Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Reversing Attorney Fees Awards in Civil Rights Litigation: Insights from Lindell v. Riddle

Reversing Attorney Fees Awards in Civil Rights Litigation: Insights from Lindell v. Riddle

Date: Sep 26, 2001
Reversing Attorney Fees Awards in Civil Rights Litigation: Insights from Lindell v. Riddle Introduction In the landmark case Lindell v. Riddle, decided on September 25, 2001, by the United States...
Same-Sex Sexual Harassment as Sex Discrimination Under Title VII: EEOC v. Harbert-Yeargin, Inc.

Same-Sex Sexual Harassment as Sex Discrimination Under Title VII: EEOC v. Harbert-Yeargin, Inc.

Date: Sep 22, 2001
Same-Sex Sexual Harassment as Sex Discrimination Under Title VII: EEOC v. Harbert-Yeargin, Inc. Introduction The case Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC),...
Affirmation of Rooker/Feldman Abstention and England Reservation in Rezoning Takings Litigation

Affirmation of Rooker/Feldman Abstention and England Reservation in Rezoning Takings Litigation

Date: Sep 22, 2001
Affirmation of Rooker/Feldman Abstention and England Reservation in Rezoning Takings Litigation Introduction The case of Russell T. Anderson v. Charter Township of Ypsilanti (266 F.3d 487, 2001)...
Affirmation of Habeas Denial in Capital Murder Case: Stanford v. Parker

Affirmation of Habeas Denial in Capital Murder Case: Stanford v. Parker

Date: Sep 21, 2001
Affirmation of Habeas Denial in Capital Murder Case: Stanford v. Parker Introduction Stanford v. Parker, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on September 20, 2001, is...
Determining Disability Under the ADA: Sixth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Swanson v. University of Cincinnati

Determining Disability Under the ADA: Sixth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Swanson v. University of Cincinnati

Date: Sep 21, 2001
Determining Disability Under the ADA: Sixth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Swanson v. University of Cincinnati Introduction The case of John D. Swanson, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant versus...
Defining Deliberate Indifference in Prison Medical Care: LeMarbe v. Wisneski and the Scope of Qualified Immunity

Defining Deliberate Indifference in Prison Medical Care: LeMarbe v. Wisneski and the Scope of Qualified Immunity

Date: Sep 20, 2001
Defining Deliberate Indifference in Prison Medical Care: LeMarbe v. Wisneski and the Scope of Qualified Immunity Introduction The case of Richard LeMarbe v. Jerome J. Wisneski, decided by the United...
Affirmation of Conviction: Establishing 'In Furtherance' in Firearm Possession for Drug Offenses

Affirmation of Conviction: Establishing 'In Furtherance' in Firearm Possession for Drug Offenses

Date: Sep 13, 2001
Affirmation of Conviction: Establishing 'In Furtherance' in Firearm Possession for Drug Offenses Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Pierre S. Mackey, 265 F.3d 457 (6th Cir....
Procedural Default and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Analysis of Jacobs v. Mohr

Procedural Default and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Analysis of Jacobs v. Mohr

Date: Sep 11, 2001
Procedural Default and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Analysis of Jacobs v. Mohr, 265 F.3d 407 (6th Cir. 2001) Introduction Earl Ralph Jacobs, convicted in Ohio for first-degree murder linked to...
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Failure to Suppress Illegally Obtained Evidence Under the Sixth Amendment

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Failure to Suppress Illegally Obtained Evidence Under the Sixth Amendment

Date: Sep 8, 2001
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Failure to Suppress Illegally Obtained Evidence Under the Sixth Amendment Introduction The case of Charles Northrop v. David Trippett delves deep into the critical...
Sanford J. BERGER v. CITY OF MAYFIELD HEIGHTS: Establishing Precedent on §1988 Attorney's Fees

Sanford J. BERGER v. CITY OF MAYFIELD HEIGHTS: Establishing Precedent on §1988 Attorney's Fees

Date: Sep 8, 2001
Sanford J. BERGER v. CITY OF MAYFIELD HEIGHTS: Establishing Precedent on §1988 Attorney's Fees Introduction In the case of Sanford J. BERGER v. CITY OF MAYFIELD HEIGHTS, 265 F.3d 399 (6th Cir. 2001),...
Title VII Retaliation and Supervisor Liability: Little v. BP Exploration Oil Co.

Title VII Retaliation and Supervisor Liability: Little v. BP Exploration Oil Co.

Date: Sep 7, 2001
Title VII Retaliation and Supervisor Liability: Little v. BP Exploration Oil Co. Introduction Robert Little v. BP Exploration Oil Company is a significant appellate decision from the United States...
Procedural Default and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel under AEDPA: An Analysis of Paul W. Greer v. Warden Mitchell

Procedural Default and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel under AEDPA: An Analysis of Paul W. Greer v. Warden Mitchell

Date: Sep 5, 2001
Procedural Default and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel under AEDPA: An Analysis of Paul W. Greer v. Warden Mitchell Introduction The case Paul W. Greer v. Betty Mitchell, Warden, adjudicated by the...
Clarifying Evidentiary Standards for Gender Discrimination Claims: Gray v. Toshiba

Clarifying Evidentiary Standards for Gender Discrimination Claims: Gray v. Toshiba

Date: Aug 31, 2001
Clarifying Evidentiary Standards for Gender Discrimination Claims: Gray v. Toshiba Introduction The case Connie D. Gray v. Toshiba America Consumer Products, Inc., adjudicated by the United States...
Examination of Eyewitness Identification Reliability and Sentencing Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c): United States v. Peter K. Langan

Examination of Eyewitness Identification Reliability and Sentencing Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c): United States v. Peter K. Langan

Date: Aug 31, 2001
Examination of Eyewitness Identification Reliability and Sentencing Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c): United States v. Peter K. Langan Introduction The case of United States of America v. Peter Kevin Langan...
Derivative Work Registration and State Law Preemption: Insights from Murray Hill Publications, Inc. v. ABC Communications, Inc.

Derivative Work Registration and State Law Preemption: Insights from Murray Hill Publications, Inc. v. ABC Communications, Inc.

Date: Aug 31, 2001
Derivative Work Registration and State Law Preemption: Insights from Murray Hill Publications, Inc. v. ABC Communications, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of Murray Hill Publications, Inc., a...
Smith v. United States: Affirming Standings and Reasonable Suspicion in Rental Vehicle Searches

Smith v. United States: Affirming Standings and Reasonable Suspicion in Rental Vehicle Searches

Date: Aug 30, 2001
Smith v. United States: Affirming Standings and Reasonable Suspicion in Rental Vehicle Searches Introduction In United States v. Steven Eugene Smith, 263 F.3d 571 (6th Cir. 2001), the United States...
Associational Standing and Mootness in Employment Discrimination: NAACP v. City of Parma

Associational Standing and Mootness in Employment Discrimination: NAACP v. City of Parma

Date: Aug 29, 2001
Associational Standing and Mootness in Employment Discrimination: NAACP v. City of Parma Introduction In the case of Cleveland Branch, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v....
Magana v. Hofbauer: Affirming a 'Reasonable Probability' Standard for Prejudice in Ineffective Assistance Claims under Habeas Corpus

Magana v. Hofbauer: Affirming a 'Reasonable Probability' Standard for Prejudice in Ineffective Assistance Claims under Habeas Corpus

Date: Aug 29, 2001
Magana v. Hofbauer: Affirming a 'Reasonable Probability' Standard for Prejudice in Ineffective Assistance Claims under Habeas Corpus Introduction In Richard Magana v. Gerald Hofbauer, 263 F.3d 542...
Judicial Immunity Affirmed Despite Excessive Authority in Sixth Circuit

Judicial Immunity Affirmed Despite Excessive Authority in Sixth Circuit

Date: Aug 25, 2001
Judicial Immunity Affirmed Despite Excessive Authority in Sixth Circuit Introduction The case of Stephen M. Stern and Christopher D. Becker v. John J. Mascio (262 F.3d 600) presents a pivotal...
Sanford v. Harvard Industries: De Novo Review for Unauthorized Benefit Denials Under ERISA

Sanford v. Harvard Industries: De Novo Review for Unauthorized Benefit Denials Under ERISA

Date: Aug 25, 2001
Sanford v. Harvard Industries: De Novo Review for Unauthorized Benefit Denials Under ERISA Introduction Sanford v. Harvard Industries is a significant appellate case adjudicated by the United States...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert