Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

7th Circuit Case Commentaries

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Under the PLRA: Williams v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Under the PLRA: Williams v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.

Date: May 1, 2020
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Under the PLRA: Williams v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. Introduction Williams v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. is a pivotal appellate case adjudicated by the...
Affirmation of Warrant Validity and Good Faith Exception in Digital Child Pornography Investigations: United States v. Rees

Affirmation of Warrant Validity and Good Faith Exception in Digital Child Pornography Investigations: United States v. Rees

Date: May 1, 2020
Affirmation of Warrant Validity and Good Faith Exception in Digital Child Pornography Investigations: United States v. Rees Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Michael Rees (957...
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Claims: Siler v. City of Kenosha

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Claims: Siler v. City of Kenosha

Date: Apr 30, 2020
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Claims: Siler v. City of Kenosha Introduction Case: Gabriella Siler, et al. v. City of Kenosha, et al. Court: United States Court of Appeals for...
Interpreting "Covered Offense" Under the First Step Act: Seventh Circuit Sets Precedent

Interpreting "Covered Offense" Under the First Step Act: Seventh Circuit Sets Precedent

Date: Apr 29, 2020
Interpreting "Covered Offense" Under the First Step Act: Seventh Circuit Sets Precedent Introduction The case United States of America v. Terrance J. Shaw, Fred T. Robinson, Rashann Grier, and Romond...
Chambers v. Sood: Reinforcing the Primacy of Pre-Suit Exhaustion under the Prison Litigation Reform Act

Chambers v. Sood: Reinforcing the Primacy of Pre-Suit Exhaustion under the Prison Litigation Reform Act

Date: Apr 29, 2020
Chambers v. Sood: Reinforcing the Primacy of Pre-Suit Exhaustion under the Prison Litigation Reform Act Introduction In the landmark case Jonathan Chambers v. Kul B. Sood, decided by the United...
Perez v. United States: Enhancing Judicial Impartiality Standards in Sentencing

Perez v. United States: Enhancing Judicial Impartiality Standards in Sentencing

Date: Apr 24, 2020
Perez v. United States: Enhancing Judicial Impartiality Standards in Sentencing Introduction In United States of America v. Juan Carlos Perez, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Skyrise Construction Group v. Annex Construction: Reinforcing Contract Formation Principles

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Skyrise Construction Group v. Annex Construction: Reinforcing Contract Formation Principles

Date: Apr 22, 2020
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Skyrise Construction Group v. Annex Construction: Reinforcing Contract Formation Principles Introduction The case of Skyrise Construction Group, LLC v. Annex...
Lund v. City of Rockford: Affirmation of Probable Cause in Retaliatory Arrest Claims

Lund v. City of Rockford: Affirmation of Probable Cause in Retaliatory Arrest Claims

Date: Apr 21, 2020
Lund v. City of Rockford: Affirmation of Probable Cause in Retaliatory Arrest Claims Introduction In the case of William Lund v. City of Rockford, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Forfeiture of Unasserted Claims: Insights from Hackett v. City of South Bend

Forfeiture of Unasserted Claims: Insights from Hackett v. City of South Bend

Date: Apr 17, 2020
Forfeiture of Unasserted Claims: Insights from Hackett v. City of South Bend Introduction Hackett v. City of South Bend, 956 F.3d 504 (7th Cir. 2020), addresses critical issues surrounding employment...
Winfield v. Dorethy: Evaluating Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Corpus Delicti Corroboration under AEDPA

Winfield v. Dorethy: Evaluating Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Corpus Delicti Corroboration under AEDPA

Date: Apr 14, 2020
Winfield v. Dorethy: Evaluating Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Corpus Delicti Corroboration under AEDPA Introduction In the case of Gerald Winfield v. Stephanie Dorethy, adjudicated by the...
Impeachment Exception and Pretrial Services Confidentiality: Chaparro v. United States

Impeachment Exception and Pretrial Services Confidentiality: Chaparro v. United States

Date: Apr 14, 2020
Impeachment Exception and Pretrial Services Confidentiality: Chaparro v. United States Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Michael L. Chaparro, adjudicated by the United States...
Markel Insurance v. Rau: Affirming Policy Non-Coverage for Unlisted Ambulance

Markel Insurance v. Rau: Affirming Policy Non-Coverage for Unlisted Ambulance

Date: Apr 10, 2020
Markel Insurance v. Rau: Affirming Policy Non-Coverage for Unlisted Ambulance Introduction In Markel Insurance Company v. Lillian Marlene Rau, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh...
Affirmation of Procedural Due Process and Excessive Force Standards in Prison Transfers

Affirmation of Procedural Due Process and Excessive Force Standards in Prison Transfers

Date: Apr 9, 2020
Affirmation of Procedural Due Process and Excessive Force Standards in Prison Transfers Introduction In the case of Nathaniel Jackson v. Alton Angus, et al., the United States Court of Appeals for...
Reaffirmation of Government Speech Doctrine: Dixon O'Brien v. Village of Lincolnshire

Reaffirmation of Government Speech Doctrine: Dixon O'Brien v. Village of Lincolnshire

Date: Apr 8, 2020
Reaffirmation of Government Speech Doctrine: Dixon O'Brien v. Village of Lincolnshire Introduction In the landmark case of Dixon O'Brien, et al. v. Village of Lincolnshire, et al. (955 F.3d 616, 7th...
Functionality Doctrine Upheld in Trade Dress Invalidation: Flexco v. CAI Affirmed

Functionality Doctrine Upheld in Trade Dress Invalidation: Flexco v. CAI Affirmed

Date: Apr 8, 2020
Functionality Doctrine Upheld in Trade Dress Invalidation: Flexco v. CAI Affirmed Introduction The case of Flexible Steel Lacing Company (Flexco) v. Conveyor Accessories, Inc. (CAI) addresses the...
Establishing Precedent on National Origin Discrimination and Equitable Remedies: Vega v. Chicago Park District

Establishing Precedent on National Origin Discrimination and Equitable Remedies: Vega v. Chicago Park District

Date: Apr 8, 2020
Establishing Precedent on National Origin Discrimination and Equitable Remedies: Vega v. Chicago Park District Introduction Vega v. Chicago Park District is a significant case adjudicated by the...
Failure to Protect in Prison: Schillinger v. Kiley et al. Establishes Stricter Exhaustion Requirements

Failure to Protect in Prison: Schillinger v. Kiley et al. Establishes Stricter Exhaustion Requirements

Date: Apr 7, 2020
Failure to Protect in Prison: Schillinger v. Kiley et al. Establishes Stricter Exhaustion Requirements Introduction Schillinger v. Kiley, Starkey, & Matti, 954 F.3d 990 (7th Cir. 2020), is a...
Affirmation of Social Security Disability Denial Based on Substantial Evidence

Affirmation of Social Security Disability Denial Based on Substantial Evidence

Date: Apr 3, 2020
Affirmation of Social Security Disability Denial Based on Substantial Evidence Introduction In the appellate case Michelle Jeske v. Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, the United States...
Limited Habeas Relief under 28 U.S.C. §2241: Insights from Worman v. Entzel

Limited Habeas Relief under 28 U.S.C. §2241: Insights from Worman v. Entzel

Date: Mar 27, 2020
Limited Habeas Relief under 28 U.S.C. §2241: Insights from Worman v. Entzel Introduction The case of John Worman v. Frederick Entzel (953 F.3d 1004) serves as a pivotal examination of the constraints...
Seventh Circuit Establishes that Diverse Investment Options and Revenue-Sharing Models Do Not Breach ERISA Fiduciary Duties: Affirmation in Divane v. Northwestern University

Seventh Circuit Establishes that Diverse Investment Options and Revenue-Sharing Models Do Not Breach ERISA Fiduciary Duties: Affirmation in Divane v. Northwestern University

Date: Mar 26, 2020
Seventh Circuit Establishes that Diverse Investment Options and Revenue-Sharing Models Do Not Breach ERISA Fiduciary Duties: Affirmation in Divane v. Northwestern University Introduction In the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert