Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Application of Twombly and Leegin in Antitrust Litigation: Insights from Total Benefits Planning Agency, Inc. v. Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield

Application of Twombly and Leegin in Antitrust Litigation: Insights from Total Benefits Planning Agency, Inc. v. Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield

Date: Dec 23, 2008
Application of Twombly and Leegin in Antitrust Litigation: Insights from Total Benefits Planning Agency, Inc. v. Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield Introduction In the case of Total Benefits Planning...
Affirmation of Disability Benefits Denial: Ledford v. Astrue Establishes Robust Adherence to Substantial Evidence in SSA Claims

Affirmation of Disability Benefits Denial: Ledford v. Astrue Establishes Robust Adherence to Substantial Evidence in SSA Claims

Date: Dec 20, 2008
Affirmation of Disability Benefits Denial: Ledford v. Astrue Establishes Robust Adherence to Substantial Evidence in SSA Claims Introduction In the case of Timothy B. Ledford v. Michael J. Astrue,...
West v. Bell: Affirming Deference to State Courts and Strickland Standards in Habeas Corpus Petitions

West v. Bell: Affirming Deference to State Courts and Strickland Standards in Habeas Corpus Petitions

Date: Dec 19, 2008
West v. Bell: Affirming Deference to State Courts and Strickland Standards in Habeas Corpus Petitions Introduction The case of Stephen Michael West v. Ricky Bell (550 F.3d 542) adjudicated by the...
Termination Act Preemption Clarified: Sidewalk Construction Requirements for Railroads

Termination Act Preemption Clarified: Sidewalk Construction Requirements for Railroads

Date: Dec 19, 2008
Termination Act Preemption Clarified: Sidewalk Construction Requirements for Railroads Introduction In the landmark case of Adrian Blissfield Railroad Company v. Village of Blissfield, 550 F.3d 533...
Withdrawal of Guilty Pleas and Right to Allocution: Insights from United States v. Haygood

Withdrawal of Guilty Pleas and Right to Allocution: Insights from United States v. Haygood

Date: Dec 16, 2008
Withdrawal of Guilty Pleas and Right to Allocution: Insights from United States v. Haygood Introduction The case of United States v. Rhamel Haygood, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Reevaluating Fee Awards in Removal Cases: Insights from Warthman v. Genoa Township

Reevaluating Fee Awards in Removal Cases: Insights from Warthman v. Genoa Township

Date: Dec 16, 2008
Reevaluating Fee Awards in Removal Cases: Insights from Warthman v. Genoa Township Introduction The case of Leslie Warthman v. Genoa Township Board of Trustees addresses significant issues...
Owens v. Guida: Reaffirming Strickland, Brady, and Lockett in Capital Habeas Corpus Appeals

Owens v. Guida: Reaffirming Strickland, Brady, and Lockett in Capital Habeas Corpus Appeals

Date: Dec 10, 2008
Owens v. Guida: Reaffirming Strickland, Brady, and Lockett in Capital Habeas Corpus Appeals Introduction In Gaile K. Owens v. Earline Guida, Warden, 549 F.3d 399 (6th Cir. 2008), the United States...
U.S. v. CAMPBELL (6th Cir. 2008): Reinforcing the Boundaries of Terry Stops and Constructive Possession

U.S. v. CAMPBELL (6th Cir. 2008): Reinforcing the Boundaries of Terry Stops and Constructive Possession

Date: Dec 3, 2008
U.S. v. CAMPBELL (6th Cir. 2008): Reinforcing the Boundaries of Terry Stops and Constructive Possession Introduction In United States v. Donnell Campbell, 549 F.3d 364 (6th Cir. 2008), the United...
Ensuring Equal Protection and Substantive Due Process in Voting Systems: League of Women Voters of Ohio v. Brunner

Ensuring Equal Protection and Substantive Due Process in Voting Systems: League of Women Voters of Ohio v. Brunner

Date: Nov 27, 2008
Ensuring Equal Protection and Substantive Due Process in Voting Systems: League of Women Voters of Ohio v. Brunner Introduction The case League of Women Voters of Ohio v. Brunner was adjudicated by...
Affirmation of Sua Sponte Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute: Rogers v. City of Warren

Affirmation of Sua Sponte Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute: Rogers v. City of Warren

Date: Nov 27, 2008
Affirmation of Sua Sponte Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute: Rogers v. City of Warren Introduction In the case of John Rogers v. City of Warren, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Enhanced Scrutiny of SSA Grids in Disability Determinations: Insights from Dineen Jordan v. Commissioner of Social Security

Enhanced Scrutiny of SSA Grids in Disability Determinations: Insights from Dineen Jordan v. Commissioner of Social Security

Date: Nov 26, 2008
Enhanced Scrutiny of SSA Grids in Disability Determinations: Insights from Dineen Jordan v. Commissioner of Social Security Introduction The case of Dineen Jordan v. Commissioner of Social Security,...
Defining Federal Jurisdiction in State Election Law Matters: A Detailed Analysis of State of Ohio v. Brunner

Defining Federal Jurisdiction in State Election Law Matters: A Detailed Analysis of State of Ohio v. Brunner

Date: Nov 26, 2008
Defining Federal Jurisdiction in State Election Law Matters: A Detailed Analysis of State of Ohio v. Brunner Introduction The case of State of Ohio, ex rel. Dana Skaggs, et al. v. Jennifer L....
Causal Nexus in Racially Motivated Wrongful Termination: Madden v. Chattanooga City Wide Service Department

Causal Nexus in Racially Motivated Wrongful Termination: Madden v. Chattanooga City Wide Service Department

Date: Nov 26, 2008
Causal Nexus in Racially Motivated Wrongful Termination: Madden v. Chattanooga City Wide Service Department Introduction Ronald L. Madden, an African-American employee, filed a lawsuit against the...
Affirmation of 'Sound Discretion' in Mistrial Declarations under Double Jeopardy

Affirmation of 'Sound Discretion' in Mistrial Declarations under Double Jeopardy

Date: Nov 26, 2008
Affirmation of 'Sound Discretion' in Mistrial Declarations under Double Jeopardy Introduction In the case of Thomas Klein v. Simon Leis, Jr., 548 F.3d 425 (6th Cir. 2008), the United States Court of...
Robinson v. United States: Establishing Aggregate Drug Quantity Thresholds in Conspiracy Cases

Robinson v. United States: Establishing Aggregate Drug Quantity Thresholds in Conspiracy Cases

Date: Nov 25, 2008
Robinson v. United States: Establishing Aggregate Drug Quantity Thresholds in Conspiracy Cases Introduction The case of United States of America v. Chris Robinson, adjudicated by the United States...
Reversing Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Martin v. Toledo Cardiology Consultants

Reversing Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Martin v. Toledo Cardiology Consultants

Date: Nov 22, 2008
Reversing Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Martin v. Toledo Cardiology Consultants Introduction Martin v. Toledo Cardiology Consultants, Inc. (548 F.3d 405) is a pivotal...
Sufficiency of Evidence in Habeas Corpus Appeals: Saxton v. Sheets

Sufficiency of Evidence in Habeas Corpus Appeals: Saxton v. Sheets

Date: Nov 21, 2008
Sufficiency of Evidence in Habeas Corpus Appeals: Saxton v. Sheets Introduction The case of Anthony L. Saxton v. Michael Sheets (547 F.3d 597) presents a critical examination of the sufficiency of...
Reaffirming Tellabs: Sixth Circuit Establishes Correct 'Strong Inference' Standard for Scienter in Securities Fraud Cases

Reaffirming Tellabs: Sixth Circuit Establishes Correct 'Strong Inference' Standard for Scienter in Securities Fraud Cases

Date: Nov 20, 2008
Reaffirming Tellabs: Sixth Circuit Establishes Correct 'Strong Inference' Standard for Scienter in Securities Fraud Cases Introduction The case of Howard Frank, Individually and On Behalf of All...
No Liberty Interest in Parole Date Under Ohio Law: A Comprehensive Commentary on Nolen Bell v. Carl S. Anderson

No Liberty Interest in Parole Date Under Ohio Law: A Comprehensive Commentary on Nolen Bell v. Carl S. Anderson

Date: Nov 19, 2008
No Liberty Interest in Parole Date Under Ohio Law: A Comprehensive Commentary on Nolen Bell v. Carl S. Anderson Introduction Nolen Bell v. Carl S. Anderson is a significant case adjudicated by the...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Whitehead v. Bowen: Establishing Officer Identification and Timeliness of Appeals

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Whitehead v. Bowen: Establishing Officer Identification and Timeliness of Appeals

Date: Nov 19, 2008
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Whitehead v. Bowen: Establishing Officer Identification and Timeliness of Appeals Introduction Case: James Whitehead, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Neil Bowen,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert