehensive Analysis of THE PEOPLE v. Darnell Lucky: Consolidation and Penalty Phase Practices in California Death Penalty Cases

Date: May 17, 1988
Comprehensive Analysis of THE PEOPLE v. Darnell Lucky: Consolidation and Penalty Phase Practices in California Death Penalty Cases Introduction In The People v. Darnell Lucky (45 Cal.3d 259, 1988),...
Advancing Felony Murder and Capital Punishment: Analysis of People v. Poggi (45 Cal.3d 306)

Advancing Felony Murder and Capital Punishment: Analysis of People v. Poggi (45 Cal.3d 306)

Date: May 17, 1988
Advancing Felony Murder and Capital Punishment: Analysis of People v. Poggi (45 Cal.3d 306) Introduction People v. Joseph Carlos Poggi is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California,...
Clarifying Juror Responsibility in Capital Sentencing: People v. Milner

Clarifying Juror Responsibility in Capital Sentencing: People v. Milner

Date: May 13, 1988
Clarifying Juror Responsibility in Capital Sentencing: People v. Milner Introduction People v. Lynn Bernard Milner (45 Cal.3d 227, 1988) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert