Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Shelby County Health Care Corporation v. Southern Council of Industrial Workers Health and Welfare Trust Fund: Establishing Timeliness Standards for ERISA Claims Involving Third-Party Liability

Shelby County Health Care Corporation v. Southern Council of Industrial Workers Health and Welfare Trust Fund: Establishing Timeliness Standards for ERISA Claims Involving Third-Party Liability

Date: Feb 16, 2000
Shelby County Health Care Corporation v. Southern Council of Industrial Workers Health and Welfare Trust Fund: Establishing Timeliness Standards for ERISA Claims Involving Third-Party Liability...
Clarifying Prisoner Retaliation Standards: Herron v. Harrison and the Thaddeus-X Precedent

Clarifying Prisoner Retaliation Standards: Herron v. Harrison and the Thaddeus-X Precedent

Date: Feb 15, 2000
Clarifying Prisoner Retaliation Standards: Herron v. Harrison and the Thaddeus-X Precedent Introduction The case of Issac LydeLL Herron v. Jimmy Harrison et al. (203 F.3d 410) adjudicated by the...
Abuse of Discretion in Denial to Amend a Complaint: Sixth Circuit Sets Precedent in Insurance Bad Faith Litigation

Abuse of Discretion in Denial to Amend a Complaint: Sixth Circuit Sets Precedent in Insurance Bad Faith Litigation

Date: Feb 15, 2000
Abuse of Discretion in Denial to Amend a Complaint: Sixth Circuit Sets Precedent in Insurance Bad Faith Litigation Introduction The case of Allen W. Rose v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company...
Hostile Work Environment Thresholds Affirmed in Burnett v. Tyco Corporation and Grinnell Corporation

Hostile Work Environment Thresholds Affirmed in Burnett v. Tyco Corporation and Grinnell Corporation

Date: Feb 12, 2000
Hostile Work Environment Thresholds Affirmed in Burnett v. Tyco Corporation and Grinnell Corporation Introduction In the case of Jenny Burnett v. Tyco Corporation and Grinnell Corporation, the United...
Absolute Immunity and Qualified Immunity in Cooper v. Parrish: A New Precedent

Absolute Immunity and Qualified Immunity in Cooper v. Parrish: A New Precedent

Date: Feb 10, 2000
Absolute Immunity and Qualified Immunity in Cooper v. Parrish: A New Precedent Introduction Cooper et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants vs. Parrish et al., Defendants-Appellees is a landmark case...
Elrod/Branti Exception Not Applicable to Jailer Positions: Sixth Circuit's Decision in Sowards v. Loudon County

Elrod/Branti Exception Not Applicable to Jailer Positions: Sixth Circuit's Decision in Sowards v. Loudon County

Date: Feb 9, 2000
Elrod/Branti Exception Not Applicable to Jailer Positions: Sixth Circuit's Decision in Sowards v. Loudon County Introduction In the landmark case of Sowards v. Loudon County, Tennessee, the United...
Memphis in May Not a State Actor: Sixth Circuit Establishes Boundaries for First Amendment Claims Against Private Entities

Memphis in May Not a State Actor: Sixth Circuit Establishes Boundaries for First Amendment Claims Against Private Entities

Date: Feb 5, 2000
Memphis in May Not a State Actor: Sixth Circuit Establishes Boundaries for First Amendment Claims Against Private Entities Introduction The case of Kenneth D. Lansing v. City of Memphis; Memphis Park...
Court Rules Paducah's Licensing Ordinance as Unconstitutional Prior Restraint Due to Insufficient Procedural Safeguards

Court Rules Paducah's Licensing Ordinance as Unconstitutional Prior Restraint Due to Insufficient Procedural Safeguards

Date: Feb 3, 2000
Court Rules Paducah's Licensing Ordinance as Unconstitutional Prior Restraint Due to Insufficient Procedural Safeguards Introduction In the case of Nightclubs, Inc. v. City of Paducah, the United...
Enhanced Interpretation of Pre-Existing Condition Exclusions under ERISA

Enhanced Interpretation of Pre-Existing Condition Exclusions under ERISA

Date: Feb 2, 2000
Enhanced Interpretation of Pre-Existing Condition Exclusions under ERISA Introduction In the landmark case University Hospitals of Cleveland v. Emerson Electric Company, the United States Court of...
Ruby Harris v. General Motors: Clarifying the Application of the Physical Facts Rule in Summary Judgment

Ruby Harris v. General Motors: Clarifying the Application of the Physical Facts Rule in Summary Judgment

Date: Feb 1, 2000
Ruby Harris v. General Motors: Clarifying the Application of the Physical Facts Rule in Summary Judgment Introduction In Ruby Harris v. General Motors Corporation, 201 F.3d 800 (6th Cir. 2000), the...
Effective Assistance of Counsel During Application for Reopening: White v. Schotten

Effective Assistance of Counsel During Application for Reopening: White v. Schotten

Date: Jan 27, 2000
Effective Assistance of Counsel During Application for Reopening: White v. Schotten Introduction In White v. Schotten (201 F.3d 743, 2000), the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit...
Establishing Retaliatory Harassment as Actionable Under Title VII: Analysis of Morris v. Oldham County Fiscal Court

Establishing Retaliatory Harassment as Actionable Under Title VII: Analysis of Morris v. Oldham County Fiscal Court

Date: Jan 21, 2000
Establishing Retaliatory Harassment as Actionable Under Title VII: Analysis of Morris v. Oldham County Fiscal Court Introduction Case: Judy G. Morris v. Oldham County Fiscal Court; John W. Black,...
Dual Representation and Sixth Amendment Rights: Insights from United States v. Hall Brothers

Dual Representation and Sixth Amendment Rights: Insights from United States v. Hall Brothers

Date: Jan 20, 2000
Dual Representation and Sixth Amendment Rights: Insights from United States v. Hall Brothers Introduction The case United States of America v. Stanley Hall and Rex Hall (200 F.3d 962, 2000) presents...
Clarifying Apportionment of Fault in Multidefendant Toxic Tort Cases: Barnes and Beckmann v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation

Clarifying Apportionment of Fault in Multidefendant Toxic Tort Cases: Barnes and Beckmann v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation

Date: Jan 19, 2000
Clarifying Apportionment of Fault in Multidefendant Toxic Tort Cases: Barnes and Beckmann v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation Introduction The case of Debbie Rogers Barnes, Lisa Bean, John Edward...
Clarifying Enhancements Under USSG § 3B1.1(c) and Restitution Procedures Under MVRA: Insights from United States v. Vandeberg

Clarifying Enhancements Under USSG § 3B1.1(c) and Restitution Procedures Under MVRA: Insights from United States v. Vandeberg

Date: Jan 15, 2000
Clarifying Enhancements Under USSG § 3B1.1(c) and Restitution Procedures Under MVRA: Insights from United States v. Vandeberg Introduction The appellate decision in United States of America v. Jesse...
Clarifying Federal Question Jurisdiction in Wrongful Discharge Claims: Long v. Bando Manufacturing

Clarifying Federal Question Jurisdiction in Wrongful Discharge Claims: Long v. Bando Manufacturing

Date: Jan 14, 2000
Clarifying Federal Question Jurisdiction in Wrongful Discharge Claims: Long v. Bando Manufacturing Introduction The case of Benjamin Craig Long v. Bando Manufacturing of America, Inc. serves as a...
Sufficiency of Evidence and Capital Specifications in Aggravated Murder: Johnson v. Coyle (6th Cir. 2000)

Sufficiency of Evidence and Capital Specifications in Aggravated Murder: Johnson v. Coyle (6th Cir. 2000)

Date: Jan 13, 2000
Sufficiency of Evidence and Capital Specifications in Aggravated Murder: Johnson v. Coyle (6th Cir. 2000) Introduction Michael Jeffrey Johnson was convicted by an Ohio state-court jury for two counts...
Enhancing Estate Representative Standing and Defining Substantive Due Process in Section 1983 Actions: Claybrook v. Birchwell et al. (199 F.3d 350)

Enhancing Estate Representative Standing and Defining Substantive Due Process in Section 1983 Actions: Claybrook v. Birchwell et al. (199 F.3d 350)

Date: Jan 12, 2000
Enhancing Estate Representative Standing and Defining Substantive Due Process in Section 1983 Actions: Claybrook v. Birchwell et al. (199 F.3d 350) Introduction In the landmark case of Claybrook v....
Limits of Ancillary Jurisdiction in Diversity Cases: Caudill v. North American Media Corp

Limits of Ancillary Jurisdiction in Diversity Cases: Caudill v. North American Media Corp

Date: Jan 11, 2000
Limits of Ancillary Jurisdiction in Diversity Cases: Caudill v. North American Media Corp Introduction Caudill v. North American Media Corporation, 200 F.3d 914 (6th Cir. 2000), is a seminal case...
Affirmation of Conviction under Double Jeopardy Protections in Robert Dale Murr v. United States

Affirmation of Conviction under Double Jeopardy Protections in Robert Dale Murr v. United States

Date: Jan 8, 2000
Affirmation of Conviction under Double Jeopardy Protections in Robert Dale Murr v. United States Introduction The case of Robert Dale Murr, Petitioner-Appellant, v. United States of America,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert