Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Limitations on Mandamus Relief for Discretionary Venue Decisions: IN RE RALSTON PURINA COMPANY

Limitations on Mandamus Relief for Discretionary Venue Decisions: IN RE RALSTON PURINA COMPANY

Date: Feb 9, 1984
Limitations on Mandamus Relief for Discretionary Venue Decisions: IN RE RALSTON PURINA COMPANY Introduction The case of IN RE RALSTON PURINA COMPANY, PETITIONER (726 F.2d 1002), adjudicated by the...
Affirmation of Grid Regulations in Disability Determinations Involving Nonexertional Impairments

Affirmation of Grid Regulations in Disability Determinations Involving Nonexertional Impairments

Date: Jan 25, 1984
Affirmation of Grid Regulations in Disability Determinations Involving Nonexertional Impairments Introduction The case of Charles Daniel Smith v. Richard S. Schweiker, decided by the United States...
Brady v. Thurston Motor Lines: Affirmation of Burden of Proof Allocation under Title VII

Brady v. Thurston Motor Lines: Affirmation of Burden of Proof Allocation under Title VII

Date: Jan 19, 1984
Brady v. Thurston Motor Lines: Affirmation of Burden of Proof Allocation under Title VII Introduction Brady v. Thurston Motor Lines, Inc., 726 F.2d 136 (4th Cir. 1984), is a pivotal appellate...
Fourth Circuit Establishes Requirement for Explicit Weighting of Medical Evidence in Social Security Disability Determinations

Fourth Circuit Establishes Requirement for Explicit Weighting of Medical Evidence in Social Security Disability Determinations

Date: Jan 12, 1984
Fourth Circuit Establishes Requirement for Explicit Weighting of Medical Evidence in Social Security Disability Determinations Introduction The case of Owen L. Gordon v. Richard S. Schweiker,...
Redlining Practices and McCarran-Ferguson Act: Insights from Mackey v. Nationwide Insurance Companies

Redlining Practices and McCarran-Ferguson Act: Insights from Mackey v. Nationwide Insurance Companies

Date: Jan 7, 1984
Redlining Practices and McCarran-Ferguson Act: Insights from Mackey v. Nationwide Insurance Companies Introduction Mackey v. Nationwide Insurance Companies, 724 F.2d 419 (4th Cir. 1984), is a pivotal...
Fourth Circuit Upholds Employer’s Authority to Modify Contingent Benefits in Division Sale Under ERISA

Fourth Circuit Upholds Employer’s Authority to Modify Contingent Benefits in Division Sale Under ERISA

Date: Dec 31, 1983
Fourth Circuit Upholds Employer’s Authority to Modify Contingent Benefits in Division Sale Under ERISA Introduction The case of Sutton et al. v. Weirton Steel Division of National Steel Corporation...
Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Denial in Capital Punishment: Hutchins v. Garrison

Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Denial in Capital Punishment: Hutchins v. Garrison

Date: Dec 30, 1983
Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Denial in Capital Punishment: Hutchins v. Garrison Introduction Hutchins v. Garrison (724 F.2d 1425) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Defining Employee Status under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act: Garrett v. Phillips Mills, Inc.

Defining Employee Status under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act: Garrett v. Phillips Mills, Inc.

Date: Nov 24, 1983
Defining Employee Status under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act: Garrett v. Phillips Mills, Inc. Introduction Garrett v. Phillips Mills, Inc. (721 F.2d 979) is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
ITCO v. Michelin: Establishing State-Level Unfair Trade Practices Claims Post Federal Antitrust Dismissal

ITCO v. Michelin: Establishing State-Level Unfair Trade Practices Claims Post Federal Antitrust Dismissal

Date: Nov 24, 1983
ITCO v. Michelin: Establishing State-Level Unfair Trade Practices Claims Post Federal Antitrust Dismissal Introduction In the landmark case of ITCO Corporation v. Michelin Tire Corporation, decided...
Establishing the Substantial Evidence Standard in Aiding and Abetting Convictions: United States v. Arrington

Establishing the Substantial Evidence Standard in Aiding and Abetting Convictions: United States v. Arrington

Date: Oct 15, 1983
Establishing the Substantial Evidence Standard in Aiding and Abetting Convictions: United States v. Arrington Introduction In United States v. Arrington, 719 F.2d 701 (4th Cir. 1983), the United...
ROSS v. REED: Affirmation of Qualified Immunity for Correctional Officials in First and Eighth Amendment Claims

ROSS v. REED: Affirmation of Qualified Immunity for Correctional Officials in First and Eighth Amendment Claims

Date: Oct 13, 1983
ROSS v. REED: Affirmation of Qualified Immunity for Correctional Officials in First and Eighth Amendment Claims Introduction ROSS v. REED is a seminal case decided by the United States Court of...
Defending Against Frivolous Title VII Claims: The Arnold v. Burger King Decision

Defending Against Frivolous Title VII Claims: The Arnold v. Burger King Decision

Date: Oct 6, 1983
Defending Against Frivolous Title VII Claims: The Arnold v. Burger King Decision Introduction In the landmark case of James D. Arnold, Jr. v. Burger King Corporation and Fickling Enterprises,...
Adoption of Magistrate's Findings Without Objection: Camby v. Davis & Lester

Adoption of Magistrate's Findings Without Objection: Camby v. Davis & Lester

Date: Oct 4, 1983
Adoption of Magistrate's Findings Without Objection: Camby v. Davis & Lester Introduction David E. Camby filed a § 1983 action against police officers Larry Davis and James M. Lester, alleging that...
Municipal Liability under Monell Requires Evidence of Official Policy or Gross Negligence: Analysis of Wellington v. Daniels

Municipal Liability under Monell Requires Evidence of Official Policy or Gross Negligence: Analysis of Wellington v. Daniels

Date: Sep 20, 1983
Municipal Liability under Monell Requires Evidence of Official Policy or Gross Negligence: Analysis of Wellington v. Daniels Introduction Wellington v. Daniels is a pivotal case decided by the United...
EAJA Application in Social Security Cases: Guthrie v. Schweiker

EAJA Application in Social Security Cases: Guthrie v. Schweiker

Date: Sep 20, 1983
EAJA Application in Social Security Cases: Guthrie v. Schweiker Introduction Paul W. Guthrie v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services, 718 F.2d 104 (4th Cir. 1983), is a...
Standing and Mootness in §1983 Claims: Insights from Buie v. Jones

Standing and Mootness in §1983 Claims: Insights from Buie v. Jones

Date: Sep 16, 1983
Standing and Mootness in §1983 Claims: Insights from Buie v. Jones Introduction The case of James Earl Buie v. Otis Jones et al., adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth...
Scott v. Greenville County: Affirming Developer Rights in Zoning Disputes

Scott v. Greenville County: Affirming Developer Rights in Zoning Disputes

Date: Sep 15, 1983
Scott v. Greenville County: Affirming Developer Rights in Zoning Disputes Introduction Scott v. Greenville County is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth...
Upholding Retroactive Withdrawal Liability: Republic Industries v. Teamsters Joint Council No. 83 of Virginia Pension Fund

Upholding Retroactive Withdrawal Liability: Republic Industries v. Teamsters Joint Council No. 83 of Virginia Pension Fund

Date: Sep 10, 1983
Upholding Retroactive Withdrawal Liability: Republic Industries v. Teamsters Joint Council No. 83 of Virginia Pension Fund Introduction The case of Republic Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation,...
Dismissal of Improper Motion to Reconsider: Insights from ABOVE THE BELT, INC. v. MEL BOHANNAN ROOFING, INC.

Dismissal of Improper Motion to Reconsider: Insights from ABOVE THE BELT, INC. v. MEL BOHANNAN ROOFING, INC.

Date: Sep 2, 1983
Dismissal of Improper Motion to Reconsider: Insights from ABOVE THE BELT, INC. v. MEL BOHANNAN ROOFING, INC. Introduction The case of ABOVE THE BELT, INC. v. MEL BOHANNAN ROOFING, INC. (99 F.R.D. 99)...
Reaffirmation of Burden of Proof and Vocational Evidence in Nonexertional Disability Claims: McLain v. Schweiker

Reaffirmation of Burden of Proof and Vocational Evidence in Nonexertional Disability Claims: McLain v. Schweiker

Date: Sep 2, 1983
Reaffirmation of Burden of Proof and Vocational Evidence in Nonexertional Disability Claims: McLain v. Schweiker Introduction Leon B. McLain v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary, Department of Health...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert