Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in §1983 Prisoner Claims: Insights from Woods v. Edwards

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in §1983 Prisoner Claims: Insights from Woods v. Edwards

Date: May 11, 1995
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in §1983 Prisoner Claims: Insights from Woods v. Edwards Introduction Woods v. Edwards, 51 F.3d 577 (5th Cir. 1995), is a notable case adjudicated by the United States...
Absence of Contribution Cause of Action Under Bankruptcy Code §362: In re Walker v. Cadle Co.

Absence of Contribution Cause of Action Under Bankruptcy Code §362: In re Walker v. Cadle Co.

Date: May 10, 1995
Absence of Contribution Cause of Action Under Bankruptcy Code §362: In re Walker v. Cadle Co. Introduction The appellate case of In re Walker v. Cadle Company, decided by the United States Court of...
No Protectible Liberty Interest in Extended Lockdown: Giovanni v. Lynn

No Protectible Liberty Interest in Extended Lockdown: Giovanni v. Lynn

Date: May 4, 1995
No Protectible Liberty Interest in Extended Lockdown: Giovanni v. Lynn Introduction Edward Giovanni v. Bruce Lynn, Secretary of the Department of Correction, et al., [48 F.3d 908 (5th Cir....
Preemption of State DTPA Claims by the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act: Analysis of Hetzel v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation

Preemption of State DTPA Claims by the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act: Analysis of Hetzel v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation

Date: Apr 25, 1995
Preemption of State DTPA Claims by the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act: Analysis of Hetzel v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation Introduction Hetzel v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation, 50 F.3d...
Judicial Improvements Act of 1990 Overrules Zahn: Comprehensive Analysis of In re Abbott Laboratories et al.

Judicial Improvements Act of 1990 Overrules Zahn: Comprehensive Analysis of In re Abbott Laboratories et al.

Date: Apr 25, 1995
Judicial Improvements Act of 1990 Overrules Zahn: Comprehensive Analysis of In re Abbott Laboratories et al. Introduction In the landmark case In re Abbott Laboratories, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company,...
Affirming Exigent Circumstances Justifying Warrantless Entry and Upholding Joint Counsel Representation - United States v. Rico

Affirming Exigent Circumstances Justifying Warrantless Entry and Upholding Joint Counsel Representation - United States v. Rico

Date: Apr 22, 1995
Affirming Exigent Circumstances Justifying Warrantless Entry and Upholding Joint Counsel Representation United States v. Debra Robinson Rico and Manuel Armando Rico Court: United States Court of...
State-Created Danger and Statute of Limitations in Civil Rights Litigation: An Analysis of Piotrowski v. City of Houston

State-Created Danger and Statute of Limitations in Civil Rights Litigation: An Analysis of Piotrowski v. City of Houston

Date: Apr 22, 1995
State-Created Danger and Statute of Limitations in Civil Rights Litigation: An Analysis of Piotrowski v. City of Houston Introduction Piotrowski v. City of Houston is a significant case adjudicated...
Southmark Corp. v. Grosz: Defining the Debtor's Estate in Commingled Funds for Preference Avoidance under 11 U.S.C. §547

Southmark Corp. v. Grosz: Defining the Debtor's Estate in Commingled Funds for Preference Avoidance under 11 U.S.C. §547

Date: Apr 15, 1995
Southmark Corp. v. Grosz: Defining the Debtor's Estate in Commingled Funds for Preference Avoidance under 11 U.S.C. §547 Introduction The case of Southmark Corporation v. Joseph Grosz (49 F.3d 1111)...
Constructive Knowledge and Overtime Compensation: Insights from Newton v. City of Henderson

Constructive Knowledge and Overtime Compensation: Insights from Newton v. City of Henderson

Date: Apr 14, 1995
Constructive Knowledge and Overtime Compensation: Insights from Newton v. City of Henderson Introduction The case Stephen R. Newton v. City of Henderson, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Balancing Attorney Disqualification and Counsel Choice: Insights from FDIC v. U.S. Fire Insurance Company

Balancing Attorney Disqualification and Counsel Choice: Insights from FDIC v. U.S. Fire Insurance Company

Date: Apr 13, 1995
Balancing Attorney Disqualification and Counsel Choice: Insights from FDIC v. U.S. Fire Insurance Company Introduction Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Manager for the FSLIC Resolution Fund,...
Clarifying Attorney’s Fees and Lodestar Adjustments in Antitrust Litigation: Louisiana Power Light Co. v. Kellstrom

Clarifying Attorney’s Fees and Lodestar Adjustments in Antitrust Litigation: Louisiana Power Light Co. v. Kellstrom

Date: Apr 11, 1995
Clarifying Attorney’s Fees and Lodestar Adjustments in Antitrust Litigation: Louisiana Power Light Co. v. Kellstrom Introduction The case of Louisiana Power Light Company v. Francis S. Kellstrom et...
Affirmation of Third-Party Consent and Apparent Authority in Warrantless Searches under the Fourth Amendment

Affirmation of Third-Party Consent and Apparent Authority in Warrantless Searches under the Fourth Amendment

Date: Apr 11, 1995
Affirmation of Third-Party Consent and Apparent Authority in Warrantless Searches under the Fourth Amendment Introduction The case of United States of America v. Mary Jane Jenkins et al. (46 F.3d...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Engstrom v. First National Bank: Clarifying Application of the Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Engstrom v. First National Bank: Clarifying Application of the Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act

Date: Mar 30, 1995
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Engstrom v. First National Bank: Clarifying Application of the Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act Introduction The case of John T. Engstrom, et al. v. The...
Accidental Death Defined Under ERISA in Cases of Autoerotic Asphyxiation

Accidental Death Defined Under ERISA in Cases of Autoerotic Asphyxiation

Date: Mar 30, 1995
Accidental Death Defined Under ERISA in Cases of Autoerotic Asphyxiation Introduction The case of Nancy J. Todd v. AIG Life Insurance Company revolves around the interpretation of accidental death...
Equitable Tolling Not Available for FTCA Claims When Statutory Remedies Exist

Equitable Tolling Not Available for FTCA Claims When Statutory Remedies Exist

Date: Mar 25, 1995
Equitable Tolling Not Available for FTCA Claims When Statutory Remedies Exist Introduction In the case of Ronald Lambert v. United States of America, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth...
Preserving Judicial Impartiality: The Standard for Judge Recusal under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) in United States v. Jordan

Preserving Judicial Impartiality: The Standard for Judge Recusal under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) in United States v. Jordan

Date: Mar 25, 1995
Preserving Judicial Impartiality: The Standard for Judge Recusal under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) in United States v. Jordan Introduction United States v. Betty Jordan is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Affirmation of Non-Pretextual Promotion Denial under ADEA

Affirmation of Non-Pretextual Promotion Denial under ADEA

Date: Mar 24, 1995
Affirmation of Non-Pretextual Promotion Denial under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) Introduction The case Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) v. Louisiana Office of...
HALE v. TOWNLEY: Defining the Scope of Qualified Immunity in Retaliation Claims under Section 1983

HALE v. TOWNLEY: Defining the Scope of Qualified Immunity in Retaliation Claims under Section 1983

Date: Mar 24, 1995
HALE v. TOWNLEY: Defining the Scope of Qualified Immunity in Retaliation Claims under Section 1983 Introduction HALE v. TOWNLEY, et al. is a seminal case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Enforcement of Ipso Facto Clauses in Bank Insolvency: Bank One v. Prudential Insurance Co.

Enforcement of Ipso Facto Clauses in Bank Insolvency: Bank One v. Prudential Insurance Co.

Date: Mar 17, 1995
Enforcement of Ipso Facto Clauses in Bank Insolvency: Bank One v. Prudential Insurance Co. Introduction Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America, along with Texas Commerce...
FTCA Liability Requires Breach of State Law Duty: JOHNSON v. SAWYER

FTCA Liability Requires Breach of State Law Duty: JOHNSON v. SAWYER

Date: Mar 17, 1995
Federal Tort Claims Act Liability Mandates State Law Basis: Insights from JOHNSON v. SAWYER Introduction JOHNSON v. SAWYER, 47 F.3d 716 (5th Cir. 1995), is a landmark decision that redefined the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert