Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Arizona Case Commentaries

Withdrawal of Plea Agreement Due to Uncounseled Interrogation: Analysis of STATE v. CONNER

Withdrawal of Plea Agreement Due to Uncounseled Interrogation: Analysis of STATE v. CONNER

Date: Jan 10, 1990
Withdrawal of Plea Agreement Due to Uncounseled Interrogation: Analysis of STATE of Arizona v. Ronnie Lloyd Conner Introduction STATE of Arizona v. Ronnie Lloyd Conner, 163 Ariz. 97 (1990), is a...
Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies False Light Invasion of Privacy Standards and Its Applicability to Public Officials

Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies False Light Invasion of Privacy Standards and Its Applicability to Public Officials

Date: Dec 20, 1989
Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies False Light Invasion of Privacy Standards and Its Applicability to Public Officials Introduction In the landmark case of Richard G. Godbehere et al. v. Phoenix...
State Farm v. Wilson: Punitive Damages Excluded from Underinsured Motorist Coverage

State Farm v. Wilson: Punitive Damages Excluded from Underinsured Motorist Coverage

Date: Oct 13, 1989
State Farm v. Wilson: Punitive Damages Excluded from Underinsured Motorist Coverage Introduction In the landmark case State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Patricia Wilson, adjudicated by...
Harmless Error Doctrine and Coerced Confessions: Insights from STATE v. Fulminante

Harmless Error Doctrine and Coerced Confessions: Insights from STATE v. Fulminante

Date: Sep 20, 1989
Harmless Error Doctrine and Coerced Confessions: Insights from STATE v. Fulminante Introduction In STATE of Arizona v. Oreste C. Fulminante, 161 Ariz. 237 (Supreme Court of Arizona, 1989), the...
Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies Sentencing Enhancements and Consecutive Sentences in STATE v. Gordon

Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies Sentencing Enhancements and Consecutive Sentences in STATE v. Gordon

Date: Jul 19, 1989
Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies Sentencing Enhancements and Consecutive Sentences in STATE v. Gordon Introduction STATE of Arizona v. Anthony Gordon is a significant case decided by the Arizona...
Clarifications on Double Jeopardy and Conspiracy Evidence in Premeditated Murder: Arizona Supreme Court's Decision in State v. Guerra

Clarifications on Double Jeopardy and Conspiracy Evidence in Premeditated Murder: Arizona Supreme Court's Decision in State v. Guerra

Date: Jun 14, 1989
Clarifications on Double Jeopardy and Conspiracy Evidence in Premeditated Murder: Arizona Supreme Court's Decision in State v. Guerra Introduction State of Arizona v. Henry Daniel Guerra is a...
Affirmation of Procedural Integrity in Judicial Impartiality and Counsel Competence: Insights from State v. Carver

Affirmation of Procedural Integrity in Judicial Impartiality and Counsel Competence: Insights from State v. Carver

Date: Apr 12, 1989
Affirmation of Procedural Integrity in Judicial Impartiality and Counsel Competence: Insights from State of Arizona v. Stewart Bradley Carver Introduction State of Arizona v. Stewart Bradley Carver...
Application of Enmund/Tison Standards in Capital Sentencing: Arizona v. Walton

Application of Enmund/Tison Standards in Capital Sentencing: Arizona v. Walton

Date: Feb 3, 1989
Application of Enmund/Tison Standards in Capital Sentencing: Arizona v. Walton Introduction State of Arizona v. Jeffrey Alan Walton (159 Ariz. 571, 1989) is a landmark judgment by the Supreme Court...
State v. Valdez: Prosecutorial Misconduct and Waiver of Juror Influence through Improper Plea Offer Discussions

State v. Valdez: Prosecutorial Misconduct and Waiver of Juror Influence through Improper Plea Offer Discussions

Date: Feb 1, 1989
State v. Valdez: Prosecutorial Misconduct and Waiver of Juror Influence through Improper Plea Offer Discussions Introduction In the landmark case of State of Arizona v. Antonio Escarsega Valdez, the...
Substituted Videotaped Testimony of Minor Witnesses Requires Individualized Necessity Findings: Insights from STATE of Arizona v. Vincent

Substituted Videotaped Testimony of Minor Witnesses Requires Individualized Necessity Findings: Insights from STATE of Arizona v. Vincent

Date: Jan 20, 1989
Substituted Videotaped Testimony of Minor Witnesses Requires Individualized Necessity Findings: Insights from STATE of Arizona v. Vincent Introduction STATE of Arizona v. Gerald Dean Vincent (159...
STATE v. Whitney: Affirming Admissibility of Excited Utterances and Prior Convictions, and Upholding Amendment of Information

STATE v. Whitney: Affirming Admissibility of Excited Utterances and Prior Convictions, and Upholding Amendment of Information

Date: Jan 13, 1989
STATE v. Whitney: Affirming Admissibility of Excited Utterances and Prior Convictions, and Upholding Amendment of Information Introduction STATE of Arizona v. Gerald Arthur Whitney is a pivotal case...
Interpretation of "Sound Health" in Livestock Mortality Insurance: Insured's Knowledge Prevails

Interpretation of "Sound Health" in Livestock Mortality Insurance: Insured's Knowledge Prevails

Date: Dec 2, 1988
Interpretation of "Sound Health" in Livestock Mortality Insurance: Insured's Knowledge Prevails Introduction The case of Lasma Corporation and Lasma Arabians, Ltd. v. Monarch Insurance Company of...
Arizona Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty and Clarifies Limitations on Physician-Patient Privilege in Criminal Proceedings

Arizona Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty and Clarifies Limitations on Physician-Patient Privilege in Criminal Proceedings

Date: Nov 2, 1988
Arizona Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty and Clarifies Limitations on Physician-Patient Privilege in Criminal Proceedings Introduction In the landmark case STATE of Arizona v. Donald Edward Beaty...
Clear and Convincing Evidence in Insanity Defense: Arizona Supreme Court Establishes 'Highly Probable' Standard

Clear and Convincing Evidence in Insanity Defense: Arizona Supreme Court Establishes 'Highly Probable' Standard

Date: Sep 23, 1988
Clear and Convincing Evidence in Insanity Defense: Arizona Supreme Court Establishes 'Highly Probable' Standard Introduction The case of State of Arizona v. Frederick King (158 Ariz. 419, 1988) marks...
Enforceability of Indefinite Severance Promises: Schade v. Diethrich

Enforceability of Indefinite Severance Promises: Schade v. Diethrich

Date: Sep 21, 1988
Enforceability of Indefinite Severance Promises: Schade v. Diethrich Introduction Schade v. Diethrich is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Arizona on September 20, 1988. The case...
Extending Arizona's Rape Shield Laws to Child Molestation: Implications and Exceptions Established in State v. Oliver and Cordone

Extending Arizona's Rape Shield Laws to Child Molestation: Implications and Exceptions Established in State v. Oliver and Cordone

Date: Aug 5, 1988
Extending Arizona's Rape Shield Laws to Child Molestation: Implications and Exceptions Established in State v. Oliver and Cordone Introduction In the landmark case of State of Arizona v. Joseph Land...
Bradshaw v. State Farm: Defining Probable Cause in Malicious Prosecution Cases

Bradshaw v. State Farm: Defining Probable Cause in Malicious Prosecution Cases

Date: Jul 7, 1988
Bradshaw v. State Farm: Defining Probable Cause in Malicious Prosecution Cases Introduction Bradshaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Appellate Review of Trial Court Discretion in Criminal Proceedings: STATE v. HANSEN

Appellate Review of Trial Court Discretion in Criminal Proceedings: STATE v. HANSEN

Date: Feb 26, 1988
Appellate Review of Trial Court Discretion in Criminal Proceedings: State of Arizona v. Zsanet Hansen Introduction State of Arizona v. Zsanet Hansen is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Legal Malpractice Does Not Arise Out of Contract for Attorney's Fees: An Analysis of Zi v. Barmat

Legal Malpractice Does Not Arise Out of Contract for Attorney's Fees: An Analysis of Zi v. Barmat

Date: Dec 11, 1987
Legal Malpractice Does Not Arise Out of Contract for Attorney's Fees: An Analysis of Zi v. Barmat Introduction In the landmark case of Zi v. Barmat, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Arizona on...
Sufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence in Conspiracy Convictions: Insights from STATE of Arizona v. Victor Manuel ARREDONDO

Sufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence in Conspiracy Convictions: Insights from STATE of Arizona v. Victor Manuel ARREDONDO

Date: Dec 4, 1987
Sufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence in Conspiracy Convictions: Insights from STATE of Arizona v. Victor Manuel ARREDONDO Introduction STATE of Arizona v. Victor Manuel ARREDONDO, 155 Ariz. 314...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert