Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Reversal of Summary Judgment in Gallagher v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.: Establishing Robust Standards for Hostile Work Environment Claims

Reversal of Summary Judgment in Gallagher v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.: Establishing Robust Standards for Hostile Work Environment Claims

Date: May 23, 2009
Reversal of Summary Judgment in Gallagher v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.: Establishing Robust Standards for Hostile Work Environment Claims Introduction The case of Julie Gallagher v. C.H. Robinson...
Promissory Estoppel Requires Clear and Unambiguous Promises: Commerce Benefits Group v. McKesson

Promissory Estoppel Requires Clear and Unambiguous Promises: Commerce Benefits Group v. McKesson

Date: May 21, 2009
Promissory Estoppel Requires Clear and Unambiguous Promises: Commerce Benefits Group v. McKesson Introduction Commerce Benefits Group, Inc. (“CBG”) initiated a lawsuit against McKesson Corporation...
Affirmation of Firearms and Methamphetamine Manufacturing Convictions: Roberge v. United States

Affirmation of Firearms and Methamphetamine Manufacturing Convictions: Roberge v. United States

Date: May 21, 2009
Affirmation of Firearms and Methamphetamine Manufacturing Convictions: Roberge v. United States Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Gary Roberge, the defendant, Gary Roberge,...
Affirmation of Probable Cause and Sentencing Guidelines in U.S. v. Lee Henry Berry

Affirmation of Probable Cause and Sentencing Guidelines in U.S. v. Lee Henry Berry

Date: May 15, 2009
Affirmation of Probable Cause and Sentencing Guidelines in U.S. v. Lee Henry Berry (565 F.3d 332) Introduction United States v. Lee Henry Berry is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of...
Requirement for Corroborating Evidence in Asylum Claims: Upholding the Substantial Evidence Standard in Yinggui Lin v. Holder

Requirement for Corroborating Evidence in Asylum Claims: Upholding the Substantial Evidence Standard in Yinggui Lin v. Holder

Date: May 15, 2009
Requirement for Corroborating Evidence in Asylum Claims: Upholding the Substantial Evidence Standard in Yinggui Lin v. Holder Introduction Yinggui Lin v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney...
Affirmation of Non-Dischargeability for Defalcation by Fiduciary Contractors under Section 523(a)(4): In re Patel

Affirmation of Non-Dischargeability for Defalcation by Fiduciary Contractors under Section 523(a)(4): In re Patel

Date: May 13, 2009
Affirmation of Non-Dischargeability for Defalcation by Fiduciary Contractors under Section 523(a)(4): In re Patel Introduction The case of In re Sameer B. Patel, Debtor versus Shamrock Floorcovering...
Affirmation and Partial Reversal in Vesligaj v. Peterson: Implications for Default Judgments and Equity Interest Valuation

Affirmation and Partial Reversal in Vesligaj v. Peterson: Implications for Default Judgments and Equity Interest Valuation

Date: May 12, 2009
Affirmation and Partial Reversal in Vesligaj v. Peterson: Implications for Default Judgments and Equity Interest Valuation Introduction The case of Mark Vesligaj v. Michael Peterson; Dialysis...
Retroactive Sentencing Adjustments Do Not Override Statutory Mandatory Minimums: Affirmation in United States v. Garrett Johnson

Retroactive Sentencing Adjustments Do Not Override Statutory Mandatory Minimums: Affirmation in United States v. Garrett Johnson

Date: May 6, 2009
Retroactive Sentencing Adjustments Do Not Override Statutory Mandatory Minimums: Affirmation in United States v. Garrett Johnson Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Garrett...
Vandiver v. Correctional Medical Services: Clarifying Exhaustion under the PLRA

Vandiver v. Correctional Medical Services: Clarifying Exhaustion under the PLRA

Date: May 2, 2009
Vandiver v. Correctional Medical Services: Clarifying Exhaustion under the PLRA Introduction In Vandiver v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc., 326 F. App'x 885 (6th Cir. 2009), the United States...
Limits on Ineffective Assistance Claims: Post-Future-Law Arguments Under Strickland in Nichols v. United States

Limits on Ineffective Assistance Claims: Post-Future-Law Arguments Under Strickland in Nichols v. United States

Date: Apr 30, 2009
Limits on Ineffective Assistance Claims: Post-Future-Law Arguments Under Strickland in Nichols v. United States Introduction In Nichols v. United States, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Sovereign Immunity and Monetary Damages under RLUIPA: Cardinal v. Metrish

Sovereign Immunity and Monetary Damages under RLUIPA: Cardinal v. Metrish

Date: Apr 25, 2009
Sovereign Immunity and Monetary Damages under RLUIPA: Cardinal v. Metrish Introduction Gerald William Cardinal v. Linda Metrish is a significant case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
HALL v. VASBINDER: Upholding Fifth Amendment Protections and Setting Standards for Habeas Relief

HALL v. VASBINDER: Upholding Fifth Amendment Protections and Setting Standards for Habeas Relief

Date: Apr 23, 2009
HALL v. VASBINDER: Upholding Fifth Amendment Protections and Setting Standards for Habeas Relief Introduction HALL v. VASBINDER, 563 F.3d 222 (6th Cir. 2009), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Sixth Circuit Upholds One-Year Statute of Limitations for 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims: Sha'rewa Bonner v. Da

Sixth Circuit Upholds One-Year Statute of Limitations for 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims: Sha'rewa Bonner v. Da

Date: Apr 21, 2009
Sixth Circuit Upholds One-Year Statute of Limitations for 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims: Sha'rewa Bonner v. Da Introduction In the landmark case of Sha'rewa Bonner v. Da, the United States Court of Appeals...
Da v. Lowe’s Home Centers: Establishing the Admissibility of Differential Diagnosis in Medical-Causation Expert Testimony

Da v. Lowe’s Home Centers: Establishing the Admissibility of Differential Diagnosis in Medical-Causation Expert Testimony

Date: Apr 17, 2009
Da v. Lowe’s Home Centers: Establishing the Admissibility of Differential Diagnosis in Medical-Causation Expert Testimony Introduction In Da v. Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc., the United States Court of...
Limitation of Statutory Damages Under TCPA and CSPA: Impact on Diversity Jurisdiction

Limitation of Statutory Damages Under TCPA and CSPA: Impact on Diversity Jurisdiction

Date: Apr 10, 2009
Limitation of Statutory Damages Under TCPA and CSPA: Impact on Diversity Jurisdiction Introduction The case of Philip Charvat v. GVN Michigan, Inc. (561 F.3d 623, 2009) addresses significant issues...
Affirmation of Firearm-Related Convictions: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Clay

Affirmation of Firearm-Related Convictions: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Clay

Date: Apr 9, 2009
Affirmation of Firearm-Related Convictions: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Clay Introduction United States v. Celina May Clay is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Court...
Sixth Circuit Expands EMTALA Liability to Estate Representatives in Moses v. Providence Hospital

Sixth Circuit Expands EMTALA Liability to Estate Representatives in Moses v. Providence Hospital

Date: Apr 7, 2009
Sixth Circuit Expands EMTALA Liability to Estate Representatives in Moses v. Providence Hospital Introduction In the landmark case Johnella Richmond Moses v. Providence Hospital and Medical Centers,...
Affirmation of Non-Misleading Debt Collection Practices under the FDCPA: United States v. Javitch, Block Rathbone

Affirmation of Non-Misleading Debt Collection Practices under the FDCPA: United States v. Javitch, Block Rathbone

Date: Apr 7, 2009
Affirmation of Non-Misleading Debt Collection Practices under the FDCPA: United States v. Javitch, Block Rathbone 1. Introduction In United States v. Javitch, Block Rathbone, 561 F.3d 588 (6th Cir....
Sixth Circuit Holds Violation of Collective Bargaining Agreement Not a Jurisdictional Prerequisite under §301 LMRA in Tackett v. M G Polymers

Sixth Circuit Holds Violation of Collective Bargaining Agreement Not a Jurisdictional Prerequisite under §301 LMRA in Tackett v. M G Polymers

Date: Apr 4, 2009
Sixth Circuit Holds Violation of Collective Bargaining Agreement Not a Jurisdictional Prerequisite under §301 LMRA in Tackett v. M G Polymers Introduction The case of Tackett v. M G Polymers, USA,...
Establishing New Grounds for Hearsay Exceptions and Collateral Estoppel in Employment Discrimination Cases: Cobbins v. Tennessee Department of Transportation

Establishing New Grounds for Hearsay Exceptions and Collateral Estoppel in Employment Discrimination Cases: Cobbins v. Tennessee Department of Transportation

Date: Apr 3, 2009
Establishing New Grounds for Hearsay Exceptions and Collateral Estoppel in Employment Discrimination Cases: Cobbins v. Tennessee Department of Transportation Introduction Gregory Cobbins v. Tennessee...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert