Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Defining "Similarly Situated" in ADEA Representative Actions: Fifth Circuit Affirms Decertification

Defining "Similarly Situated" in ADEA Representative Actions: Fifth Circuit Affirms Decertification

Date: Jun 21, 1995
Defining "Similarly Situated" in ADEA Representative Actions: Fifth Circuit Affirms Decertification Introduction The case of Robert R. Mooney, et al. v. Aramco Services Co., et al. adjudicated by the...
Fifth Circuit Revises Stance on Polygraph Evidence Following Daubert Decision

Fifth Circuit Revises Stance on Polygraph Evidence Following Daubert Decision

Date: Jun 21, 1995
Fifth Circuit Revises Stance on Polygraph Evidence Following Daubert Decision Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Miriam Henao Posado et al., the United States Court of...
Involuntary Plea and Ineffective Counsel: Insights from RONNIE JAMES v. BURL CAIN

Involuntary Plea and Ineffective Counsel: Insights from RONNIE JAMES v. BURL CAIN

Date: Jun 21, 1995
Involuntary Plea and Ineffective Counsel: Insights from RONNIE JAMES v. BURL CAIN Introduction RONNIE JAMES v. BURL CAIN, 56 F.3d 662 (5th Cir. 1995), represents a significant appellate decision that...
Arbitrary Enforcement in Employment Disputes: Williams v. Cigna Financial Advisors

Arbitrary Enforcement in Employment Disputes: Williams v. Cigna Financial Advisors

Date: Jun 20, 1995
Enforcing Arbitration in Employment Disputes: Williams v. Cigna Financial Advisors Introduction In Williams v. Cigna Financial Advisors, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit...
Abuse of Writ Doctrine Reinforced in Fearance v. Scott: Implications for Serial Habeas Corpus Petitions

Abuse of Writ Doctrine Reinforced in Fearance v. Scott: Implications for Serial Habeas Corpus Petitions

Date: Jun 19, 1995
Abuse of Writ Doctrine Reinforced in Fearance v. Scott: Implications for Serial Habeas Corpus Petitions Introduction John Fearance, Jr., the petitioner-appellant, has been at the center of a...
Strict Compliance with Notice Requirements under 21 U.S.C. § 851(a) for Sentencing Enhancements

Strict Compliance with Notice Requirements under 21 U.S.C. § 851(a) for Sentencing Enhancements

Date: Jun 14, 1995
Strict Compliance with Notice Requirements under 21 U.S.C. § 851(a) for Sentencing Enhancements Introduction The case of United States of America v. Sandy Steen, Jr. and Bernel Ruiz, reported at 55...
Retroactive Sentencing Guidelines and Right to Counsel: Insights from United States v. Whitebird

Retroactive Sentencing Guidelines and Right to Counsel: Insights from United States v. Whitebird

Date: Jun 10, 1995
Retroactive Sentencing Guidelines and Right to Counsel: Insights from United States v. Whitebird Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Malcolm Jones Whitebird, 55 F.3d 1007...
ECOA Waiver of Federal Sovereign Immunity Confirmed: Moore v. USDA

ECOA Waiver of Federal Sovereign Immunity Confirmed: Moore v. USDA

Date: Jun 7, 1995
ECOA Waiver of Federal Sovereign Immunity Confirmed: Moore v. USDA Introduction In Moore v. United States Department of Agriculture, 55 F.3d 991 (5th Cir. 1995), the United States Court of Appeals...
Establishing Probable Cause Through Olfactory Evidence in Drug Conspiracy Cases: Gibson v. United States

Establishing Probable Cause Through Olfactory Evidence in Drug Conspiracy Cases: Gibson v. United States

Date: Jun 6, 1995
Establishing Probable Cause Through Olfactory Evidence in Drug Conspiracy Cases: Gibson v. United States Introduction Gibson v. United States is a landmark decision by the United States Court of...
Dutcher v. Ingalls Shipbuilding: Defining Disability Under the ADA

Dutcher v. Ingalls Shipbuilding: Defining Disability Under the ADA

Date: Jun 6, 1995
Dutcher v. Ingalls Shipbuilding: Defining Disability Under the ADA Introduction Case Citation: Tamela J. Dutcher v. Ingalls Shipbuilding, 53 F.3d 723 (5th Cir. 1995) Court: United States Court of...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies for Monetary Damages in Section 1983 Suits Affirmed

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies for Monetary Damages in Section 1983 Suits Affirmed

Date: Jun 3, 1995
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies for Monetary Damages in Section 1983 Suits Affirmed Introduction Tanya Marsh v. Johnnie W. Jones, Jr., Warden, et al. serves as a pivotal case in the realm of...
Prepayment Premiums Not Usurious Under Texas Law: Analysis of C.C. Port, Ltd. v. Davis-Penn Mortgage Company

Prepayment Premiums Not Usurious Under Texas Law: Analysis of C.C. Port, Ltd. v. Davis-Penn Mortgage Company

Date: Jun 2, 1995
Prepayment Premiums Not Usurious Under Texas Law: Analysis of C.C. Port, Ltd. v. Davis-Penn Mortgage Company Introduction The case of C.C. Port, Ltd., a Texas Limited Partnership, and Weil...
Authority of Liquidating Trustee to Assert Avoidance Actions in Chapter 11 Plans

Authority of Liquidating Trustee to Assert Avoidance Actions in Chapter 11 Plans

Date: Jun 2, 1995
Authority of Liquidating Trustee to Assert Avoidance Actions in Chapter 11 Plans Introduction The case of Van E. McFarland and McFarland Tondre v. Steven A. Leyh, Trustee of the Liquidating Trust of...
Enhancing the Good Cause Exception: Confrontation Rights in Supervised Release Revocation

Enhancing the Good Cause Exception: Confrontation Rights in Supervised Release Revocation

Date: May 25, 1995
Enhancing the Good Cause Exception: Confrontation Rights in Supervised Release Revocation Introduction The case of United States of America v. Woody Hyatt McCormick, Jr. (54 F.3d 214) addresses...
Federal Jurisdiction Reinforced: Understanding the Limits of Removal in Avitts v. Amoco Production Co.

Federal Jurisdiction Reinforced: Understanding the Limits of Removal in Avitts v. Amoco Production Co.

Date: May 23, 1995
Federal Jurisdiction Reinforced: Understanding the Limits of Removal in Avitts v. Amoco Production Co. Introduction The case of W.H. Avitts, et al. v. Amoco Production Co., et al. (53 F.3d 690)...
Expanding the Scope of Vehicle Search Consent: Insights from United States v. McSween

Expanding the Scope of Vehicle Search Consent: Insights from United States v. McSween

Date: May 20, 1995
Expanding the Scope of Vehicle Search Consent: Insights from United States v. McSween Introduction United States of America v. Gerry Carlyle McSween, 53 F.3d 684 (5th Cir. 1995), is a pivotal case...
BILOXI BELLE Classification under the Jones Act: A Comprehensive Analysis

BILOXI BELLE Classification under the Jones Act: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: May 20, 1995
BILOXI BELLE Classification under the Jones Act: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction In Christopher Pavone v. Mississippi Riverboat Amusement Corporation, et al., and Kathleen L. Ketzel v....
Establishing Sedentary Work Standards in Disability Benefits: Vaughan v. Shalala

Establishing Sedentary Work Standards in Disability Benefits: Vaughan v. Shalala

Date: May 18, 1995
Establishing Sedentary Work Standards in Disability Benefits: Vaughan v. Shalala Introduction Vaughan v. Shalala is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth...
Establishing the K-2 as a Non-Vessel: Implications for Jones Act and LHWCA Claims

Establishing the K-2 as a Non-Vessel: Implications for Jones Act and LHWCA Claims

Date: May 12, 1995
Establishing the K-2 as a Non-Vessel: Implications for Jones Act and LHWCA Claims Introduction The case of David Burchett and Cheryl Burchett v. Cargill, Inc. addresses critical issues surrounding...
Hostile Work Environment Claims Require Severe and Pervasive Conduct: Insights from DeAngelis v. El Paso Municipal Police Officers Association

Hostile Work Environment Claims Require Severe and Pervasive Conduct: Insights from DeAngelis v. El Paso Municipal Police Officers Association

Date: May 11, 1995
Hostile Work Environment Claims Require Severe and Pervasive Conduct: Insights from DeAngelis v. El Paso Municipal Police Officers Association Introduction DeAngelis v. El Paso Municipal Police...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert