Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Rigorous Scrutiny of Prosecutorial Conduct: Boyle v. Million Establishes Enhanced Standards for Fair Trial Protections

Rigorous Scrutiny of Prosecutorial Conduct: Boyle v. Million Establishes Enhanced Standards for Fair Trial Protections

Date: Jan 8, 2000
Rigorous Scrutiny of Prosecutorial Conduct: Boyle v. Million Establishes Enhanced Standards for Fair Trial Protections Introduction The case of Cornelius D. Boyle v. George Million serves as a...
Extended Medical Leave Not Considered Reasonable Accommodation Under ADA: UPS v. Walsh

Extended Medical Leave Not Considered Reasonable Accommodation Under ADA: UPS v. Walsh

Date: Jan 7, 2000
Extended Medical Leave Not Considered Reasonable Accommodation Under ADA: UPS v. Walsh Introduction The case of Gary Walsh v. United Parcel Service (UPS) revolves around the termination of Gary...
Clarifying the Duty of Explanation in Arbitration Awards: Insights from DANIEL V. GREEN v. Ameritech

Clarifying the Duty of Explanation in Arbitration Awards: Insights from DANIEL V. GREEN v. Ameritech

Date: Jan 7, 2000
Clarifying the Duty of Explanation in Arbitration Awards: Insights from DANIEL V. GREEN v. Ameritech Introduction The case of Daniel V. Green, et al. v. Ameritech Corporation and Ameritech Services,...
RICO Sentencing Guidelines Reassessed: Downward Departure Factors in Tocco v. United States

RICO Sentencing Guidelines Reassessed: Downward Departure Factors in Tocco v. United States

Date: Jan 6, 2000
RICO Sentencing Guidelines Reassessed: Downward Departure Factors in Tocco v. United States Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Jack William Tocco, adjudicated by the...
Navigating Trade Dress Protection After Patent Expiration: Insights from Marketing Displays, Inc. v. TrafFix Devices, Inc.

Navigating Trade Dress Protection After Patent Expiration: Insights from Marketing Displays, Inc. v. TrafFix Devices, Inc.

Date: Dec 30, 1999
Navigating Trade Dress Protection After Patent Expiration: Insights from Marketing Displays, Inc. v. TrafFix Devices, Inc. Introduction The case of Marketing Displays, Incorporated (MDI) v. TrafFix...
State Remedies Must Include Federally Cognizable Claims to Toll AEDPA's One-Year Limitation: Austin v. Mitchell

State Remedies Must Include Federally Cognizable Claims to Toll AEDPA's One-Year Limitation: Austin v. Mitchell

Date: Dec 29, 1999
State Remedies Must Include Federally Cognizable Claims to Toll AEDPA's One-Year Limitation: Austin v. Mitchell Introduction Roy L. Austin, a prisoner from St. Clairsville, Ohio, serving a life...
Trustee's Right to Challenge Marital Property Transfers in Bankruptcy Proceedings

Trustee's Right to Challenge Marital Property Transfers in Bankruptcy Proceedings

Date: Dec 23, 1999
Trustee's Right to Challenge Marital Property Transfers in Bankruptcy Proceedings Introduction The case In re: Daniel Fordu, Debtor, Harold A. Corzin, Appellee, v. Julie A. Fordu, Appellant (201 F.3d...
Contract Formation and Liability Limitations: Insights from Dyno Construction Co. v. McWane, Inc.

Contract Formation and Liability Limitations: Insights from Dyno Construction Co. v. McWane, Inc.

Date: Dec 21, 1999
Contract Formation and Liability Limitations: Insights from Dyno Construction Co. v. McWane, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of Dyno Construction Company v. McWane, Inc., 198 F.3d 567 (6th...
Affirmation of Kickback Convictions under 18 U.S.C. § 666 Despite Procedural Challenges

Affirmation of Kickback Convictions under 18 U.S.C. § 666 Despite Procedural Challenges

Date: Dec 18, 1999
Affirmation of Kickback Convictions under 18 U.S.C. § 666 Despite Procedural Challenges Introduction The case of United States of America v. Frederick Dakota and Jerrold Polinsky (97-2256/2257)...
Enhancing Subpoena Compliance in Tax Litigation: AEP v. United States

Enhancing Subpoena Compliance in Tax Litigation: AEP v. United States

Date: Dec 18, 1999
Enhancing Subpoena Compliance in Tax Litigation: AEP v. United States Introduction The case of American Electric Power Company, Inc. (AEP) v. United States of America is a pivotal judicial decision...
Burden of Proof in Disability Claims: Insights from Yer Her v. Commissioner of Social Security

Burden of Proof in Disability Claims: Insights from Yer Her v. Commissioner of Social Security

Date: Dec 17, 1999
Burden of Proof in Disability Claims: Insights from Yer Her v. Commissioner of Social Security Introduction The case of Yer Her v. Commissioner of Social Security, decided by the United States Court...
Revisiting Harmless Error in Jury Instructions: The Stacey Barker Case

Revisiting Harmless Error in Jury Instructions: The Stacey Barker Case

Date: Dec 16, 1999
Revisiting Harmless Error in Jury Instructions: The Stacey Barker Case Introduction The case of Stacey Barker v. Joan Yukins addressed critical issues regarding jury instructions in self-defense...
Loral Defense Systems and Aircraft Braking Systems v. National Labor Relations Board: A New Precedent on Unilateral Health Plan Changes

Loral Defense Systems and Aircraft Braking Systems v. National Labor Relations Board: A New Precedent on Unilateral Health Plan Changes

Date: Dec 9, 1999
Loral Defense Systems and Aircraft Braking Systems v. National Labor Relations Board: A New Precedent on Unilateral Health Plan Changes Introduction The case of Loral Defense Systems-Akron, Division...
Enhancing Exhaustion Requirements under the Prison Litigation Reform Act: Insights from Hartsfield v. Vidor

Enhancing Exhaustion Requirements under the Prison Litigation Reform Act: Insights from Hartsfield v. Vidor

Date: Dec 4, 1999
Enhancing Exhaustion Requirements under the Prison Litigation Reform Act: Insights from Hartsfield v. Vidor Introduction Hartsfield v. Vidor, 199 F.3d 305 (6th Cir. 1999), is a pivotal case that...
Limiting the Scope of Pollution Exclusions in CGL Policies: Meridian Mutual Insurance Co. v. Kellman

Limiting the Scope of Pollution Exclusions in CGL Policies: Meridian Mutual Insurance Co. v. Kellman

Date: Dec 3, 1999
Limiting the Scope of Pollution Exclusions in CGL Policies: Meridian Mutual Insurance Co. v. Kellman Introduction Meridian Mutual Insurance Company v. Roslyn E. Kellman is a significant appellate...
Limits of Absolute Immunity for Prosecutorial Investigations: Prince v. Hicks

Limits of Absolute Immunity for Prosecutorial Investigations: Prince v. Hicks

Date: Dec 3, 1999
Limits of Absolute Immunity for Prosecutorial Investigations: Prince v. Hicks Introduction The case of Sharon A. Prince v. Jan Hicks et al. revolves around allegations of constitutional violations...
Defining "Debt Collectors" Under FDCPA: Sixth Circuit Affirms in Schroyer v. Frankel

Defining "Debt Collectors" Under FDCPA: Sixth Circuit Affirms in Schroyer v. Frankel

Date: Dec 3, 1999
Defining "Debt Collectors" Under FDCPA: Sixth Circuit Affirms in Schroyer v. Frankel Introduction The case of Michael G. Schroyer; Gail R. Schroyer v. Kenneth P. Frankel; Gerald M. Smith Company,...
Employer's Fitness-for-Duty Examinations Do Not Constitute Disability Perception Under ADA: Sullivan v. River Valley School District

Employer's Fitness-for-Duty Examinations Do Not Constitute Disability Perception Under ADA: Sullivan v. River Valley School District

Date: Nov 30, 1999
Employer's Fitness-for-Duty Examinations Do Not Constitute Disability Perception Under ADA: Sullivan v. River Valley School District Introduction In the landmark case of Sullivan v. River Valley...
Affirmation of § 922(g)(8) Constitutionality in U.S. v. Baker

Affirmation of § 922(g)(8) Constitutionality in U.S. v. Baker

Date: Nov 24, 1999
Affirmation of § 922(g)(8) Constitutionality in United States v. Baker Introduction In United States v. Baker, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals addressed pivotal issues surrounding firearm...
Reaffirmation of Non-Dischargeability of Willfully Evaded Tax Debts under 11 U.S.C §523(a)(1)(C)

Reaffirmation of Non-Dischargeability of Willfully Evaded Tax Debts under 11 U.S.C §523(a)(1)(C)

Date: Nov 18, 1999
Reaffirmation of Non-Dischargeability of Willfully Evaded Tax Debts under 11 U.S.C §523(a)(1)(C) Introduction The case of In re Terrance J. Meyers addresses the critical issue of the dischargeability...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert