Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Clarifying Multiple-Murder Special Circumstances in California Death Penalty Cases: People v. Caro Introduction The case of People v. Caro, decided by the Supreme Court of California on October 6,...
Reaffirming Voluntariness in Self-Incrimination Claims: People v. Jennings (1988) Introduction People v. Michael Wayne Jennings is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California dated...
Establishing Standards for Severance and Special Circumstances in Capital Cases: People v. Bean Introduction In People v. Anthony Cornell Bean (46 Cal.3d 919, 1988), the Supreme Court of California...
Ensuring Effective Counsel and Accurate Jury Instructions in Capital Cases: Insights from People v. Crandell (46 Cal.3d 833) Introduction People v. Crandell is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Death Penalty in People v. Russell Coleman: Application of Witherspoon Standard and Forensic Evidence Reliability Introduction People v. Russell Coleman is a pivotal case adjudicated...
Proper Application of Multiple-Murder Special Circumstances under Penal Code § 190.2(a)(3): Analysis of People v. Bonin Introduction People v. William George Bonin, 46 Cal.3d 659 (1988), is a...
Jury Composition and Admissibility of Prior Convictions in Capital Cases: An Analysis of People v. Karis Introduction People v. James Leslie Karis, Jr., 46 Cal.3d 612, was adjudicated by the Supreme...
Affirmation of the Reasonable-Possibility Test in Capital Sentencing: People v. John G. Brown Introduction People v. John G. Brown (46 Cal.3d 432, 1988) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
The People v. Timothy Jones et al.: Expanding Sentencing Discretion for Enumerated Sex Offenses 1. Introduction The People v. Timothy Jones et al., 46 Cal.3d 585 (1988), is a landmark decision by the...
Affirmation of Guilt and Controversy Over Penalty Procedures in People v. Keenan Introduction People v. Maurice J. Keenan is a pivotal 1988 decision by the Supreme Court of California that upheld the...
Reaffirmation of Acquittal-First Rule in Jury Deliberations: Insights from The People v. Kurtzman Introduction The People v. David Kenneth Kurtzman (46 Cal.3d 322, 1988) is a pivotal case adjudicated...
Elden v. Sheldon: California Supreme Court Limits Emotional Distress and Consortium Recovery to Married Couples Introduction The case of Richard C. Elden v. Robert Louis Sheldon et al. (46 Cal.3d...
Supreme Court of California Overrules Royal Globe: No Private Cause of Action Against Insurers Under Unfair Practices Act Introduction In the landmark case of Parvaneh Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund...
Joint Trials and Jury Instructions in Death Penalty Cases: Insights from The People v. Richard Boyde Introduction The People v. Richard Boyde is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Due Process Requires Enhancement Statutes to be Pledged and Proven: The PEOPLE v. HERNANDEZ Introduction The case of The People v. James Hernandez (46 Cal.3d 194, 1988) addresses a critical issue in...
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Intoxication Defense: Insights from In re Antonio Cordero, Jr. Introduction In re Antonio Cordero, Jr., on Habeas Corpus is a landmark 1988 decision by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Capital Sentencing Standards in People v. McLain Introduction People v. Robert Cruz McLain (46 Cal.3d 97, 1988) is a pivotal decision by the Supreme Court of California that pertains...
Interpretation of Penal Code Section 190.4 in Felony-Murder Special Circumstances: In re Oscar Lee Morris Introduction Case Title: The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Oscar Lee Morris, Defendant...
Ensuring Defendant Competency: Reversal of Death Sentence in People v. Marks Introduction People v. Marks (45 Cal.3d 1335, 1988) serves as a pivotal case in the realm of criminal law, particularly...
People v. Bunyard: Establishing Precedent for Reversal of Death Penalty Under PEOPLE v. RAMOS Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Bunyard, the Supreme Court of California addressed...