Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Ensuring Accurate Drug Quantity Assessment in Sentencing: Insights from States v. Maliszewski Appeals

Ensuring Accurate Drug Quantity Assessment in Sentencing: Insights from States v. Maliszewski Appeals

Date: Dec 9, 1998
Ensuring Accurate Drug Quantity Assessment in Sentencing: Insights from States of America v. Maliszewski et al. Appeals Introduction The case of States of America v. Joseph Maliszewski et al. (161...
United States v. Ware, Jr.: Sixth Circuit Affirms Conviction, Clarifies Scope of 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(2)

United States v. Ware, Jr.: Sixth Circuit Affirms Conviction, Clarifies Scope of 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(2)

Date: Dec 4, 1998
United States v. Ware, Jr.: Sixth Circuit Affirms Conviction, Clarifies Scope of 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(2) Introduction In United States v. Ware, Jr., the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Presumption vs. Evidence of Juror Impartiality in Pretrial Publicity: Analyzing DeLisle v. Rivers

Presumption vs. Evidence of Juror Impartiality in Pretrial Publicity: Analyzing DeLisle v. Rivers

Date: Dec 1, 1998
Presumption vs. Evidence of Juror Impartiality in Pretrial Publicity: Analyzing DeLisle v. Rivers Introduction The case of Lawrence DeLisle v. Jessie Rivers (161 F.3d 370) adjudicated by the United...
Affirmation of Specific Intent in Aiding and Abetting Convictions: Warren v. Smith

Affirmation of Specific Intent in Aiding and Abetting Convictions: Warren v. Smith

Date: Nov 24, 1998
Affirmation of Specific Intent in Aiding and Abetting Convictions: Warren v. Smith Introduction The case of Gerald Warren, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David Smith, Respondent-Appellee, adjudicated by...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Age and Sex Discrimination Case: F. Donald Bush v. Dictaphone Corporation

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Age and Sex Discrimination Case: F. Donald Bush v. Dictaphone Corporation

Date: Nov 24, 1998
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Age and Sex Discrimination Case: F. Donald Bush v. Dictaphone Corporation Introduction F. Donald Bush v. Dictaphone Corporation, 161 F.3d 363 (6th Cir. 1998), is a...
Double Jeopardy Protection in Administrative License Suspension: Insights from Herbert et al. v. Billy et al.

Double Jeopardy Protection in Administrative License Suspension: Insights from Herbert et al. v. Billy et al.

Date: Nov 21, 1998
Double Jeopardy Protection in Administrative License Suspension: Insights from Herbert et al. v. Billy et al. Introduction The case of Thomas J. Herbert et al. v. Gerry Billy et al. (160 F.3d 1131)...
Affirmation of Appeal-Waiver Non-Enforceability in Collateral Attacks: Hunter v. United States

Affirmation of Appeal-Waiver Non-Enforceability in Collateral Attacks: Hunter v. United States

Date: Nov 20, 1998
Affirmation of Appeal-Waiver Non-Enforceability in Collateral Attacks: Hunter v. United States Introduction Brian K. Hunter, a member of the Ready Rock Boys gang in Youngstown, Ohio, pled guilty to...
Reaffirming the Adequacy of Random Jury Selection Procedures in Upholding Sixth Amendment Fair Cross-Section Requirements

Reaffirming the Adequacy of Random Jury Selection Procedures in Upholding Sixth Amendment Fair Cross-Section Requirements

Date: Nov 20, 1998
Reaffirming the Adequacy of Random Jury Selection Procedures in Upholding Sixth Amendment Fair Cross-Section Requirements Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Chris Jermaine Allen...
Establishing Harmless Error Standards for Capital Sentencing Jury Instructions in Coe v. Bell

Establishing Harmless Error Standards for Capital Sentencing Jury Instructions in Coe v. Bell

Date: Nov 17, 1998
Establishing Harmless Error Standards for Capital Sentencing Jury Instructions in Coe v. Bell Introduction Case: Robert Glen Coe v. Ricky Bell, Warden Court: United States Court of Appeals, Sixth...
Obstruction of Justice Enhancements Must Relate to the Instant Offense: United States v. Koeberlein

Obstruction of Justice Enhancements Must Relate to the Instant Offense: United States v. Koeberlein

Date: Nov 13, 1998
Obstruction of Justice Enhancements Must Relate to the Instant Offense: United States v. Koeberlein Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Francis A. Koeberlein, decided on...
Application of Colorado River Abstention Doctrine in Duplicative Federal and State Securities Class Actions

Application of Colorado River Abstention Doctrine in Duplicative Federal and State Securities Class Actions

Date: Nov 11, 1998
Application of Colorado River Abstention Doctrine in Duplicative Federal and State Securities Class Actions Introduction The case of Larry Romine and Sonia Mitelman v. CompuServe Corporation, et al....
Jones v. United States: Affirmation and Remand on Selective Prosecution and Sentencing Enhancements

Jones v. United States: Affirmation and Remand on Selective Prosecution and Sentencing Enhancements

Date: Nov 7, 1998
Jones v. United States: Affirmation and Remand on Selective Prosecution and Sentencing Enhancements Introduction In United States of America v. Climmie Jones, Jr., the United States Court of Appeals...
Affirming the Scope of Warrantless Vehicle Inventory Searches: Engine Compartments Included

Affirming the Scope of Warrantless Vehicle Inventory Searches: Engine Compartments Included

Date: Nov 7, 1998
Affirming the Scope of Warrantless Vehicle Inventory Searches: Engine Compartments Included Introduction United States of America v. Richard Allen Lumpkin is a landmark case decided by the United...
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Employer Notice Requirements for Tip Credit under FLSA in Outback Steakhouse Decision

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Employer Notice Requirements for Tip Credit under FLSA in Outback Steakhouse Decision

Date: Nov 3, 1998
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Employer Notice Requirements for Tip Credit under FLSA in Outback Steakhouse Decision Introduction The case of MISTI A. KILGORE et al. v. Outback Steakhouse of Florida, Inc.,...
Expanding Hostile Environment Harassment under Title VII: Abeita v. TransAmerica

Expanding Hostile Environment Harassment under Title VII: Abeita v. TransAmerica

Date: Oct 31, 1998
Expanding Hostile Environment Harassment under Title VII: Abeita v. TransAmerica Introduction The case of Gail E. Abeita v. TransAmerica Mailings, Inc. serves as a significant judicial examination of...
Affirmation of Death Sentence Amidst Claims of Prosecutorial Misconduct and Ineffective Counsel: Workman v. Bell

Affirmation of Death Sentence Amidst Claims of Prosecutorial Misconduct and Ineffective Counsel: Workman v. Bell

Date: Oct 31, 1998
Affirmation of Death Sentence Amidst Claims of Prosecutorial Misconduct and Ineffective Counsel: Workman v. Bell Introduction The case of Philip R. Workman v. Ricky Bell, adjudicated by the United...
Affirmation of Death Sentence Under Multiple Aggravating Factors and Rejection of Ineffective Assistance Claims: Workman v. Bell

Affirmation of Death Sentence Under Multiple Aggravating Factors and Rejection of Ineffective Assistance Claims: Workman v. Bell

Date: Oct 31, 1998
Affirmation of Death Sentence Under Multiple Aggravating Factors and Rejection of Ineffective Assistance Claims: Workman v. Bell Introduction Philip R. Workman, the petitioner-appellant, was...
EEOC Charge Specificity Limits Subsequent Court Claims: Davis v. Sodexho

EEOC Charge Specificity Limits Subsequent Court Claims: Davis v. Sodexho

Date: Oct 7, 1998
EEOC Charge Specificity Limits Subsequent Court Claims: Davis v. Sodexho Introduction The case of Hazel M. Davis v. Sodexho presents a pivotal examination of the procedural prerequisites under the...
Waiver of Monetary Claims in Federal Civil Rights Actions: Turker v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections

Waiver of Monetary Claims in Federal Civil Rights Actions: Turker v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections

Date: Oct 6, 1998
Waiver of Monetary Claims in Federal Civil Rights Actions: Turker v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections Introduction Melda Turker, employed by the Ohio Department of Corrections (ODRC)...
Enhanced Magistrate Judge Authority and Defendant Rights in Supervised Release Revocation: United States v. Charles C. Waters

Enhanced Magistrate Judge Authority and Defendant Rights in Supervised Release Revocation: United States v. Charles C. Waters

Date: Sep 29, 1998
Enhanced Magistrate Judge Authority and Defendant Rights in Supervised Release Revocation: United States v. Charles C. Waters Introduction In United States of America v. Charles C. Waters, 158 F.3d...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert