Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Enhanced Standards for Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Claims: Baker v. City of Hamilton

Enhanced Standards for Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Claims: Baker v. City of Hamilton

Date: Dec 19, 2006
Enhanced Standards for Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Claims: Baker v. City of Hamilton Introduction The case of Baker v. City of Hamilton, Ohio (471 F.3d 601) examined critical issues...
Enhancing Trade Secret Protections: Key Takeaways from MTH v. Lionel on Expert Testimony and Damages Allocation

Enhancing Trade Secret Protections: Key Takeaways from MTH v. Lionel on Expert Testimony and Damages Allocation

Date: Dec 15, 2006
Enhancing Trade Secret Protections: Key Takeaways from MTH v. Lionel on Expert Testimony and Damages Allocation Introduction The case of MIKE'S TRAIN HOUSE, INC. (MTH) v. LIONEL, L.L.C. revolves...
Mandatory Life Imprisonment for Drug Conspiracy under 21 U.S.C. §841(b)(1)(A): Analysis of U.S. v. Paige

Mandatory Life Imprisonment for Drug Conspiracy under 21 U.S.C. §841(b)(1)(A): Analysis of U.S. v. Paige

Date: Dec 13, 2006
Mandatory Life Imprisonment for Drug Conspiracy under 21 U.S.C. §841(b)(1)(A): Analysis of U.S. v. Paige Introduction The case of United States of America v. Oscar Paige, Jr. is a significant...
Affirmation of Conspiracy Convictions in United States v. Cal Establishes Rigorous Standards for Drug Conspiracy Proof

Affirmation of Conspiracy Convictions in United States v. Cal Establishes Rigorous Standards for Drug Conspiracy Proof

Date: Dec 5, 2006
Affirmation of Conspiracy Convictions in United States v. Cal Establishes Rigorous Standards for Drug Conspiracy Proof Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. Calvin Caver,...
Reliability of Informant Corroboration in Search Warrants Upheld: United States v. Jackson

Reliability of Informant Corroboration in Search Warrants Upheld: United States v. Jackson

Date: Dec 1, 2006
Reliability of Informant Corroboration in Search Warrants Upheld: United States v. Jackson Introduction United States v. Michael L. Jackson is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Standing and Equal Protection in Bid Submission: Club Italia Soccer Sports Organization, Inc. v. Charter Township of Shelby

Standing and Equal Protection in Bid Submission: Club Italia Soccer Sports Organization, Inc. v. Charter Township of Shelby

Date: Dec 1, 2006
Standing and Equal Protection in Bid Submission: Club Italia Soccer Sports Organization, Inc. v. Charter Township of Shelby Introduction The case of Club Italia Soccer Sports Organization, Inc. v....
Withdrawal of Guilty Plea and Forfeiture Obligations: Insights from United States v. Ellis

Withdrawal of Guilty Plea and Forfeiture Obligations: Insights from United States v. Ellis

Date: Nov 30, 2006
Withdrawal of Guilty Plea and Forfeiture Obligations: Insights from United States v. Ellis Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Bernard H. Ellis, Jr., the United States...
Younger Abstention Affirmed in Judicial Disciplinary Proceedings: Squire v. Coughlan

Younger Abstention Affirmed in Judicial Disciplinary Proceedings: Squire v. Coughlan

Date: Nov 29, 2006
Younger Abstention Affirmed in Judicial Disciplinary Proceedings: Squire v. Coughlan Introduction In the case of Carole R. Squire v. Jonathan E. Coughlan, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Establishing Standards for Trademark Infringement and Cybersquatting in Domain Names

Establishing Standards for Trademark Infringement and Cybersquatting in Domain Names

Date: Nov 28, 2006
Establishing Standards for Trademark Infringement and Cybersquatting in Domain Names Introduction The case of AUDI AG and Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. Bob D'Amato deals with complex issues...
Affidavit Sufficiency and Good-Faith Exception: Insights from United States v. McPhearson

Affidavit Sufficiency and Good-Faith Exception: Insights from United States v. McPhearson

Date: Nov 28, 2006
Affidavit Sufficiency and Good-Faith Exception: Insights from United States v. McPhearson Introduction United States v. Martedis McPhearson, 469 F.3d 518 (6th Cir. 2006), is a pivotal case...
Scarbrough v. Morgan County Board of Education: Establishing Precedents in First Amendment Retaliation

Scarbrough v. Morgan County Board of Education: Establishing Precedents in First Amendment Retaliation

Date: Nov 23, 2006
Scarbrough v. Morgan County Board of Education: Establishing Precedents in First Amendment Retaliation Introduction In the landmark case of Paul Scarbrough v. Morgan County Board of Education, the...
Affirmation of Sentencing in United States v. Algis J. Gale: A Comprehensive Analysis

Affirmation of Sentencing in United States v. Algis J. Gale: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Nov 21, 2006
Affirmation of Sentencing in United States v. Algis J. Gale: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction The case of United States of America v. Algis J. Gale, 468 F.3d 929 (6th Cir. 2006), serves as a...
Strict Interpretation of Sexual Harassment Under the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act Affirmed in Henderson v. Walled Lake Consolidated Schools

Strict Interpretation of Sexual Harassment Under the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act Affirmed in Henderson v. Walled Lake Consolidated Schools

Date: Nov 17, 2006
Strict Interpretation of Sexual Harassment Under the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act Affirmed in Henderson v. Walled Lake Consolidated Schools Introduction Henderson v. Walled Lake Consolidated...
Elliott v. Metropolitan Life: Reinforcing the 'Arbitrary and Capricious' Standard in ERISA Benefit Denials

Elliott v. Metropolitan Life: Reinforcing the 'Arbitrary and Capricious' Standard in ERISA Benefit Denials

Date: Nov 16, 2006
Elliott v. Metropolitan Life: Reinforcing the 'Arbitrary and Capricious' Standard in ERISA Benefit Denials Introduction Patricia Elliott v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (473 F.3d 613, 6th...
Affirmation of Speedy Trial Rights and Batson Ruling in United States v. Watford

Affirmation of Speedy Trial Rights and Batson Ruling in United States v. Watford

Date: Nov 15, 2006
Affirmation of Speedy Trial Rights and Batson Ruling in United States v. Watford Introduction In the case titled United States of America v. Marlon Watford, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Establishing Legality of Vehicle Stops and Subsequent Searches: United States v. Garrido (6th Cir. 2006)

Establishing Legality of Vehicle Stops and Subsequent Searches: United States v. Garrido (6th Cir. 2006)

Date: Nov 10, 2006
Establishing Legality of Vehicle Stops and Subsequent Searches: United States v. Garrido (6th Cir. 2006) Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Victor M. Garrido, the United...
Independent Habeas Relief Under Section 2241: Rittenberry v. Morgan

Independent Habeas Relief Under Section 2241: Rittenberry v. Morgan

Date: Nov 10, 2006
Independent Habeas Relief Under Section 2241: Rittenberry v. Morgan Introduction Rittenberry v. Morgan (468 F.3d 331, 2006) is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Mis-Specified Capital Indictment and Due Process: Affirmation of Habeas Corpus in Joseph v. Coyle

Mis-Specified Capital Indictment and Due Process: Affirmation of Habeas Corpus in Joseph v. Coyle

Date: Nov 10, 2006
Mis-Specified Capital Indictment and Due Process: Affirmation of Habeas Corpus in Joseph v. Coyle Introduction Joseph v. Coyle, 469 F.3d 441 (6th Cir. 2006) presents a pivotal case concerning the...
Stewart v. Wolfenbarger: Upholding the Essential Role of Proper Alibi Notice and Witness Investigation in Ineffective Assistance Claims

Stewart v. Wolfenbarger: Upholding the Essential Role of Proper Alibi Notice and Witness Investigation in Ineffective Assistance Claims

Date: Nov 10, 2006
Stewart v. Wolfenbarger: Upholding the Essential Role of Proper Alibi Notice and Witness Investigation in Ineffective Assistance Claims Introduction In Joseph Stewart v. Hugh Wolfenbarger, 468 F.3d...
Presumption of Innocence and Indictment-Evidence Variance: Comprehensive Analysis of Hynes v. United States

Presumption of Innocence and Indictment-Evidence Variance: Comprehensive Analysis of Hynes v. United States

Date: Nov 8, 2006
Presumption of Innocence and Indictment-Evidence Variance: Comprehensive Analysis of Hynes v. United States Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Donald Hynes, adjudicated by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert