Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Reaffirmation of Juror Disqualification for Stock Ownership: Gladhill v. General Motors

Reaffirmation of Juror Disqualification for Stock Ownership: Gladhill v. General Motors

Date: Sep 18, 1984
Reaffirmation of Juror Disqualification for Stock Ownership: Gladhill v. General Motors Introduction The case of Robert Gladhill; Harriet Gladhill and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company,...
Standing and Conspiracy Standards in Fourth Circuit Drug Smuggling: United States v. Manbeck

Standing and Conspiracy Standards in Fourth Circuit Drug Smuggling: United States v. Manbeck

Date: Sep 12, 1984
Standing and Conspiracy Standards in Fourth Circuit Drug Smuggling: United States v. Manbeck (744 F.2d 360) Introduction In the complex landscape of federal drug enforcement, the case United States...
Limits on Administrative Grids in Disability Determinations: Insights from Wilson v. Heckler

Limits on Administrative Grids in Disability Determinations: Insights from Wilson v. Heckler

Date: Sep 5, 1984
Limits on Administrative Grids in Disability Determinations: Insights from Wilson v. Heckler Introduction Marion Wilson v. Margaret H. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services (743 F.2d 218,...
Armour Company Racial Discrimination Case: Class Action Certification and Retroactive Seniority

Armour Company Racial Discrimination Case: Class Action Certification and Retroactive Seniority

Date: Aug 21, 1984
Armour Company Racial Discrimination Case: Class Action Certification and Retroactive Seniority Introduction The case of Curtis Holsey, Jackie L. Drakeford, Julius Frazier, Mynell Bennett, Linwood...
Limitation of Hearsay Exceptions under the Sixth Amendment: McCall v. United States

Limitation of Hearsay Exceptions under the Sixth Amendment: McCall v. United States

Date: Aug 18, 1984
Limitation of Hearsay Exceptions under the Sixth Amendment: McCall v. United States Introduction UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. ROBERT P. McCALL, APPELLANT, 740 F.2d 1331 (4th Cir. 1984),...
Substantial Evidence Standard in Disability Claims: Shively v. Heckler

Substantial Evidence Standard in Disability Claims: Shively v. Heckler

Date: Aug 3, 1984
Substantial Evidence Standard in Disability Claims: Shively v. Heckler Introduction The case of James Kenneth Shively v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services (739 F.2d 987, 4th...
Mandatory Counsel Appointment for Indigent 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Plaintiffs Affirmed by Fourth Circuit

Mandatory Counsel Appointment for Indigent 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Plaintiffs Affirmed by Fourth Circuit

Date: Jul 18, 1984
Mandatory Counsel Appointment for Indigent 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Plaintiffs Affirmed by Fourth Circuit Introduction The case of Bobby Whisenant, Appellant v. Dr. Stanley Yuam et al., adjudicated by the...
Establishing Substantive Due Process and Municipal Liability under §1983: Analysis of Spell v. McDaniel (1984)

Establishing Substantive Due Process and Municipal Liability under §1983: Analysis of Spell v. McDaniel (1984)

Date: Jul 13, 1984
Establishing Substantive Due Process and Municipal Liability under §1983: Analysis of Spell v. McDaniel (1984) Introduction Spell v. McDaniel, 591 F. Supp. 1090 (E.D. North Carolina, 1984), is a...
Reaffirming Individual Protection in Disparate Impact Claims: Betsey v. Turtle Creek Associates

Reaffirming Individual Protection in Disparate Impact Claims: Betsey v. Turtle Creek Associates

Date: Jun 19, 1984
Reaffirming Individual Protection in Disparate Impact Claims: Betsey v. Turtle Creek Associates Introduction The case of Betsey et al. v. Turtle Creek Associates et al. (736 F.2d 983) adjudicated by...
Application and Upholding of N.C.G.S. § 1-15(b) in Asbestosis Litigation

Application and Upholding of N.C.G.S. § 1-15(b) in Asbestosis Litigation

Date: Jun 8, 1984
Application and Upholding of N.C.G.S. § 1-15(b) in Asbestosis Litigation Introduction The case of Arnold G. Barwick v. The Celotex Corporation et al. (736 F.2d 946, United States Court of Appeals,...
Establishing Supervisory Liability in Correctional Institutions: Slakan v. Porter et al.

Establishing Supervisory Liability in Correctional Institutions: Slakan v. Porter et al.

Date: Jun 6, 1984
Establishing Supervisory Liability in Correctional Institutions: Slakan v. Porter et al. Introduction In the landmark case of Charles J. Slakan v. T.C. Porter, M.M. Walters, Amos Reed, Ralph Edwards,...
Affirmation of Death Penalty in SHAW v. MARTIN: Legal Principles and Implications

Affirmation of Death Penalty in SHAW v. MARTIN: Legal Principles and Implications

Date: Apr 27, 1984
Affirmation of Death Penalty in SHAW v. MARTIN: Legal Principles and Implications Introduction The case of Joseph Carl Shaw v. Joseph R. Martin, Warden, Central Correctional Institution, and Hon....
Affirmation of Substituted Service through Secretary of State under West Virginia Long Arm Statute: FDIC v. Spartan Mining Co.

Affirmation of Substituted Service through Secretary of State under West Virginia Long Arm Statute: FDIC v. Spartan Mining Co.

Date: Apr 18, 1984
Affirmation of Substituted Service through Secretary of State under West Virginia Long Arm Statute: FDIC v. Spartan Mining Co. Introduction In the landmark case of Federal Deposit Insurance...
Expanding the Applicability of §1985(3) Conspiracy Claims to Include Public Officials: Insights from Waller v. Butkovich

Expanding the Applicability of §1985(3) Conspiracy Claims to Include Public Officials: Insights from Waller v. Butkovich

Date: Apr 18, 1984
Expanding the Applicability of §1985(3) Conspiracy Claims to Include Public Officials: Insights from Waller v. Butkovich Introduction The case of James Waller, et al. v. Bernard Butkovich, et al....
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Plea Negotiations: Little v. Allsbrook

Effective Assistance of Counsel in Plea Negotiations: Little v. Allsbrook

Date: Apr 6, 1984
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Plea Negotiations: Little v. Allsbrook Introduction Henry Arthur Little, the appellant, was convicted of second-degree murder in North Carolina after entering a...
Expansion of Rule 60(b) Relief to Professional Corporations: Carbo v. Upjohn Co. Analysis

Expansion of Rule 60(b) Relief to Professional Corporations: Carbo v. Upjohn Co. Analysis

Date: Apr 5, 1984
Expansion of Rule 60(b) Relief to Professional Corporations: Carbo v. Upjohn Co. Analysis Introduction Carbo v. Upjohn Co., 731 F.2d 204 (4th Cir. 1984), represents a pivotal case in the context of...
Limits on Exempting Personal Injury Settlement Proceeds in Bankruptcy: In re Tignor

Limits on Exempting Personal Injury Settlement Proceeds in Bankruptcy: In re Tignor

Date: Mar 16, 1984
Limits on Exempting Personal Injury Settlement Proceeds in Bankruptcy: In re Tignor Introduction The case of Henry Clay Tignor v. William C. Parkinson, Jr. (729 F.2d 977) presents pivotal issues in...
Clarifying FLSA Coverage: Application of Rolling Quarters and Commission Calculations in Burnley v. Short

Clarifying FLSA Coverage: Application of Rolling Quarters and Commission Calculations in Burnley v. Short

Date: Mar 13, 1984
Clarifying FLSA Coverage: Application of Rolling Quarters and Commission Calculations in Burnley v. Short Introduction In the case of Burnley et al. v. Short, the United States Court of Appeals for...
Attorney-Client Privilege in Grand Jury Proceedings: Insights from IN RE GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS (727 F.2d 1352)

Attorney-Client Privilege in Grand Jury Proceedings: Insights from IN RE GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS (727 F.2d 1352)

Date: Feb 25, 1984
Attorney-Client Privilege in Grand Jury Proceedings: Insights from IN RE GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS (727 F.2d 1352) Introduction The case of IN RE GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS (727 F.2d 1352), adjudicated by...
Waiver of Appellate Review Due to Failure to Object to Magistrate’s Findings: United States v. Schronce

Waiver of Appellate Review Due to Failure to Object to Magistrate’s Findings: United States v. Schronce

Date: Feb 17, 1984
Waiver of Appellate Review Due to Failure to Object to Magistrate’s Findings: United States v. Schronce Introduction United States v. Schronce is a landmark case decided by the United States Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert