Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Enforcing Forum-Selection Clauses: Insights from Security Watch, Inc. v. Sentinel Systems, Inc.

Enforcing Forum-Selection Clauses: Insights from Security Watch, Inc. v. Sentinel Systems, Inc.

Date: May 12, 1999
Enforcing Forum-Selection Clauses: Insights from Security Watch, Inc. v. Sentinel Systems, Inc. Introduction The case of Security Watch, Inc. v. Sentinel Systems, Inc.; American Telephone and...
Affirmation of Rule 41(b) Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute in Age Discrimination Case

Affirmation of Rule 41(b) Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute in Age Discrimination Case

Date: May 12, 1999
Affirmation of Rule 41(b) Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute in Age Discrimination Case Introduction The case of John R. Knoll v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company and Lucent Technologies,...
Seizure of Property and Prosecutorial Immunity: Insights from Fox v. Van Oosterum

Seizure of Property and Prosecutorial Immunity: Insights from Fox v. Van Oosterum

Date: May 11, 1999
Seizure of Property and Prosecutorial Immunity: Insights from Fox v. Van Oosterum Introduction Fox v. Van Oosterum, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on May 10,...
Affirmation of Racial Discrimination Liability in Davine Alexander v. Local 496 and LIUNA

Affirmation of Racial Discrimination Liability in Davine Alexander v. Local 496 and LIUNA

Date: May 1, 1999
Affirmation of Racial Discrimination Liability in Davine Alexander v. Local 496 and LIUNA Introduction The case of Davine Alexander, et al. v. Local 496, Laborers' International Union of North...
Welch v. Burke (1999): Upholding AEDPA Standards in Federal Habeas Corpus Review

Welch v. Burke (1999): Upholding AEDPA Standards in Federal Habeas Corpus Review

Date: Apr 27, 1999
Welch v. Burke (1999): Upholding AEDPA Standards in Federal Habeas Corpus Review Introduction Welch v. Burke (1999) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States District Court for the Eastern...
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Employer Liability and Retaliation Standards in Coworker Sexual Harassment Cases

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Employer Liability and Retaliation Standards in Coworker Sexual Harassment Cases

Date: Apr 24, 1999
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Employer Liability and Retaliation Standards in Coworker Sexual Harassment Cases Introduction In Heather Fenton v. HiSAN, Inc., 174 F.3d 827 (6th Cir. 1999), the United States...
EEOC's Independent Enforcement Authority Overrules Individual Arbitration Agreements under Title VII

EEOC's Independent Enforcement Authority Overrules Individual Arbitration Agreements under Title VII

Date: Apr 24, 1999
EEOC's Independent Enforcement Authority Overrules Individual Arbitration Agreements under Title VII Introduction The case of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) v. Frank's Nursery Crafts,...
Affirmation of Reasonable Suspicion in Vehicle Stops: Houston v. Clark County Sheriff

Affirmation of Reasonable Suspicion in Vehicle Stops: Houston v. Clark County Sheriff

Date: Apr 24, 1999
Affirmation of Reasonable Suspicion in Vehicle Stops: Houston v. Clark County Sheriff Introduction Houston v. Clark County Sheriff is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Strengthening Standards for Granting Habeas Corpus Relief: An Analysis of Henry L. Hence, Jr. v. Smith

Strengthening Standards for Granting Habeas Corpus Relief: An Analysis of Henry L. Hence, Jr. v. Smith

Date: Apr 23, 1999
Strengthening Standards for Granting Habeas Corpus Relief: An Analysis of Henry L. Hence, Jr. v. Smith Introduction The case of Henry L. Hence, Jr. v. David Smith adjudicated in the United States...
Establishment Clause and Secularization of Public Holidays: Insights from Granzeier v. Middleton

Establishment Clause and Secularization of Public Holidays: Insights from Granzeier v. Middleton

Date: Apr 20, 1999
Establishment Clause and Secularization of Public Holidays: Insights from Granzeier v. Middleton Introduction In the landmark case of Granzeier v. Middleton, the United States Court of Appeals for...
Cherrywood Residents v. ODOT: Reversing Statute of Limitations Bar on Civil Rights Claims

Cherrywood Residents v. ODOT: Reversing Statute of Limitations Bar on Civil Rights Claims

Date: Apr 17, 1999
Cherrywood Residents v. ODOT: Reversing Statute of Limitations Bar on Civil Rights Claims Introduction In the landmark case Joyce Tolbert et al. v. State of Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT),...
Relation Back under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(c) in Section 1983 Claims: Analysis of Brown v. Shaner et al.

Relation Back under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(c) in Section 1983 Claims: Analysis of Brown v. Shaner et al.

Date: Apr 16, 1999
Relation Back under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(c) in Section 1983 Claims: Analysis of Brown v. Shaner et al. Introduction Brown v. Shaner et al., 172 F.3d 927 (6th Cir. 1999), is a...
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Eleventh Amendment Immunity in Corneal Removal Cases

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Eleventh Amendment Immunity in Corneal Removal Cases

Date: Apr 15, 1999
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Eleventh Amendment Immunity in Corneal Removal Cases Introduction The case of Deborah S. Brotherton v. Frank P. Cleveland, M.D.; Bethesda, Inc. addressed critical issues...
Turner Standard Validates Prison Regulations Restricting Inmate Religious Activities in Spies v. Voinovich

Turner Standard Validates Prison Regulations Restricting Inmate Religious Activities in Spies v. Voinovich

Date: Apr 15, 1999
Turner Standard Validates Prison Regulations Restricting Inmate Religious Activities in Spies v. Voinovich Introduction The case of Douglas Spies v. George V. Voinovich, et al., decided by the United...
Sixth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination Claim: Godfredson v. Hess Clark

Sixth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination Claim: Godfredson v. Hess Clark

Date: Apr 9, 1999
Sixth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination Claim: Godfredson v. Hess Clark Introduction The case of Fredrick P. Godfredson v. Hess Clark, Inc. revolves around allegations of age...
Discrimination Based on Association: Insights from Tetro v. Elliott Popham Pontiac

Discrimination Based on Association: Insights from Tetro v. Elliott Popham Pontiac

Date: Apr 7, 1999
Discrimination Based on Association: Insights from Tetro v. Elliott Popham Pontiac Introduction In the landmark case of Fred E. Tetro, Jr. v. Elliott Popham Pontiac, Oldsmobile, Buick, and GMC...
Re/Max v. Realty One & Smythe Cramer: Antitrust Implications of Adverse Commission Splits

Re/Max v. Realty One & Smythe Cramer: Antitrust Implications of Adverse Commission Splits

Date: Apr 7, 1999
Re/Max v. Realty One & Smythe Cramer: Antitrust Implications of Adverse Commission Splits Introduction The case of RE/MAX International, Inc. et al. v. REALTY ONE Limited Partnership, ZAMES REALTY,...
Super Sulky v. USTA: Sixth Circuit Affirms Judgment on Antitrust and Tortious Interference Claims

Super Sulky v. USTA: Sixth Circuit Affirms Judgment on Antitrust and Tortious Interference Claims

Date: Apr 7, 1999
Super Sulky v. USTA: Sixth Circuit Affirms Judgment on Antitrust and Tortious Interference Claims Introduction In the case of Super Sulky, Inc. v. United States Trotting Association (USTA), the...
Admissibility of Expert Testimony and Sentencing Guidelines in Telemarketing Fraud: U.S. v. Brawner

Admissibility of Expert Testimony and Sentencing Guidelines in Telemarketing Fraud: U.S. v. Brawner

Date: Apr 3, 1999
Admissibility of Expert Testimony and Sentencing Guidelines in Telemarketing Fraud: United States v. Brawner Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Steven D. Brawner, 173 F.3d 966...
Huron Memorial Hospital v. Krohn: Affirmative ERISA Fiduciary Duties to Inform and File Claims

Huron Memorial Hospital v. Krohn: Affirmative ERISA Fiduciary Duties to Inform and File Claims

Date: Apr 2, 1999
Huron Memorial Hospital v. Krohn: Affirmative ERISA Fiduciary Duties to Inform and File Claims Introduction The case of Margaret Krohn v. Huron Memorial Hospital represents a pivotal moment in the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert