Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Issue Preclusion Upholds Summary Judgment in Section 1983 Action: Flowers v. City of Detroit

Issue Preclusion Upholds Summary Judgment in Section 1983 Action: Flowers v. City of Detroit

Date: Jan 17, 2009
Issue Preclusion Upholds Summary Judgment in Section 1983 Action: Flowers v. City of Detroit Introduction Flowers v. City of Detroit is a significant case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Public Disclosure Prevails: Jurisdictional Bar Under the False Claims Act in Poteet v. Medtronic

Public Disclosure Prevails: Jurisdictional Bar Under the False Claims Act in Poteet v. Medtronic

Date: Jan 15, 2009
Public Disclosure Prevails: Jurisdictional Bar Under the False Claims Act in Poteet v. Medtronic Introduction In the landmark case Jacqueline Kay Poteet v. Medtronic, Inc. et al., the United States...
Defining the Boundaries of Hostile Work Environment and Retaliation under Title VII: Insights from Ladd v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad

Defining the Boundaries of Hostile Work Environment and Retaliation under Title VII: Insights from Ladd v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad

Date: Jan 15, 2009
Defining the Boundaries of Hostile Work Environment and Retaliation under Title VII: Insights from Ladd v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Introduction The case Christine M. Ladd v. Grand Trunk Western...
Affirmation of Long-Term Possession Conviction under the Child Pornography Protection Act and Sentencing Enhancements in Paull v. United States

Affirmation of Long-Term Possession Conviction under the Child Pornography Protection Act and Sentencing Enhancements in Paull v. United States

Date: Jan 10, 2009
Affirmation of Long-Term Possession Conviction under the Child Pornography Protection Act and Sentencing Enhancements in Paull v. United States Introduction In United States of America v. Jerry...
Non-Custodial Home Interrogation Does Not Trigger Miranda Suppression: United States v. Panak

Non-Custodial Home Interrogation Does Not Trigger Miranda Suppression: United States v. Panak

Date: Jan 10, 2009
Non-Custodial Home Interrogation Does Not Trigger Miranda Suppression: United States v. Panak Introduction In United States v. Panak, 552 F.3d 462 (6th Cir. 2009), the United States Court of Appeals...
GUNASEKERA v. IRWIN & Krendl: Establishing Due Process Protections for Academic Faculty

GUNASEKERA v. IRWIN & Krendl: Establishing Due Process Protections for Academic Faculty

Date: Jan 9, 2009
GUNASEKERA v. IRWIN & Krendl: Establishing Due Process Protections for Academic Faculty Introduction GUNASEKERA v. IRWIN and Krendl (551 F.3d 461) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States...
Affirming Probable Cause Standards in Drug Trafficking: Insights from United States v. Gunter

Affirming Probable Cause Standards in Drug Trafficking: Insights from United States v. Gunter

Date: Jan 9, 2009
Affirming Probable Cause Standards in Drug Trafficking: Insights from United States v. Gunter Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. Michael Charles Gunter, 551 F.3d 472 (6th...
Murphy v. State of Ohio: Affirmation of AEDPA Standards and Upholding Legal Principles in Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Murphy v. State of Ohio: Affirmation of AEDPA Standards and Upholding Legal Principles in Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Date: Jan 9, 2009
Murphy v. State of Ohio: Affirmation of AEDPA Standards and Upholding Legal Principles in Habeas Corpus Proceedings Introduction In the landmark case of Joseph D. Murphy v. State of Ohio (551 F.3d...
Affirming Federal Disbarment: Due Process and the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in Legal Discipline

Affirming Federal Disbarment: Due Process and the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in Legal Discipline

Date: Jan 7, 2009
Affirming Federal Disbarment: Due Process and the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in Legal Discipline Introduction In the case of In re Linda S. Cook, 551 F.3d 542 (6th Cir. 2009), the United States Court of...
Deliberate Indifference Under Title IX: Sixth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Patterson v. Hudson Area Schools

Deliberate Indifference Under Title IX: Sixth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Patterson v. Hudson Area Schools

Date: Jan 7, 2009
Deliberate Indifference Under Title IX: Sixth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Patterson v. Hudson Area Schools Introduction In Patterson v. Hudson Area Schools, the United States Court of...
Reevaluating AEDPA Deference in Habeas Proceedings with Substantial New Evidence: Brown v. Smith

Reevaluating AEDPA Deference in Habeas Proceedings with Substantial New Evidence: Brown v. Smith

Date: Jan 1, 2009
Reevaluating AEDPA Deference in Habeas Proceedings with Substantial New Evidence: Brown v. Smith Introduction Michael W. Brown v. David Smith, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Affirmed: Standards for Deliberate Indifference in Eighth Amendment Prisoner Medical Rights Claims

Affirmed: Standards for Deliberate Indifference in Eighth Amendment Prisoner Medical Rights Claims

Date: Dec 25, 2008
Affirmed: Standards for Deliberate Indifference in Eighth Amendment Prisoner Medical Rights Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Ricardo V. Dodson v. Reginald A. Wilkinson, et al., the United...
Affirming the Legality of Acquitted Conduct in Sentencing under Sixth Amendment Constraints

Affirming the Legality of Acquitted Conduct in Sentencing under Sixth Amendment Constraints

Date: Dec 25, 2008
Affirming the Legality of Acquitted Conduct in Sentencing under Sixth Amendment Constraints Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Roger Clayton White (551 F.3d 381, 6th Cir. 2008),...
Application of Twombly and Leegin in Antitrust Litigation: Insights from Total Benefits Planning Agency, Inc. v. Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield

Application of Twombly and Leegin in Antitrust Litigation: Insights from Total Benefits Planning Agency, Inc. v. Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield

Date: Dec 23, 2008
Application of Twombly and Leegin in Antitrust Litigation: Insights from Total Benefits Planning Agency, Inc. v. Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield Introduction In the case of Total Benefits Planning...
Affirmation of Disability Benefits Denial: Ledford v. Astrue Establishes Robust Adherence to Substantial Evidence in SSA Claims

Affirmation of Disability Benefits Denial: Ledford v. Astrue Establishes Robust Adherence to Substantial Evidence in SSA Claims

Date: Dec 20, 2008
Affirmation of Disability Benefits Denial: Ledford v. Astrue Establishes Robust Adherence to Substantial Evidence in SSA Claims Introduction In the case of Timothy B. Ledford v. Michael J. Astrue,...
West v. Bell: Affirming Deference to State Courts and Strickland Standards in Habeas Corpus Petitions

West v. Bell: Affirming Deference to State Courts and Strickland Standards in Habeas Corpus Petitions

Date: Dec 19, 2008
West v. Bell: Affirming Deference to State Courts and Strickland Standards in Habeas Corpus Petitions Introduction The case of Stephen Michael West v. Ricky Bell (550 F.3d 542) adjudicated by the...
Termination Act Preemption Clarified: Sidewalk Construction Requirements for Railroads

Termination Act Preemption Clarified: Sidewalk Construction Requirements for Railroads

Date: Dec 19, 2008
Termination Act Preemption Clarified: Sidewalk Construction Requirements for Railroads Introduction In the landmark case of Adrian Blissfield Railroad Company v. Village of Blissfield, 550 F.3d 533...
Withdrawal of Guilty Pleas and Right to Allocution: Insights from United States v. Haygood

Withdrawal of Guilty Pleas and Right to Allocution: Insights from United States v. Haygood

Date: Dec 16, 2008
Withdrawal of Guilty Pleas and Right to Allocution: Insights from United States v. Haygood Introduction The case of United States v. Rhamel Haygood, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Reevaluating Fee Awards in Removal Cases: Insights from Warthman v. Genoa Township

Reevaluating Fee Awards in Removal Cases: Insights from Warthman v. Genoa Township

Date: Dec 16, 2008
Reevaluating Fee Awards in Removal Cases: Insights from Warthman v. Genoa Township Introduction The case of Leslie Warthman v. Genoa Township Board of Trustees addresses significant issues...
Owens v. Guida: Reaffirming Strickland, Brady, and Lockett in Capital Habeas Corpus Appeals

Owens v. Guida: Reaffirming Strickland, Brady, and Lockett in Capital Habeas Corpus Appeals

Date: Dec 10, 2008
Owens v. Guida: Reaffirming Strickland, Brady, and Lockett in Capital Habeas Corpus Appeals Introduction In Gaile K. Owens v. Earline Guida, Warden, 549 F.3d 399 (6th Cir. 2008), the United States...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert