Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

6th Circuit Expands FDCPA Protections to Consumers Mistakenly Alleged to Owe Debts

6th Circuit Expands FDCPA Protections to Consumers Mistakenly Alleged to Owe Debts

Date: May 1, 2012
6th Circuit Expands FDCPA Protections to Consumers Mistakenly Alleged to Owe Debts Introduction In Lisa Bridge & William W. Bridge, III v. Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB et al., decided on April 30, 2012,...
Affirmation of ACCA Sentencing and Reasonable Suspicion Standards in United States v. James Jones

Affirmation of ACCA Sentencing and Reasonable Suspicion Standards in United States v. James Jones

Date: Apr 28, 2012
Affirmation of ACCA Sentencing and Reasonable Suspicion Standards in United States v. James Jones Introduction In United States of America v. James Jones, 673 F.3d 497 (6th Cir. 2012), the United...
Al v. Campbell: Upholding AEDPA Standards in Death Penalty Habeas Corpus Review

Al v. Campbell: Upholding AEDPA Standards in Death Penalty Habeas Corpus Review

Date: Apr 21, 2012
Al v. Campbell: Upholding AEDPA Standards in Death Penalty Habeas Corpus Review Introduction Alva E. Campbell stands convicted of four counts of aggravated murder, resulting in a death sentence that...
Six-Year Statute of Limitations for Fraudulent Fiduciary Breaches Under ERISA: Insights from Cataldo v. United States Steel Corporation

Six-Year Statute of Limitations for Fraudulent Fiduciary Breaches Under ERISA: Insights from Cataldo v. United States Steel Corporation

Date: Apr 14, 2012
Six-Year Statute of Limitations for Fraudulent Fiduciary Breaches Under ERISA: Insights from Cataldo v. United States Steel Corporation Introduction Cataldo v. United States Steel Corporation (676...
Procedural Default Prevails in Habeas Petition Despite Alleged Prosecutorial Misconduct: Wogenstahl v. Mitchell

Procedural Default Prevails in Habeas Petition Despite Alleged Prosecutorial Misconduct: Wogenstahl v. Mitchell

Date: Apr 13, 2012
Procedural Default Prevails in Habeas Petition Despite Alleged Prosecutorial Misconduct: Wogenstahl v. Mitchell Introduction In the case of Jeffrey A. Wogenstahl v. Betty Mitchell, adjudicated by the...
Reinterpreting 'Proceeds' Under §1956: The Wooten v. Cauley Decision

Reinterpreting 'Proceeds' Under §1956: The Wooten v. Cauley Decision

Date: Apr 13, 2012
Reinterpreting 'Proceeds' Under §1956: The Wooten v. Cauley Decision Introduction In the case of Jerry Lane Wooten v. E.K. Cauley, 677 F.3d 303 (6th Cir. 2012), the United States Court of Appeals for...
Judicial Immunity Affirmed in Savoie v. Martin: Implications for Judges Transitioning from Mediation Roles

Judicial Immunity Affirmed in Savoie v. Martin: Implications for Judges Transitioning from Mediation Roles

Date: Apr 13, 2012
Judicial Immunity Affirmed in Savoie v. Martin: Implications for Judges Transitioning from Mediation Roles Introduction The case of Christopher John Savoie, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Judge James G....
Defining Hostile Work Environment: Sixth Circuit's Decision in Berryman v. SuperValu Holdings

Defining Hostile Work Environment: Sixth Circuit's Decision in Berryman v. SuperValu Holdings

Date: Apr 12, 2012
Defining Hostile Work Environment: Sixth Circuit's Decision in Berryman v. SuperValu Holdings Introduction In the landmark case of Berryman et al. v. SuperValu Holdings, Inc., the United States Court...
Mootness and Standing in Municipal Ordinance Challenges: Bench Billboard Co. v. City of Cincinnati

Mootness and Standing in Municipal Ordinance Challenges: Bench Billboard Co. v. City of Cincinnati

Date: Apr 11, 2012
Mootness and Standing in Municipal Ordinance Challenges: Bench Billboard Co. v. City of Cincinnati Introduction The case of Bench Billboard Company versus the City of Cincinnati addresses significant...
Romani v. Michigan DHS: 6th Circuit Defines 'Needed to Care For' in FMLA and Upholds Title VII Summary Judgment

Romani v. Michigan DHS: 6th Circuit Defines 'Needed to Care For' in FMLA and Upholds Title VII Summary Judgment

Date: Apr 7, 2012
Romani v. Michigan DHS: 6th Circuit Defines 'Needed to Care For' in FMLA and Upholds Title VII Summary Judgment Introduction In Romani v. Michigan Department of Human Services (668 F.3d 826), the...
Affirmed: Duty to Monitor Electronic Dockets and Limits on Excusable Neglect in Federal Court

Affirmed: Duty to Monitor Electronic Dockets and Limits on Excusable Neglect in Federal Court

Date: Apr 7, 2012
Affirmed: Duty to Monitor Electronic Dockets and Limits on Excusable Neglect in Federal Court 1. Introduction The case of Gary D. Yeschick v. Norman Y. Mineta, decided by the United States Court of...
Finality of Sentences in Federal Habeas Corpus: Analysis of Rashad v. Lafler

Finality of Sentences in Federal Habeas Corpus: Analysis of Rashad v. Lafler

Date: Apr 6, 2012
Finality of Sentences in Federal Habeas Corpus: Analysis of Rashad v. Lafler Introduction Dwight Rashad v. Blaine Lafler, 675 F.3d 564 (6th Cir. 2012), presents a significant examination of the...
Reaffirming Sixth Amendment Protections: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Sentencing – McPhearson v. United States

Reaffirming Sixth Amendment Protections: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Sentencing – McPhearson v. United States

Date: Apr 6, 2012
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Sentencing: McPhearson v. United States Sets New Standard Introduction Martedis McPhearson v. United States is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States...
Classification of Fractional Undivided Interests in Oil and Gas as Securities and Rescission Damages under §10(b): Nolfi v. Ohio Kentucky Oil Corp.

Classification of Fractional Undivided Interests in Oil and Gas as Securities and Rescission Damages under §10(b): Nolfi v. Ohio Kentucky Oil Corp.

Date: Apr 5, 2012
Classification of Fractional Undivided Interests in Oil and Gas as Securities and Rescission Damages under §10(b): Nolfi v. Ohio Kentucky Oil Corp. Introduction The case of Gregory M. Nolfi, et al....
Affirmation of Strict Standards for Title IX Student Harassment Claims: Pahssen v. Merrill Community School District

Affirmation of Strict Standards for Title IX Student Harassment Claims: Pahssen v. Merrill Community School District

Date: Apr 5, 2012
Affirmation of Strict Standards for Title IX Student Harassment Claims: Pahssen v. Merrill Community School District Introduction Pahssen v. Merrill Community School District, 668 F.3d 356 (6th Cir....
Rigorous Evaluation of Expert Testimony and Design Defect Claims Reinforced in Newell Rubbermaid v. Raymond Corp.

Rigorous Evaluation of Expert Testimony and Design Defect Claims Reinforced in Newell Rubbermaid v. Raymond Corp.

Date: Apr 4, 2012
Rigorous Evaluation of Expert Testimony and Design Defect Claims Reinforced in Newell Rubbermaid v. Raymond Corp. Introduction The case of Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. v. The Raymond Corporation (676 F.3d...
Affirmation of Dismissal in Fair Housing Act Claim: HDC, LLC v. City of Ann Arbor

Affirmation of Dismissal in Fair Housing Act Claim: HDC, LLC v. City of Ann Arbor

Date: Mar 31, 2012
Affirmation of Dismissal in Fair Housing Act Claim: HDC, LLC v. City of Ann Arbor Introduction In the case of HDC, LLC; XY, LLC; 200 East William Street, LDHA, LLC v. City of Ann Arbor, the United...
Inconsequential Adverse Actions in First Amendment Retaliation Claims: Analysis of WURZELBACHER v. JONES-KELLEY

Inconsequential Adverse Actions in First Amendment Retaliation Claims: Analysis of WURZELBACHER v. JONES-KELLEY

Date: Mar 28, 2012
Inconsequential Adverse Actions in First Amendment Retaliation Claims: Analysis of WURZELBACHER v. JONES-KELLEY Introduction WURZELBACHER v. JONES-KELLEY, 675 F.3d 580 (6th Cir. 2012), presents a...
Full Faith and Credit Doctrine and Class Action Preclusion: A Commentary on Gooch v. Life Investors Insurance Co.

Full Faith and Credit Doctrine and Class Action Preclusion: A Commentary on Gooch v. Life Investors Insurance Co.

Date: Mar 17, 2012
Full Faith and Credit Doctrine and Class Action Preclusion: A Commentary on Gooch v. Life Investors Insurance Co. Introduction Gooch v. Life Investors Insurance Company of America is a pivotal case...
Expansion of Service Scope under Perpetual Telecommunications Franchises: Mediacom Southeast LLC v. AT&T Kentucky

Expansion of Service Scope under Perpetual Telecommunications Franchises: Mediacom Southeast LLC v. AT&T Kentucky

Date: Mar 3, 2012
Expansion of Service Scope under Perpetual Telecommunications Franchises: Mediacom Southeast LLC v. AT&T Kentucky Introduction The case of Mediacom Southeast LLC v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert