Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Narrow Interpretation of Work Product Protection in Insurance Bad Faith Claims

Narrow Interpretation of Work Product Protection in Insurance Bad Faith Claims

Date: Nov 5, 1988
Narrow Interpretation of Work Product Protection in Insurance Bad Faith Claims Introduction The case of Pete Rinaldi's Fast Foods, Inc. t/a Pete Rinaldi's Fried Chicken v. Great American Insurance...
Mandamus Relief in Tax Disputes: In re First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Durham

Mandamus Relief in Tax Disputes: In re First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Durham

Date: Oct 27, 1988
Mandamus Relief in Tax Disputes: In re First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Durham Introduction In the landmark case of In re First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Durham, decided on...
Affirmation of Attorney Fee Awards to Environmental Prevailing Parties under the Clean Water Act: NWF v. Hanson

Affirmation of Attorney Fee Awards to Environmental Prevailing Parties under the Clean Water Act: NWF v. Hanson

Date: Oct 15, 1988
Affirmation of Attorney Fee Awards to Environmental Prevailing Parties under the Clean Water Act: NWF v. Hanson Introduction The case of National Wildlife Federation, et al. v. Hanson (859 F.2d 313,...
Establishing Jurisdiction and Causation: Insights from Brandenburg v. First Maryland Savings and Loan

Establishing Jurisdiction and Causation: Insights from Brandenburg v. First Maryland Savings and Loan

Date: Oct 12, 1988
Establishing Jurisdiction and Causation: Insights from Brandenburg v. First Maryland Savings and Loan Introduction The case of Brandenburg v. First Maryland Savings and Loan (859 F.2d 1179, 4th Cir....
Affirmation of Statute of Limitations in Section 1983 Claims: Insights from Sattler v. Johnson

Affirmation of Statute of Limitations in Section 1983 Claims: Insights from Sattler v. Johnson

Date: Sep 20, 1988
Affirmation of Statute of Limitations in Section 1983 Claims: Insights from Sattler v. Johnson Introduction The case of William Sattler v. Darrell Johnson et al. addresses critical issues surrounding...
Fourth Circuit Upholds Exclusive Remedy Provision in FTCA: Pendley v. United States

Fourth Circuit Upholds Exclusive Remedy Provision in FTCA: Pendley v. United States

Date: Sep 20, 1988
Fourth Circuit Upholds Exclusive Remedy Provision in FTCA: Pendley v. United States Introduction Pendley v. United States, 856 F.2d 699 (4th Cir. 1988), is a landmark case in the realm of federal...
Affirmation of Reasonable Suspicion and Police Conduct Standards under the Fourth Amendment: United States v. Taylor

Affirmation of Reasonable Suspicion and Police Conduct Standards under the Fourth Amendment: United States v. Taylor

Date: Sep 14, 1988
Affirmation of Reasonable Suspicion and Police Conduct Standards under the Fourth Amendment: United States v. Taylor Introduction The case of United States of America v. Thomas H. Taylor, Jr.,...
Reaffirmation of the Substantiality Doctrine in Federal Jurisdiction: Davis v. Pak et al.

Reaffirmation of the Substantiality Doctrine in Federal Jurisdiction: Davis v. Pak et al.

Date: Sep 14, 1988
Reaffirmation of the Substantiality Doctrine in Federal Jurisdiction: Davis v. Pak et al. Introduction In the landmark case of Evelyn Davis v. Chong M. Pak; Ralph G. Cantrell; Diane E. France, the...
Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Monsanto Company and Others

Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Monsanto Company and Others

Date: Sep 8, 1988
Joint and Several Liability under CERCLA: Insights from United States v. Monsanto Company and Others Introduction The case of United States of America v. Monsanto Company et al., decided by the...
Implied Waiver of Work-Product Privilege in Rule 17(c) Subpoenas: Insights from In re Martin Marietta Corp. v. William C. Pollard

Implied Waiver of Work-Product Privilege in Rule 17(c) Subpoenas: Insights from In re Martin Marietta Corp. v. William C. Pollard

Date: Sep 7, 1988
Implied Waiver of Work-Product Privilege in Rule 17(c) Subpoenas: Insights from In re Martin Marietta Corp. v. William C. Pollard Introduction In re Martin Marietta Corporation, Appellant. United...
Voluntariness of Resignation and Due Process: Insights from H. Harlan Stone, M.D. v. University of Maryland

Voluntariness of Resignation and Due Process: Insights from H. Harlan Stone, M.D. v. University of Maryland

Date: Aug 20, 1988
Voluntariness of Resignation and Due Process: Insights from H. Harlan Stone, M.D. v. University of Maryland Introduction The case of H. Harlan Stone, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, et al. v. University...
Voluntary Resignation and Due Process: Analyzing H. Harlan Stone v. University of Maryland Medical System

Voluntary Resignation and Due Process: Analyzing H. Harlan Stone v. University of Maryland Medical System

Date: Aug 20, 1988
Voluntary Resignation and Due Process: Analyzing H. Harlan Stone v. University of Maryland Medical System Introduction The case of H. Harlan Stone, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant versus University of...
Enforcing Consent Decrees: Fourth Circuit Upholds Contempt for Paramilitary Activity and Defines Role of Private Counsel

Enforcing Consent Decrees: Fourth Circuit Upholds Contempt for Paramilitary Activity and Defines Role of Private Counsel

Date: Aug 17, 1988
Enforcing Consent Decrees: Fourth Circuit Upholds Contempt for Paramilitary Activity and Defines Role of Private Counsel Introduction The case of Bobby L. Person, United States of America v. Glen F....
Clarifying Section 1983 and Qualified Immunity: Clark v. Link

Clarifying Section 1983 and Qualified Immunity: Clark v. Link

Date: Aug 17, 1988
Clarifying Section 1983 and Qualified Immunity: Clark v. Link Introduction In the case of Clark v. Link, decided on August 16, 1988, by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, the...
Admissibility of Racial Slurs as Evidence in Discrimination Claims: Insights from Mullen v. Princess Anne Volunteer Fire Company

Admissibility of Racial Slurs as Evidence in Discrimination Claims: Insights from Mullen v. Princess Anne Volunteer Fire Company

Date: Aug 10, 1988
Admissibility of Racial Slurs as Evidence in Discrimination Claims: Insights from Mullen v. Princess Anne Volunteer Fire Company Introduction Mullen v. Princess Anne Volunteer Fire Company, Inc. is a...
Affirmation of Breach of Licensing Contract and Rejection of Tortious Interference Claim in Erdmann v. Preferred Research

Affirmation of Breach of Licensing Contract and Rejection of Tortious Interference Claim in Erdmann v. Preferred Research

Date: Jul 30, 1988
Affirmation of Breach of Licensing Contract and Rejection of Tortious Interference Claim in Erdmann v. Preferred Research Introduction Erdmann v. Preferred Research, Inc. is a pivotal case...
Proximate Causation and Special Relationships in 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Analyzing Gulledge v. Smart

Proximate Causation and Special Relationships in 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Analyzing Gulledge v. Smart

Date: Jul 30, 1988
Proximate Causation and Special Relationships in 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Analyzing Gulledge v. Smart Introduction Gulledge v. Smart, decided on July 29, 1988, by the United States District Court for the...
Limitation on Attorney's Fees Under 42 U.S.C. §1988: SPELL v. McDANIEL Establishes Reasonableness Standards

Limitation on Attorney's Fees Under 42 U.S.C. §1988: SPELL v. McDANIEL Establishes Reasonableness Standards

Date: Jul 27, 1988
Limitation on Attorney's Fees Under 42 U.S.C. §1988: SPELL v. McDANIEL Establishes Reasonableness Standards Introduction The case of Henry Z. Spell v. Charles D. McDaniel et al. presented before the...
Establishing Trustee Authority Over Alter Ego Claims in Bankruptcy: Insights from Steyr-Daimler-Puch v. Pappas

Establishing Trustee Authority Over Alter Ego Claims in Bankruptcy: Insights from Steyr-Daimler-Puch v. Pappas

Date: Jul 26, 1988
Establishing Trustee Authority Over Alter Ego Claims in Bankruptcy: Insights from Steyr-Daimler-Puch v. Pappas Introduction The case Steyr-Daimler-Puch of America Corporation v. Pappas (852 F.2d 132)...
Jury Impartiality and Third-Party Interference: STOCKTON v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia

Jury Impartiality and Third-Party Interference: STOCKTON v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia

Date: Jul 23, 1988
Jury Impartiality and Third-Party Interference: STOCKTON v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia Introduction Dennis Waldon STOCKTON v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia, 852 F.2d 740 (4th Cir. 1988), is a pivotal case...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert