Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Fifth Circuit Establishes Three-Year Statute of Limitations for Federal Communications Act Claims

Fifth Circuit Establishes Three-Year Statute of Limitations for Federal Communications Act Claims

Date: Jan 18, 2001
Fifth Circuit Establishes Three-Year Statute of Limitations for Federal Communications Act Claims Introduction The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in the case of Prostar v....
Reaffirming Rigorous Standards for §1983 Municipal Liability: PIOTROWSKI v. CITY OF HOUSTON

Reaffirming Rigorous Standards for §1983 Municipal Liability: PIOTROWSKI v. CITY OF HOUSTON

Date: Jan 18, 2001
Reaffirming Rigorous Standards for §1983 Municipal Liability: PIOTROWSKI v. CITY OF HOUSTON Introduction PIOTROWSKI v. CITY OF HOUSTON, 237 F.3d 567 (5th Cir. 2001), is a pivotal case that delves...
Fifth Circuit Establishes Waiver of Eleventh Amendment Immunity and Upholds EX PARTE YOUNG Exception in Telecommunications Regulation

Fifth Circuit Establishes Waiver of Eleventh Amendment Immunity and Upholds EX PARTE YOUNG Exception in Telecommunications Regulation

Date: Jan 17, 2001
Fifth Circuit Establishes Waiver of Eleventh Amendment Immunity and Upholds EX PARTE YOUNG Exception in Telecommunications Regulation Introduction In the case of ATT Communications,...
Reaffirmation of the Prison Litigation Reform Act’s Limitations on Emotional Injury Claims in Eighth Amendment Cases: Herman v. Holiday et al.

Reaffirmation of the Prison Litigation Reform Act’s Limitations on Emotional Injury Claims in Eighth Amendment Cases: Herman v. Holiday et al.

Date: Jan 17, 2001
Reaffirmation of the Prison Litigation Reform Act’s Limitations on Emotional Injury Claims in Eighth Amendment Cases: Herman v. Holiday et al. Introduction In the appellate case Johnny Ray Herman v....
Prolonged Traffic Stop and Fourth Amendment Protections: Insights from United States v. Jones & Daniel

Prolonged Traffic Stop and Fourth Amendment Protections: Insights from United States v. Jones & Daniel

Date: Jan 17, 2001
Prolonged Traffic Stop and Fourth Amendment Protections: Insights from United States v. Jones & Daniel Introduction United States of America v. Napoleon Jones and Eduardo Gabriel Daniel (234 F.3d...
Lloyd Brown v. Kinney Shoe Corp.: Establishing Rigorous Standards in Title VII Racial Discrimination Claims

Lloyd Brown v. Kinney Shoe Corp.: Establishing Rigorous Standards in Title VII Racial Discrimination Claims

Date: Jan 16, 2001
Lloyd Brown v. Kinney Shoe Corp.: Establishing Rigorous Standards in Title VII Racial Discrimination Claims Introduction In the landmark case Lloyd Brown v. Kinney Shoe Corp., adjudicated by the...
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Procedural Bar in Sayre v. Anderson

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Procedural Bar in Sayre v. Anderson

Date: Jan 13, 2001
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Procedural Bar in Sayre v. Anderson Introduction Elroy Earl Sayre, a resident of Pascagoula, Mississippi, appealed his denial of habeas corpus relief concerning...
Reaffirmation of Drug Conspiracy Convictions in Light of APPRENDI v. NEW JERSEY

Reaffirmation of Drug Conspiracy Convictions in Light of APPRENDI v. NEW JERSEY

Date: Jan 13, 2001
Reaffirmation of Drug Conspiracy Convictions in Light of APPRENDI v. NEW JERSEY Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. James Slaughter, decided by the United States Court of...
Enhanced Standards for Residual Functional Capacity Assessment in Disability Claims: Myers v. Apfel

Enhanced Standards for Residual Functional Capacity Assessment in Disability Claims: Myers v. Apfel

Date: Jan 12, 2001
Enhanced Standards for Residual Functional Capacity Assessment in Disability Claims: Myers v. Apfel Introduction Case Citation: Cindy T. Myers, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner...
Clarifying Statute of Limitations for CERCLA Contribution Claims: Geraghty and Miller, Inc. v. Conoco Inc. and Condea Vista Chemical Company

Clarifying Statute of Limitations for CERCLA Contribution Claims: Geraghty and Miller, Inc. v. Conoco Inc. and Condea Vista Chemical Company

Date: Jan 12, 2001
Clarifying Statute of Limitations for CERCLA Contribution Claims: Geraghty and Miller, Inc. v. Conoco Inc. and Condea Vista Chemical Company Introduction Geraghty and Miller, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter...
Leave to Amend in Securities Act Class Actions – Schlotzsky’s Inc. Decision

Leave to Amend in Securities Act Class Actions – Schlotzsky’s Inc. Decision

Date: Jan 10, 2001
Leave to Amend in Securities Act Class Actions – Schlotzsky’s Inc. Decision Introduction The case of LONE STAR LADIES INVESTMENT CLUB et al. v. Schlotzsky's Inc. et al. was adjudicated by the United...
Affirmation of Disability Determination Standards in Social Security Claims: Shave v. Apfel

Affirmation of Disability Determination Standards in Social Security Claims: Shave v. Apfel

Date: Jan 10, 2001
Affirmation of Disability Determination Standards in Social Security Claims: Shave v. Apfel Introduction Craig A. Shave v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security is a landmark case decided...
Reevaluation of Summary Judgment Standards in Title VII Failure to Promote Claims: Blow v. City of San Antonio

Reevaluation of Summary Judgment Standards in Title VII Failure to Promote Claims: Blow v. City of San Antonio

Date: Jan 9, 2001
Reevaluation of Summary Judgment Standards in Title VII Failure to Promote Claims: Blow v. City of San Antonio Introduction Blow v. City of San Antonio, Texas, 236 F.3d 293 (5th Cir. 2001), is a...
Clarifying the Confrontation Clause and Counsel Effectiveness: Insights from GOCHICOA v. JOHNSON

Clarifying the Confrontation Clause and Counsel Effectiveness: Insights from GOCHICOA v. JOHNSON

Date: Jan 2, 2001
Clarifying the Confrontation Clause and Counsel Effectiveness: Insights from GOCHICOA v. JOHNSON Introduction GOCHICOA v. JOHNSON, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit...
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Insights from Wadsworth v. Johnson

Jurisdictional Boundaries in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Insights from Wadsworth v. Johnson

Date: Dec 29, 2000
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Insights from Wadsworth v. Johnson, 235 F.3d 959 Introduction Ronald Lynn Wadsworth, a petitioner incarcerated in Texas, sought habeas corpus...
Fraudulent Joinder in Diversity Removal: Insights from BADON v. RJR NABISCO INC.

Fraudulent Joinder in Diversity Removal: Insights from BADON v. RJR NABISCO INC.

Date: Dec 22, 2000
Fraudulent Joinder in Diversity Removal: Insights from BADON v. RJR NABISCO INC., 236 F.3d 282 (5th Cir. 2000) Introduction The case of BADON v. RJR NABISCO INC. represents a pivotal judicial...
Affirmative Action Admissions: Analyzing Hopwood III v. State of Texas

Affirmative Action Admissions: Analyzing Hopwood III v. State of Texas

Date: Dec 22, 2000
Affirmative Action Admissions: Analyzing Hopwood III v. State of Texas Introduction Cheryl J. Hopwood et al. v. State of Texas, 236 F.3d 256 (5th Cir. 2000), commonly referred to as Hopwood III, is a...
Substantive Due Process Protects Property Rights: Simi Investment Co. v. Harris County

Substantive Due Process Protects Property Rights: Simi Investment Co. v. Harris County

Date: Dec 22, 2000
Substantive Due Process Protects Property Rights: Simi Investment Co. v. Harris County Introduction In Simi Investment Company, Inc. v. Harris County, Texas, the United States Court of Appeals for...
Kallestad Decision: Affirming Federal Authority over Local Possession of Child Pornography via the Commerce Clause

Kallestad Decision: Affirming Federal Authority over Local Possession of Child Pornography via the Commerce Clause

Date: Dec 20, 2000
Kallestad Decision: Affirming Federal Authority over Local Possession of Child Pornography via the Commerce Clause Introduction The case of United States v. Kallestad, adjudicated by the United...
Establishing Seaman Status under the Jones Act: Endeavor Marine, Inc. v. Baye

Establishing Seaman Status under the Jones Act: Endeavor Marine, Inc. v. Baye

Date: Dec 12, 2000
Establishing Seaman Status under the Jones Act: Endeavor Marine, Inc. v. Baye Introduction The case of Endeavor Marine, Inc. and Tako Towing, Inc. v. Kevin M. Baye, Sr. revolves around the critical...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert