Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Broadening Class Action Criteria in Title VII Discrimination Cases: Barnett v. W.T. Grant Co.

Broadening Class Action Criteria in Title VII Discrimination Cases: Barnett v. W.T. Grant Co.

Date: Jun 13, 1975
Broadening Class Action Criteria in Title VII Discrimination Cases: Barnett v. W.T. Grant Co. Introduction In Hyland Lewis Barnett v. W.T. Grant Company et al., 518 F.2d 543 (4th Cir. 1975), the...
Carras Estate v. Merrill Lynch: Establishing Enhanced Broker Fiduciary Duties Under Rule 10b-5

Carras Estate v. Merrill Lynch: Establishing Enhanced Broker Fiduciary Duties Under Rule 10b-5

Date: May 7, 1975
Carras Estate v. Merrill Lynch: Establishing Enhanced Broker Fiduciary Duties Under Rule 10b-5 Introduction Helen C. Carras and Bill G. Carras, Co-Executors of the Estate of Gus N. Carras, Deceased...
Individual Director Liability Under Civil Rights Acts: Insights from Tillman v. Wheaton-Haven Recreation Association

Individual Director Liability Under Civil Rights Acts: Insights from Tillman v. Wheaton-Haven Recreation Association

Date: Apr 16, 1975
Individual Director Liability Under Civil Rights Acts: Insights from Tillman v. Wheaton-Haven Recreation Association Introduction The case of Murray Tillman et al. v. Wheaton-Haven Recreation...
Exhaustion of State Remedies Not Required for Inmates Filing § 1983 Suits: A Comprehensive Review of McCray v. Burrell

Exhaustion of State Remedies Not Required for Inmates Filing § 1983 Suits: A Comprehensive Review of McCray v. Burrell

Date: Apr 11, 1975
Exhaustion of State Remedies Not Required for Inmates Filing § 1983 Suits: A Comprehensive Review of McCray v. Burrell Introduction The case of Milton McCray v. Robert Burrell is a significant...
Reversing Secretary's Denial: The Taylor v. Weinberger Precedent on Disability Benefits

Reversing Secretary's Denial: The Taylor v. Weinberger Precedent on Disability Benefits

Date: Mar 18, 1975
Reversing Secretary's Denial: The Taylor v. Weinberger Precedent on Disability Benefits Introduction The case of DORIS A. TAYLOR v. CASPAR WEINBERGER, SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE, 512...
Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken Inc.: Establishing Strict Boundaries for Attorney-Client and Work Product Privileges in Multi-District Patent-Antitrust Litigation

Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken Inc.: Establishing Strict Boundaries for Attorney-Client and Work Product Privileges in Multi-District Patent-Antitrust Litigation

Date: Feb 14, 1975
Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken Inc.: Establishing Strict Boundaries for Attorney-Client and Work Product Privileges in Multi-District Patent-Antitrust Litigation Introduction The case of The Duplan...
Continued Protection of Attorneys' Opinion Work Product in Subsequent Litigation: DUPLAN CORP. v. MOULINAGE ET RETORDERIE de Chavanoz

Continued Protection of Attorneys' Opinion Work Product in Subsequent Litigation: DUPLAN CORP. v. MOULINAGE ET RETORDERIE de Chavanoz

Date: Oct 19, 1974
Continued Protection of Attorneys' Opinion Work Product in Subsequent Litigation: DUPLAN CORP. v. MOULINAGE ET RETORDERIE de Chavanoz Introduction The landmark case Duplan Corporation v. Moulinage et...
Ellicott Machine Corp. v. Modern Welding Co.: Upholding the First-to-File Venue Principle and Limiting Interlocutory Appeals

Ellicott Machine Corp. v. Modern Welding Co.: Upholding the First-to-File Venue Principle and Limiting Interlocutory Appeals

Date: Aug 13, 1974
Ellicott Machine Corp. v. Modern Welding Co.: Upholding the First-to-File Venue Principle and Limiting Interlocutory Appeals Introduction Ellicott Machine Corporation (Appellee) v. Modern Welding...
Rowley v. McMillan: Defining the Boundaries of Executive Immunity in Protecting Constitutional Rights

Rowley v. McMillan: Defining the Boundaries of Executive Immunity in Protecting Constitutional Rights

Date: Jul 27, 1974
Rowley v. McMillan: Defining the Boundaries of Executive Immunity in Protecting Constitutional Rights Introduction In Rowley and Grimes v. McMillan et al., the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Defendant's Right to Presence and Reliability of Informant Testimony in U.S. v. Gregorio

Defendant's Right to Presence and Reliability of Informant Testimony in U.S. v. Gregorio

Date: Jun 1, 1974
Defendant's Right to Presence and Reliability of Informant Testimony in United States v. Gregorio Introduction United States of America v. Paul F. Gregorio, 497 F.2d 1253 (4th Cir. 1974), presents a...
Enhancing Interstate Commerce Jurisdiction in Antitrust Law: Fourth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Greenville Publishing v. The Daily Reflector

Enhancing Interstate Commerce Jurisdiction in Antitrust Law: Fourth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Greenville Publishing v. The Daily Reflector

Date: May 2, 1974
Enhancing Interstate Commerce Jurisdiction in Antitrust Law: Fourth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Greenville Publishing v. The Daily Reflector Introduction In the landmark case of Greenville...
Requirement for Local Boards to Articulate Reasons for Denying Conscientious Objector Claims: The Wainscott Precedent

Requirement for Local Boards to Articulate Reasons for Denying Conscientious Objector Claims: The Wainscott Precedent

Date: Apr 26, 1974
Requirement for Local Boards to Articulate Reasons for Denying Conscientious Objector Claims: The Wainscott Precedent Introduction The case of United States of America v. John Charles Wainscott (496...
Preponderance of Evidence Standard Established in Breeden v. Weinberger

Preponderance of Evidence Standard Established in Breeden v. Weinberger

Date: Mar 20, 1974
Preponderance of Evidence Standard Established in Breeden v. Weinberger Introduction The case of Minnie Florence Breeden v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, decided...
End Organ Damage Not an Exclusive Prerequisite for Disability Determination: Martin v. Secretary of Department of Health, Education and Welfare

End Organ Damage Not an Exclusive Prerequisite for Disability Determination: Martin v. Secretary of Department of Health, Education and Welfare

Date: Mar 6, 1974
End Organ Damage Not an Exclusive Prerequisite for Disability Determination: Martin v. Secretary of Department of Health, Education and Welfare Introduction The case of Ruby R. Martin v. Secretary of...
Limitation of §1983 Claims to Constitutional Violations in Warrantless Misdemeanor Arrests

Limitation of §1983 Claims to Constitutional Violations in Warrantless Misdemeanor Arrests

Date: Feb 22, 1974
Limitation of §1983 Claims to Constitutional Violations in Warrantless Misdemeanor Arrests Introduction The case of George B. Street v. Officer Leo Surdyka, Baltimore City Police Department, et al....
Centrally Operating Company v. Utility Workers of America: Jurisdictional Precedents Established

Centrally Operating Company v. Utility Workers of America: Jurisdictional Precedents Established

Date: Jan 25, 1974
Centrally Operating Company v. Utility Workers of America: Jurisdictional Precedents Established Introduction Centrally Operating Company v. Utility Workers of America, AFL-CIO, ET AL. (491 F.2d 245)...
Judicial Discretion in Dismissals for Failure to Prosecute: Insights from Reizakis v. Loy

Judicial Discretion in Dismissals for Failure to Prosecute: Insights from Reizakis v. Loy

Date: Jan 23, 1974
Judicial Discretion in Dismissals for Failure to Prosecute: Insights from Reizakis v. Loy Introduction The case of Paris Reizakis v. Albert E. Loy, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Personal Injury Claims via Breach of Implied Warranty Barred by Two-Year Statute of Limitations: Maynard v. General Electric (1973)

Personal Injury Claims via Breach of Implied Warranty Barred by Two-Year Statute of Limitations: Maynard v. General Electric (1973)

Date: Oct 31, 1973
Personal Injury Claims via Breach of Implied Warranty Barred by Two-Year Statute of Limitations: Maynard v. General Electric (1973) Introduction The case of Halcy R. Maynard and Muriel Maynard v....
Partial Subrogation and Diversity Jurisdiction: Affirmation of VEPCO’s Right to Sue Without Insurer Joinder

Partial Subrogation and Diversity Jurisdiction: Affirmation of VEPCO’s Right to Sue Without Insurer Joinder

Date: Oct 4, 1973
Partial Subrogation and Diversity Jurisdiction: Affirmation of VEPCO’s Right to Sue Without Insurance Company Joinder Introduction In the landmark case Virginia Electric and Power Company v....
Admissibility of Prior Occurrences in Proving Corpus Delicti: Woods v. United States

Admissibility of Prior Occurrences in Proving Corpus Delicti: Woods v. United States

Date: Sep 13, 1973
Admissibility of Prior Occurrences in Proving Corpus Delicti: Woods v. United States (484 F.2d 127) Introduction Woods v. United States is a pivotal case heard by the United States Court of Appeals...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert