Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Proper §1983 Mandates: Defendant Identification and Municipal Liability Standards

Affirmation of Proper §1983 Mandates: Defendant Identification and Municipal Liability Standards

Date: Mar 7, 2007
Affirmation of Proper §1983 Mandates: Defendant Identification and Municipal Liability Standards Introduction The case of Sherman Petty v. County of Franklin, Ohio, et al. (478 F.3d 341, Sixth...
Corrigan v. United States Steel and Kobe Steel: Upholding Ohio’s Standards for Piercing the Corporate Veil in Employment Discrimination and Benefit Claims

Corrigan v. United States Steel and Kobe Steel: Upholding Ohio’s Standards for Piercing the Corporate Veil in Employment Discrimination and Benefit Claims

Date: Mar 6, 2007
Corrigan v. United States Steel and Kobe Steel: Upholding Ohio’s Standards for Piercing the Corporate Veil in Employment Discrimination and Benefit Claims Introduction In the landmark case James T....
Affirmation of Substantial Downward Departure for Extraordinary Family Circumstances Under U.S.S.G. §5H1.6 in United States v. Husein

Affirmation of Substantial Downward Departure for Extraordinary Family Circumstances Under U.S.S.G. §5H1.6 in United States v. Husein

Date: Mar 3, 2007
Affirmation of Substantial Downward Departure for Extraordinary Family Circumstances Under U.S.S.G. §5H1.6 in United States v. Husein Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Fadya...
Sixth Circuit Affirms Strict Compliance with Title III: No Good-Faith Exception for Wiretap Warrants

Sixth Circuit Affirms Strict Compliance with Title III: No Good-Faith Exception for Wiretap Warrants

Date: Mar 3, 2007
Sixth Circuit Affirms Strict Compliance with Title III: No Good-Faith Exception for Wiretap Warrants Introduction In United States of America v. Reginald Shantez Rice et al., the United States Court...
Accrual Date for § 1983 Method-of-Execution Claims: Insights from Cooley v. Strickland

Accrual Date for § 1983 Method-of-Execution Claims: Insights from Cooley v. Strickland

Date: Mar 3, 2007
Accrual Date for § 1983 Method-of-Execution Claims: Insights from Cooley v. Strickland Introduction In the landmark case Richard Wade Cooley, II v. Ted Strickland, the United States Court of Appeals...
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Limitations on Delegating Compensatory Education Remedies to IEP Teams Under IDEA

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Limitations on Delegating Compensatory Education Remedies to IEP Teams Under IDEA

Date: Mar 3, 2007
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Limitations on Delegating Compensatory Education Remedies to IEP Teams Under IDEA Introduction The case of Board of Education of Fayette County, Kentucky v. L.M. addresses...
Affirmation of State Tax Incidence on Non-Tribal Tobacco Sales: Keweenaw Bay Indian Community v. Rising et al.

Affirmation of State Tax Incidence on Non-Tribal Tobacco Sales: Keweenaw Bay Indian Community v. Rising et al.

Date: Mar 1, 2007
Affirmation of State Tax Incidence on Non-Tribal Tobacco Sales: Keweenaw Bay Indian Community v. Rising et al. Introduction The case of Keweenaw Bay Indian Community v. Jay Rising; Harrold Reid;...
Functional Availability Doctrine Affirmed in Secondary-Line Price Discrimination under Robinson-Patman Act

Functional Availability Doctrine Affirmed in Secondary-Line Price Discrimination under Robinson-Patman Act

Date: Feb 28, 2007
Functional Availability Doctrine Affirmed in Secondary-Line Price Discrimination under Robinson-Patman Act Introduction In the landmark case Smith Wholesale Company et al. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco...
Affirmation of Burford Abstention in ADRIAN ENERGY ASSOCIATES v. MICHIGAN PSC: Implications for Federal Declaratory Judgments in State-Regulated Energy Contracts

Affirmation of Burford Abstention in ADRIAN ENERGY ASSOCIATES v. MICHIGAN PSC: Implications for Federal Declaratory Judgments in State-Regulated Energy Contracts

Date: Feb 27, 2007
Affirmation of Burford Abstention in ADRIAN ENERGY ASSOCIATES v. MICHIGAN PSC: Implications for Federal Declaratory Judgments in State-Regulated Energy Contracts Introduction Adrian Energy...
Strict Adherence to Procedural Requirements in Motions to Reopen and Reconsider: Alizoti v. Gonzales

Strict Adherence to Procedural Requirements in Motions to Reopen and Reconsider: Alizoti v. Gonzales

Date: Feb 27, 2007
Strict Adherence to Procedural Requirements in Motions to Reopen and Reconsider: Alizoti v. Gonzales Introduction The case of Selma Alizoti v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States...
Reaffirming Separate Claims under ERISA: The Gore v. El Paso Decision

Reaffirming Separate Claims under ERISA: The Gore v. El Paso Decision

Date: Feb 24, 2007
Reaffirming Separate Claims under ERISA: The Gore v. El Paso Decision Introduction In the landmark case John T. Gore, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. El Paso Energy Corporation Long Term Disability Plan and...
State-Action Immunity under the Sherman Act: Limitations in Public Record Reproduction Practices

State-Action Immunity under the Sherman Act: Limitations in Public Record Reproduction Practices

Date: Feb 23, 2007
State-Action Immunity under the Sherman Act: Limitations in Public Record Reproduction Practices Introduction In the landmark case of First American Title Company v. Various County Registers of...
Affirmation of Dress Code Enforcement in Public Schools under First Amendment: Brogdon v. LAFON

Affirmation of Dress Code Enforcement in Public Schools under First Amendment: Brogdon v. LAFON

Date: Feb 22, 2007
Affirmation of Dress Code Enforcement in Public Schools under First Amendment: Brogdon v. LAFON Introduction Brogdon v. LAFON is a landmark appellate case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Civil Rights Retaliation Claim

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Civil Rights Retaliation Claim

Date: Feb 21, 2007
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Civil Rights Retaliation Claim Introduction The case of Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. City of Springboro et al. (477 F.3d 807, Sixth Circuit, 2007)...
Establishing Renewal Copyright Ownership: Insights from Roger Miller Music, Inc. v. Sony/ATV Publishing, LLC

Establishing Renewal Copyright Ownership: Insights from Roger Miller Music, Inc. v. Sony/ATV Publishing, LLC

Date: Feb 14, 2007
Establishing Renewal Copyright Ownership: Insights from Roger Miller Music, Inc. v. Sony/ATV Publishing, LLC Introduction The case of Roger Miller Music, Inc., and Mary A. Miller versus Sony/ATV...
GenCorp v. Olin Corporation: Establishing the Requirement for a Civil Action Under CERCLA §113(f)(1)

GenCorp v. Olin Corporation: Establishing the Requirement for a Civil Action Under CERCLA §113(f)(1)

Date: Feb 13, 2007
GenCorp v. Olin Corporation: Establishing the Requirement for a Civil Action Under CERCLA §113(f)(1) Introduction GENCORP, INC. v. OLIN CORPoration is a pivotal case decided by the United States...
Affirmation of Disability Benefits Denial in Griffeth v. Commissioner of Social Security

Affirmation of Disability Benefits Denial in Griffeth v. Commissioner of Social Security

Date: Feb 10, 2007
Affirmation of Disability Benefits Denial in Griffeth v. Commissioner of Social Security Introduction Case Title: Gary D. Griffeth, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Commissioner of Social Security,...
Residual Functional Capacity and Disability Determination: Insights from Colvin v. Barnhart

Residual Functional Capacity and Disability Determination: Insights from Colvin v. Barnhart

Date: Feb 9, 2007
Residual Functional Capacity and Disability Determination: Insights from Colvin v. Barnhart Introduction Deborah Colvin, the plaintiff-appellant, filed for Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB) and...
Qualified Immunity and Excessive Force: Insights from Livermore v. Rohm (6th Cir. 2007)

Qualified Immunity and Excessive Force: Insights from Livermore v. Rohm (6th Cir. 2007)

Date: Feb 8, 2007
Qualified Immunity and Excessive Force: Insights from Livermore v. Rohm (6th Cir. 2007) Introduction The case of Geraldine Livermore v. Estate of Roland E. Rohm (476 F.3d 397) adjudicated by the...
Sanford and Hill v. United States: Probable Cause in Traffic Stops under Tennessee Law

Sanford and Hill v. United States: Probable Cause in Traffic Stops under Tennessee Law

Date: Feb 7, 2007
Sanford and Hill v. United States: Probable Cause in Traffic Stops under Tennessee Law Introduction Sanford and Hill v. United States is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert