Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Arizona Case Commentaries

Arizona Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent on Insurance Settlements Under Reservation of Rights

Arizona Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent on Insurance Settlements Under Reservation of Rights

Date: Sep 16, 1987
Arizona Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent on Insurance Settlements Under Reservation of Rights Introduction The case of United Services Automobile Association v. John I. Morris, decided by the...
Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies Valuation Standards in Partial Eminent Domain Takings

Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies Valuation Standards in Partial Eminent Domain Takings

Date: Sep 16, 1987
Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies Valuation Standards in Partial Eminent Domain Takings Introduction In the landmark case State of Arizona ex rel. Ordway v. Buchanan, the Arizona Supreme Court...
Duty of Care in Insurance Coverage Verification: St. Joseph's Hospital v. Reserve Life Insurance Co.

Duty of Care in Insurance Coverage Verification: St. Joseph's Hospital v. Reserve Life Insurance Co.

Date: Sep 4, 1987
Duty of Care in Insurance Coverage Verification: St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center v. Reserve Life Insurance Co. Introduction The case of St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center v. Reserve...
Enforcing Reasonable Expectations Against Standardized Insurance Terms: Gordinier v. Aetna

Enforcing Reasonable Expectations Against Standardized Insurance Terms: Gordinier v. Aetna

Date: Jul 29, 1987
Enforcing Reasonable Expectations Against Standardized Insurance Terms: Gordinier v. Aetna Introduction Gordinier v. Aetna Casualty Surety Company, 154 Ariz. 266, 742 P.2d 273 (Supreme Court of...
Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies 'Covered Claims' Interpretation in Insurance Guaranty Fund Cases

Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies 'Covered Claims' Interpretation in Insurance Guaranty Fund Cases

Date: May 6, 1987
Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies 'Covered Claims' Interpretation in Insurance Guaranty Fund Cases Introduction The Arizona Supreme Court's decision in Arizona Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty...
Employer Liability for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: Ford v. Revlon Inc.

Employer Liability for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: Ford v. Revlon Inc.

Date: Apr 22, 1987
Employer Liability for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: Ford v. Revlon Inc. Introduction Ford v. Revlon, Inc. is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Arizona in 1987. This...
Invalidation of A.R.S. § 13-1416: Reinforcing Hearsay Rules in Child Sexual Abuse Cases

Invalidation of A.R.S. § 13-1416: Reinforcing Hearsay Rules in Child Sexual Abuse Cases

Date: Apr 8, 1987
Invalidation of A.R.S. § 13-1416: Reinforcing Hearsay Rules in Child Sexual Abuse Cases Introduction In the landmark case The STATE of Arizona v. Michael Eugene Robinson (153 Ariz. 191), the Supreme...
Admissibility of Insurer’s Claims Practices and Standards for Punitive Damages in Hawkins v. Allstate Insurance Company

Admissibility of Insurer’s Claims Practices and Standards for Punitive Damages in Hawkins v. Allstate Insurance Company

Date: Mar 5, 1987
Admissibility of Insurer’s Claims Practices and Standards for Punitive Damages in Hawkins v. Allstate Insurance Company Introduction In the landmark case of Jack Randy Hawkins and Cynthia Hawkins v....
LaGrand v. State: Affirming Death Penalty Procedures and Counsel Effectiveness in Arizona

LaGrand v. State: Affirming Death Penalty Procedures and Counsel Effectiveness in Arizona

Date: Jan 31, 1987
LaGrand v. State: Affirming Death Penalty Procedures and Counsel Effectiveness in Arizona Introduction In State of Arizona v. Karl Hinze LaGrand, 152 Ariz. 483 (1987), the Arizona Supreme Court...
Strict Corroboration Standard for Hearsay Confessions and Felony Murder Sentencing Affirmed in LaGrand v. State

Strict Corroboration Standard for Hearsay Confessions and Felony Murder Sentencing Affirmed in LaGrand v. State

Date: Jan 31, 1987
Strict Corroboration Standard for Hearsay Confessions and Felony Murder Sentencing Affirmed in LaGrand v. State Introduction State of Arizona v. Walter Burnhart LaGrand is a landmark case adjudicated...
Limits on Expert Testimony in Sexual Abuse Cases: Arizona Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling in STATE v. MORAN

Limits on Expert Testimony in Sexual Abuse Cases: Arizona Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling in STATE v. MORAN

Date: Nov 20, 1986
Limits on Expert Testimony in Sexual Abuse Cases: Arizona Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling in STATE v. MORAN Introduction The Supreme Court of Arizona's decision in The State of Arizona v. William...
Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Insurance Contracts: RAWLINGS v. APODACA

Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Insurance Contracts: RAWLINGS v. APODACA

Date: Sep 25, 1986
Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Insurance Contracts: RAWLINGS v. APODACA Introduction RAWLINGS v. APODACA, 151 Ariz. 149 (Supreme Court of Arizona, 1986), is a landmark case that...
Dombey v. Phoenix Newspapers: Defining Limited Purpose Public Figures in Defamation Law

Dombey v. Phoenix Newspapers: Defining Limited Purpose Public Figures in Defamation Law

Date: Sep 24, 1986
Dombey v. Phoenix Newspapers: Defining Limited Purpose Public Figures in Defamation Law Introduction Dale K. Dombey, Billie Jo Dombey, and Dombey, Inc. v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. is a landmark case...
State v. Gary Michael Ault: Upholding the Sanctity of Home Against Warrantless Searches

State v. Gary Michael Ault: Upholding the Sanctity of Home Against Warrantless Searches

Date: Sep 19, 1986
State v. Gary Michael Ault: Upholding the Sanctity of Home Against Warrantless Searches Introduction In the case of State of Arizona v. Gary Michael Ault (150 Ariz. 459), the Supreme Court of Arizona...
Reining in Punitive Damages: Arizona Supreme Court Sets Stricter Standards in Bad Faith Insurance Claims

Reining in Punitive Damages: Arizona Supreme Court Sets Stricter Standards in Bad Faith Insurance Claims

Date: Sep 10, 1986
Reining in Punitive Damages: Arizona Supreme Court Sets Stricter Standards in Bad Faith Insurance Claims Introduction The Arizona Supreme Court's decision in Sandra Linthicum, widow, sur (150 Ariz....
Limitations on Expert Testimony Regarding Witness Credibility Established in STATE v. LINDSEY

Limitations on Expert Testimony Regarding Witness Credibility Established in STATE v. LINDSEY

Date: Jun 27, 1986
Limitations on Expert Testimony Regarding Witness Credibility Established in STATE of Arizona v. Paul Phillip Lindsey, Jr. Introduction In the landmark case of STATE of Arizona v. Paul Phillip...
Collateral Estoppel in Contract Termination: Insights from Chaney Building Co. v. City of Tucson

Collateral Estoppel in Contract Termination: Insights from Chaney Building Co. v. City of Tucson

Date: Apr 23, 1986
Collateral Estoppel in Contract Termination: Insights from Chaney Building Co. v. City of Tucson Introduction The case of Chaney Building Co., Plaintiff/Appellee, v. City of Tucson,...
Arizona Supreme Court Upholds Reliability and Admissibility of the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test in DUI Cases

Arizona Supreme Court Upholds Reliability and Admissibility of the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test in DUI Cases

Date: Apr 8, 1986
Arizona Supreme Court Upholds Reliability and Admissibility of the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test in DUI Cases Introduction In the landmark case of The STATE of Arizona v. Frederick Andrew Blake, the...
State v. Schrock: Upholding Discovery Rules and Addressing Post-Trial Relief under Rule 32

State v. Schrock: Upholding Discovery Rules and Addressing Post-Trial Relief under Rule 32

Date: Apr 1, 1986
State v. Schrock: Upholding Discovery Rules and Addressing Post-Trial Relief under Rule 32 Introduction State of Arizona v. Lee Arthur Schrock, 149 Ariz. 433 (1986), is a significant case adjudicated...
Lucchesi v. Stimmell: Reassessing the Boundaries of Outrageous Conduct in Medical Practice

Lucchesi v. Stimmell: Reassessing the Boundaries of Outrageous Conduct in Medical Practice

Date: Mar 28, 1986
Lucchesi v. Stimmell: Reassessing the Boundaries of Outrageous Conduct in Medical Practice Introduction Lucchesi v. Stimmell is a pivotal 1986 decision by the Supreme Court of Arizona that delves...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert