Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Strickland Standard in Cumulative Ineffective Assistance Claims: Millender v. Adams

Affirmation of Strickland Standard in Cumulative Ineffective Assistance Claims: Millender v. Adams

Date: Jul 16, 2004
Affirmation of Strickland Standard in Cumulative Ineffective Assistance Claims: Millender v. Adams Introduction The case of Trenton Millender v. Stanley Adams (376 F.3d 520, 6th Cir. 2004) represents...
Denial of Reasonable Accommodations Constitutes Constructive Discharge Under the Rehabilitation Act: Sixth Circuit

Denial of Reasonable Accommodations Constitutes Constructive Discharge Under the Rehabilitation Act: Sixth Circuit

Date: Jul 16, 2004
Denial of Reasonable Accommodations Constitutes Constructive Discharge Under the Rehabilitation Act: Sixth Circuit Introduction In the case of Mary Christine Smith v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster...
Enhanced Due Process Standards for Public Employees Under 42 U.S.C. §1983: Insights from Mitchell v. Fankhauser

Enhanced Due Process Standards for Public Employees Under 42 U.S.C. §1983: Insights from Mitchell v. Fankhauser

Date: Jul 15, 2004
Enhanced Due Process Standards for Public Employees Under 42 U.S.C. §1983: Insights from Mitchell v. Fankhauser Introduction Mitchell v. Fankhauser is a pivotal case decided by the United States...
Revisiting Attorney Fee Eligibility Under the Equal Access to Justice Act: Howard v. Barnhart

Revisiting Attorney Fee Eligibility Under the Equal Access to Justice Act: Howard v. Barnhart

Date: Jul 13, 2004
Revisiting Attorney Fee Eligibility Under the Equal Access to Justice Act: Howard v. Barnhart Introduction The case of Jimmie L. Howard, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Knox v. Neaton Auto Products Manufacturing: Implications for Gender Discrimination and Workplace Harassment Claims

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Knox v. Neaton Auto Products Manufacturing: Implications for Gender Discrimination and Workplace Harassment Claims

Date: Jul 10, 2004
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Knox v. Neaton Auto Products Manufacturing: Implications for Gender Discrimination and Workplace Harassment Claims Introduction The case of Jayne Knox,...
Clinkscale v. Carter: Reinforcing the Requirement for Timely Alibi Notifications Under the Sixth Amendment

Clinkscale v. Carter: Reinforcing the Requirement for Timely Alibi Notifications Under the Sixth Amendment

Date: Jul 9, 2004
Clinkscale v. Carter: Reinforcing the Requirement for Timely Alibi Notifications Under the Sixth Amendment Introduction Clinkscale v. Carter is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of...
Residual Functional Capacity and Credibility Determinations in Disability Claims: The Warner v. Commissioner of Social Security Judgment

Residual Functional Capacity and Credibility Determinations in Disability Claims: The Warner v. Commissioner of Social Security Judgment

Date: Jul 9, 2004
Residual Functional Capacity and Credibility Determinations in Disability Claims: The Warner v. Commissioner of Social Security Judgment Introduction In the landmark case of Gary Warner v....
Procedural Default Standards in Ineffective Assistance Claims: Hargrave-Thomas v. Yukins

Procedural Default Standards in Ineffective Assistance Claims: Hargrave-Thomas v. Yukins

Date: Jul 7, 2004
Procedural Default Standards in Ineffective Assistance Claims: Hargrave-Thomas v. Yukins Introduction Hargrave-Thomas v. Yukins, 374 F.3d 383 (6th Cir. 2004) is a pivotal case in the realm of federal...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in AutoZone v. Tandy: No Likelihood of Confusion or Dilution Found in Disparate Retail Trademarks

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in AutoZone v. Tandy: No Likelihood of Confusion or Dilution Found in Disparate Retail Trademarks

Date: Jun 30, 2004
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in AutoZone v. Tandy: No Likelihood of Confusion or Dilution Found in Disparate Retail Trademarks Introduction The case of AutoZone, Inc. and Speedbar, Inc. v. Tandy...
Limits on Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction in Insurance Indemnity Cases: Insights from BITUMINOUS CASUALTY CORP. v. J L Lumber Co.

Limits on Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction in Insurance Indemnity Cases: Insights from BITUMINOUS CASUALTY CORP. v. J L Lumber Co.

Date: Jun 30, 2004
Limits on Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction in Insurance Indemnity Cases: Insights from Bituminous Casualty Corporation v. J L Lumber Company, Inc. Introduction Bituminous Casualty Corporation v. J L...
Reaffirming the Standards for Knowing and Intelligent Jury Waivers in Capital Cases: Sowell v. Bradshaw

Reaffirming the Standards for Knowing and Intelligent Jury Waivers in Capital Cases: Sowell v. Bradshaw

Date: Jun 24, 2004
Reaffirming the Standards for Knowing and Intelligent Jury Waivers in Capital Cases: Sowell v. Bradshaw Introduction Billy Joe Sowell appealed his death sentence in the case of Sowell v. Bradshaw,...
Hillcrest Training School Denied Sovereign Immunity: A Comprehensive Legal Analysis

Hillcrest Training School Denied Sovereign Immunity: A Comprehensive Legal Analysis

Date: Jun 23, 2004
Hillcrest Training School Denied Sovereign Immunity: A Comprehensive Legal Analysis Introduction S.J., a former resident of Hillcrest Training School, filed a lawsuit against Hamilton County, Ohio,...
Geier v. Sundquist: Reevaluating Lodestar and Johnson Factors in 42 U.S.C. §1988 Attorney Fee Determinations

Geier v. Sundquist: Reevaluating Lodestar and Johnson Factors in 42 U.S.C. §1988 Attorney Fee Determinations

Date: Jun 19, 2004
Geier v. Sundquist: Reevaluating Lodestar and Johnson Factors in 42 U.S.C. §1988 Attorney Fee Determinations Introduction The case of Geier v. Sundquist, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Strict Enforcement of Statute of Limitations in Copyright Infringement: Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Diamond Time, Ltd.

Strict Enforcement of Statute of Limitations in Copyright Infringement: Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Diamond Time, Ltd.

Date: Jun 19, 2004
Strict Enforcement of Statute of Limitations in Copyright Infringement: Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Diamond Time, Ltd. Introduction In the landmark case Bridgeport Music, Inc.; Westbound Records, Inc.,...
Procedural Safeguards for Government Objections in Sentencing Departures: United States v. Bostic

Procedural Safeguards for Government Objections in Sentencing Departures: United States v. Bostic

Date: Jun 18, 2004
Procedural Safeguards for Government Objections in Sentencing Departures: United States v. Bostic Introduction United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Henry A. Bostic, Defendant-Appellee...
Glancy v. Taubman Centers: Indispensable Party Doctrine Reinforced in Shareholder Litigation

Glancy v. Taubman Centers: Indispensable Party Doctrine Reinforced in Shareholder Litigation

Date: Jun 17, 2004
Glancy v. Taubman Centers: Indispensable Party Doctrine Reinforced in Shareholder Litigation Introduction The case of Lionel Z. Glancy v. Taubman Centers, Inc. examines the application of the Federal...
Affirmation of Stalking and Harassment Convictions: United States v. Bowker

Affirmation of Stalking and Harassment Convictions: United States v. Bowker

Date: Jun 12, 2004
Affirmation of Stalking and Harassment Convictions: United States v. Bowker Introduction In United States v. Erik Bowker (372 F.3d 365), the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit...
Affirmation of Denial of Habeas Corpus: Ralph Baze, Jr. v. Philip Parker

Affirmation of Denial of Habeas Corpus: Ralph Baze, Jr. v. Philip Parker

Date: Jun 10, 2004
Affirmation of Denial of Habeas Corpus: Ralph Baze, Jr. v. Philip Parker Introduction In the landmark case of Ralph Stephens Baze, Jr. v. Philip Parker, decided on June 9, 2004, by the United States...
Establishment Clause Reinforced: Rhea County School Board's Religious Instruction Program Invalidated

Establishment Clause Reinforced: Rhea County School Board's Religious Instruction Program Invalidated

Date: Jun 8, 2004
Establishment Clause Reinforced: Rhea County School Board's Religious Instruction Program Invalidated Introduction In the landmark case of Doe v. Porter, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Affirmation of Probable Cause and Due Process Standards for School Officials in Juvenile Arrests: Williams v. Cambridge Board of Education

Affirmation of Probable Cause and Due Process Standards for School Officials in Juvenile Arrests: Williams v. Cambridge Board of Education

Date: Jun 5, 2004
Affirmation of Probable Cause and Due Process Standards for School Officials in Juvenile Arrests: Williams v. Cambridge Board of Education Introduction In the wake of the tragic Columbine High School...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert