Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Clarifying the Dual Offenses under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c): Insights from United States v. Leon Combs

Clarifying the Dual Offenses under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c): Insights from United States v. Leon Combs

Date: Jun 5, 2004
Clarifying the Dual Offenses under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c): Insights from United States v. Leon Combs Introduction United States v. Leon Combs is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Enforcement of Plea Agreements and Sentence Enhancements: Analysis of United States v. Swanberg & Tuimala

Enforcement of Plea Agreements and Sentence Enhancements: Analysis of United States v. Swanberg & Tuimala

Date: Jun 4, 2004
Enforcement of Plea Agreements and Sentence Enhancements: Analysis of United States v. Swanberg & Tuimala Introduction The case of United States of America v. Craig Alan Swanberg and Adam Elwin...
JGR v. Thomasville Furniture: Standards for Lay versus Expert Testimony in Contract Breach Cases

JGR v. Thomasville Furniture: Standards for Lay versus Expert Testimony in Contract Breach Cases

Date: Jun 4, 2004
JGR v. Thomasville Furniture: Standards for Lay versus Expert Testimony in Contract Breach Cases Introduction The case of JGR, Inc. v. Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc. represents a pivotal...
Reversing Garmon Preemption: Establishing Employee Standing under RICO in Wage-related Disputes

Reversing Garmon Preemption: Establishing Employee Standing under RICO in Wage-related Disputes

Date: Jun 4, 2004
Reversing Garmon Preemption: Establishing Employee Standing under RICO in Wage-related Disputes Introduction In the landmark case of Birda Trollinger et al. v. Tyson Foods, Inc. (370 F.3d 602),...
ERISA §510 Discrimination Protection Clarified in Coomer v. Bethesda Hospital

ERISA §510 Discrimination Protection Clarified in Coomer v. Bethesda Hospital

Date: Jun 2, 2004
ERISA §510 Discrimination Protection Clarified in Coomer v. Bethesda Hospital Introduction In the appellate decision Glenn A. Coomer et al. v. Bethesda Hospital, Inc. et al., the United States Court...
Affirming Employer's Discretion in Terminating Disruptive Speech and Ensuring Due Process: Farhat v. Jopke

Affirming Employer's Discretion in Terminating Disruptive Speech and Ensuring Due Process: Farhat v. Jopke

Date: May 29, 2004
Affirming Employer's Discretion in Terminating Disruptive Speech and Ensuring Due Process: Farhat v. Jopke Introduction In Kenneth Farhat v. Janet Jopke, 370 F.3d 580 (6th Cir. 2004), the United...
Honda of America Manufacturing, Inc. v. Bacon and Harden: Class Certification Standards in Employment Discrimination

Honda of America Manufacturing, Inc. v. Bacon and Harden: Class Certification Standards in Employment Discrimination

Date: May 28, 2004
Honda of America Manufacturing, Inc. v. Bacon and Harden: Class Certification Standards in Employment Discrimination Introduction In the case of Marc E. Bacon and Terry Harden v. Honda of America...
Zayed v. United States: Judicial Review Limitations Under 8 U.S.C. §1429

Zayed v. United States: Judicial Review Limitations Under 8 U.S.C. §1429

Date: May 25, 2004
Zayed v. United States: Judicial Review Limitations Under 8 U.S.C. §1429 Introduction Zayed Zayed v. United States of America, 368 F.3d 902 (6th Cir. 2004), is a pivotal case that addresses the...
Limitation of Rule 36 in Correcting Sentencing Orders: Insights from UNITED STATES v. Robinson

Limitation of Rule 36 in Correcting Sentencing Orders: Insights from UNITED STATES v. Robinson

Date: May 22, 2004
Limitation of Rule 36 in Correcting Sentencing Orders: Insights from UNITED STATES v. Robinson Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. Sterling Robinson, 368 F.3d 653 (6th Cir....
Qualified Immunity and Appellate Jurisdiction: Sixth Circuit Sets Precedent in Summers v. Leis

Qualified Immunity and Appellate Jurisdiction: Sixth Circuit Sets Precedent in Summers v. Leis

Date: May 22, 2004
Qualified Immunity and Appellate Jurisdiction: Sixth Circuit Sets Precedent in Summers v. Leis Introduction Terry Summers, a Cincinnati resident, initiated a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C....
Affirmed: Constitutionality of Vehicle Impoundment and Civil Forfeiture under Michigan’s Nuisance Abatement Laws

Affirmed: Constitutionality of Vehicle Impoundment and Civil Forfeiture under Michigan’s Nuisance Abatement Laws

Date: May 20, 2004
Affirmed: Constitutionality of Vehicle Impoundment and Civil Forfeiture under Michigan’s Nuisance Abatement Laws Introduction In the case of John ROSS, et al. v. Michael DUGGAN, et al. (402 F.3d...
Webb v. Commissioner of Social Security: Clarifying the Scope of Hypothetical Questions for Vocational Experts in Supplemental Security Income Claims

Webb v. Commissioner of Social Security: Clarifying the Scope of Hypothetical Questions for Vocational Experts in Supplemental Security Income Claims

Date: May 20, 2004
Webb v. Commissioner of Social Security: Clarifying the Scope of Hypothetical Questions for Vocational Experts in Supplemental Security Income Claims Introduction In Debbie Webb v. Commissioner of...
Essential Alibi Awareness and the Scope of Brady Obligations: The Sixth Circuit's Decision in Spirko v. Mitchell

Essential Alibi Awareness and the Scope of Brady Obligations: The Sixth Circuit's Decision in Spirko v. Mitchell

Date: May 18, 2004
Essential Alibi Awareness and the Scope of Brady Obligations: The Sixth Circuit's Decision in Spirko v. Mitchell Introduction The case of John G. Spirko, Jr. v. Betty Mitchell (368 F.3d 603, 6th Cir....
Affirmation of Felon-in-Possession Conviction Without Specific Unanimity Instructions and No Violation of the Speedy Trial Act

Affirmation of Felon-in-Possession Conviction Without Specific Unanimity Instructions and No Violation of the Speedy Trial Act

Date: May 14, 2004
Affirmation of Felon-in-Possession Conviction Without Specific Unanimity Instructions and No Violation of the Speedy Trial Act Introduction In United States of America v. Anthony DeJOHN and...
Mitochondrial DNA Admissibility and Batson Standards in United States v. Beverly et al.

Mitochondrial DNA Admissibility and Batson Standards in United States v. Beverly et al.

Date: May 13, 2004
Mitochondrial DNA Admissibility and Batson Standards in United States v. Beverly et al. 1. Introduction United States v. Beverly, Crockett, and Turns (369 F.3d 516) is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Bigelow v. Williams: Reinforcing Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Alibi Defenses

Bigelow v. Williams: Reinforcing Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Alibi Defenses

Date: May 11, 2004
Bigelow v. Williams: Reinforcing Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Alibi Defenses Introduction Bigelow v. Williams is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Establishing Constitutional Boundaries in Prison Fire Safety: E v. Rett Hadix, et al.

Establishing Constitutional Boundaries in Prison Fire Safety: E v. Rett Hadix, et al.

Date: May 7, 2004
Establishing Constitutional Boundaries in Prison Fire Safety: E v. Rett HADIX, et al. (367 F.3d 513) Introduction The case of Everett Hadix, et al. v. Perry M. Johnson, et al. is a landmark decision...
Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements in Employment Contracts Affirmed: Cooper v. MRM Investment Company

Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements in Employment Contracts Affirmed: Cooper v. MRM Investment Company

Date: May 4, 2004
Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements in Employment Contracts Affirmed: Cooper v. MRM Investment Company Introduction The case of Tonya Cooper v. MRM Investment Company addresses the...
Denaturalization Affirmed for Illicit Procurement of Citizenship via Nazi Camp Service: United States v. John Demjanjuk

Denaturalization Affirmed for Illicit Procurement of Citizenship via Nazi Camp Service: United States v. John Demjanjuk

Date: May 1, 2004
Denaturalization Affirmed for Illicit Procurement of Citizenship via Nazi Camp Service: United States v. John Demjanjuk Introduction The case of United States of America v. John Demjanjuk revolves...
Bonilla v. Hurley: Procedural Default and Federal Habeas Corpus Review

Bonilla v. Hurley: Procedural Default and Federal Habeas Corpus Review

Date: Apr 28, 2004
Bonilla v. Hurley: Procedural Default and Federal Habeas Corpus Review Introduction Eduardo Bonilla, an Ohio prisoner, pursued a writ of habeas corpus following his conviction on multiple charges,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert