Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in ERISA §510 and Age Discrimination: Majewski v. ADP

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in ERISA §510 and Age Discrimination: Majewski v. ADP

Date: Dec 22, 2001
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in ERISA §510 and Age Discrimination: Majewski v. ADP Introduction In the case of Ronald C. Majewski v. Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP), adjudicated by the...
Establishing the Threshold for Mental Retardation in Disability Claims: Foster v. Halter

Establishing the Threshold for Mental Retardation in Disability Claims: Foster v. Halter

Date: Dec 21, 2001
Establishing the Threshold for Mental Retardation in Disability Claims: Foster v. Halter Introduction In the case of Theresa E. Foster v. William A. Halter, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Conviction and Sentencing Enhancement in United States v. Randy Graham

Affirmation of Conviction and Sentencing Enhancement in United States v. Randy Graham

Date: Dec 18, 2001
Affirmation of Conviction and Sentencing Enhancement in United States v. Randy Graham Introduction United States of America v. Randy Graham, 275 F.3d 490 (6th Cir. 2001), is a significant appellate...
Strict Enforcement of Fee Disclosure Requirements in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Insights from In re Kisseberth v. Henderson

Strict Enforcement of Fee Disclosure Requirements in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Insights from In re Kisseberth v. Henderson

Date: Dec 13, 2001
Strict Enforcement of Fee Disclosure Requirements in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Insights from In re Kisseberth v. Henderson Introduction The case of In re William Kyle Kisseberth and Ekaterina...
Deliberate Indifference in Prisoner Suicide Prevention: Sixth Circuit's Landmark Decision in Comstock v. McCrary et al.

Deliberate Indifference in Prisoner Suicide Prevention: Sixth Circuit's Landmark Decision in Comstock v. McCrary et al.

Date: Dec 13, 2001
Deliberate Indifference in Prisoner Suicide Prevention: Sixth Circuit's Landmark Decision in Comstock v. McCrary et al. Introduction In the significant appellate case of Carolyn Comstock v. Norris...
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Deliberate Indifference Standard in §1983 Medical Negligence Claims

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Deliberate Indifference Standard in §1983 Medical Negligence Claims

Date: Dec 12, 2001
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Deliberate Indifference Standard in §1983 Medical Negligence Claims Introduction The case of Lily V. Watkins, Personal Representative v. for the Estate of Ralph L. Watkins,...
Enforceability of Aspirational Language in Educational Contracts: Ullmo v. Gilmour Academy

Enforceability of Aspirational Language in Educational Contracts: Ullmo v. Gilmour Academy

Date: Dec 8, 2001
Enforceability of Aspirational Language in Educational Contracts Ullmo v. Gilmour Academy, 273 F.3d 671 (6th Cir. 2001) Introduction The case of Thomas Ullmo, Jacqueline Ullmo, and Jason Ullmo, by...
Prompt Judicial Review and Overbroad Definitions: Sixth Circuit's Decision in Deja Vu of Nashville, Inc. v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville

Prompt Judicial Review and Overbroad Definitions: Sixth Circuit's Decision in Deja Vu of Nashville, Inc. v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville

Date: Dec 7, 2001
Prompt Judicial Review and Overbroad Definitions: Sixth Circuit's Decision in Deja Vu of Nashville, Inc. v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville Introduction The case of Deja Vu of Nashville, Inc.,...
Judicial Impartiality and Recusal in Death Penalty Cases: Buell v. Mitchell

Judicial Impartiality and Recusal in Death Penalty Cases: Buell v. Mitchell

Date: Dec 5, 2001
Judicial Impartiality and Recusal in Death Penalty Cases: Buell v. Mitchell Introduction Robert A. Buell v. Betty Mitchell, 274 F.3d 337 (6th Cir. 2001), is a pivotal case that addresses the...
Sixth Circuit Mandates Consideration of Amended Complaints in Securities Fraud Cases: Bovee v. Coopers Lybrand

Sixth Circuit Mandates Consideration of Amended Complaints in Securities Fraud Cases: Bovee v. Coopers Lybrand

Date: Nov 22, 2001
Sixth Circuit Mandates Consideration of Amended Complaints in Securities Fraud Cases: Bovee v. Coopers Lybrand Introduction In the landmark decision of Bovee v. Coopers Lybrand, the United States...
Temporal Proximity Insufficient for Pretext in FMLA Retaliation: Skrjanc v. Great Lakes Power Service Company

Temporal Proximity Insufficient for Pretext in FMLA Retaliation: Skrjanc v. Great Lakes Power Service Company

Date: Nov 15, 2001
Temporal Proximity Insufficient for Pretext in FMLA Retaliation: Skrjanc v. Great Lakes Power Service Company Introduction Michael Skrjanc filed a lawsuit against his former employer, Great Lakes...
Reaffirming the Confrontation Clause: Use of Voluntary Videotaped Depositions in Criminal Trials - Cal v. Bailey

Reaffirming the Confrontation Clause: Use of Voluntary Videotaped Depositions in Criminal Trials - Cal v. Bailey

Date: Nov 14, 2001
Reaffirming the Confrontation Clause: Use of Voluntary Videotaped Depositions in Criminal Trials - Cal v. Bailey Introduction Calvin Bailey, the petitioner-appellant, challenged the denial of his...
Protecting Teachers' First Amendment Rights: Sixth Circuit in Cockrel v. Shelby County

Protecting Teachers' First Amendment Rights: Sixth Circuit in Cockrel v. Shelby County

Date: Nov 10, 2001
Protecting Teachers' First Amendment Rights: Sixth Circuit in Cockrel v. Shelby County Introduction In Donna Cockrel v. Shelby County School District, 270 F.3d 1036 (6th Cir. 2001), the United States...
Establishing Jurisdiction for Enforcing Settlement Agreements: Insights from RE/MAX International, Inc. v. Realty One, Inc.

Establishing Jurisdiction for Enforcing Settlement Agreements: Insights from RE/MAX International, Inc. v. Realty One, Inc.

Date: Nov 10, 2001
Establishing Jurisdiction for Enforcing Settlement Agreements: Insights from RE/MAX International, Inc. v. Realty One, Inc. Introduction The case of RE/MAX International, Inc. v. Realty One, Inc....
Clarifying Pleading Requirements for §1983 Claims: MOORE v. CITY OF HARRIMAN

Clarifying Pleading Requirements for §1983 Claims: MOORE v. CITY OF HARRIMAN

Date: Nov 9, 2001
Clarifying Pleading Requirements for §1983 Claims: MOORE v. CITY OF HARRIMAN Introduction In the landmark case of Ralph Moore, Jr. v. City of Harriman, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Absolute Immunity in Child Custody Proceedings: Analyzing Tra v. RIPPY

Absolute Immunity in Child Custody Proceedings: Analyzing Tra v. RIPPY

Date: Nov 3, 2001
Absolute Immunity in Child Custody Proceedings: Analyzing Tra v. RIPPY Introduction Tra v. RIPPY, 270 F.3d 416 (6th Cir. 2001), addresses critical issues surrounding the application of absolute and...
6th Circuit Holds Labor Department's 'Hot Goods' Action Against Bankruptcy Trustee Falls Outside Police Power Exception

6th Circuit Holds Labor Department's 'Hot Goods' Action Against Bankruptcy Trustee Falls Outside Police Power Exception

Date: Nov 1, 2001
6th Circuit Holds Labor Department's 'Hot Goods' Action Against Bankruptcy Trustee Falls Outside Police Power Exception Introduction In Elaine Chao, Secretary of Labor, v. Hospital Staffing Services,...
Setoff Rights in Bankruptcy: In re Gordon Sel-Way, Inc.

Setoff Rights in Bankruptcy: In re Gordon Sel-Way, Inc.

Date: Oct 27, 2001
Setoff Rights in Bankruptcy: In re Gordon Sel-Way, Inc. Introduction The case of In re Gordon Sel-Way, Inc. involves intricate issues concerning setoff rights within the framework of bankruptcy law....
Clarifying Qualified Immunity Standards for Eighth Amendment Violations in Correctional Settings

Clarifying Qualified Immunity Standards for Eighth Amendment Violations in Correctional Settings

Date: Oct 27, 2001
Clarifying Qualified Immunity Standards for Eighth Amendment Violations in Correctional Settings Introduction The case of Edward H. Flint, Individually as Father, Next of Kin, Administrator, and...
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Defendants Through Purposeful Communications: Neal v. Janssen

Establishing Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Defendants Through Purposeful Communications: Neal v. Janssen

Date: Oct 24, 2001
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Defendants Through Purposeful Communications: Neal v. Janssen Introduction Neal v. Janssen, 270 F.3d 328 (6th Cir. 2001), is a pivotal case that...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert