Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Effective Assistance of Counsel and Reinforcement of the Wilcox Rule in Wong v. Money

Affirmation of Effective Assistance of Counsel and Reinforcement of the Wilcox Rule in Wong v. Money

Date: Apr 17, 1998
Affirmation of Effective Assistance of Counsel and Reinforcement of the Wilcox Rule in Wong v. Money Introduction The case of Carrie C. Wong v. Christine Money, Warden; Attorney General of the State...
Abstention in Federal Courts: The Gottfried v. Medical Planning Services Decision

Abstention in Federal Courts: The Gottfried v. Medical Planning Services Decision

Date: Apr 17, 1998
Abstention in Federal Courts: The Gottfried v. Medical Planning Services Decision Introduction The case of Holly Gottfried v. Medical Planning Services, Inc. is a landmark decision by the United...
Enhanced Standards for Sua Sponte Dismissals in Federal Courts: Catz v. Chalker

Enhanced Standards for Sua Sponte Dismissals in Federal Courts: Catz v. Chalker

Date: Apr 17, 1998
Enhanced Standards for Sua Sponte Dismissals in Federal Courts: Catz v. Chalker Introduction Catz v. Chalker, 142 F.3d 279 (6th Cir. 1998), presents a pivotal moment in federal procedural law. The...
Affirmation of Canine Sniff and Plain-View Doctrine in Fourth Amendment Searches: United States v. Reed

Affirmation of Canine Sniff and Plain-View Doctrine in Fourth Amendment Searches: United States v. Reed

Date: Apr 16, 1998
Affirmation of Canine Sniff and Plain-View Doctrine in Fourth Amendment Searches: United States v. Reed Introduction In United States v. Reed, 141 F.3d 644 (6th Cir. 1998), the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Subjective Intent Standard for Fraudulent Credit Card Debt Discharge in Benethel Rembert Case

Affirmation of Subjective Intent Standard for Fraudulent Credit Card Debt Discharge in Benethel Rembert Case

Date: Apr 10, 1998
Affirmation of Subjective Intent Standard for Fraudulent Credit Card Debt Discharge in Benethel Rembert Case Introduction In the case of Benethel Rembert v. AT&T Universal Card Services, Inc.;...
Admissibility of Summary Exhibits Under Federal Rules of Evidence: Analysis of United States v. Bray

Admissibility of Summary Exhibits Under Federal Rules of Evidence: Analysis of United States v. Bray

Date: Apr 7, 1998
Admissibility of Summary Exhibits Under Federal Rules of Evidence: Analysis of United States v. Bray Introduction United States of America v. James A. Bray is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Establishing Proper Venue under 28 U.S.C. §1391(a)(2): Insights from First of Michigan Corp. v. Bramlet

Establishing Proper Venue under 28 U.S.C. §1391(a)(2): Insights from First of Michigan Corp. v. Bramlet

Date: Apr 4, 1998
Establishing Proper Venue under 28 U.S.C. §1391(a)(2): Insights from First of Michigan Corp. v. Bramlet Introduction The case of First of Michigan Corporation and Michael Sobol v. Carlton Bramlet and...
Estoppel and Choice of Law in Insurance Coverage: A Comprehensive Analysis of Northland Insurance Co. v. Guardsman Products

Estoppel and Choice of Law in Insurance Coverage: A Comprehensive Analysis of Northland Insurance Co. v. Guardsman Products

Date: Apr 1, 1998
Estoppel and Choice of Law in Insurance Coverage: A Comprehensive Analysis of Northland Insurance Co. v. Guardsman Products Introduction The case Northland Insurance Company v. Guardsman Products,...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Prison Litigation: Brown v. Toombs et al.

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Prison Litigation: Brown v. Toombs et al.

Date: Mar 28, 1998
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Prison Litigation: Brown v. Toombs et al. Introduction Brown v. Toombs et al. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Carroll v. City of Mount Clemens: Clarifying Younger Abstention in Federal Damages Actions

Carroll v. City of Mount Clemens: Clarifying Younger Abstention in Federal Damages Actions

Date: Mar 20, 1998
Carroll v. City of Mount Clemens: Clarifying Younger Abstention in Federal Damages Actions Introduction Carroll v. City of Mount Clemens, 139 F.3d 1072 (6th Cir. 1998), addresses a pivotal question...
Preservation of Equitable Relief in Corporate Seizure: Insights from GBJ Corp. v. Eastern Ohio Paving Co.

Preservation of Equitable Relief in Corporate Seizure: Insights from GBJ Corp. v. Eastern Ohio Paving Co.

Date: Mar 20, 1998
Preservation of Equitable Relief in Corporate Seizure: Insights from GBJ Corp. v. Eastern Ohio Paving Co. Introduction The case of GBJ Corporation; Topaz Capital Corporation; Jeffrey J. Gelmin; and...
Establishing Reasonable Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Defendants: Insights from Aristech Chemical International Ltd. v. Acrylic Fabricators Ltd.

Establishing Reasonable Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Defendants: Insights from Aristech Chemical International Ltd. v. Acrylic Fabricators Ltd.

Date: Mar 13, 1998
Establishing Reasonable Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Defendants: Insights from Aristech Chemical International Limited v. Acrylic Fabricators Limited Introduction The case of Aristech Chemical...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in ADA Employment Discrimination Case: Cassidy v. Detroit Edison Company

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in ADA Employment Discrimination Case: Cassidy v. Detroit Edison Company

Date: Mar 13, 1998
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in ADA Employment Discrimination Case: Cassidy v. Detroit Edison Company Introduction In Cassidy v. Detroit Edison Company, 138 F.3d 629 (6th Cir. 1998), the United...
Stough v. Mayville: Upholding Judicial Discretion in Procedural Dismissals Under Rule 41(b)

Stough v. Mayville: Upholding Judicial Discretion in Procedural Dismissals Under Rule 41(b)

Date: Mar 12, 1998
Stough v. Mayville: Upholding Judicial Discretion in Procedural Dismissals Under Rule 41(b) Introduction In Debra Stough, Individually and as Next Friend of Eric Lee Stough, a Minor,...
REICH v. Hall Holding Company, INC.: Enforcing Fiduciary Duties and Preventing Self-Dealing in ESOP Transactions under ERISA

REICH v. Hall Holding Company, INC.: Enforcing Fiduciary Duties and Preventing Self-Dealing in ESOP Transactions under ERISA

Date: Mar 11, 1998
REICH v. Hall Holding Company, INC.: Enforcing Fiduciary Duties and Preventing Self-Dealing in ESOP Transactions under ERISA Introduction The case of Robert B. Reich, Secretary of the United States...
Enhancing Sentences for Obstruction of Justice: Insights from United States v. Charles

Enhancing Sentences for Obstruction of Justice: Insights from United States v. Charles

Date: Mar 6, 1998
Enhancing Sentences for Obstruction of Justice: Insights from United States v. Charles Introduction The case of United States of America v. Matthew Otis Charles, adjudicated by the United States...
Judicial Oversight and Equal Protection: Comprehensive Analysis of GLOVER v. JOHNSON

Judicial Oversight and Equal Protection: Comprehensive Analysis of GLOVER v. JOHNSON

Date: Mar 3, 1998
Judicial Oversight and Equal Protection: Comprehensive Analysis of GLOVER v. JOHNSON Introduction GLOVER v. JOHNSON, 138 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 1998), presents a pivotal case addressing the prolonged...
Reaffirming Administrative Deference in ERISA Benefit Determinations: The SummaCare Case

Reaffirming Administrative Deference in ERISA Benefit Determinations: The SummaCare Case

Date: Feb 28, 1998
Reaffirming Administrative Deference in ERISA Benefit Determinations: The SummaCare Case Introduction The case of Robert A. Peruzzi, Executor of the Estate of Gloria M. Peruzzi v. Summa Medical Plan,...
Carlson v. Pitcher: Defining 'Second or Successive' Habeas Corpus Applications under AEDPA

Carlson v. Pitcher: Defining 'Second or Successive' Habeas Corpus Applications under AEDPA

Date: Feb 26, 1998
Carlson v. Pitcher: Defining 'Second or Successive' Habeas Corpus Applications under AEDPA Introduction Carlson v. Pitcher, 137 F.3d 416 (6th Cir. 1998), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Contract Disputes Act Preempts District Court Jurisdiction in SBA Claims

Contract Disputes Act Preempts District Court Jurisdiction in SBA Claims

Date: Feb 26, 1998
Contract Disputes Act Preempts District Court Jurisdiction in SBA Claims Introduction The case of Robert P. Campanella, Robert P. Campanella Associates v. Commerce Exchange Bank, United States Small...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert