Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Narrow Construction of Section 1001: The Limits of the 'Exculpatory No' Exception in UNITED STATES v. MOORE

Narrow Construction of Section 1001: The Limits of the 'Exculpatory No' Exception in UNITED STATES v. MOORE

Date: Jun 23, 1994
Narrow Construction of Section 1001: The Limits of the 'Exculpatory No' Exception in UNITED STATES v. MOORE 1. Introduction UNITED STATES v. MOORE, 27 F.3d 969 (4th Cir. 1994), serves as a pivotal...
De Minimis Force in Eighth Amendment Claims: NORMAN v. TAYLOR

De Minimis Force in Eighth Amendment Claims: NORMAN v. TAYLOR

Date: Jun 17, 1994
De Minimis Force in Eighth Amendment Claims: NORMAN v. TAYLOR Introduction NORMAN v. TAYLOR, 25 F.3d 1259 (4th Cir. 1994), is a pivotal case addressing the application of the Eighth Amendment's...
Reversing Judgment as a Matter of Law in Securities Fraud: The Malone v. Microdyne Decision

Reversing Judgment as a Matter of Law in Securities Fraud: The Malone v. Microdyne Decision

Date: Jun 9, 1994
Reversing Judgment as a Matter of Law in Securities Fraud: The Malone v. Microdyne Decision Introduction The case of Michael F. Malone; Seth Rosenberg, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Microdyne Corporation;...
Enhanced Scrutiny of FOIA Document Withholding: Insights from Ethyl Corp. v. EPA

Enhanced Scrutiny of FOIA Document Withholding: Insights from Ethyl Corp. v. EPA

Date: Jun 2, 1994
Enhanced Scrutiny of FOIA Document Withholding: Insights from Ethyl Corp. v. EPA Introduction The case of Ethyl Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (25 F.3d 1241, 4th...
Schultz v. Spirit Cruises: Establishing Precedent on Rule 60(b)(3) and Discovery Misconduct

Schultz v. Spirit Cruises: Establishing Precedent on Rule 60(b)(3) and Discovery Misconduct

Date: May 25, 1994
Schultz v. Spirit Cruises: Establishing Precedent on Rule 60(b)(3) and Discovery Misconduct Introduction The case of Karen Schultz v. Spirit Cruises, Inc. serves as a significant precedent in the...
Admissibility of State-Warranted Evidence in Federal Courts Governed by Fourth Amendment Standards

Admissibility of State-Warranted Evidence in Federal Courts Governed by Fourth Amendment Standards

Date: May 19, 1994
Admissibility of State-Warranted Evidence in Federal Courts Governed by Fourth Amendment Standards Introduction The case of United States of America v. Charles E. Clyburn, decided on May 18, 1994, by...
Abuse of the Writ Doctrine in Habeas Corpus Petitions: The Noble v. Barnett Case

Abuse of the Writ Doctrine in Habeas Corpus Petitions: The Noble v. Barnett Case

Date: May 13, 1994
Abuse of the Writ Doctrine in Habeas Corpus Petitions: The Noble v. Barnett Case Introduction FREDERICK ALLEN NOBLE, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. TALMADGE L. BARNETT, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE. (24 F.3d 582)...
Fourth Circuit Recognizes Actual Innocence Exception in §2255 Collateral Sentencing Challenges

Fourth Circuit Recognizes Actual Innocence Exception in §2255 Collateral Sentencing Challenges

Date: May 7, 1994
Fourth Circuit Recognizes Actual Innocence Exception in §2255 Collateral Sentencing Challenges Introduction United States of America v. Thomas John Maybeck, 23 F.3d 888 (4th Cir. 1994), is a pivotal...
ERISA and the Enforceability of Pre-Plan Representations: Insights from ELMORE v. CONE MILLS CORPoration

ERISA and the Enforceability of Pre-Plan Representations: Insights from ELMORE v. CONE MILLS CORPoration

Date: May 7, 1994
ERISA and the Enforceability of Pre-Plan Representations: Insights from ELMORE v. CONE MILLS CORPoration Introduction The case of ELMORE v. CONE MILLS CORPoration addresses a pivotal question within...
Limits of Government Discretion under Plea Agreements and Standards for Challenging Sentencing on Racial Grounds: U.S. v. Wallace

Limits of Government Discretion under Plea Agreements and Standards for Challenging Sentencing on Racial Grounds: U.S. v. Wallace

Date: Apr 26, 1994
Limits of Government Discretion under Plea Agreements and Standards for Challenging Sentencing on Racial Grounds: U.S. v. Wallace Introduction The case of United States of America v. James Darnell...
Fourth Circuit Upholds Reasonable Traffic Stop Standards in Jeffus Case

Fourth Circuit Upholds Reasonable Traffic Stop Standards in Jeffus Case

Date: Apr 23, 1994
Fourth Circuit Upholds Reasonable Traffic Stop Standards in Jeffus Case Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Edward Dane Jeffus, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Clarifying Qui Tam Procedural Standards under the False Claims Act: The Fourth Circuit's Interpretation in US v. Becton Dickinson

Clarifying Qui Tam Procedural Standards under the False Claims Act: The Fourth Circuit's Interpretation in US v. Becton Dickinson

Date: Apr 19, 1994
Clarifying Qui Tam Procedural Standards under the False Claims Act: The Fourth Circuit's Interpretation in United States of America v. Becton Dickinson Company Introduction In the landmark case of...
Fourth Circuit Sets Precedent on Preliminary Injunctions in Cable Provider Disputes

Fourth Circuit Sets Precedent on Preliminary Injunctions in Cable Provider Disputes

Date: Apr 15, 1994
Fourth Circuit Sets Precedent on Preliminary Injunctions in Cable Provider Disputes Introduction The case of Multi-Channel TV Cable Company v. Charlottesville Quality Cable Operating Company involves...
Protected Liberty Interests in Prisoner Classification: An Analysis of Slezak v. Evatt

Protected Liberty Interests in Prisoner Classification: An Analysis of Slezak v. Evatt

Date: Apr 15, 1994
Protected Liberty Interests in Prisoner Classification: An Analysis of Slezak v. Evatt Introduction The case of Gary Slezak and James Plyler; Donald M. Cogdill v. Parker Evatt et al., adjudicated by...
Establishing Procedural Requirements for Summary Judgment: Insights from Campbell v. Hewitt, Coleman Associates, Inc.

Establishing Procedural Requirements for Summary Judgment: Insights from Campbell v. Hewitt, Coleman Associates, Inc.

Date: Apr 13, 1994
Establishing Procedural Requirements for Summary Judgment: Insights from Campbell v. Hewitt, Coleman Associates, Inc. Introduction The case of Fay M. Campbell v. Hewitt, Coleman Associates,...
Defining Scope of Employment in Copyright Ownership:
    Avtec Systems v. Peiffer

Defining Scope of Employment in Copyright Ownership: Avtec Systems v. Peiffer

Date: Apr 7, 1994
Defining Scope of Employment in Copyright Ownership: Avtec Systems v. Peiffer Introduction Avtec Systems, Incorporated v. Jeffrey G. Peiffer et al., decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Ensuring Due Process in Jury Selection: Insights from United States v. Hanno

Ensuring Due Process in Jury Selection: Insights from United States v. Hanno

Date: Mar 29, 1994
Ensuring Due Process in Jury Selection: Insights from United States v. Hanno Introduction The case of United States of America v. Michael John Hanno addressed critical issues surrounding jury...
Affirmation of RICO Exception: New Beckley Mining Corp. v. United Mine Workers of America

Affirmation of RICO Exception: New Beckley Mining Corp. v. United Mine Workers of America

Date: Mar 5, 1994
Affirmation of RICO Exception: New Beckley Mining Corp. v. United Mine Workers of America Introduction The case of New Beckley Mining Corporation v. International Union, United Mine Workers of...
Preemption of State Common Law Claims under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA): Feikema v. Texaco, Inc.

Preemption of State Common Law Claims under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA): Feikema v. Texaco, Inc.

Date: Mar 4, 1994
Preemption of State Common Law Claims under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA): Feikema v. Texaco, Inc. Introduction The case of Feikema et al. v. Texaco, Inc. serves as a pivotal...
Affirmation of the Plain View Doctrine under Good Faith: United States v. Legg

Affirmation of the Plain View Doctrine under Good Faith: United States v. Legg

Date: Mar 2, 1994
Affirmation of the Plain View Doctrine under Good Faith: United States v. Legg Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Jeffrey S. Legg, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert