Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Balancing Federal Discovery Rules and International Conventions in Personal Jurisdiction Disputes: Analysis of Rich v. KIS California (1988)

Balancing Federal Discovery Rules and International Conventions in Personal Jurisdiction Disputes: Analysis of Rich v. KIS California (1988)

Date: Jun 23, 1988
Balancing Federal Discovery Rules and International Conventions in Personal Jurisdiction Disputes: Analysis of Rich v. KIS California (1988) Introduction In the landmark case of Rich et al. v. KIS...
Excessive Force and Medical Neglect in Arrest: Martin v. County Defendants

Excessive Force and Medical Neglect in Arrest: Martin v. County Defendants

Date: Jun 18, 1988
Excessive Force and Medical Neglect in Arrest: Martin v. County Defendants Introduction In the landmark case of Felicisimo N. Martin v. County Defendants, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Alvarado v. Board of Trustees: Expanding Employer Identification under Title VII

Alvarado v. Board of Trustees: Expanding Employer Identification under Title VII

Date: Jun 4, 1988
Alvarado v. Board of Trustees: Expanding Employer Identification under Title VII Introduction The case Arcangel Alvarado v. Board of Trustees of Montgomery Community College (848 F.2d 457)...
Probable Cause Affirmed in Drug-Related Arrest Based on Totality of Circumstances – United States v. Garcia

Probable Cause Affirmed in Drug-Related Arrest Based on Totality of Circumstances – United States v. Garcia

Date: Jun 2, 1988
Probable Cause Affirmed in Drug-Related Arrest Based on Totality of Circumstances – United States v. Garcia Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Jorge Manuel Garcia (848 F.2d 58),...
Fourth Amendment Implications on Canine Searches in Train Compartments: United States v. Whitehead

Fourth Amendment Implications on Canine Searches in Train Compartments: United States v. Whitehead

Date: May 25, 1988
Fourth Amendment Implications on Canine Searches in Train Compartments: United States v. Whitehead Introduction In United States of America v. Conrad Whitehead, II, the United States Court of Appeals...
Establishing Transferable Skills: A Precedent in SSI Disability Determinations - Pyles v. Bowen

Establishing Transferable Skills: A Precedent in SSI Disability Determinations - Pyles v. Bowen

Date: May 21, 1988
Establishing Transferable Skills: A Precedent in SSI Disability Determinations - Pyles v. Bowen Introduction SHEILA PYLES v. OTIS R. BOWEN is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Clarifying Qualified Immunity and Probable Cause Standards: Sevigny v. Dicksey

Clarifying Qualified Immunity and Probable Cause Standards: Sevigny v. Dicksey

Date: May 19, 1988
Clarifying Qualified Immunity and Probable Cause Standards: Sevigny v. Dicksey Introduction Diana Pepper Sevigny, a single mother, initiated a legal action against Andrew F. Dicksey, a police...
Enhancing Hearsay Exceptions in Child Abuse Litigation: Foretich v. Morgan

Enhancing Hearsay Exceptions in Child Abuse Litigation: Foretich v. Morgan

Date: May 18, 1988
Enhancing Hearsay Exceptions in Child Abuse Litigation: Foretich v. Morgan Introduction Foretich v. Morgan, 846 F.2d 941 (4th Cir. 1988), is a pivotal case in the realm of child abuse litigation,...
Affirming Qualified Privilege and Public Access in Defamation: Rushford v. The New Yorker (1988)

Affirming Qualified Privilege and Public Access in Defamation: Rushford v. The New Yorker (1988)

Date: May 7, 1988
Affirming Qualified Privilege and Public Access in Defamation: Rushford v. The New Yorker (1988) Introduction The case of Greg Rushford v. The New Yorker Magazine, Inc. adjudicated in the United...
Qualified Immunity and Fourth Amendment Rights: Turner v. Dammon et al. Analysis

Qualified Immunity and Fourth Amendment Rights: Turner v. Dammon et al. Analysis

Date: May 4, 1988
Qualified Immunity and Fourth Amendment Rights: Turner v. Dammon et al. Analysis Introduction Turner v. Dammon et al., 848 F.2d 440 (4th Cir. 1988), is a pivotal case addressing the boundaries of...
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Insanity Defense: Analyzing Hooper v. Garraghty

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Insanity Defense: Analyzing Hooper v. Garraghty

Date: May 4, 1988
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Insanity Defense: Analyzing Hooper v. Garraghty Introduction The case of Gerald R. Hooper v. D.A. Garraghty et al., decided by the United States Court of Appeals...
State Tort Claims for Vaccine Defects Not Preempted by Federal Law: Analysis of Abbot v. American Cyanamid

State Tort Claims for Vaccine Defects Not Preempted by Federal Law: Analysis of Abbot v. American Cyanamid

Date: Apr 21, 1988
State Tort Claims for Vaccine Defects Not Preempted by Federal Law: Analysis of Abbot v. American Cyanamid Introduction The case Tracy Isabel Abbot v. American Cyanamid Co. addressed the critical...
Supremacy of ERISA Preemption Over Law of the Case Doctrine: Sejman et al. v. Warner-Lambert Company

Supremacy of ERISA Preemption Over Law of the Case Doctrine: Sejman et al. v. Warner-Lambert Company

Date: Apr 19, 1988
Supremacy of ERISA Preemption Over Law of the Case Doctrine: Sejman et al. v. Warner-Lambert Company Introduction The case of Sejman et al. v. Warner-Lambert Company addressed the critical interplay...
Fourth Circuit Upholds Procedural Default in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Clanton v. Muncy

Fourth Circuit Upholds Procedural Default in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Clanton v. Muncy

Date: Apr 15, 1988
Fourth Circuit Upholds Procedural Default in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Clanton v. Muncy Introduction Clanton v. Muncy, 845 F.2d 1238 (4th Cir. 1988), is a pivotal case in the realm of federal habeas...
Revisiting Rule 60(b): Augusta Fiberglass Coatings v. Fodor Contracting – A Comprehensive Commentary

Revisiting Rule 60(b): Augusta Fiberglass Coatings v. Fodor Contracting – A Comprehensive Commentary

Date: Apr 8, 1988
Revisiting Rule 60(b): Augusta Fiberglass Coatings v. Fodor Contracting – A Comprehensive Commentary Introduction The case of Augusta Fiberglass Coatings, Inc. v. Fodor Contracting Corporation,...
Espionage Act Expanded: Press Leaks Now Criminalized under §§793(d)-(e)

Espionage Act Expanded: Press Leaks Now Criminalized under §§793(d)-(e)

Date: Apr 2, 1988
Espionage Act Expanded: Press Leaks Now Criminalized under §§793(d)-(e) Introduction The case of United States of America v. Samuel Loring Morison (844 F.2d 1057, 4th Cir. 1988) marks a significant...
Requirement to Allege Interstate Commerce Effect in RICO Indictments: United States v. Hooker

Requirement to Allege Interstate Commerce Effect in RICO Indictments: United States v. Hooker

Date: Mar 11, 1988
Requirement to Allege Interstate Commerce Effect in RICO Indictments: United States v. Hooker Introduction The case of United States of America v. J. Murray Hooker, II, 841 F.2d 1225 (4th Cir. 1988),...
Directors' Personal Liability for Corporate Debts Post-Dissolution: Flip Mortgage Inc. v. McElhone

Directors' Personal Liability for Corporate Debts Post-Dissolution: Flip Mortgage Inc. v. McElhone

Date: Mar 5, 1988
Directors' Personal Liability for Corporate Debts Post-Dissolution: Flip Mortgage Inc. v. McElhone Introduction Flip Mortgage Corporation v. McElhone is a pivotal case decided by the United States...
Procedural Due Process in Decertification of Contract Employees: Harrison v. United States Postal Service

Procedural Due Process in Decertification of Contract Employees: Harrison v. United States Postal Service

Date: Feb 26, 1988
Procedural Due Process in Decertification of Contract Employees: Harrison v. United States Postal Service Introduction The case of Leslie A. Harrison v. United States Postal Service addresses...
Rivanna Trawlers Unlimited v. Defendants-Appellees: General Partnership Interests Not Classified as Securities

Rivanna Trawlers Unlimited v. Defendants-Appellees: General Partnership Interests Not Classified as Securities

Date: Feb 23, 1988
Rivanna Trawlers Unlimited v. Defendants-Appellees: General Partnership Interests Not Classified as Securities Introduction Rivanna Trawlers Unlimited, A Virginia General Partnership and its...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert