Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Establishing Secondary Meaning in Trade Dress Claims and Recognizing Post-Mortem Right of Publicity in Herman Miller v. Palazzetti

Establishing Secondary Meaning in Trade Dress Claims and Recognizing Post-Mortem Right of Publicity in Herman Miller v. Palazzetti

Date: Oct 23, 2001
Establishing Secondary Meaning in Trade Dress Claims and Recognizing Post-Mortem Right of Publicity in Herman Miller, Inc. v. Palazzetti Imports and Exports, Inc. Introduction The case of Herman...
Priority of Bankruptcy Claims Established in In re Autostyle Plastics, Inc.

Priority of Bankruptcy Claims Established in In re Autostyle Plastics, Inc.

Date: Oct 23, 2001
Priority of Bankruptcy Claims Established in In re Autostyle Plastics, Inc. Introduction The case of In re Autostyle Plastics, Inc., Debtor. Bayer Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MascoTech,...
Exogamy Rule Upheld: Vaughn v. Lawrenceburg Power System Sets New Standards for Employment Policies and Retaliatory Discharge Claims

Exogamy Rule Upheld: Vaughn v. Lawrenceburg Power System Sets New Standards for Employment Policies and Retaliatory Discharge Claims

Date: Oct 20, 2001
Exogamy Rule Upheld: Vaughn v. Lawrenceburg Power System Sets New Standards for Employment Policies and Retaliatory Discharge Claims Introduction In the landmark case Keith Vaughn; Jennifer Vaughn,...
Affirmation of USPC Jurisdiction Over Special Parole for Deported Aliens in Urbina v. Thoms

Affirmation of USPC Jurisdiction Over Special Parole for Deported Aliens in Urbina v. Thoms

Date: Oct 18, 2001
Affirmation of USPC Jurisdiction Over Special Parole for Deported Aliens in Urbina v. Thoms Introduction Benjamin Urbina, a deported alien, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus against...
Classification of Executive and Administrative Employees Under the FLSA: Insights from Ale v. Tennessee Valley Authority

Classification of Executive and Administrative Employees Under the FLSA: Insights from Ale v. Tennessee Valley Authority

Date: Oct 18, 2001
Classification of Executive and Administrative Employees Under the FLSA: Insights from Ale v. Tennessee Valley Authority Introduction In the landmark case of Stephen A. Ale, et al. v. Tennessee...
Affirming Procedural Default: Terry L. Peveler v. United States

Affirming Procedural Default: Terry L. Peveler v. United States

Date: Oct 18, 2001
Affirming Procedural Default: Terry L. Peveler v. United States Introduction Terry L. Peveler v. United States of America, 269 F.3d 693 (6th Cir. 2001), is a pivotal case addressing the procedural...
Tindall v. Wayne County: Strengthening the Boundaries of Younger Abstention Doctrine

Tindall v. Wayne County: Strengthening the Boundaries of Younger Abstention Doctrine

Date: Oct 16, 2001
Tindall v. Wayne County: Strengthening the Boundaries of Younger Abstention Doctrine Introduction The case of Michael E. Tindall v. Wayne County Friend of the Court et al. adjudicated by the United...
Establishing the Boundaries of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from Hinkle v. Randle

Establishing the Boundaries of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from Hinkle v. Randle

Date: Oct 12, 2001
Establishing the Boundaries of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from Hinkle v. Randle Introduction The case of James H. Hinkle v. Michael Randle, Warden, adjudicated by the United States...
Enhancing Confrontation Rights: Admissibility of Videotaped Depositions in Brumley v. Wingard

Enhancing Confrontation Rights: Admissibility of Videotaped Depositions in Brumley v. Wingard

Date: Oct 12, 2001
Enhancing Confrontation Rights: Admissibility of Videotaped Depositions in Brumley v. Wingard Introduction The case of Brumley v. Wingard, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Affirmation of Counsel's Juror Retention Strategy: Miller v. Francis Sets Precedent on Strickland Application

Affirmation of Counsel's Juror Retention Strategy: Miller v. Francis Sets Precedent on Strickland Application

Date: Oct 12, 2001
Affirmation of Counsel's Juror Retention Strategy: Miller v. Francis Sets Precedent on Strickland Application Introduction The case of Henry C. Miller v. Rod Francis, adjudicated by the United States...
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: COLEMAN v. MITCHELL Analysis

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: COLEMAN v. MITCHELL Analysis

Date: Oct 11, 2001
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: COLEMAN v. MITCHELL Analysis Introduction The case of Alton Coleman v. Betty Mitchell, Warden (268 F.3d 417) presents a pivotal judicial...
Allocation of Burden of Proof and Material Breach in SBA Loan Guaranty Agreements: Insights from First Tennessee Bank v. Barreto

Allocation of Burden of Proof and Material Breach in SBA Loan Guaranty Agreements: Insights from First Tennessee Bank v. Barreto

Date: Oct 10, 2001
Allocation of Burden of Proof and Material Breach in SBA Loan Guaranty Agreements: Insights from First Tennessee Bank v. Barreto Introduction The case of First Tennessee Bank National Association v....
Enhancements in Collateral Relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255: Weinberger v. United States

Enhancements in Collateral Relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255: Weinberger v. United States

Date: Oct 6, 2001
Enhancements in Collateral Relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255: Weinberger v. United States Introduction Barrett N. Weinberger, a disbarred attorney, faced a significant federal indictment in 1997 for...
Aiding and Abetting Suicide: Comprehensive Analysis of Mitzel v. Tate

Aiding and Abetting Suicide: Comprehensive Analysis of Mitzel v. Tate

Date: Oct 6, 2001
Aiding and Abetting Suicide: Comprehensive Analysis of Mitzel v. Tate Introduction The case of Robert Mitzel v. Arthur Tate, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on...
Reaffirming the Strict Voluntariness Standard for Rule 41(a)(1)(i) Dismissals: Warfield v. AlliedSignal

Reaffirming the Strict Voluntariness Standard for Rule 41(a)(1)(i) Dismissals: Warfield v. AlliedSignal

Date: Oct 6, 2001
Reaffirming the Strict Voluntariness Standard for Rule 41(a)(1)(i) Dismissals: Warfield v. AlliedSignal Introduction In Warfield v. AlliedSignal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Vienna Convention Consular Rights Not Enforceable Individually in Federal Courts – United States v. Emuegbunam

Vienna Convention Consular Rights Not Enforceable Individually in Federal Courts – United States v. Emuegbunam

Date: Oct 6, 2001
Vienna Convention Consular Rights Not Enforceable Individually in Federal Courts – United States v. Emuegbunam Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Chucks Emuegbunam, adjudicated...
Enforceability of Arbitration Clauses in Consumer Loan Agreements: Analysis of Be v. rly BURDEN, et al.

Enforceability of Arbitration Clauses in Consumer Loan Agreements: Analysis of Be v. rly BURDEN, et al.

Date: Oct 2, 2001
Enforceability of Arbitration Clauses in Consumer Loan Agreements: Analysis of Be v. rly BURDEN, et al., 267 F.3d 483 (6th Cir. 2001) Introduction The case Be v. rly BURDEN, et al., decided by the...
Actual Innocence Exception to AEDPA's One-Year Statute of Limitations Established in Holloway v. Jones

Actual Innocence Exception to AEDPA's One-Year Statute of Limitations Established in Holloway v. Jones

Date: Sep 29, 2001
Actual Innocence Exception to AEDPA's One-Year Statute of Limitations Established in Holloway v. Jones Introduction Spencer Tracy Holloway, the petitioner, was convicted in 1986 of first-degree...
Establishing the Requirements for a Hostile Work Environment in Racial Discrimination Cases: Newman v. Federal Express

Establishing the Requirements for a Hostile Work Environment in Racial Discrimination Cases: Newman v. Federal Express

Date: Sep 28, 2001
Establishing the Requirements for a Hostile Work Environment in Racial Discrimination Cases: Newman v. Federal Express Introduction The case of Robert Newman v. Federal Express Corporation, decided...
Implied Covenants Do Not Apply to Flat-Rate Oil and Gas Leases: Analysis of Hayes v. Equitable Production

Implied Covenants Do Not Apply to Flat-Rate Oil and Gas Leases: Analysis of Hayes v. Equitable Production

Date: Sep 27, 2001
Implied Covenants Do Not Apply to Flat-Rate Oil and Gas Leases: Analysis of Hayes v. Equitable Production Introduction The case of Margaret Hayes, Administratrix of Louisa Hoover and Melvin Hoover v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert