Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

7th Circuit Case Commentaries

Waiver of Procedural Relief Arguments: O'Neal v. Reilly Sets Precedent on Rule 60(b) Waiver

Waiver of Procedural Relief Arguments: O'Neal v. Reilly Sets Precedent on Rule 60(b) Waiver

Date: Jun 10, 2020
Waiver of Procedural Relief Arguments: O'Neal v. Reilly Sets Precedent on Rule 60(b) Waiver Introduction In the case of Harry O'Neal v. James Reilly, decided on June 9, 2020, by the United States...
Re-defining Affirmative Defenses Upon Amended Complaints: Burton v. Ghosh and Wexford

Re-defining Affirmative Defenses Upon Amended Complaints: Burton v. Ghosh and Wexford

Date: Jun 9, 2020
Re-defining Affirmative Defenses Upon Amended Complaints: Burton v. Ghosh and Wexford Introduction In the case of Alnoraindus Burton v. Partha Ghosh and Wexford Health Sources, Inc., the United...
Interpretation of 'Costs' under Rule 68 in FDCPA Claims Affirmed by Seventh Circuit in Peck v. IMC Credit Services

Interpretation of 'Costs' under Rule 68 in FDCPA Claims Affirmed by Seventh Circuit in Peck v. IMC Credit Services

Date: Jun 6, 2020
Interpretation of 'Costs' under Rule 68 in FDCPA Claims Affirmed by Seventh Circuit in Peck v. IMC Credit Services Introduction Norman Peck v. IMC Credit Services, 960 F.3d 972 (7th Cir. 2020), is a...
Standard for Vacating Default Judgments and Corporate Officer Liability under TCPA: Insights from ARWA Chiropractic v. Med-Care

Standard for Vacating Default Judgments and Corporate Officer Liability under TCPA: Insights from ARWA Chiropractic v. Med-Care

Date: Jun 6, 2020
Standard for Vacating Default Judgments and Corporate Officer Liability under TCPA: Insights from ARWA Chiropractic v. Med-Care Introduction The case of Arwa Chiropractic, P.C., Individually and as...
Enforceability of Umbrella NDAs with Subsequent Commission Agreements: R3 Composites Corp. v. G&S Sales Corp.

Enforceability of Umbrella NDAs with Subsequent Commission Agreements: R3 Composites Corp. v. G&S Sales Corp.

Date: Jun 2, 2020
Enforceability of Umbrella NDAs with Subsequent Commission Agreements: R3 Composites Corp. v. G&S Sales Corp. Introduction The case of R3 Composites Corporation v. G&S Sales Corporation, 960 F.3d 935...
Affirmation of Disability Benefits Denial Due to Insufficient Objective Medical Evidence

Affirmation of Disability Benefits Denial Due to Insufficient Objective Medical Evidence

Date: May 21, 2020
Affirmation of Disability Benefits Denial Due to Insufficient Objective Medical Evidence Introduction The case of Isaac S. Atkins v. Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security addresses the...
Judicial Discretion in Recruiting Counsel for Indigent Prisoners: McCaa v. Hamilton

Judicial Discretion in Recruiting Counsel for Indigent Prisoners: McCaa v. Hamilton

Date: May 21, 2020
Judicial Discretion in Recruiting Counsel for Indigent Prisoners: McCaa v. Hamilton Introduction Randy McCaa v. Todd Hamilton, et al., 959 F.3d 842 (7th Cir. 2020), is a pivotal case addressing the...
Establishing Limits on Monell Liability and ADA Accommodations in Correctional Healthcare: Hildreth v. Butler et al.

Establishing Limits on Monell Liability and ADA Accommodations in Correctional Healthcare: Hildreth v. Butler et al.

Date: May 20, 2020
Establishing Limits on Monell Liability and ADA Accommodations in Correctional Healthcare: Hildreth v. Butler et al. Introduction Scott Hildreth v. Kim Butler, Lori Oakley, and Wexford Health...
Polk County v. J.K.J. and M.J.J.: Establishing Municipal Liability for Institutional Inaction under Monell

Polk County v. J.K.J. and M.J.J.: Establishing Municipal Liability for Institutional Inaction under Monell

Date: May 16, 2020
Polk County v. J.K.J. and M.J.J.: Establishing Municipal Liability for Institutional Inaction under Monell Introduction In the landmark case of J.K.J. and M.J.J. v. Polk County and Darryl L....
Affirming the Sham Affidavit Rule in Summary Judgment: James v. Hale

Affirming the Sham Affidavit Rule in Summary Judgment: James v. Hale

Date: May 15, 2020
Affirming the Sham Affidavit Rule in Summary Judgment: James v. Hale Introduction The case of Dustin James v. Deborah Hale (959 F.3d 307) adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Hoglund v. Neal: Assessing the Boundaries of Ineffective Assistance and Expert Vouching Under Strickland and Due Process Rights

Hoglund v. Neal: Assessing the Boundaries of Ineffective Assistance and Expert Vouching Under Strickland and Due Process Rights

Date: May 15, 2020
Hoglund v. Neal: Assessing the Boundaries of Ineffective Assistance and Expert Vouching Under Strickland and Due Process Rights Introduction Hoglund v. Neal is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Compassionate Release Denied in United States v. Melgarejo: Implications for COVID-19 Related Inmate Releases

Compassionate Release Denied in United States v. Melgarejo: Implications for COVID-19 Related Inmate Releases

Date: May 13, 2020
Compassionate Release Denied in United States v. Melgarejo: Implications for COVID-19 Related Inmate Releases Introduction The case of United States of America v. Juliāno Melgarejo marks a...
Consumer Reporting Agencies Not Required to Validate Legal Validity of Debts Under FCRA: Denan v. Trans Union LLC

Consumer Reporting Agencies Not Required to Validate Legal Validity of Debts Under FCRA: Denan v. Trans Union LLC

Date: May 12, 2020
Consumer Reporting Agencies Not Required to Validate Legal Validity of Debts Under FCRA: Denan v. Trans Union LLC Introduction In the case of Joseph W. Denan et al. v. Trans Union LLC, decided on May...
Establishing Article III Standing for BIPA Violations: Bryant v. Compass Group Decision

Establishing Article III Standing for BIPA Violations: Bryant v. Compass Group Decision

Date: May 6, 2020
Establishing Article III Standing for BIPA Violations: Bryant v. Compass Group USA, Inc. Decision Introduction The case of Christine Bryant v. Compass Group USA, Inc. (958 F.3d 617) marks a...
Reinforcing Res Judicata Effect of Federal Rule 68 Judgments: H.A.L. NY Holdings, LLC v. Joseph Guinan, Jr.

Reinforcing Res Judicata Effect of Federal Rule 68 Judgments: H.A.L. NY Holdings, LLC v. Joseph Guinan, Jr.

Date: May 6, 2020
Reinforcing Res Judicata Effect of Federal Rule 68 Judgments: H.A.L. NY Holdings, LLC v. Joseph Guinan, Jr. Introduction The case of H.A.L. NY Holdings, LLC v. Joseph Michael Guinan, Jr. (958 F.3d...
ADA Title III Applicability to Ridesharing Services: Standing and Direct Injury Requirements Affirmed

ADA Title III Applicability to Ridesharing Services: Standing and Direct Injury Requirements Affirmed

Date: May 6, 2020
ADA Title III Applicability to Ridesharing Services: Standing and Direct Injury Requirements Affirmed Introduction The case of Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago, et al. v. Uber Technologies,...
Pretrial Record as the Exclusive Basis for Appellate Review in Suppression Motions: Insights from U.S. v. Howell

Pretrial Record as the Exclusive Basis for Appellate Review in Suppression Motions: Insights from U.S. v. Howell

Date: May 5, 2020
Pretrial Record as the Exclusive Basis for Appellate Review in Suppression Motions: Insights from U.S. v. Howell Introduction In United States of America v. Anthony Howell, the United States Court of...
Enforcement of Contractual Dispute Windows Despite Documentation Omissions: Stampley v. Altom Transport, Inc.

Enforcement of Contractual Dispute Windows Despite Documentation Omissions: Stampley v. Altom Transport, Inc.

Date: May 2, 2020
Enforcement of Contractual Dispute Windows Despite Documentation Omissions: Stampley v. Altom Transport, Inc. Introduction The case of Michael Stampley v. Altom Transport, Inc. (958 F.3d 580) heard...
Religious Freedom in Incarceration: Thompson v. Bukowski - A Comprehensive Analysis

Religious Freedom in Incarceration: Thompson v. Bukowski - A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: May 2, 2020
Religious Freedom in Incarceration: Thompson v. Bukowski - A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction The case of Walter Thompson v. Timothy Bukowski addresses the crucial issue of religious freedom...
Strict Enforcement of Condition Precedent in HAMP Loan Modifications Affirmed

Strict Enforcement of Condition Precedent in HAMP Loan Modifications Affirmed

Date: May 1, 2020
Strict Enforcement of Condition Precedent in HAMP Loan Modifications Affirmed Introduction In Anthony G. Taylor v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 958 F.3d 556 (7th Cir. 2020), the United States Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert