Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Finality of Remand Orders Under 28 U.S.C. §1447(d) Following Powerex Corp. v. Reliant Energy Services, Inc.

Finality of Remand Orders Under 28 U.S.C. §1447(d) Following Powerex Corp. v. Reliant Energy Services, Inc.

Date: Jan 9, 2008
Finality of Remand Orders Under 28 U.S.C. §1447(d) Following Powerex Corp. v. Reliant Energy Services, Inc. Introduction The case of Rick Blackburn, et al. v. Oaktree Capital Management, LLC, et al.,...
Demand Futility Must Be Specifically Demonstrated in Shareholder Derivative Actions: Insights from In re Ferro Corporation Derivative Litigation

Demand Futility Must Be Specifically Demonstrated in Shareholder Derivative Actions: Insights from In re Ferro Corporation Derivative Litigation

Date: Jan 8, 2008
Demand Futility Must Be Specifically Demonstrated in Shareholder Derivative Actions: Insights from In re Ferro Corporation Derivative Litigation Introduction In re Ferro Corporation Derivative...
Refining the Boundaries of Brady Material: BELL v. BELL (6th Cir. 2008)

Refining the Boundaries of Brady Material: BELL v. BELL (6th Cir. 2008)

Date: Jan 5, 2008
Refining the Boundaries of Brady Material: BELL v. BELL (6th Cir. 2008) Introduction In the landmark case of Stephen M. Bell v. Ricky BELL, Warden, 512 F.3d 223 (6th Cir. 2008), the United States...
SIMCOX v. SIMCOX (2007): Refining the Use of Undertakings Under the Hague Convention in Abusive Family Situations

SIMCOX v. SIMCOX (2007): Refining the Use of Undertakings Under the Hague Convention in Abusive Family Situations

Date: Dec 29, 2007
SIMCOX v. SIMCOX (2007): Refining the Use of Undertakings Under the Hague Convention in Abusive Family Situations Introduction SIMCOX v. SIMCOX is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of...
Defining Frivolous Asylum Applications: Insights from Ceraj v. Mukasey

Defining Frivolous Asylum Applications: Insights from Ceraj v. Mukasey

Date: Dec 29, 2007
Defining Frivolous Asylum Applications: Insights from Ceraj v. Mukasey Introduction In Ceraj CERAJ and Irini Deda-Ceraj v. Michael B. MUKASEY, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit...
Procedural Default in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Affirmation of Dismissal under the Maupin Framework

Procedural Default in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Affirmation of Dismissal under the Maupin Framework

Date: Dec 28, 2007
Procedural Default in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Affirmation of Dismissal under the Maupin Framework Introduction Robert S. Scuba v. Anthony Brigano, Warden (527 F.3d 479) is a significant case...
Reaffirmation of Automobile and Inventory Exceptions in Warrantless Searches: United States v. Lakento Brian Smith

Reaffirmation of Automobile and Inventory Exceptions in Warrantless Searches: United States v. Lakento Brian Smith

Date: Dec 27, 2007
Reaffirmation of Automobile and Inventory Exceptions in Warrantless Searches: United States v. Lakento Brian Smith Introduction In the appellate case of United States v. Lakento Brian Smith, reported...
Standard of Appellate Review for Supervised Release Revocation Sentences Post-Booker

Standard of Appellate Review for Supervised Release Revocation Sentences Post-Booker

Date: Dec 21, 2007
Standard of Appellate Review for Supervised Release Revocation Sentences Post-Booker Introduction The case of United States of America v. Roxie Nicole Bolds, 511 F.3d 568 (6th Cir. 2007), serves as a...
Rule 403 Prevails: Exclusion of Prior Bad Acts Evidence in U.S. v. Stout

Rule 403 Prevails: Exclusion of Prior Bad Acts Evidence in U.S. v. Stout

Date: Dec 21, 2007
Rule 403 Prevails: Exclusion of Prior Bad Acts Evidence in U.S. v. Stout Introduction United States of America v. Michael Stout is a landmark decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Affirmation of Statute of Limitations on §1983 Claims in Custody Removal Cases: Eidson v. Tennessee Department of Children's Services

Affirmation of Statute of Limitations on §1983 Claims in Custody Removal Cases: Eidson v. Tennessee Department of Children's Services

Date: Dec 21, 2007
Affirmation of Statute of Limitations on §1983 Claims in Custody Removal Cases: Eidson v. Tennessee Department of Children's Services Introduction The case of Ronald Eidson v. State of Tennessee...
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Prima Facie Case in Title VII Gender Discrimination: Replacement Need Not Be Similarly Qualified

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Prima Facie Case in Title VII Gender Discrimination: Replacement Need Not Be Similarly Qualified

Date: Dec 20, 2007
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Prima Facie Case in Title VII Gender Discrimination: Replacement Need Not Be Similarly Qualified Introduction In Jama M. Vincent v. Brewer Company, 514 F.3d 489 (6th Cir....
Establishing Attorney Fee Calculation Standards under the False Claims Act: Gonter v. Hunt Valve Company

Establishing Attorney Fee Calculation Standards under the False Claims Act: Gonter v. Hunt Valve Company

Date: Dec 19, 2007
Establishing Attorney Fee Calculation Standards under the False Claims Act: Gonter v. Hunt Valve Company Introduction The case of Tina Marie Gonter; Charles William Gonter v. Hunt Valve Company,...
Affirmation of Class Certification for Deceptive Billing Practices in Barbrasue BEATTIE and James So v. CenturyTel, Inc.

Affirmation of Class Certification for Deceptive Billing Practices in Barbrasue BEATTIE and James So v. CenturyTel, Inc.

Date: Dec 19, 2007
Affirmation of Class Certification for Deceptive Billing Practices in Barbrasue BEATTIE and James So v. CenturyTel, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of Barbrasue BEATTIE and James So v....
Enforcement of Non-Competition Clauses under Michigan Law: Certified Restoration Dry Cleaning Network v. Tenke Corp.

Enforcement of Non-Competition Clauses under Michigan Law: Certified Restoration Dry Cleaning Network v. Tenke Corp.

Date: Dec 18, 2007
Enforcement of Non-Competition Clauses under Michigan Law: Certified Restoration Dry Cleaning Network v. Tenke Corp. Introduction Certified Restoration Dry Cleaning Network, L.L.C. v. Tenke Corp. is...
Clarifying Sufficiency of Evidence for Intent in Felonious Assault under AEDPA: NASH v. EBERLIN

Clarifying Sufficiency of Evidence for Intent in Felonious Assault under AEDPA: NASH v. EBERLIN

Date: Dec 15, 2007
Clarifying Sufficiency of Evidence for Intent in Felonious Assault under AEDPA: NASH v. EBERLIN Introduction Case: Darell Nash, Sr., Petitioner-Appellee, v. Michelle Eberlin, Warden,...
Enforcement of Contractual Inspection Rights via Specific Performance: Insights from JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Winget

Enforcement of Contractual Inspection Rights via Specific Performance: Insights from JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Winget

Date: Dec 15, 2007
Enforcement of Contractual Inspection Rights via Specific Performance: Insights from JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Winget Introduction The case of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent v. Larry...
Permitting ERISA §502(a)(2) Actions on Behalf of Defunct Plans: Insights from Pfahler v. National Latex Products Co.

Permitting ERISA §502(a)(2) Actions on Behalf of Defunct Plans: Insights from Pfahler v. National Latex Products Co.

Date: Dec 15, 2007
Permitting ERISA §502(a)(2) Actions on Behalf of Defunct Plans: Insights from Pfahler v. National Latex Products Co. Introduction In the landmark case of Pfahler et al. v. National Latex Products...
Sixth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Worker Claims: Clarifications on Mootness, Standing, and Noerr-Pennington Doctrine

Sixth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Worker Claims: Clarifications on Mootness, Standing, and Noerr-Pennington Doctrine

Date: Dec 15, 2007
Sixth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Worker Claims: Clarifications on Mootness, Standing, and Noerr-Pennington Doctrine Introduction In the case of Douglas Campbell et al. v. PMI Food Equipment Group,...
Defining Protected Activity under the ADEA: Insights from Fox v. Eagle Distributing Company

Defining Protected Activity under the ADEA: Insights from Fox v. Eagle Distributing Company

Date: Dec 15, 2007
Defining Protected Activity under the ADEA: Insights from Fox v. Eagle Distributing Company Introduction The case of James Fox v. Eagle Distributing Company, Incorporated (510 F.3d 587), adjudicated...
Clarification on Plea Procedure and Sentencing Guidelines Compliance: United States v. Lalonde

Clarification on Plea Procedure and Sentencing Guidelines Compliance: United States v. Lalonde

Date: Dec 13, 2007
Clarification on Plea Procedure and Sentencing Guidelines Compliance: United States v. Lalonde Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Lalonde (509 F.3d 750), the United...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert