Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Reinforcing the Burden of Proof in Same-Sex Harassment Claims: Analysis of Wasek v. Arrow Energy Services

Reinforcing the Burden of Proof in Same-Sex Harassment Claims: Analysis of Wasek v. Arrow Energy Services

Date: Jun 21, 2012
Reinforcing the Burden of Proof in Same-Sex Harassment Claims: Analysis of Wasek v. Arrow Energy Services Introduction Wasek v. Arrow Energy Services, Inc., 682 F.3d 463 (6th Cir. 2012) is a...
Affirmation of Traffic Stop Legitimacy and Inventory Search Standards in United States v. Jackson

Affirmation of Traffic Stop Legitimacy and Inventory Search Standards in United States v. Jackson

Date: Jun 20, 2012
Affirmation of Traffic Stop Legitimacy and Inventory Search Standards in United States v. Jackson Introduction United States of America v. Rudolph V. Jackson, 682 F.3d 448 (6th Cir. 2012), is a...
Involuntary Transportation as Arrest: Sixth Circuit’s Landmark Decision on § 1983 and Qualified Immunity

Involuntary Transportation as Arrest: Sixth Circuit’s Landmark Decision on § 1983 and Qualified Immunity

Date: Jun 14, 2012
Involuntary Transportation as Arrest: Sixth Circuit’s Landmark Decision on § 1983 and Qualified Immunity Introduction The case of Alan Hoover v. Timothy Walsh, Michael Gondek, Dearborn Heights Police...
Constructive Amendment and Mandatory Minimum Sentencing: Insights from United States v. Ferguson

Constructive Amendment and Mandatory Minimum Sentencing: Insights from United States v. Ferguson

Date: Jun 6, 2012
Constructive Amendment and Mandatory Minimum Sentencing: Insights from United States v. Ferguson Introduction United States v. Ferguson, 681 F.3d 826 (6th Cir. 2012), is a pivotal case that addresses...
Prosecutorial Immunity in §1983 Claims: Insights from Heyerman v. County of Calhoun

Prosecutorial Immunity in §1983 Claims: Insights from Heyerman v. County of Calhoun

Date: May 30, 2012
Prosecutorial Immunity in §1983 Claims: Insights from Heyerman v. County of Calhoun Introduction The case of Buxton Craig Heyerman v. County of Calhoun et al., adjudicated by the United States Court...
Adopting the 'But-For' Causation Standard in ADA Claims: Analysis of Lewis v. Humboldt Acquisition Corporation

Adopting the 'But-For' Causation Standard in ADA Claims: Analysis of Lewis v. Humboldt Acquisition Corporation

Date: May 26, 2012
Adopting the 'But-For' Causation Standard in ADA Claims: Analysis of Lewis v. Humboldt Acquisition Corporation Introduction In the landmark case of Susan Lewis v. Humboldt Acquisition Corporation,...
Standing in ERISA Breach Cases: Insights from Taylor v. KeyCorp

Standing in ERISA Breach Cases: Insights from Taylor v. KeyCorp

Date: May 26, 2012
Standing in ERISA Breach Cases: Insights from Taylor v. KeyCorp Introduction Taylor v. KeyCorp, 680 F.3d 609 (6th Cir. 2012), is a pivotal case addressing the issue of standing in the context of the...
Clarifying Qualified Immunity Standards in Eighth Amendment Medical Negligence Claims: Reilly v. Vadlamudi and Payne

Clarifying Qualified Immunity Standards in Eighth Amendment Medical Negligence Claims: Reilly v. Vadlamudi and Payne

Date: May 26, 2012
Clarifying Qualified Immunity Standards in Eighth Amendment Medical Negligence Claims: Reilly v. Vadlamudi and Payne Introduction The case of Joshua Reilly v. Seetha Vadlamudi and Phillip Payne...
Waiver of Arbitration Rights Through Litigation Conduct: Johnson Associates Corp. v. HL Operating Corp.

Waiver of Arbitration Rights Through Litigation Conduct: Johnson Associates Corp. v. HL Operating Corp.

Date: May 24, 2012
Waiver of Arbitration Rights Through Litigation Conduct: Johnson Associates Corp. v. HL Operating Corp. Introduction The case of Johnson Associates Corporation; T. Chantal International Limited v. HL...
Affirmation of Dangerous Weapon Enhancement and Second Amendment Considerations in United States v. Greeno

Affirmation of Dangerous Weapon Enhancement and Second Amendment Considerations in United States v. Greeno

Date: May 22, 2012
Affirmation of Dangerous Weapon Enhancement and Second Amendment Considerations in United States v. Greeno Introduction In the case of United States v. Mark Greeno, the United States Court of Appeals...
Rede–Mendez v. United States: Redefining 'Crime of Violence' for Sentencing Enhancements

Rede–Mendez v. United States: Redefining 'Crime of Violence' for Sentencing Enhancements

Date: May 22, 2012
Rede–Mendez v. United States: Redefining 'Crime of Violence' for Sentencing Enhancements Introduction Rede–Mendez v. United States is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Limiting Supervisory Release Conditions and Upholding Traffic Stop Reasonableness in Narcotics Conspiracy: Insights from U.S. v. Stepp

Limiting Supervisory Release Conditions and Upholding Traffic Stop Reasonableness in Narcotics Conspiracy: Insights from U.S. v. Stepp

Date: May 18, 2012
Limiting Supervisory Release Conditions and Upholding Traffic Stop Reasonableness in Narcotics Conspiracy: Insights from U.S. v. Stepp Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Tommie...
6th Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity for City Officials in Warrantless Water Meter Searches: Clemente v. Vaslo

6th Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity for City Officials in Warrantless Water Meter Searches: Clemente v. Vaslo

Date: May 16, 2012
6th Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity for City Officials in Warrantless Water Meter Searches: Clemente v. Vaslo Introduction In the case of Clemente v. Vaslo, the plaintiffs, former employees of the...
Affirmation of Rational Basis Review in Citizenship Age Requirements: Guzman v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Affirmation of Rational Basis Review in Citizenship Age Requirements: Guzman v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Date: May 11, 2012
Affirmation of Rational Basis Review in Citizenship Age Requirements: Guzman v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security Introduction Guzman v. United States Department of Homeland Security is a landmark...
Reversing District Court: Sexual Orientation Discrimination in Prison Employment Under Equal Protection

Reversing District Court: Sexual Orientation Discrimination in Prison Employment Under Equal Protection

Date: May 11, 2012
Reversing District Court: Sexual Orientation Discrimination in Prison Employment Under Equal Protection Introduction In Davis v. Prison Health Services, 679 F.3d 433 (6th Cir. 2012), the United...
Affirming ELCRA's Scope: Sexual Harassment Claims Must Be Based on Sex, Not Sexual Orientation

Affirming ELCRA's Scope: Sexual Harassment Claims Must Be Based on Sex, Not Sexual Orientation

Date: May 11, 2012
Affirming ELCRA's Scope: Sexual Harassment Claims Must Be Based on Sex, Not Sexual Orientation Introduction In the case of Jeffrey Kalich v. AT&T Mobility, LLC, adjudicated by the United States Court...
Sixth Circuit Affirms Trademark Protection for Trade Dress: The Case of Maker's Mark’s Red Dripping Wax Seal

Sixth Circuit Affirms Trademark Protection for Trade Dress: The Case of Maker's Mark’s Red Dripping Wax Seal

Date: May 10, 2012
Sixth Circuit Affirms Trademark Protection for Trade Dress: The Case of Maker's Mark’s Red Dripping Wax Seal Introduction The case of Maker's Mark Distillery, Inc. v. Diageo North America, Inc....
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Reinforced in Surles v. Andison

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Reinforced in Surles v. Andison

Date: May 9, 2012
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Reinforced in Surles v. Andison Introduction In the landmark case of Samuel Surles v. Donald Andison, et al., decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Honest Belief in Disability Fraud Protects Employers from FMLA Retaliation Claims – Seeger v. Cincinnati Bell

Honest Belief in Disability Fraud Protects Employers from FMLA Retaliation Claims – Seeger v. Cincinnati Bell

Date: May 9, 2012
Honest Belief in Disability Fraud Protects Employers from FMLA Retaliation Claims – Seeger v. Cincinnati Bell Introduction The case of Tom Seeger v. Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company, LLC, decided by...
Affirming Restrictions on Habeas Corpus Petitions under the REAL ID Act in Immigration Cases: Zundel v. Holder

Affirming Restrictions on Habeas Corpus Petitions under the REAL ID Act in Immigration Cases: Zundel v. Holder

Date: May 8, 2012
Affirming Restrictions on Habeas Corpus Petitions under the REAL ID Act in Immigration Cases: Zundel v. Holder Introduction Ernst C. Zundel, a German citizen, and his wife, Ingrid A. Zundel, a United...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert