Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Frivolous Claims and Upholding PLRA's "Three Strikes" Provision in Wilson v. Yaklich & Sanford

Affirmation of Frivolous Claims and Upholding PLRA's "Three Strikes" Provision in Wilson v. Yaklich & Sanford

Date: Jun 9, 1998
Affirmation of Frivolous Claims and Upholding PLRA's "Three Strikes" Provision in Wilson v. Yaklich & Sanford Introduction The case of Kenneth Jay Wilson v. Lewis Yaklich, et al., and Mary Sanford,...
Affirmation of Tribal Exclusive Gaming Rights under Consent Judgment in Sault Ste. Marie Tribe v. Engler

Affirmation of Tribal Exclusive Gaming Rights under Consent Judgment in Sault Ste. Marie Tribe v. Engler

Date: Jun 6, 1998
Affirmation of Tribal Exclusive Gaming Rights under Consent Judgment in Sault Ste. Marie Tribe v. Engler A Comprehensive Commentary on 146 F.3d 367, United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit,...
Reynolds v. Berry: Expanding Habeas Corpus Relief through Rule 11.42 Motions

Reynolds v. Berry: Expanding Habeas Corpus Relief through Rule 11.42 Motions

Date: Jun 5, 1998
Reynolds v. Berry: Expanding Habeas Corpus Relief through Rule 11.42 Motions Introduction Reynolds v. Berry, 146 F.3d 345 (6th Cir. 1998), is a pivotal case in the realm of post-conviction relief and...
Trademark Priority and Geographic Scope: Insights from Allard Enterprises v. Advanced Programming Resources

Trademark Priority and Geographic Scope: Insights from Allard Enterprises v. Advanced Programming Resources

Date: Jun 5, 1998
Trademark Priority and Geographic Scope: Insights from Allard Enterprises v. Advanced Programming Resources Introduction The case of Allard Enterprises, Inc. v. Advanced Programming Resources, Inc....
Limitations on Retroactive State Procedural Bars in Federal Habeas Corpus Review: Rogers v. Howes

Limitations on Retroactive State Procedural Bars in Federal Habeas Corpus Review: Rogers v. Howes

Date: May 27, 1998
Limitations on Retroactive State Procedural Bars in Federal Habeas Corpus Review: Rogers v. Howes Introduction Rogers v. Howes, 144 F.3d 990 (6th Cir. 1998), is a pivotal case addressing the...
Norris v. Schotten: Affirming Magistrate Judges' Authority in Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Norris v. Schotten: Affirming Magistrate Judges' Authority in Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Date: May 27, 1998
Norris v. Schotten: Affirming Magistrate Judges' Authority in Habeas Corpus Proceedings Introduction Norris v. Schotten, 146 F.3d 314 (6th Cir. 1998), is a pivotal case that addresses the scope of...
White v. United States: Clarifying Standing and Statute of Limitations in Civil Forfeiture

White v. United States: Clarifying Standing and Statute of Limitations in Civil Forfeiture

Date: May 27, 1998
White v. United States: Clarifying Standing and Statute of Limitations in Civil Forfeiture Introduction White v. United States is a landmark decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Affirmation of Res Judicata and Enforcement of Prefiling Restrictions in Humphries Heirs Litigation

Affirmation of Res Judicata and Enforcement of Prefiling Restrictions in Humphries Heirs Litigation

Date: May 23, 1998
Affirmation of Res Judicata and Enforcement of Prefiling Restrictions in Humphries Heirs Litigation Introduction The case of Roy Feathers, as Administrator of the Estate of Pelham Humphries, Deceased...
Apparent Authority and Vicarious Liability under the FCRA: Jones v. Federated Financial Reserve Corporation

Apparent Authority and Vicarious Liability under the FCRA: Jones v. Federated Financial Reserve Corporation

Date: May 23, 1998
Apparent Authority and Vicarious Liability under the FCRA: Jones v. Federated Financial Reserve Corporation Introduction The case KAREN JONES v. FEDERATED FINANCIAL RESERVE CORPORATION, decided by...
Competency to Waive Habeas Rights in Death Penalty Cases: Insights from Franklin & Quigley v. Francis

Competency to Waive Habeas Rights in Death Penalty Cases: Insights from Franklin & Quigley v. Francis

Date: May 23, 1998
Competency to Waive Habeas Rights in Death Penalty Cases: Insights from Franklin & Quigley v. Francis Introduction Franklin & Quigley, on behalf of Wilford Lee Berry, Jr., v. Rodney L. Francis,...
Kincaide v. United States: Affirmation of Wiretap Procedures and Standards for Joint Trials

Kincaide v. United States: Affirmation of Wiretap Procedures and Standards for Joint Trials

Date: May 22, 1998
Kincaide v. United States: Affirmation of Wiretap Procedures and Standards for Joint Trials Introduction The case of United States of America v. Willie Kincaide, Christian R. Key, Keith Elbert Riley...
Establishing Probable Cause in Drug-Related Arrests: Analysis of United States v. Strickland

Establishing Probable Cause in Drug-Related Arrests: Analysis of United States v. Strickland

Date: May 21, 1998
Establishing Probable Cause in Drug-Related Arrests: Analysis of United States v. Strickland Introduction The case of United States of America v. DeWayne A. Strickland, decided by the United States...
Menuskin v. Williams: Establishing Standards for Negligent Misrepresentation in Real Estate Transactions

Menuskin v. Williams: Establishing Standards for Negligent Misrepresentation in Real Estate Transactions

Date: May 15, 1998
Menuskin v. Williams: Establishing Standards for Negligent Misrepresentation in Real Estate Transactions Introduction In the landmark case Menuskin, et al. v. Williams, et al., decided by the United...
UNA ALINE GANTT v. WILSON SPORTING GOODS COMPANY: Affirmation of Summary Judgment on ADA and ADEA Claims

UNA ALINE GANTT v. WILSON SPORTING GOODS COMPANY: Affirmation of Summary Judgment on ADA and ADEA Claims

Date: May 13, 1998
UNA ALINE GANTT v. WILSON SPORTING GOODS COMPANY: Affirmation of Summary Judgment on ADA and ADEA Claims Introduction The case of Una Aline Gantt v. Wilson Sporting Goods Company (143 F.3d 1042)...
Affirmation of Conspiracy Convictions and Sentencing Guidelines in United States v. Gaitan-Acevedo et al.

Affirmation of Conspiracy Convictions and Sentencing Guidelines in United States v. Gaitan-Acevedo et al.

Date: May 13, 1998
Affirmation of Conspiracy Convictions and Sentencing Guidelines in United States v. Gaitan-Acevedo et al. Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Elias Gaitán-Acevedo, Paul Free,...
Res Judicata Reinforced in Employment Discrimination: Rivers v. Barberton Board of Education

Res Judicata Reinforced in Employment Discrimination: Rivers v. Barberton Board of Education

Date: May 12, 1998
Res Judicata Reinforced in Employment Discrimination: Rivers v. Barberton Board of Education Introduction Rivers v. Barberton Board of Education, 143 F.3d 1029 (6th Cir. 1998), addresses critical...
Incontestability Clauses in Disability Insurance: Analysis of Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Poe

Incontestability Clauses in Disability Insurance: Analysis of Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Poe

Date: May 7, 1998
Incontestability Clauses in Disability Insurance: Analysis of Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Jeffrey M. Poe Introduction The case Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Jeffrey...
Federal Arbitration Act Preempts State Law: Arbitrability of Fraudulent Inducement in Ferro Corp. v. Garrison Industries

Federal Arbitration Act Preempts State Law: Arbitrability of Fraudulent Inducement in Ferro Corp. v. Garrison Industries

Date: Apr 29, 1998
Federal Arbitration Act Preempts State Law: Arbitrability of Fraudulent Inducement in Ferro Corporation v. Garrison Industries, Inc. Introduction The case of Ferro Corporation v. Garrison Industries,...
Sova v. City of Mt. Pleasant: Reaffirming Qualified Immunity Standards in Use of Deadly Force

Sova v. City of Mt. Pleasant: Reaffirming Qualified Immunity Standards in Use of Deadly Force

Date: Apr 25, 1998
Sova v. City of Mt. Pleasant: Reaffirming Qualified Immunity Standards in Use of Deadly Force Introduction In the landmark case of Victoria and Gary Sova, as Personal Representatives of the Estate of...
Affirmation of Probable Cause and Constructive Possession in Hill v. United States

Affirmation of Probable Cause and Constructive Possession in Hill v. United States

Date: Apr 17, 1998
Affirmation of Probable Cause and Constructive Possession in Hill v. United States Introduction United States of America v. John A. Hill is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert