Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Sixth Circuit Reaffirms First Amendment Protections in Retaliatory Arrest Case

Sixth Circuit Reaffirms First Amendment Protections in Retaliatory Arrest Case

Date: Feb 3, 2007
Sixth Circuit Reaffirms First Amendment Protections in Retaliatory Arrest Case Introduction In the landmark case Thomas Leonard v. Stephen Robinson, decided on February 2, 2007, the United States...
Reaffirming Federal Probable Cause Standards and Limiting State Law Influence in §1983 Claims: Analysis of Wilson v. Knox County

Reaffirming Federal Probable Cause Standards and Limiting State Law Influence in §1983 Claims: Analysis of Wilson v. Knox County

Date: Feb 2, 2007
Reaffirming Federal Probable Cause Standards and Limiting State Law Influence in §1983 Claims: Analysis of Wilson v. Knox County Introduction Wilson v. Knox County, 477 F.3d 326 (6th Cir. 2007), is a...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Bench Signs v. City of Canton: Implications for §1983 and Tortious Interference Claims

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Bench Signs v. City of Canton: Implications for §1983 and Tortious Interference Claims

Date: Feb 2, 2007
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Bench Signs v. City of Canton: Implications for §1983 and Tortious Interference Claims Introduction The case of Bench Signs Unlimited, Inc. v. City of Canton (221...
Affirmation of Waiver and Protective Sweep Standards in United States v. Stover & Hinton

Affirmation of Waiver and Protective Sweep Standards in United States v. Stover & Hinton

Date: Jan 31, 2007
Affirmation of Waiver and Protective Sweep Standards in United States v. Stover & Hinton Introduction United States of America v. Bart Stover and Timothy Hinton (474 F.3d 904, 6th Cir. 2007) is a...
Good Reason and Veil-Piercing Liability: Insights from Servo Kinetics v. Moog

Good Reason and Veil-Piercing Liability: Insights from Servo Kinetics v. Moog

Date: Jan 31, 2007
Good Reason and Veil-Piercing Liability: Insights from Servo Kinetics v. Moog Introduction Servo Kinetics, Inc. ("SKI") entered into a five-year exclusive distribution agreement with Tokyo Precision...
Mitigating Evidence Consideration in Resentencing: Davis v. Coyle

Mitigating Evidence Consideration in Resentencing: Davis v. Coyle

Date: Jan 30, 2007
Mitigating Evidence Consideration in Resentencing: Davis v. Coyle Introduction Von Clark Davis v. Ralph Coyle, 475 F.3d 761 (6th Cir. 2007), is a pivotal case that addresses the rights of capital...
Enforcement of Arbitration Awards within Collective Bargaining Agreements: Insights from MFR v. SEIU Local 517M

Enforcement of Arbitration Awards within Collective Bargaining Agreements: Insights from MFR v. SEIU Local 517M

Date: Jan 27, 2007
Enforcement of Arbitration Awards within Collective Bargaining Agreements: Insights from MFR v. SEIU Local 517M Introduction The case of Michigan Family Resources, Inc. (MFR) v. Service Employees...
Qualified Immunity in First Amendment Retaliation: Analysis of Da v. Haynes

Qualified Immunity in First Amendment Retaliation: Analysis of Da v. Haynes

Date: Jan 26, 2007
Qualified Immunity in First Amendment Retaliation: Analysis of Da v. Haynes Introduction Da v. H. Haynes, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on January 25, 2007,...
Affirmation of Convictions in United States v. Hal M. Atchley: Strengthening Standards for Exigent Circumstances in Drug Manufacturing Cases

Affirmation of Convictions in United States v. Hal M. Atchley: Strengthening Standards for Exigent Circumstances in Drug Manufacturing Cases

Date: Jan 24, 2007
Affirmation of Convictions in United States v. Hal M. Atchley: Strengthening Standards for Exigent Circumstances in Drug Manufacturing Cases Introduction United States v. Hal M. Atchley is a pivotal...
Reinforcing the Duty of ALJs in Evaluating Medical Evidence for Unrepresented Claimants: D'Angelo v. SSA

Reinforcing the Duty of ALJs in Evaluating Medical Evidence for Unrepresented Claimants: D'Angelo v. SSA

Date: Jan 23, 2007
Reinforcing the Duty of Administrative Law Judges in Evaluating Medical Evidence for Unrepresented Claimants: D'Angelo v. SSA Introduction In the landmark case of David D'Angelo v. Commissioner of...
Reaffirming Rooker-Feldman Doctrine and Res Judicata in SCFRA Pension Benefit Conversion Cases: Abbott v. State of Michigan

Reaffirming Rooker-Feldman Doctrine and Res Judicata in SCFRA Pension Benefit Conversion Cases: Abbott v. State of Michigan

Date: Jan 23, 2007
Reaffirming Rooker-Feldman Doctrine and Res Judicata in SCFRA Pension Benefit Conversion Cases: Abbott v. State of Michigan Introduction In the landmark case of Abbott et al. v. State of Michigan et...
Establishing Limits on Rule 60(b)(6) Relief in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Insights from Stokes v. Williams

Establishing Limits on Rule 60(b)(6) Relief in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Insights from Stokes v. Williams

Date: Jan 20, 2007
Establishing Limits on Rule 60(b)(6) Relief in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Insights from Stokes v. Williams Introduction Frank L. Stokes v. Jessie Williams, Warden is a significant appellate decision...
Affirmation of Jury Verdict in Age Discrimination Case: Standards for Judgment as a Matter of Law

Affirmation of Jury Verdict in Age Discrimination Case: Standards for Judgment as a Matter of Law

Date: Jan 19, 2007
Affirmation of Jury Verdict in Age Discrimination Case: Standards for Judgment as a Matter of Law Introduction In Patricia Burlin Tuttle v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County,...
Admissibility Standards for Prior Incident Reports and Expert Testimony in Common Carrier Negligence Cases

Admissibility Standards for Prior Incident Reports and Expert Testimony in Common Carrier Negligence Cases

Date: Jan 19, 2007
Admissibility Standards for Prior Incident Reports and Expert Testimony in Common Carrier Negligence Cases 1. Introduction The case of Sharon Surles v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., decided by the United...
Affirming Non-Critical Stage Status of Consolidation Hearings under the Sixth Amendment

Affirming Non-Critical Stage Status of Consolidation Hearings under the Sixth Amendment

Date: Jan 17, 2007
Affirming Non-Critical Stage Status of Consolidation Hearings under the Sixth Amendment Introduction The case of Roeur Van v. Kurt Jones, Warden explores the boundaries of the Sixth Amendment's...
Affirmation of Effective Assistance of Counsel Standards in Capital Cases: Benge v. Johnson

Affirmation of Effective Assistance of Counsel Standards in Capital Cases: Benge v. Johnson

Date: Jan 17, 2007
Affirmation of Effective Assistance of Counsel Standards in Capital Cases: Benge v. Johnson Introduction In the landmark case of Michael W. Benge v. David Johnson, decided on January 16, 2007, by the...
Affirmation that Dismissal is an Inappropriate Remedy for Speedy Trial Act Violations in United States v. Jackson

Affirmation that Dismissal is an Inappropriate Remedy for Speedy Trial Act Violations in United States v. Jackson

Date: Jan 13, 2007
Affirmation that Dismissal is an Inappropriate Remedy for Speedy Trial Act Violations in United States v. Jackson Introduction United States v. Charles J. Jackson, 473 F.3d 660 (6th Cir. 2007), is a...
Reversing Summary Judgment: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Standards for Use of Vascular Neck Restraints under Qualified Immunity

Reversing Summary Judgment: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Standards for Use of Vascular Neck Restraints under Qualified Immunity

Date: Jan 11, 2007
Reversing Summary Judgment: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Standards for Use of Vascular Neck Restraints under Qualified Immunity Introduction The case of Liler Razor Griffith, Personal Representative of...
Confrontation Clause and Sentencing Under Booker: Insights from United States v. Mooneyham

Confrontation Clause and Sentencing Under Booker: Insights from United States v. Mooneyham

Date: Jan 10, 2007
Confrontation Clause and Sentencing Under Booker: Insights from United States v. Mooneyham Introduction United States v. George Mooneyham is a significant appellate case decided by the United States...
Affirmation of Sentencing Guidelines as Advisory in Illegal Re-entry and Supervised Release Violations

Affirmation of Sentencing Guidelines as Advisory in Illegal Re-entry and Supervised Release Violations

Date: Jan 6, 2007
Affirmation of Sentencing Guidelines as Advisory in Illegal Re-entry and Supervised Release Violations Introduction The case of United States of America v. Rogelio Perez-Arellano, adjudicated by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert