Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Bloch v. Ribar: Setting New Standards for Qualified Immunity in §1983 Retaliation Claims

Bloch v. Ribar: Setting New Standards for Qualified Immunity in §1983 Retaliation Claims

Date: Sep 22, 1998
Bloch v. Ribar: Setting New Standards for Qualified Immunity in §1983 Retaliation Claims Introduction In Cynthia Bloch and Thomas Bloch v. Sheriff L. John Ribar, 156 F.3d 673 (6th Cir. 1998), the...
Re-defining 'Use' and 'Carry' under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1): Hilliard v. United States Sets New Precedent

Re-defining 'Use' and 'Carry' under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1): Hilliard v. United States Sets New Precedent

Date: Sep 22, 1998
Re-defining 'Use' and 'Carry' under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1): Hilliard v. United States Sets New Precedent Introduction Rockie Lane Hilliard, the petitioner-appellant, confronted the United States of...
UNITED STATES v. ERWIN: Upholding the Reasonableness of Warrantless Vehicle Searches Based on Voluntary Consent

UNITED STATES v. ERWIN: Upholding the Reasonableness of Warrantless Vehicle Searches Based on Voluntary Consent

Date: Sep 18, 1998
UNITED STATES v. ERWIN: Upholding the Reasonableness of Warrantless Vehicle Searches Based on Voluntary Consent Introduction United States of America v. James Erwin, Jr. (155 F.3d 818), adjudicated...
Establishing the Limits of Honest Belief in ADA Discrimination Claims: An Analysis of Smith v. Chrysler

Establishing the Limits of Honest Belief in ADA Discrimination Claims: An Analysis of Smith v. Chrysler

Date: Sep 16, 1998
Establishing the Limits of Honest Belief in ADA Discrimination Claims: An Analysis of Smith v. Chrysler Introduction In James P. Smith v. Chrysler Corporation (155 F.3d 799), the United States Court...
Due Process in Administrative Segregation Affirmed: ALVIN JONES v. BAKER

Due Process in Administrative Segregation Affirmed: ALVIN JONES v. BAKER

Date: Sep 16, 1998
Due Process in Administrative Segregation Affirmed: ALVIN JONES v. BAKER Introduction In the landmark case of Alvin Jones v. Dennis A. Baker, et al., adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Establishing the Right to a Jury Trial under the Family and Medical Leave Act: Analysis of Frizzell v. Southwest Motor Freight

Establishing the Right to a Jury Trial under the Family and Medical Leave Act: Analysis of Frizzell v. Southwest Motor Freight

Date: Sep 11, 1998
Establishing the Right to a Jury Trial under the Family and Medical Leave Act: Analysis of Frizzell v. Southwest Motor Freight Introduction In the case of Carla D. Frizzell v. Southwest Motor...
Affirming 'Carrying' Firearms under 18 U.S.C. §924(c) Post-Bailey: Fair v. United States

Affirming 'Carrying' Firearms under 18 U.S.C. §924(c) Post-Bailey: Fair v. United States

Date: Sep 10, 1998
Affirming 'Carrying' Firearms under 18 U.S.C. §924(c) Post-Bailey: Fair v. United States Introduction The case of Buford Dale Fair v. United States (157 F.3d 427) adjudicated by the United States...
Federal Precedent on Prejudgment Interest and Attorney Fees under ERISA Established in Ford v. Uniroyal Pension Plan

Federal Precedent on Prejudgment Interest and Attorney Fees under ERISA Established in Ford v. Uniroyal Pension Plan

Date: Sep 5, 1998
Federal Precedent on Prejudgment Interest and Attorney Fees under ERISA Established in Ford v. Uniroyal Pension Plan Introduction The case of Isaac Ford, et al. v. Uniroyal Pension Plan, 154 F.3d 613...
Enhanced Sentencing in Drug Conspiracy Cases: Insights from United States v. Pruitt et al.

Enhanced Sentencing in Drug Conspiracy Cases: Insights from United States v. Pruitt et al.

Date: Sep 5, 1998
Enhanced Sentencing in Drug Conspiracy Cases: Insights from United States v. Pruitt et al. Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Tobias Marco Pruitt et al., the United...
Spikes v. United States: Affirming Search Warrant Validity, Evidentiary Admissibility, and Sentencing Under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)

Spikes v. United States: Affirming Search Warrant Validity, Evidentiary Admissibility, and Sentencing Under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)

Date: Sep 3, 1998
Spikes v. United States: Affirming Search Warrant Validity, Evidentiary Admissibility, and Sentencing Under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1) Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v....
Establishing Vicarious Consent in Parental Wiretapping: Pollock v. Pollock

Establishing Vicarious Consent in Parental Wiretapping: Pollock v. Pollock

Date: Sep 2, 1998
Establishing Vicarious Consent in Parental Wiretapping: Pollock v. Pollock Introduction Pollock v. Pollock is a landmark decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, rendered...
Recognition of Medical Leave as a Reasonable Accommodation under the ADA: Cehrs v. Northeast Ohio Alzheimer's Research Center

Recognition of Medical Leave as a Reasonable Accommodation under the ADA: Cehrs v. Northeast Ohio Alzheimer's Research Center

Date: Sep 2, 1998
Recognition of Medical Leave as a Reasonable Accommodation under the ADA: Cehrs v. Northeast Ohio Alzheimer's Research Center Introduction The case Katherine R. Cehrs v. Northeast Ohio Alzheimer's...
Limitation of Potentially Responsible Parties to Contribution Actions under CERCLA § 113(f): Analysis of Centerior Service Company v. Acme Scrap Iron Metal Corporation

Limitation of Potentially Responsible Parties to Contribution Actions under CERCLA § 113(f): Analysis of Centerior Service Company v. Acme Scrap Iron Metal Corporation

Date: Sep 1, 1998
Limitation of Potentially Responsible Parties to Contribution Actions under CERCLA § 113(f): Analysis of Centerior Service Company v. Acme Scrap Iron Metal Corporation Introduction The case of...
Enhanced Standards for Prima Facie Cases in Age Discrimination: Ercegovich v. Goodyear

Enhanced Standards for Prima Facie Cases in Age Discrimination: Ercegovich v. Goodyear

Date: Sep 1, 1998
Enhanced Standards for Prima Facie Cases in Age Discrimination: Ercegovich v. Goodyear Introduction Ercegovich v. Goodyear Tire Rubber Company, 154 F.3d 344 (6th Cir. 1998), is a pivotal case in the...
Affirmation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 Liability for False Mortgage Statements Affecting HUD Jurisdiction

Affirmation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 Liability for False Mortgage Statements Affecting HUD Jurisdiction

Date: Aug 29, 1998
Affirmation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 Liability for False Mortgage Statements Affecting HUD Jurisdiction Introduction The case of United States of America v. Truth E. Lutz, decided by the United States...
Affirming Sua Sponte Summary Judgment in Civil Rights Academic Dispute

Affirming Sua Sponte Summary Judgment in Civil Rights Academic Dispute

Date: Aug 28, 1998
Affirming Sua Sponte Summary Judgment in Civil Rights Academic Dispute Introduction The case of Samad Salehpour v. University of Tennessee et al. (159 F.3d 199) presents a significant examination of...
Brighton Township v. United States: Redefining Operator Liability under CERCLA

Brighton Township v. United States: Redefining Operator Liability under CERCLA

Date: Aug 26, 1998
Brighton Township v. United States: Redefining Operator Liability under CERCLA Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. Township of Brighton, Michigan, the United States Court of...
Upholding the First Amendment: Sixth Circuit Validates 18 U.S.C. § 2257 in Connection Distributing Co. v. Reno

Upholding the First Amendment: Sixth Circuit Validates 18 U.S.C. § 2257 in Connection Distributing Co. v. Reno

Date: Aug 14, 1998
Upholding the First Amendment: Sixth Circuit Validates 18 U.S.C. § 2257 in Connection Distributing Co. v. Reno Introduction In Connection Distributing Co. v. Reno, 154 F.3d 281 (6th Cir. 1998), the...
VAHILA v. HALL and Its Application in Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Byers: Expanding Causation in Legal Malpractice

VAHILA v. HALL and Its Application in Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Byers: Expanding Causation in Legal Malpractice

Date: Aug 13, 1998
VAHILA v. HALL and Its Application in Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Byers: Expanding Causation in Legal Malpractice Introduction The case of Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Fritz Byers (151 F.3d 574)...
Expanding ADA Title II Protections to Public Contracting: Johnson v. City of Saline

Expanding ADA Title II Protections to Public Contracting: Johnson v. City of Saline

Date: Aug 7, 1998
Expanding ADA Title II Protections to Public Contracting: Johnson v. City of Saline Introduction In Jotham Clement Johnson v. City of Saline, et al., 151 F.3d 564 (6th Cir. 1998), the United States...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert