Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

9th Circuit Case Commentaries

Review Standards for Magistrate Findings Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1): Insights from Webb and Groza v. Califano

Review Standards for Magistrate Findings Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1): Insights from Webb and Groza v. Califano

Date: Apr 20, 1979
Review Standards for Magistrate Findings Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1): Insights from Webb and Groza v. Califano Introduction The cases of Webb v. Califano and Groza v. Califano, adjudicated on April...
Section 1983 Liability for Omission in Forfeiture of Prison Earnings: Analysis of Johnson v. Duffy

Section 1983 Liability for Omission in Forfeiture of Prison Earnings: Analysis of Johnson v. Duffy

Date: Dec 28, 1978
Section 1983 Liability for Omission in Forfeiture of Prison Earnings: Analysis of Johnson v. Duffy Introduction The case of Bradley H. Johnson, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly...
Protecting Indian Treaty Fishing Rights: An In-Depth Analysis of United States v. Washington

Protecting Indian Treaty Fishing Rights: An In-Depth Analysis of United States v. Washington

Date: Jul 1, 1978
Protecting Indian Treaty Fishing Rights: An In-Depth Analysis of United States v. Washington Introduction The case of United States of America et al., Plaintiffs, v. State of Washington et al.,...
Hearn v. Rhay: Qualified Immunity and the Limitation of Attorney-Client Privilege in 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Cases

Hearn v. Rhay: Qualified Immunity and the Limitation of Attorney-Client Privilege in 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Cases

Date: Sep 27, 1975
Hearn v. Rhay: Qualified Immunity and the Limitation of Attorney-Client Privilege in 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Cases Introduction In Hearn v. Rhay (68 F.R.D. 574, United States District Court, E.D....
Establishing Supremacy of Native American Treaty Fishing Rights Over State Regulations: United States v. Quinault Tribe

Establishing Supremacy of Native American Treaty Fishing Rights Over State Regulations: United States v. Quinault Tribe

Date: Mar 23, 1974
Establishing Supremacy of Native American Treaty Fishing Rights Over State Regulations: United States v. Quinault Tribe Introduction The case of United States of America v. Quinault Tribe of Indians...
Previous
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert