Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Indispensable Party Doctrine Applied to Agent-Principal Relationships Under Rule 19: Soberay v. MRF Limited

Indispensable Party Doctrine Applied to Agent-Principal Relationships Under Rule 19: Soberay v. MRF Limited

Date: Jun 17, 1999
Indispensable Party Doctrine Applied to Agent-Principal Relationships Under Rule 19: Soberay v. MRF Limited Introduction In the landmark case of Soberay Machine Equipment Company v. MRF Limited, Inc....
Limitation of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) to In Forma Pauperis Proceedings: Analysis of Benson v. O'Brien

Limitation of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) to In Forma Pauperis Proceedings: Analysis of Benson v. O'Brien

Date: Jun 16, 1999
Limitation of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) to In Forma Pauperis Proceedings: Analysis of Benson v. O'Brien Introduction In Benson v. O'Brien et al., 179 F.3d 1014 (6th Cir. 1999), the United States Court...
Affirmation of Partial Unitary Status in School Desegregation: REED v. RHODES

Affirmation of Partial Unitary Status in School Desegregation: REED v. RHODES

Date: Jun 11, 1999
Affirmation of Partial Unitary Status in School Desegregation: REED v. RHODES Introduction REED v. RHODES is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on...
Sixth Circuit Establishes Clarifications on Removal Jurisdiction in Diversity Cases

Sixth Circuit Establishes Clarifications on Removal Jurisdiction in Diversity Cases

Date: Jun 11, 1999
Sixth Circuit Establishes Clarifications on Removal Jurisdiction in Diversity Cases Introduction The case of Jeffrey D. Brierly, Administrator of the Estate of Paul Brierly v. Alusuisse Flexible...
Qualified Immunity and the Applicability of ADA and Rehabilitation Act to Prisoners: Key v. Grayson

Qualified Immunity and the Applicability of ADA and Rehabilitation Act to Prisoners: Key v. Grayson

Date: Jun 10, 1999
Qualified Immunity and the Applicability of ADA and Rehabilitation Act to Prisoners: Key v. Grayson Introduction The case of David G. Key v. Henry Grayson, Warden et al. addresses a pivotal issue...
Limitation of Private Rights under the Fair Credit Reporting Act: Carney v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

Limitation of Private Rights under the Fair Credit Reporting Act: Carney v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

Date: Jun 10, 1999
Limitation of Private Rights under the Fair Credit Reporting Act: Carney v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Introduction The case of Chris R. Carney v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et...
Incorporation of Retroactive Pollution Exclusions in Excess Insurance Policies: GenCorp v. A.I.U. Insurance Company

Incorporation of Retroactive Pollution Exclusions in Excess Insurance Policies: GenCorp v. A.I.U. Insurance Company

Date: Jun 3, 1999
Incorporation of Retroactive Pollution Exclusions in Excess Insurance Policies: GenCorp v. A.I.U. Insurance Company Introduction GenCorp, Inc., a prominent corporation, initiated a declaratory...
Enhanced Interpretation of Statutory Damages under the Wiretapping Statute: Dorris v. Absher

Enhanced Interpretation of Statutory Damages under the Wiretapping Statute: Dorris v. Absher

Date: Jun 3, 1999
Enhanced Interpretation of Statutory Damages under the Wiretapping Statute: Dorris v. Absher Introduction Dorris et al. v. Absher et al. is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of...
Constructive Amendments and Effective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from Lucas v. O'Dea

Constructive Amendments and Effective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from Lucas v. O'Dea

Date: Jun 3, 1999
Constructive Amendments and Effective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from Lucas v. O'Dea Introduction Lucas v. O'Dea, 179 F.3d 412 (6th Cir. 1999), presents a pivotal appellate decision addressing...
Affirmation of Strict Standards in Federal Habeas Corpus Review: Prosecutorial Conduct and Evidence Preservation

Affirmation of Strict Standards in Federal Habeas Corpus Review: Prosecutorial Conduct and Evidence Preservation

Date: Jun 3, 1999
Affirmation of Strict Standards in Federal Habeas Corpus Review: Prosecutorial Conduct and Evidence Preservation Introduction TONY CALDWELL, the petitioner-appellant, a state prisoner convicted of...
Ensuring Evidentiary Hearings in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Arredondo v. United States Sets New Precedent

Ensuring Evidentiary Hearings in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Arredondo v. United States Sets New Precedent

Date: May 29, 1999
Ensuring Evidentiary Hearings in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Arredondo v. United States Sets New Precedent Introduction Ricardo Arredondo v. United States of America is a landmark...
Revised Procedures for In Forma Pauperis Appeals: Callihan v. Schneider and Fed.R.App.P. 24 Amendments

Revised Procedures for In Forma Pauperis Appeals: Callihan v. Schneider and Fed.R.App.P. 24 Amendments

Date: May 29, 1999
Revised Procedures for In Forma Pauperis Appeals: Callihan v. Schneider and Fed.R.App.P. 24 Amendments Introduction In the landmark case of Callihan v. Schneider (178 F.3d 800, 6th Cir. 1999), the...
Establishing Discrimination Standards in Employment Law: Jacklyn v. Schering-Plough

Establishing Discrimination Standards in Employment Law: Jacklyn v. Schering-Plough

Date: May 25, 1999
Establishing Discrimination Standards in Employment Law: Jacklyn v. Schering-Plough Introduction In Carol A. Jacklyn; Roger Jacklyn v. Schering-Plough Healthcare Products Sales Corporation, 176 F.3d...
Franchise Agreement Definition Under Michigan Law: Jerome-Duncan, Inc. v. Auto-By-Tel

Franchise Agreement Definition Under Michigan Law: Jerome-Duncan, Inc. v. Auto-By-Tel

Date: May 22, 1999
Franchise Agreement Definition Under Michigan Law: Jerome-Duncan, Inc. v. Auto-By-Tel Introduction The case of Jerome-Duncan, Inc. v. Auto-By-Tel adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Ensuring Juror Impartiality: Insights from United States v. Davis

Ensuring Juror Impartiality: Insights from United States v. Davis

Date: May 22, 1999
Ensuring Juror Impartiality: Insights from United States v. Davis Introduction United States of America v. Andre Lee Davis et al. (177 F.3d 552, Sixth Circuit, 1999) is a pivotal case that...
Individual Liability for Retaliation under the Rehabilitation Act: Wayne Hiler v. Jesse Brown

Individual Liability for Retaliation under the Rehabilitation Act: Wayne Hiler v. Jesse Brown

Date: May 21, 1999
Individual Liability for Retaliation under the Rehabilitation Act: Wayne Hiler v. Jesse Brown Introduction The case of Wayne Hiler v. Jesse Brown addresses a pivotal issue in employment...
Establishing Fraud and Breach of Contract in Life Insurance Misrepresentations: Greenberg & Rossmann v. Life Insurance Company of Virginia

Establishing Fraud and Breach of Contract in Life Insurance Misrepresentations: Greenberg & Rossmann v. Life Insurance Company of Virginia

Date: May 20, 1999
Establishing Fraud and Breach of Contract in Life Insurance Misrepresentations: Greenberg & Rossmann v. Life Insurance Company of Virginia Introduction In Greenberg and Rossmann v. The Life Insurance...
FERMCO v. Skalka: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Burden of Proof for Age Discrimination and Establishes Guidelines for Damages Calculation under ADEA

FERMCO v. Skalka: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Burden of Proof for Age Discrimination and Establishes Guidelines for Damages Calculation under ADEA

Date: May 20, 1999
FERMCO v. Skalka: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Burden of Proof for Age Discrimination and Establishes Guidelines for Damages Calculation under ADEA Introduction The case of FERMCO v. Skalka (178 F.3d 414)...
Affirmation of Procedural Defaults and Harmless Error in Habeas Corpus Reviews: Analysis of Cook v. Stegall

Affirmation of Procedural Defaults and Harmless Error in Habeas Corpus Reviews: Analysis of Cook v. Stegall

Date: May 19, 1999
Affirmation of Procedural Defaults and Harmless Error in Habeas Corpus Reviews: Analysis of Cook v. Stegall Introduction The case of John Curtis Cook v. Jimmy Stegall (56 F. Supp. 2d 788, United...
Access and Independent Creation in Copyright Infringement: Ellis v. Diffie

Access and Independent Creation in Copyright Infringement: Ellis v. Diffie

Date: May 18, 1999
Access and Independent Creation in Copyright Infringement: Ellis v. Diffie Introduction Everett A. Ellis, a self-employed carpenter and amateur songwriter, initiated legal action against Joe Diffie...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert