Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

9th Circuit Case Commentaries

Ratto v. Secretary: Reinforcing the Eight-Hour Day Standard in Disability Claims and Upholding the Weight of Medical Testimony

Ratto v. Secretary: Reinforcing the Eight-Hour Day Standard in Disability Claims and Upholding the Weight of Medical Testimony

Date: Aug 14, 1993
Ratto v. Secretary: Reinforcing the Eight-Hour Day Standard in Disability Claims and Upholding the Weight of Medical Testimony Introduction In the case of Carol Ratto v. Secretary, Department of...
Dismissal Standards for Pro Se Civil Rights Plaintiffs: Ferdik v. Bonzelet

Dismissal Standards for Pro Se Civil Rights Plaintiffs: Ferdik v. Bonzelet

Date: May 8, 1992
Dismissal Standards for Pro Se Civil Rights Plaintiffs: Ferdik v. Bonzelet Introduction Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258 (9th Cir. 1992), addresses the procedural challenges faced by pro se...
Federal Discovery Principles in Civil Rights Litigation: Key Takeaways from Miller v. Pancucci (141 F.R.D. 292)

Federal Discovery Principles in Civil Rights Litigation: Key Takeaways from Miller v. Pancucci (141 F.R.D. 292)

Date: Jan 22, 1992
Federal Discovery Principles in Civil Rights Litigation: Key Takeaways from Miller v. Pancucci (141 F.R.D. 292) Introduction Miller v. Pancucci et al. is a landmark case adjudicated by the United...
Martinez v. Ylst: Affirming the 'Beyond a Reasonable Doubt' Standard for Harmless Error in Habeas Corpus Review

Martinez v. Ylst: Affirming the 'Beyond a Reasonable Doubt' Standard for Harmless Error in Habeas Corpus Review

Date: Dec 25, 1991
Martinez v. Ylst: Affirming the 'Beyond a Reasonable Doubt' Standard for Harmless Error in Habeas Corpus Review Introduction Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991), is a pivotal case in the...
Extension of Negligent Misrepresentation Liability to Intended Recipients in Securities Communications

Extension of Negligent Misrepresentation Liability to Intended Recipients in Securities Communications

Date: Mar 14, 1991
Extension of Negligent Misrepresentation Liability to Intended Recipients in Securities Communications Introduction In the landmark case of Joseph COLAPRICO and Joel Gerber v. Sun Microsystems, Inc.,...
Reversal of Disability Denial: Legal Precedent on Combined Impairments in Carr v. Sullivan

Reversal of Disability Denial: Legal Precedent on Combined Impairments in Carr v. Sullivan

Date: Mar 6, 1991
Reversal of Disability Denial: Legal Precedent on Combined Impairments in Carr v. Sullivan Introduction Rolane P. Carr v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D. is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States...
Baxter v. Sullivan: Ninth Circuit Reinforces Comprehensive Evaluation Standards in Disability Claims

Baxter v. Sullivan: Ninth Circuit Reinforces Comprehensive Evaluation Standards in Disability Claims

Date: Jan 24, 1991
Baxter v. Sullivan: Ninth Circuit Reinforces Comprehensive Evaluation Standards in Disability Claims Introduction Baxter v. Sullivan is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals...
Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department: Expanding Equal Protection Claims and Upholding Pro Se Litigant Rights

Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department: Expanding Equal Protection Claims and Upholding Pro Se Litigant Rights

Date: May 12, 1990
Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department: Expanding Equal Protection Claims and Upholding Pro Se Litigant Rights Introduction Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department is a pivotal case decided by the...
Approval of Class Action Settlement under Rule 23(e): A Comprehensive Analysis of In re WPPSS Securities Litigation

Approval of Class Action Settlement under Rule 23(e): A Comprehensive Analysis of In re WPPSS Securities Litigation

Date: Sep 6, 1989
Approval of Class Action Settlement under Rule 23(e): A Comprehensive Analysis of In re WPPSS Securities Litigation Introduction In the landmark case In re WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM...
Substantial Evidence Standard in Determining Disability Onset: Magallanes v. Bowen

Substantial Evidence Standard in Determining Disability Onset: Magallanes v. Bowen

Date: Aug 5, 1989
Substantial Evidence Standard in Determining Disability Onset: Magallanes v. Bowen Introduction Mary M. Magallanes filed a lawsuit against Otis R. Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services,...
Ninth Circuit Establishes Personal Liability under §1983 for Denial of Sixth Amendment Rights in Inmate Self-Representation Cases

Ninth Circuit Establishes Personal Liability under §1983 for Denial of Sixth Amendment Rights in Inmate Self-Representation Cases

Date: Jul 18, 1989
Ninth Circuit Establishes Personal Liability under §1983 for Denial of Sixth Amendment Rights in Inmate Self-Representation Cases Introduction The case of James F. Taylor v. Robert List, adjudicated...
Establishing the 'Official Information' Privilege: Balancing Law Enforcement Confidentiality and Civil Rights Litigation in Kelly v. City of San Jose

Establishing the 'Official Information' Privilege: Balancing Law Enforcement Confidentiality and Civil Rights Litigation in Kelly v. City of San Jose

Date: Feb 27, 1987
Establishing the 'Official Information' Privilege: Balancing Law Enforcement Confidentiality and Civil Rights Litigation in Kelly v. City of San Jose Introduction In Michael Kelly v. City of San Jose...
Ninth Circuit Upholds Strict 'Specific Facts' Standard in Antitrust Conspiracy Allegations: PECA v. Electrical Contractors

Ninth Circuit Upholds Strict 'Specific Facts' Standard in Antitrust Conspiracy Allegations: PECA v. Electrical Contractors

Date: Feb 6, 1987
Ninth Circuit Upholds Strict 'Specific Facts' Standard in Antitrust Conspiracy Allegations Introduction In the landmark case T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. et al. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors...
Establishing "Lascivious Exhibition" in Child Pornography Cases: Analysis of United States v. Dost and Wiegand

Establishing "Lascivious Exhibition" in Child Pornography Cases: Analysis of United States v. Dost and Wiegand

Date: Jun 13, 1986
Establishing "Lascivious Exhibition" in Child Pornography Cases: Analysis of United States v. Dost and Wiegand Introduction The case of United States of America v. Robert S. Dost and Edwin E....
State Action Immunity Denied in Municipal Water Contract Antitrust Case: Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of Bakersfield

State Action Immunity Denied in Municipal Water Contract Antitrust Case: Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of Bakersfield

Date: Apr 1, 1986
State Action Immunity Denied in Municipal Water Contract Antitrust Case: Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of Bakersfield Introduction The case of Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of Bakersfield...
Guidelines for Answering Contention Interrogatories in Pretrial Discovery: Insights from In re CONVERGENT TECHNOLOGIES SECURITIES LITIGATION

Guidelines for Answering Contention Interrogatories in Pretrial Discovery: Insights from In re CONVERGENT TECHNOLOGIES SECURITIES LITIGATION

Date: Oct 29, 1985
Guidelines for Answering Contention Interrogatories in Pretrial Discovery Insights from In re CONVERGENT TECHNOLOGIES SECURITIES LITIGATION Introduction The case of In re CONVERGENT TECHNOLOGIES...
Labor Exemption Affirmed in Antitrust Group Boycott Case: Insights from Dick G. RICHARDS v. Nielsen Freight Lines et al.

Labor Exemption Affirmed in Antitrust Group Boycott Case: Insights from Dick G. RICHARDS v. Nielsen Freight Lines et al.

Date: Feb 16, 1985
Labor Exemption Affirmed in Antitrust Group Boycott Case: Insights from Dick G. RICHARDS v. Nielsen Freight Lines et al. Introduction In the landmark case of Dick G. RICHARDS and Capitol Bank of...
Exhaustion of State Remedies in Federal Habeas Corpus: Insights from Johnstone v. Warden

Exhaustion of State Remedies in Federal Habeas Corpus: Insights from Johnstone v. Warden

Date: Feb 1, 1984
Exhaustion of State Remedies in Federal Habeas Corpus: Insights from Johnstone v. Warden Introduction Johnstone v. Warden is a pivotal case decided by the United States District Court for the...
Enhancing Civil Procedure: Comprehensive Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Establish New Standards for Discovery, Pretrial Management, and Magistrate Jurisdiction

Enhancing Civil Procedure: Comprehensive Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Establish New Standards for Discovery, Pretrial Management, and Magistrate Jurisdiction

Date: Apr 29, 1983
Enhancing Civil Procedure: Comprehensive Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Establish New Standards for Discovery, Pretrial Management, and Magistrate Jurisdiction Introduction On...
Establishing Protocol for Motion to Dismiss in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: Hillery v. Pulley

Establishing Protocol for Motion to Dismiss in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: Hillery v. Pulley

Date: Mar 10, 1982
Establishing Protocol for Motion to Dismiss in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: Hillery v. Pulley Introduction Booker T. Hillery, Jr. v. Reginald Pulley is a seminal case decided by the United States...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert