Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

U.S. v. CAMPBELL (6th Cir. 2008): Reinforcing the Boundaries of Terry Stops and Constructive Possession

U.S. v. CAMPBELL (6th Cir. 2008): Reinforcing the Boundaries of Terry Stops and Constructive Possession

Date: Dec 3, 2008
U.S. v. CAMPBELL (6th Cir. 2008): Reinforcing the Boundaries of Terry Stops and Constructive Possession Introduction In United States v. Donnell Campbell, 549 F.3d 364 (6th Cir. 2008), the United...
Ensuring Equal Protection and Substantive Due Process in Voting Systems: League of Women Voters of Ohio v. Brunner

Ensuring Equal Protection and Substantive Due Process in Voting Systems: League of Women Voters of Ohio v. Brunner

Date: Nov 27, 2008
Ensuring Equal Protection and Substantive Due Process in Voting Systems: League of Women Voters of Ohio v. Brunner Introduction The case League of Women Voters of Ohio v. Brunner was adjudicated by...
Affirmation of Sua Sponte Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute: Rogers v. City of Warren

Affirmation of Sua Sponte Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute: Rogers v. City of Warren

Date: Nov 27, 2008
Affirmation of Sua Sponte Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute: Rogers v. City of Warren Introduction In the case of John Rogers v. City of Warren, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Enhanced Scrutiny of SSA Grids in Disability Determinations: Insights from Dineen Jordan v. Commissioner of Social Security

Enhanced Scrutiny of SSA Grids in Disability Determinations: Insights from Dineen Jordan v. Commissioner of Social Security

Date: Nov 26, 2008
Enhanced Scrutiny of SSA Grids in Disability Determinations: Insights from Dineen Jordan v. Commissioner of Social Security Introduction The case of Dineen Jordan v. Commissioner of Social Security,...
Defining Federal Jurisdiction in State Election Law Matters: A Detailed Analysis of State of Ohio v. Brunner

Defining Federal Jurisdiction in State Election Law Matters: A Detailed Analysis of State of Ohio v. Brunner

Date: Nov 26, 2008
Defining Federal Jurisdiction in State Election Law Matters: A Detailed Analysis of State of Ohio v. Brunner Introduction The case of State of Ohio, ex rel. Dana Skaggs, et al. v. Jennifer L....
Causal Nexus in Racially Motivated Wrongful Termination: Madden v. Chattanooga City Wide Service Department

Causal Nexus in Racially Motivated Wrongful Termination: Madden v. Chattanooga City Wide Service Department

Date: Nov 26, 2008
Causal Nexus in Racially Motivated Wrongful Termination: Madden v. Chattanooga City Wide Service Department Introduction Ronald L. Madden, an African-American employee, filed a lawsuit against the...
Affirmation of 'Sound Discretion' in Mistrial Declarations under Double Jeopardy

Affirmation of 'Sound Discretion' in Mistrial Declarations under Double Jeopardy

Date: Nov 26, 2008
Affirmation of 'Sound Discretion' in Mistrial Declarations under Double Jeopardy Introduction In the case of Thomas Klein v. Simon Leis, Jr., 548 F.3d 425 (6th Cir. 2008), the United States Court of...
Robinson v. United States: Establishing Aggregate Drug Quantity Thresholds in Conspiracy Cases

Robinson v. United States: Establishing Aggregate Drug Quantity Thresholds in Conspiracy Cases

Date: Nov 25, 2008
Robinson v. United States: Establishing Aggregate Drug Quantity Thresholds in Conspiracy Cases Introduction The case of United States of America v. Chris Robinson, adjudicated by the United States...
Reversing Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Martin v. Toledo Cardiology Consultants

Reversing Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Martin v. Toledo Cardiology Consultants

Date: Nov 22, 2008
Reversing Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Martin v. Toledo Cardiology Consultants Introduction Martin v. Toledo Cardiology Consultants, Inc. (548 F.3d 405) is a pivotal...
Sufficiency of Evidence in Habeas Corpus Appeals: Saxton v. Sheets

Sufficiency of Evidence in Habeas Corpus Appeals: Saxton v. Sheets

Date: Nov 21, 2008
Sufficiency of Evidence in Habeas Corpus Appeals: Saxton v. Sheets Introduction The case of Anthony L. Saxton v. Michael Sheets (547 F.3d 597) presents a critical examination of the sufficiency of...
Reaffirming Tellabs: Sixth Circuit Establishes Correct 'Strong Inference' Standard for Scienter in Securities Fraud Cases

Reaffirming Tellabs: Sixth Circuit Establishes Correct 'Strong Inference' Standard for Scienter in Securities Fraud Cases

Date: Nov 20, 2008
Reaffirming Tellabs: Sixth Circuit Establishes Correct 'Strong Inference' Standard for Scienter in Securities Fraud Cases Introduction The case of Howard Frank, Individually and On Behalf of All...
No Liberty Interest in Parole Date Under Ohio Law: A Comprehensive Commentary on Nolen Bell v. Carl S. Anderson

No Liberty Interest in Parole Date Under Ohio Law: A Comprehensive Commentary on Nolen Bell v. Carl S. Anderson

Date: Nov 19, 2008
No Liberty Interest in Parole Date Under Ohio Law: A Comprehensive Commentary on Nolen Bell v. Carl S. Anderson Introduction Nolen Bell v. Carl S. Anderson is a significant case adjudicated by the...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Whitehead v. Bowen: Establishing Officer Identification and Timeliness of Appeals

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Whitehead v. Bowen: Establishing Officer Identification and Timeliness of Appeals

Date: Nov 19, 2008
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Whitehead v. Bowen: Establishing Officer Identification and Timeliness of Appeals Introduction Case: James Whitehead, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Neil Bowen,...
Affirmation of U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(a) Enhancement: United States v. Felix Walls

Affirmation of U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(a) Enhancement: United States v. Felix Walls

Date: Nov 14, 2008
Affirmation of U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(a) Enhancement: United States v. Felix Walls Introduction The case of United States of America v. Felix Walls (546 F.3d 728) represents a pivotal judicial decision by...
Upholding Miranda Rights and AEDPA Standards: Comprehensive Commentary on Davie v. Mitchell

Upholding Miranda Rights and AEDPA Standards: Comprehensive Commentary on Davie v. Mitchell

Date: Nov 13, 2008
Upholding Miranda Rights and AEDPA Standards: Comprehensive Commentary on Davie v. Mitchell Introduction The case of Roderick Davie v. Betty Mitchell, Warden, adjudicated by the United States Court...
Enhancing Deference to Treating Physicians in Social Security Disability Determinations

Enhancing Deference to Treating Physicians in Social Security Disability Determinations

Date: Nov 6, 2008
Enhancing Deference to Treating Physicians in Social Security Disability Determinations Introduction The case of Karen Germany-Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security (313 F. App'x 771, 2008)...
Double Jeopardy Protections and Administrative Sanctions: Insights from U.S.A. v. Simpson

Double Jeopardy Protections and Administrative Sanctions: Insights from U.S.A. v. Simpson

Date: Nov 5, 2008
Double Jeopardy Protections and Administrative Sanctions: Insights from U.S.A. v. Simpson Introduction United States of America v. George Hubert Simpson, 546 F.3d 394 (6th Cir. 2008), represents a...
Fourth Amendment Rights in Private Security Detentions: Manley v. Paramount's Kings Island

Fourth Amendment Rights in Private Security Detentions: Manley v. Paramount's Kings Island

Date: Nov 4, 2008
Fourth Amendment Rights in Private Security Detentions: Manley v. Paramount's Kings Island Introduction Case: Tabatha C. Manley, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paramount's Kings Island, et al.,...
Affirming Residual Functional Capacity and Occupational Availability in Disability Determinations: McGlothin v. Commissioner

Affirming Residual Functional Capacity and Occupational Availability in Disability Determinations: McGlothin v. Commissioner

Date: Nov 1, 2008
Affirming Residual Functional Capacity and Occupational Availability in Disability Determinations: McGlothin v. Commissioner Introduction In the case of Rebecca McGlothin v. Commissioner of Social...
Nader v. Blackwell: Sixth Circuit on First Amendment Rights and Qualified Immunity in Ballot Access Regulations

Nader v. Blackwell: Sixth Circuit on First Amendment Rights and Qualified Immunity in Ballot Access Regulations

Date: Oct 30, 2008
Nader v. Blackwell: Sixth Circuit on First Amendment Rights and Qualified Immunity in Ballot Access Regulations Introduction In the landmark case Ralph Nader v. J. Kenneth Blackwell, the United...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert