Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Procedural Default in Habeas Corpus: Abdul Awkal v. Betty Mitchell

Affirmation of Procedural Default in Habeas Corpus: Abdul Awkal v. Betty Mitchell

Date: Jul 24, 2010
Affirmation of Procedural Default in Habeas Corpus: Abdul Awkal v. Betty Mitchell Introduction The case of Abdul Awkal v. Betty Mitchell (613 F.3d 629) adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Non-Preemption of State Consumer Credit Protection Claims under the National Bank Act: McGraw v. Capital One

Non-Preemption of State Consumer Credit Protection Claims under the National Bank Act: McGraw v. Capital One

Date: Jul 23, 2010
Non-Preemption of State Consumer Credit Protection Claims under the National Bank Act: McGraw v. Capital One Introduction In State of West Virginia, ex rel. Darrell v. McGraw, Jr., Attorney General,...
Ensuring Substantial Evidence and Due Process in SSI Decisions: Gilliam v. Astrue

Ensuring Substantial Evidence and Due Process in SSI Decisions: Gilliam v. Astrue

Date: Jul 20, 2010
Ensuring Substantial Evidence and Due Process in SSI Decisions: Gilliam v. Astrue Introduction Gilliam v. Astrue is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States District Court for the Eastern...
High Deference to State Courts under AEDPA in Assessing Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel: Shaneberger v. Jones

High Deference to State Courts under AEDPA in Assessing Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel: Shaneberger v. Jones

Date: Jul 17, 2010
High Deference to State Courts under AEDPA in Assessing Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel: Shaneberger v. Jones Introduction The case of Richard Shaneberger v. Kurt Jones (615 F.3d 448)...
Mandatory Victims Restitution Act Overrides Equitable Estoppel in Fraud Cases: United States v. Williams

Mandatory Victims Restitution Act Overrides Equitable Estoppel in Fraud Cases: United States v. Williams

Date: Jul 16, 2010
Mandatory Victims Restitution Act Overrides Equitable Estoppel in Fraud Cases: United States v. Williams Introduction United States v. Martin T. Williams (612 F.3d 500) is a landmark decision by the...
Affirmation of False Statements and Deliberate Ignorance in Regulatory Submissions: United States v. Geisen

Affirmation of False Statements and Deliberate Ignorance in Regulatory Submissions: United States v. Geisen

Date: Jul 16, 2010
Affirmation of False Statements and Deliberate Ignorance in Regulatory Submissions: United States v. Geisen Introduction The case of United States of America v. David Geisen revolves around serious...
Reinforcing Miranda Waiver Standards and Strickland Analysis in Death Penalty Cases: Treesh v. Bagley

Reinforcing Miranda Waiver Standards and Strickland Analysis in Death Penalty Cases: Treesh v. Bagley

Date: Jul 14, 2010
Reinforcing Miranda Waiver Standards and Strickland Analysis in Death Penalty Cases: Treesh v. Bagley Introduction Frederick Treesh v. Margaret Bagley, 612 F.3d 424 (6th Cir. 2010), represents a...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Title VII Claims: Younis v. Pinnacle Airlines

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Title VII Claims: Younis v. Pinnacle Airlines

Date: Jul 1, 2010
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Title VII Claims: Younis v. Pinnacle Airlines Introduction In Younis v. Pinnacle Airlines, Inc., 610 F.3d 359 (6th Cir. 2010), the United States Court of...
Fourth Amendment Protections Extend Through Probable-Cause Hearings: Aldini v. Johnson and Bodine Commentary

Fourth Amendment Protections Extend Through Probable-Cause Hearings: Aldini v. Johnson and Bodine Commentary

Date: Jun 30, 2010
Fourth Amendment Protections Extend Through Probable-Cause Hearings: Aldini v. Johnson and Bodine Commentary Introduction Louis Aldini, Jr. v. Dustin L. Johnson and Troy E. Bodine is a pivotal case...
Procedural Due Process in Zoning Amendments: Insights from WEDGEWOOD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I v. TOWNSHIP OF LIBERTY

Procedural Due Process in Zoning Amendments: Insights from WEDGEWOOD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I v. TOWNSHIP OF LIBERTY

Date: Jun 29, 2010
Procedural Due Process in Zoning Amendments: Insights from WEDGEWOOD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I v. TOWNSHIP OF LIBERTY Introduction The case of WEDGEWOOD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I v. TOWNSHIP OF LIBERTY...
Transferable Skills and Substantial Evidence: Insights from Kyle v. Commissioner of Social Security

Transferable Skills and Substantial Evidence: Insights from Kyle v. Commissioner of Social Security

Date: Jun 29, 2010
Transferable Skills and Substantial Evidence: Insights from Kyle v. Commissioner of Social Security Introduction Robert Kyle v. Commissioner of Social Security is a pivotal case decided by the United...
Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Strict Detention Criteria for Seditious Conspiracy Cases under the Bail Reform Act

Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Strict Detention Criteria for Seditious Conspiracy Cases under the Bail Reform Act

Date: Jun 23, 2010
Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Strict Detention Criteria for Seditious Conspiracy Cases under the Bail Reform Act Introduction The case of UNITED STATES of America v. Da (608 F.3d 939) involves the...
Establishing the Limits of Temporal Proximity in First Amendment Retaliation Claims: The Vereecke v. Huron Valley School District Decision

Establishing the Limits of Temporal Proximity in First Amendment Retaliation Claims: The Vereecke v. Huron Valley School District Decision

Date: Jun 19, 2010
Establishing the Limits of Temporal Proximity in First Amendment Retaliation Claims: The Vereecke v. Huron Valley School District Decision Introduction Vereecke v. Huron Valley School District, 609...
Affirming Confrontation Rights: Preliminary Examination Testimony in Strayhorn v. Booker

Affirming Confrontation Rights: Preliminary Examination Testimony in Strayhorn v. Booker

Date: Jun 19, 2010
Affirming Confrontation Rights: Preliminary Examination Testimony in Strayhorn v. Booker Introduction In the case of Lynn Strayhorn v. Raymond Booker, adjudicated on June 18, 2010, by the United...
Enforceability of Employment Releases under USERRA: Insights from Wysocki v. IBM

Enforceability of Employment Releases under USERRA: Insights from Wysocki v. IBM

Date: Jun 17, 2010
Enforceability of Employment Releases under USERRA: Insights from Wysocki v. IBM Introduction The case of George Wysocki v. International Business Machines Corporation (IBM), adjudicated by the...
Bonilla-Morales v. Holder: Establishing the Nexus and Defining Protected Social Groups in Asylum Claims

Bonilla-Morales v. Holder: Establishing the Nexus and Defining Protected Social Groups in Asylum Claims

Date: Jun 16, 2010
Bonilla-Morales v. Holder: Establishing the Nexus and Defining Protected Social Groups in Asylum Claims Introduction Bonilla-Morales v. Holder is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court...
Defining the "Applicable Guideline Range": Implications from United States v. Pembrook

Defining the "Applicable Guideline Range": Implications from United States v. Pembrook

Date: Jun 12, 2010
Defining the "Applicable Guideline Range": Implications from United States v. Pembrook Introduction The case of United States v. Daryl Marcus Pembrook, 609 F.3d 381 (6th Cir. 2010), serves as a...
Consent Overrides Warrant Deficiencies: Analysis of U.S. v. Hinojosa

Consent Overrides Warrant Deficiencies: Analysis of U.S. v. Hinojosa

Date: Jun 10, 2010
Consent Overrides Warrant Deficiencies: Analysis of United States v. Hinojosa Introduction United States v. Michael Hinojosa is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Establishment Clause and Government Display of Religious Symbols: Insights from McCreary County v. ACLU

Establishment Clause and Government Display of Religious Symbols: Insights from McCreary County v. ACLU

Date: Jun 10, 2010
Establishment Clause and Government Display of Religious Symbols: Insights from McCreary County v. ACLU Introduction The case of American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky et al. v. McCreary County...
Substantial Evidence Requirement Affirmed in Disability Claims: Turner v. SSA

Substantial Evidence Requirement Affirmed in Disability Claims: Turner v. SSA

Date: Jun 8, 2010
Substantial Evidence Requirement Affirmed in Disability Claims: Turner v. SSA Introduction Carter Lee Turner filed an appeal against the Commissioner of Social Security following the denial of his...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert