Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Hostile Work Environment under ADEA: Crawford v. Medina General Hospital

Hostile Work Environment under ADEA: Crawford v. Medina General Hospital

Date: Sep 25, 1996
Hostile Work Environment under ADEA: Crawford v. Medina General Hospital Introduction In the case of Mary Ann Crawford v. Medina General Hospital, Darla Kermendy, Kenneth Milligan, and Rex Slee,...
Vote Dilution Claims and Standing Doctrine: Comprehensive Analysis of Bennett and Mango v. City of Columbus

Vote Dilution Claims and Standing Doctrine: Comprehensive Analysis of Bennett and Mango v. City of Columbus

Date: Sep 21, 1996
Vote Dilution Claims and Standing Doctrine: Comprehensive Analysis of Bennett and Mango v. City of Columbus Introduction The case Bennett and Mango v. City of Columbus represents a significant...
Kent v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company: Establishing Substantial Compliance with E.R.I.S.A. Procedural Requirements

Kent v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company: Establishing Substantial Compliance with E.R.I.S.A. Procedural Requirements

Date: Sep 21, 1996
Kent v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company: Establishing Substantial Compliance with E.R.I.S.A. Procedural Requirements Introduction Kent v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company, 96 F.3d 803...
Expanding ACAA Protections to Cargo Carriers: Bower v. FedEx

Expanding ACAA Protections to Cargo Carriers: Bower v. FedEx

Date: Sep 19, 1996
Expanding ACAA Protections to Cargo Carriers: Bower v. FedEx Introduction In Bower v. Federal Express Corporation, 96 F.3d 200 (6th Cir. 1996), the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Protecting Divorce-Related Pension Interests from Bankruptcy: Insights from IN RE McCafferty

Protecting Divorce-Related Pension Interests from Bankruptcy: Insights from IN RE McCafferty

Date: Sep 19, 1996
Protecting Divorce-Related Pension Interests from Bankruptcy: Insights from IN RE McCafferty Introduction The case of IN RE: Robert C. McCafferty, Debtor vs. Marion McCafferty, Respondent-Appellant...
Qualified Immunity and Media Presence in Search Warrant Execution: Insights from Stack v. Killian

Qualified Immunity and Media Presence in Search Warrant Execution: Insights from Stack v. Killian

Date: Sep 17, 1996
Qualified Immunity and Media Presence in Search Warrant Execution: Insights from Stack v. Killian Introduction Lydia Stack and Aid to Animals of Michigan, Inc. appealed a decision from the United...
Application of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) 'Carry' Prong Following BAILEY v. UNITED STATES

Application of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) 'Carry' Prong Following BAILEY v. UNITED STATES

Date: Sep 17, 1996
Application of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) 'Carry' Prong Following BAILEY v. UNITED STATES Introduction The case of United States of America v. Clyde Johnson addresses the application of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)...
Post-Termination Commissions in Agency Agreements: Terry Barr Sales v. All-Lock Company

Post-Termination Commissions in Agency Agreements: Terry Barr Sales v. All-Lock Company

Date: Sep 17, 1996
Post-Termination Commissions in Agency Agreements: Terry Barr Sales v. All-Lock Company Introduction The case of Terry Barr Sales Agency, Inc. v. All-Lock Company, Inc., decided by the United States...
ERISA Plan Determination and Employer Endorsement: Thompson v. American Home Assurance Co. Commentary

ERISA Plan Determination and Employer Endorsement: Thompson v. American Home Assurance Co. Commentary

Date: Sep 12, 1996
ERISA Plan Determination and Employer Endorsement: Thompson v. American Home Assurance Co. Commentary Introduction Thompson v. American Home Assurance Company, 95 F.3d 429 (6th Cir. 1996), is a...
Reinforcement of Evidentiary Standards for Damages and Fiduciary Duty in Real Estate Transactions

Reinforcement of Evidentiary Standards for Damages and Fiduciary Duty in Real Estate Transactions

Date: Sep 10, 1996
Reinforcement of Evidentiary Standards for Damages and Fiduciary Duty in Real Estate Transactions Introduction The case of Gerald L. Anchor and Hazel B. Anchor v. Dennis M. O'Toole and Melinda L....
Affirmation of State Discretion in Funding Disability Compensation: Brock v. McWherter

Affirmation of State Discretion in Funding Disability Compensation: Brock v. McWherter

Date: Aug 31, 1996
Affirmation of State Discretion in Funding Disability Compensation: Brock v. McWherter Introduction The case Rosetta Brock, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Ned Ray McWherter, et al., decided on...
Coram Nobis and Effective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from Blanton v. United States

Coram Nobis and Effective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from Blanton v. United States

Date: Aug 29, 1996
Coram Nobis and Effective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from Blanton v. United States Introduction Blanton v. United States is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Discretionary Subpoena Power in Social Security Disability Hearings: Flatford v. Chater Analysis

Discretionary Subpoena Power in Social Security Disability Hearings: Flatford v. Chater Analysis

Date: Aug 29, 1996
Discretionary Subpoena Power in Social Security Disability Hearings: Flatford v. Chater Analysis Introduction Clifford Flatford v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security is a pivotal case...
Automatic Good Cause for Failure to Serve Process in Forma Pauperis: Byrd v. Stone

Automatic Good Cause for Failure to Serve Process in Forma Pauperis: Byrd v. Stone

Date: Aug 27, 1996
Automatic Good Cause for Failure to Serve Process in Forma Pauperis: Byrd v. Stone Introduction Byrd v. Stone, 94 F.3d 217 (6th Cir. 1996), addresses the critical issue of service of process in the...
Procedural Default and Due Process in Federal Habeas Corpus: An Analysis of Garcia v. Sparkman

Procedural Default and Due Process in Federal Habeas Corpus: An Analysis of Garcia v. Sparkman

Date: Aug 24, 1996
Procedural Default and Due Process in Federal Habeas Corpus: An Analysis of Garcia v. Sparkman Introduction The case of Garcia H. Simpson v. Emitt L. Sparkman, adjudicated by the United States Court...
Exclusive Right of Rural Water Associations Under Section 1926(b): Lexington-South Elkhorn Water District v. City of Wilmore

Exclusive Right of Rural Water Associations Under Section 1926(b): Lexington-South Elkhorn Water District v. City of Wilmore

Date: Aug 17, 1996
Exclusive Right of Rural Water Associations Under Section 1926(b): Lexington-South Elkhorn Water District v. City of Wilmore Introduction The case of Lexington-South Elkhorn Water District v. City of...
Reexamining Fourth Amendment Protections: Standing and Consent in Vehicle Trailer Searches – United States v. Jenkins

Reexamining Fourth Amendment Protections: Standing and Consent in Vehicle Trailer Searches – United States v. Jenkins

Date: Aug 14, 1996
Reexamining Fourth Amendment Protections: Standing and Consent in Vehicle Trailer Searches – United States v. Jenkins Introduction The case of United States of America v. Dean Jenkins (92 F.3d 430)...
Affirmation of Dismissal Standards for Pro Se Prisoners in Bounds Claims

Affirmation of Dismissal Standards for Pro Se Prisoners in Bounds Claims

Date: Aug 8, 1996
Affirmation of Dismissal Standards for Pro Se Prisoners in Bounds Claims Introduction The case of Torrance Pilgrim et al. v. John Littlefield et al., decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Reinforcing Burden-Shifting in Disability Discrimination: Dana W. Burns v. City of Columbus

Reinforcing Burden-Shifting in Disability Discrimination: Dana W. Burns v. City of Columbus

Date: Aug 8, 1996
Reinforcing Burden-Shifting in Disability Discrimination: Dana W. Burns v. City of Columbus Introduction The case of Dana W. Burns v. City of Columbus addresses critical issues surrounding disability...
Reaffirmation of Eleventh Amendment Immunity in Class Actions: Children’s Healthcare is a Legal Duty, Inc. v. Deters

Reaffirmation of Eleventh Amendment Immunity in Class Actions: Children’s Healthcare is a Legal Duty, Inc. v. Deters

Date: Aug 6, 1996
Reaffirmation of Eleventh Amendment Immunity in Class Actions: Children’s Healthcare is a Legal Duty, Inc. v. Deters Introduction The case of Children’s Healthcare is a Legal Duty, Inc.; Steven...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert