Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Disciplinary Action Standards in Prisoner Habeas Corpus Review

Affirmation of Disciplinary Action Standards in Prisoner Habeas Corpus Review

Date: Feb 16, 2001
Affirmation of Disciplinary Action Standards in Prisoner Habeas Corpus Review Introduction The case of O'Neill Hudson v. Gary L. Johnson addresses the procedural safeguards applicable to prison...
Expansion of Customs-Duty Exception under FTCA Upheld in Jeanmarie v. United States

Expansion of Customs-Duty Exception under FTCA Upheld in Jeanmarie v. United States

Date: Feb 16, 2001
Expansion of Customs-Duty Exception under FTCA Upheld in Jeanmarie v. United States Introduction In Jeanmarie v. United States, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the...
Procter & Gamble v. Amway: Fifth Circuit Establishes Enhanced Criteria for Commercial Speech and Standing under the Lanham Act

Procter & Gamble v. Amway: Fifth Circuit Establishes Enhanced Criteria for Commercial Speech and Standing under the Lanham Act

Date: Feb 15, 2001
Procter & Gamble v. Amway: Fifth Circuit Establishes Enhanced Criteria for Commercial Speech and Standing under the Lanham Act Introduction In The PROCTER GAMBLE COMPANY and The Procter Gamble...
Defining Prevailing Party Status Under 42 U.S.C. § 1988: Riser v. Dean, et al.

Defining Prevailing Party Status Under 42 U.S.C. § 1988: Riser v. Dean, et al.

Date: Feb 14, 2001
Defining Prevailing Party Status Under 42 U.S.C. § 1988: Riser v. Dean, et al. Introduction The case of William D. Dean, Jr., et al. v. Larkin T. Riser addresses a pivotal issue within civil rights...
Standing and Class Certification in Labor Representation: Analysis of BERTULLI et al. v. INDEPENDENT ASSOCIATION OF CONTINENTAL PILOTS et al.

Standing and Class Certification in Labor Representation: Analysis of BERTULLI et al. v. INDEPENDENT ASSOCIATION OF CONTINENTAL PILOTS et al.

Date: Feb 14, 2001
Standing and Class Certification in Labor Representation: Analysis of BERTULLI et al. v. INDEPENDENT ASSOCIATION OF CONTINENTAL PILOTS et al. Introduction In the early 2000s, a significant case...
Affirmation of Procedural Bars in Federal Habeas Review: Beazley v. Johnson Establishes Standards Under §2254(d)(1)

Affirmation of Procedural Bars in Federal Habeas Review: Beazley v. Johnson Establishes Standards Under §2254(d)(1)

Date: Feb 10, 2001
Affirmation of Procedural Bars in Federal Habeas Review: Beazley v. Johnson Establishes Standards Under §2254(d)(1) Introduction Napoleon Beazley v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of...
Strict Standards for Deliberate Indifference in Prisoner Medical Care: Analysis of Domino v. Texas Dept. of Corrections

Strict Standards for Deliberate Indifference in Prisoner Medical Care: Analysis of Domino v. Texas Dept. of Corrections

Date: Feb 8, 2001
Strict Standards for Deliberate Indifference in Prisoner Medical Care: Analysis of Domino v. Texas Department of Corrections Introduction The case of Anna Domino et al. v. Texas Department of...
Limits of U.S. Antitrust Jurisdiction over Foreign Conduct under FTAIA: Statoil v. Heeremac

Limits of U.S. Antitrust Jurisdiction over Foreign Conduct under FTAIA: Statoil v. Heeremac

Date: Feb 6, 2001
Limits of U.S. Antitrust Jurisdiction over Foreign Conduct under FTAIA: Statoil v. Heeremac Introduction Den Norske Stats Oljeselskap AS (Statoil), a Norwegian oil company operating exclusively in...
Broadening Jurisdiction Under 18 U.S.C. §1958: Intrastate Use of Interstate Commerce Facilities Constitutes Murder-for-Hire

Broadening Jurisdiction Under 18 U.S.C. §1958: Intrastate Use of Interstate Commerce Facilities Constitutes Murder-for-Hire

Date: Feb 3, 2001
Broadening Jurisdiction Under 18 U.S.C. §1958: Intrastate Use of Interstate Commerce Facilities Constitutes Murder-for-Hire Introduction The case of United States of America v. Betty Louise Marek and...
Reinforcing Nondischargeability of Partnership Liability for Partner's Fraud Under §523(a)(2)(A): A Comprehensive Analysis of Deodati v. M.M. Winkler Associates

Reinforcing Nondischargeability of Partnership Liability for Partner's Fraud Under §523(a)(2)(A): A Comprehensive Analysis of Deodati v. M.M. Winkler Associates

Date: Feb 2, 2001
Reinforcing Nondischargeability of Partnership Liability for Partner's Fraud Under §523(a)(2)(A) Introduction The case of Bruno Deodati v. M.M. Winkler Associates, Bill Morgan, and Okee McDonald...
Limitations on Employers' Use of Subjective Hiring Criteria in Age Discrimination Litigation: Medina v. Ramsey Steel

Limitations on Employers' Use of Subjective Hiring Criteria in Age Discrimination Litigation: Medina v. Ramsey Steel

Date: Jan 30, 2001
Limitations on Employers' Use of Subjective Hiring Criteria in Age Discrimination Litigation: Medina v. Ramsey Steel Introduction Arturo P. Medina v. Ramsey Steel Company, Inc. is a pivotal case...
Benefit of the Bargain Damages Recognized in Contract and Fraud Claims: Insights from Coghlan v. Wellcraft Marine Co.

Benefit of the Bargain Damages Recognized in Contract and Fraud Claims: Insights from Coghlan v. Wellcraft Marine Co.

Date: Jan 27, 2001
Benefit of the Bargain Damages Recognized in Contract and Fraud Claims: Insights from Coghlan v. Wellcraft Marine Co. Introduction Frank E. Coghlan, III, et al. v. Wellcraft Marine Corporation et...
Establishing Reasonable Suspicion in Investigatory Stops: Insights from United States v. Guerrero-Barajas

Establishing Reasonable Suspicion in Investigatory Stops: Insights from United States v. Guerrero-Barajas

Date: Jan 27, 2001
Establishing Reasonable Suspicion in Investigatory Stops: Insights from United States v. Guerrero-Barajas Introduction United States v. Ernesto Guerrero-Barajas (240 F.3d 428, 5th Cir. 2001) is a...
Premature Notice of Appeal in § 2255 Motions: Requirements for Reinstatement of Criminal Judgment

Premature Notice of Appeal in § 2255 Motions: Requirements for Reinstatement of Criminal Judgment

Date: Jan 27, 2001
Premature Notice of Appeal in § 2255 Motions: Requirements for Reinstatement of Criminal Judgment Introduction The case of UNITED STATES of America v. Dee Ann West (240 F.3d 456) adjudicated by the...
Peel Co. v. The Rug Market: Establishing Material Fact Questions in Copyright Infringement

Peel Co. v. The Rug Market: Establishing Material Fact Questions in Copyright Infringement

Date: Jan 25, 2001
Peel Co. v. The Rug Market: Establishing Material Fact Questions in Copyright Infringement Introduction In Peel Company, Inc. v. The Rug Market, 238 F.3d 391 (5th Cir. 2001), the United States Court...
Affirming the Legality of Mandatory School Uniform Policies under First Amendment Constraints: Da v. Turner

Affirming the Legality of Mandatory School Uniform Policies under First Amendment Constraints: Da v. Turner

Date: Jan 24, 2001
Affirming the Legality of Mandatory School Uniform Policies under First Amendment Constraints: Da v. Turner Introduction Da v. Turner, 240 F.3d 437 (5th Cir. 2001), addresses the contentious issue of...
Jurisdiction Over State Law Takings Claims in Federal Diversity Cases: Insights from Vulcan Materials Co. v. City of Tehuacana

Jurisdiction Over State Law Takings Claims in Federal Diversity Cases: Insights from Vulcan Materials Co. v. City of Tehuacana

Date: Jan 24, 2001
Jurisdiction Over State Law Takings Claims in Federal Diversity Cases: Insights from Vulcan Materials Co. v. City of Tehuacana Introduction Vulcan Materials Company v. The City of Tehuacana is a...
Balancing Fourth Amendment Protections: Exigent Circumstances in United States v. Jones

Balancing Fourth Amendment Protections: Exigent Circumstances in United States v. Jones

Date: Jan 23, 2001
Balancing Fourth Amendment Protections: Exigent Circumstances in United States v. Jones Introduction United States v. Raymond Lee Jones, 239 F.3d 716 (5th Cir. 2001), is a pivotal case that addresses...
Ensuring Comprehensive Evaluation of Impairments in Social Security Disability Claims: Boyd v. Apfel

Ensuring Comprehensive Evaluation of Impairments in Social Security Disability Claims: Boyd v. Apfel

Date: Jan 20, 2001
Ensuring Comprehensive Evaluation of Impairments in Social Security Disability Claims: Boyd v. Apfel Introduction Willie L. Boyd v. Kenneth S. Apfel is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States...
Reaffirming Strickland Standards Under AEDPA: Insights from Howard Monte v. Lee Neal

Reaffirming Strickland Standards Under AEDPA: Insights from Howard Monte v. Lee Neal

Date: Jan 19, 2001
Reaffirming Strickland Standards Under AEDPA: Insights from Howard Monte v. Lee Neal Introduction Howard Monteville Neal appealed his death sentence for the brutal rape and murder of his...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert