Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Equitable Tolling Applied to Section 2255 Habeas Corpus Motions under AEDPA: Solomon v. United States

Equitable Tolling Applied to Section 2255 Habeas Corpus Motions under AEDPA: Solomon v. United States

Date: Nov 3, 2006
Equitable Tolling Applied to Section 2255 Habeas Corpus Motions under AEDPA: Solomon v. United States Introduction In Solomon v. United States, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Interlocutory Appeal and State Intervention in Ohio Voter ID Law Case

Interlocutory Appeal and State Intervention in Ohio Voter ID Law Case

Date: Nov 1, 2006
Interlocutory Appeal and State Intervention in Ohio Voter ID Law Case Introduction The case of Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless and Service Employees International Union, Local 1199 v. J....
Reaffirming Double Jeopardy Protections: Comprehensive Analysis of PATTERSON v. HASKINS

Reaffirming Double Jeopardy Protections: Comprehensive Analysis of PATTERSON v. HASKINS

Date: Nov 1, 2006
Reaffirming Double Jeopardy Protections: Comprehensive Analysis of PATTERSON v. HASKINS Introduction Eric Scott Patterson, the petitioner-appellant, challenged his conviction for involuntary...
Williams v. Haviland: Clarifying the Scope of Apprendi in State Prosecutions

Williams v. Haviland: Clarifying the Scope of Apprendi in State Prosecutions

Date: Oct 27, 2006
Williams v. Haviland: Clarifying the Scope of Apprendi in State Prosecutions Introduction Williams v. Haviland, 467 F.3d 527 (6th Cir. 2006), is a pivotal case that examines the applicability of the...
Establishing Clear Parameters for Trade Dress Infringement: General Motors v. Lanard Toys

Establishing Clear Parameters for Trade Dress Infringement: General Motors v. Lanard Toys

Date: Oct 26, 2006
Establishing Clear Parameters for Trade Dress Infringement: General Motors v. Lanard Toys Introduction The legal landscape of trademark and trade dress infringement was significantly shaped by the...
Ramaj v. Gonzales: Enhancing Standards for Asylum Credibility and Document Authentication

Ramaj v. Gonzales: Enhancing Standards for Asylum Credibility and Document Authentication

Date: Oct 25, 2006
Ramaj v. Gonzales: Enhancing Standards for Asylum Credibility and Document Authentication Introduction In the case of Ded Ramaj and Vera Ramaj v. Alberto Gonzales, decided by the United States Court...
Strict Enforcement of Federal Rule 8 Affirmed in NAFZIGER v. McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL

Strict Enforcement of Federal Rule 8 Affirmed in NAFZIGER v. McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL

Date: Oct 21, 2006
Strict Enforcement of Federal Rule 8 Affirmed in NAFZIGER et al. v. McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, Inc. Introduction The case of George NAFZIGER et al. v. McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, Inc. et al. (467 F.3d...
Limits of Remand under Booker: Upholding Resentencing and Safety Valve Standards in United States v. Haynes

Limits of Remand under Booker: Upholding Resentencing and Safety Valve Standards in United States v. Haynes

Date: Oct 21, 2006
Limits of Remand under Booker: Upholding Resentencing and Safety Valve Standards in United States v. Haynes Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. Haynes, the United States Court of...
Brady Violations and Procedural Default in Habeas Corpus: Apanovitch v. Houk

Brady Violations and Procedural Default in Habeas Corpus: Apanovitch v. Houk

Date: Oct 20, 2006
Brady Violations and Procedural Default in Habeas Corpus: Apanovitch v. Houk Introduction Anthony Apanovitch v. Marc C. Houk, 466 F.3d 460 (6th Cir. 2006), is a pivotal case that delves into the...
Qualified Immunity and Deliberate Indifference in Eighth Amendment Prisoner Claims: PEREZ v. OAKLAND COUNTY

Qualified Immunity and Deliberate Indifference in Eighth Amendment Prisoner Claims: PEREZ v. OAKLAND COUNTY

Date: Oct 19, 2006
Qualified Immunity and Deliberate Indifference in Eighth Amendment Prisoner Claims: PEREZ v. OAKLAND COUNTY 1. Introduction The case Ariel Perez, Sr. v. Oakland County (466 F.3d 416, 2006) examines...
Enforcement of 28 U.S.C. § 1927 for Attorney Misconduct Post-Settlement: Red Carpet Studios v. Joseph

Enforcement of 28 U.S.C. § 1927 for Attorney Misconduct Post-Settlement: Red Carpet Studios v. Joseph

Date: Oct 11, 2006
Enforcement of 28 U.S.C. § 1927 for Attorney Misconduct Post-Settlement: Red Carpet Studios v. Joseph Introduction The case Red Carpet Studios Division of Source Advantage, Ltd. v. Joel D. Joseph,...
Clarifying the Pattern Requirement in RICO Claims: Moon v. Harrison Piping Supply

Clarifying the Pattern Requirement in RICO Claims: Moon v. Harrison Piping Supply

Date: Sep 29, 2006
Clarifying the Pattern Requirement in RICO Claims: Moon v. Harrison Piping Supply Introduction The case of Timothy Moon v. Harrison Piping Supply (465 F.3d 719) addressed significant aspects of the...
Affirmation in Tysinger v. Zanesville: Clarifying Standards for Pregnancy Discrimination Claims

Affirmation in Tysinger v. Zanesville: Clarifying Standards for Pregnancy Discrimination Claims

Date: Sep 26, 2006
Affirmation in Tysinger v. Zanesville: Clarifying Standards for Pregnancy Discrimination Claims Introduction The case of Teresa Tysinger v. Police Department of the City of Zanesville (463 F.3d 569,...
Reasonable Relation of Special Supervised-Release Conditions to Offense and Criminal History: Insights from United States v. Carter

Reasonable Relation of Special Supervised-Release Conditions to Offense and Criminal History: Insights from United States v. Carter

Date: Sep 19, 2006
Reasonable Relation of Special Supervised-Release Conditions to Offense and Criminal History: Insights from United States v. Carter (6th Cir., 2006) Introduction The case of United States of America...
Affirming the Primacy of Federal Appellate Cost Procedures over PLRA in Cost Awards Against Incarcerated Litigants

Affirming the Primacy of Federal Appellate Cost Procedures over PLRA in Cost Awards Against Incarcerated Litigants

Date: Sep 19, 2006
Affirming the Primacy of Federal Appellate Cost Procedures over PLRA in Cost Awards Against Incarcerated Litigants Introduction The case of Christopher Skinner v. A. Peter Govorchin, et al. explores...
Reversal of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force and First Amendment Claims: Swiecicki v. Delgado

Reversal of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force and First Amendment Claims: Swiecicki v. Delgado

Date: Sep 16, 2006
Reversal of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force and First Amendment Claims: Swiecicki v. Delgado Introduction The case of Jeffrey Swiecicki v. Jose Delgado (463 F.3d 489, 6th Cir. 2006) presents a...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Age and Sex Discrimination Claims: Briggs v. Potter

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Age and Sex Discrimination Claims: Briggs v. Potter

Date: Sep 16, 2006
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Age and Sex Discrimination Claims: Briggs v. Potter Introduction Briggs v. Potter is a seminal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Affirmation of RICO Conspiracy Convictions and Sentencing Guidelines Application in United States v. Gardiner & Lupo

Affirmation of RICO Conspiracy Convictions and Sentencing Guidelines Application in United States v. Gardiner & Lupo

Date: Sep 13, 2006
Affirmation of RICO Conspiracy Convictions and Sentencing Guidelines Application in United States v. Gardiner & Lupo Introduction The case of United States of America v. John F. Gardiner and Ronald...
Procedural Default and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from Smith v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. Corr.

Procedural Default and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from Smith v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. Corr.

Date: Sep 9, 2006
Procedural Default and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from Smith v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections (6th Cir. 2006) Introduction Scott M. Smith, the...
Ballot Access Restrictions and First Amendment Rights: Analysis of Libertarian Party of Ohio v. Blackwell

Ballot Access Restrictions and First Amendment Rights: Analysis of Libertarian Party of Ohio v. Blackwell

Date: Sep 7, 2006
Ballot Access Restrictions and First Amendment Rights: Analysis of Libertarian Party of Ohio v. Blackwell Introduction In Libertarian Party of Ohio; Jason Hallmark; Dena Bruedigam; Patrick J....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert