Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Arizona Case Commentaries

State of Arizona v. Robert Charles Comer: Upholding Aggravated Robbery and Death Penalty Standards

State of Arizona v. Robert Charles Comer: Upholding Aggravated Robbery and Death Penalty Standards

Date: Nov 15, 1990
State of Arizona v. Robert Charles Comer: Upholding Aggravated Robbery and Death Penalty Standards Introduction State of Arizona v. Robert Charles Comer is a significant case adjudicated by the...
Mutual Assent in Real Estate Transactions: Legal Descriptions Do Not Preclude Rescission for Misunderstanding

Mutual Assent in Real Estate Transactions: Legal Descriptions Do Not Preclude Rescission for Misunderstanding

Date: Nov 7, 1990
Mutual Assent in Real Estate Transactions: Legal Descriptions Do Not Preclude Rescission for Misunderstanding Introduction The Supreme Court of Arizona, in the case of The Hill-Shafer Partnership v....
Korzep v. State: Expanding the Justification Defense within Household Dynamics

Korzep v. State: Expanding the Justification Defense within Household Dynamics

Date: Oct 5, 1990
Korzep v. State: Expanding the Justification Defense within Household Dynamics Introduction The Supreme Court of Arizona's decision in State of Arizona v. Roberta Korzep (165 Ariz. 490, 1990) marks a...
Best Interests of the Child in Parental Rights Termination: Analysis of In the Matter of the APPEAL in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-500274

Best Interests of the Child in Parental Rights Termination: Analysis of In the Matter of the APPEAL in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-500274

Date: Sep 19, 1990
Best Interests of the Child in Parental Rights Termination: Analysis of In the Matter of the APPEAL in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-500274 Introduction The Supreme Court of Arizona...
Insufficiency of Evidence: The Precedent Set in State v. Mathers

Insufficiency of Evidence: The Precedent Set in State v. Mathers

Date: Jun 27, 1990
Insufficiency of Evidence: The Precedent Set in State v. Mathers Introduction In the landmark case of State of Arizona v. Jimmy Lee Mathers, the Supreme Court of Arizona addressed critical issues...
Ensuring Fair Sentencing: Arizona Supreme Court's Stance on Plea Agreements and Presentence Reports

Ensuring Fair Sentencing: Arizona Supreme Court's Stance on Plea Agreements and Presentence Reports

Date: Jun 8, 1990
Ensuring Fair Sentencing: Arizona Supreme Court's Stance on Plea Agreements and Presentence Reports Introduction The Supreme Court of Arizona's decision in State of Arizona v. Scott Allen Watton, 164...
Jurisdictional Limits on Appellate Correction of Sentencing Errors Without State Cross-Appeal: State v. Dawson

Jurisdictional Limits on Appellate Correction of Sentencing Errors Without State Cross-Appeal: State v. Dawson

Date: May 11, 1990
Jurisdictional Limits on Appellate Correction of Sentencing Errors Without State Cross-Appeal: State v. Dawson Introduction In State of Arizona v. Lawrence Dawson, 164 Ariz. 278 (1990), the Supreme...
Duty to Warn Independent Contractors: Arizona Supreme Court Sets New Precedent in Sixpence Inns Case

Duty to Warn Independent Contractors: Arizona Supreme Court Sets New Precedent in Sixpence Inns Case

Date: May 2, 1990
Duty to Warn Independent Contractors: Arizona Supreme Court Sets New Precedent in Sixpence Inns Case Introduction In the landmark case of E v. Sixpence Inns of America, Inc., the Supreme Court of...
Arizona Supreme Court Declares Liability Limitation for Tavernkeepers Unconstitutional

Arizona Supreme Court Declares Liability Limitation for Tavernkeepers Unconstitutional

Date: Apr 6, 1990
Arizona Supreme Court Declares Liability Limitation for Tavernkeepers Unconstitutional Introduction In SCHWAB v. MATLEY, 164 Ariz. 421 (1990), the Supreme Court of Arizona addressed the...
Non-Jurisdictional Nature of A.R.S. § 12-821 in Claims Against the State

Non-Jurisdictional Nature of A.R.S. § 12-821 in Claims Against the State

Date: Mar 6, 1990
Non-Jurisdictional Nature of A.R.S. § 12-821 in Claims Against the State Introduction In the landmark case of PRITCHARD v. STATE of Arizona, decided by the Supreme Court of Arizona on March 5, 1990,...
Resisting Arrest as an Aggravating Factor: Arizona Supreme Court's Clarification

Resisting Arrest as an Aggravating Factor: Arizona Supreme Court's Clarification

Date: Jan 17, 1990
Resisting Arrest as an Aggravating Factor: Arizona Supreme Court's Clarification Introduction The case of State of Arizona v. Samuel Villegas Lopez (163 Ariz. 108) adjudicated by the Arizona Supreme...
Withdrawal of Plea Agreement Due to Uncounseled Interrogation: Analysis of STATE v. CONNER

Withdrawal of Plea Agreement Due to Uncounseled Interrogation: Analysis of STATE v. CONNER

Date: Jan 10, 1990
Withdrawal of Plea Agreement Due to Uncounseled Interrogation: Analysis of STATE of Arizona v. Ronnie Lloyd Conner Introduction STATE of Arizona v. Ronnie Lloyd Conner, 163 Ariz. 97 (1990), is a...
Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies False Light Invasion of Privacy Standards and Its Applicability to Public Officials

Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies False Light Invasion of Privacy Standards and Its Applicability to Public Officials

Date: Dec 20, 1989
Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies False Light Invasion of Privacy Standards and Its Applicability to Public Officials Introduction In the landmark case of Richard G. Godbehere et al. v. Phoenix...
State Farm v. Wilson: Punitive Damages Excluded from Underinsured Motorist Coverage

State Farm v. Wilson: Punitive Damages Excluded from Underinsured Motorist Coverage

Date: Oct 13, 1989
State Farm v. Wilson: Punitive Damages Excluded from Underinsured Motorist Coverage Introduction In the landmark case State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Patricia Wilson, adjudicated by...
Harmless Error Doctrine and Coerced Confessions: Insights from STATE v. Fulminante

Harmless Error Doctrine and Coerced Confessions: Insights from STATE v. Fulminante

Date: Sep 20, 1989
Harmless Error Doctrine and Coerced Confessions: Insights from STATE v. Fulminante Introduction In STATE of Arizona v. Oreste C. Fulminante, 161 Ariz. 237 (Supreme Court of Arizona, 1989), the...
Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies Sentencing Enhancements and Consecutive Sentences in STATE v. Gordon

Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies Sentencing Enhancements and Consecutive Sentences in STATE v. Gordon

Date: Jul 19, 1989
Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies Sentencing Enhancements and Consecutive Sentences in STATE v. Gordon Introduction STATE of Arizona v. Anthony Gordon is a significant case decided by the Arizona...
Clarifications on Double Jeopardy and Conspiracy Evidence in Premeditated Murder: Arizona Supreme Court's Decision in State v. Guerra

Clarifications on Double Jeopardy and Conspiracy Evidence in Premeditated Murder: Arizona Supreme Court's Decision in State v. Guerra

Date: Jun 14, 1989
Clarifications on Double Jeopardy and Conspiracy Evidence in Premeditated Murder: Arizona Supreme Court's Decision in State v. Guerra Introduction State of Arizona v. Henry Daniel Guerra is a...
Affirmation of Procedural Integrity in Judicial Impartiality and Counsel Competence: Insights from State v. Carver

Affirmation of Procedural Integrity in Judicial Impartiality and Counsel Competence: Insights from State v. Carver

Date: Apr 12, 1989
Affirmation of Procedural Integrity in Judicial Impartiality and Counsel Competence: Insights from State of Arizona v. Stewart Bradley Carver Introduction State of Arizona v. Stewart Bradley Carver...
Application of Enmund/Tison Standards in Capital Sentencing: Arizona v. Walton

Application of Enmund/Tison Standards in Capital Sentencing: Arizona v. Walton

Date: Feb 3, 1989
Application of Enmund/Tison Standards in Capital Sentencing: Arizona v. Walton Introduction State of Arizona v. Jeffrey Alan Walton (159 Ariz. 571, 1989) is a landmark judgment by the Supreme Court...
State v. Valdez: Prosecutorial Misconduct and Waiver of Juror Influence through Improper Plea Offer Discussions

State v. Valdez: Prosecutorial Misconduct and Waiver of Juror Influence through Improper Plea Offer Discussions

Date: Feb 1, 1989
State v. Valdez: Prosecutorial Misconduct and Waiver of Juror Influence through Improper Plea Offer Discussions Introduction In the landmark case of State of Arizona v. Antonio Escarsega Valdez, the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert