Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Fourth Circuit Recognizes Drug Conspiracy Convictions as Instant Offenses for Career Offender Enhancement

Fourth Circuit Recognizes Drug Conspiracy Convictions as Instant Offenses for Career Offender Enhancement

Date: Aug 18, 1994
Fourth Circuit Recognizes Drug Conspiracy Convictions as Instant Offenses for Career Offender Enhancement Introduction The case of United States of America v. Joseph Willie Kennedy was deliberated by...
Fourth Circuit Affirms Proper Admission of Prior Felony Convictions in § 922(g)(1) Offenses

Fourth Circuit Affirms Proper Admission of Prior Felony Convictions in § 922(g)(1) Offenses

Date: Aug 18, 1994
Fourth Circuit Affirms Proper Admission of Prior Felony Convictions in § 922(g)(1) Offenses Introduction In United States of America v. Button Jack Rhodes (32 F.3d 867), the United States Court of...
Interpreting "Medically Necessary" Under ERISA: Insights from Sheppard Enoch Pratt Hospital v. Travelers Insurance Company

Interpreting "Medically Necessary" Under ERISA: Insights from Sheppard Enoch Pratt Hospital v. Travelers Insurance Company

Date: Aug 16, 1994
Interpreting "Medically Necessary" Under ERISA: Insights from Sheppard Enoch Pratt Hospital v. Travelers Insurance Company Introduction The case of Sheppard Enoch Pratt Hospital, Inc. v. Travelers...
Defining a "Qualified Individual" Under the ADA: Commentary on Tyndall v. National Education Centers

Defining a "Qualified Individual" Under the ADA: Commentary on Tyndall v. National Education Centers

Date: Aug 4, 1994
Defining a "Qualified Individual" Under the ADA: Commentary on Tyndall v. National Education Centers Introduction The case of Mary M. Tyndall versus National Education Centers, Incorporated of...
Retaliation Claims Require Causation: The 'Same Decision' Doctrine in Employment Discrimination Cases

Retaliation Claims Require Causation: The 'Same Decision' Doctrine in Employment Discrimination Cases

Date: Aug 4, 1994
Retaliation Claims Require Causation: The 'Same Decision' Doctrine in Employment Discrimination Cases Introduction The case of Susan Preston v. Commonwealth of Virginia ex rel. New River Community...
ERISA Preempts State Substantial Compliance Doctrine: Establishing Federal Common Law in Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Adams

ERISA Preempts State Substantial Compliance Doctrine: Establishing Federal Common Law in Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Adams

Date: Jul 28, 1994
ERISA Preempts State Substantial Compliance Doctrine: Establishing Federal Common Law in Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Adams Introduction The case of Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Company v....
Title VII and Section 1983: Coexisting Remedies for Employment Discrimination – Beardsley v. Webb

Title VII and Section 1983: Coexisting Remedies for Employment Discrimination – Beardsley v. Webb

Date: Jul 27, 1994
Title VII and Section 1983: Coexisting Remedies for Employment Discrimination – Beardsley v. Webb Introduction In the landmark case Beardsley v. Webb, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Randall v. United States: Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Military Medical Practitioners' Due Process Rights

Randall v. United States: Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Military Medical Practitioners' Due Process Rights

Date: Jul 27, 1994
Randall v. United States: Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Military Medical Practitioners' Due Process Rights Introduction Randall v. United States is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Ahmeds v. United States: Administrative Exhaustion Under the Federal Tort Claims Act

Ahmeds v. United States: Administrative Exhaustion Under the Federal Tort Claims Act

Date: Jul 26, 1994
Ahmeds v. United States: Administrative Exhaustion Under the Federal Tort Claims Act Introduction The case Fozia Ahmed; Mohammad Ahmed, Individually and as Parents and Next Friends of Ayesha Ahmed;...
Establishing Reasonable Attorney Fees under 42 U.S.C. §1988: Insights from RUM CREEK COAL SALES, INC. v. CAPERTON

Establishing Reasonable Attorney Fees under 42 U.S.C. §1988: Insights from RUM CREEK COAL SALES, INC. v. CAPERTON

Date: Jul 26, 1994
Establishing Reasonable Attorney Fees under 42 U.S.C. §1988: Insights from RUM CREEK COAL SALES, INC. v. CAPERTON Introduction RUM CREEK COAL SALES, INC. v. CAPERTON is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Affirming Employer-Only Liability Under the ADEA: Insights from Birkbeck v. Marvel Lighting Corporation

Affirming Employer-Only Liability Under the ADEA: Insights from Birkbeck v. Marvel Lighting Corporation

Date: Jul 23, 1994
Affirming Employer-Only Liability Under the ADEA: Insights from Birkbeck v. Marvel Lighting Corporation Introduction The case of PATRICIA BIRKBECK, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ALAN...
Qualified Immunity in Child Abuse Record Maintenance: Hodges v. Jones

Qualified Immunity in Child Abuse Record Maintenance: Hodges v. Jones

Date: Jul 20, 1994
Qualified Immunity in Child Abuse Record Maintenance: Hodges v. Jones Introduction Hodges v. Jones, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on July 19, 1994, addresses...
Affirmation of Rule 32(c)(3)(D) Compliance in Sentencing: United States v. Walker

Affirmation of Rule 32(c)(3)(D) Compliance in Sentencing: United States v. Walker

Date: Jul 19, 1994
Affirmation of Rule 32(c)(3)(D) Compliance in Sentencing: United States v. Walker Introduction United States of America v. Harold R. Walker, 29 F.3d 908 (4th Cir. 1994), serves as a pivotal case in...
Establishing Disability: Objective Medical Evidence Requirements in Subjective Pain Claims - Mickles v. Shalala

Establishing Disability: Objective Medical Evidence Requirements in Subjective Pain Claims - Mickles v. Shalala

Date: Jul 19, 1994
Establishing Disability: Objective Medical Evidence Requirements in Subjective Pain Claims Mickles v. Shalala, United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit, 1994 Introduction Case: Nannie Mickles,...
Liability of Brand-Name Drug Manufacturers in the Context of Generic Equivalents: Foster v. Wyeth

Liability of Brand-Name Drug Manufacturers in the Context of Generic Equivalents: Foster v. Wyeth

Date: Jul 15, 1994
Liability of Brand-Name Drug Manufacturers in the Context of Generic Equivalents: Foster v. Wyeth Introduction The case of Craig Foster; Karen Foster v. American Home Products Corporation (Wyeth)...
Federal Question Jurisdiction in State Law Negligence Claims: Insights from Mulcahey v. Columbia Organic Chemicals Co.

Federal Question Jurisdiction in State Law Negligence Claims: Insights from Mulcahey v. Columbia Organic Chemicals Co.

Date: Jul 12, 1994
Federal Question Jurisdiction in State Law Negligence Claims: Insights from Mulcahey v. Columbia Organic Chemicals Co. Introduction The case of Mulcahey v. Columbia Organic Chemicals Company, Inc.,...
Ensuring Factual Basis in Expert Testimony: Fourth Circuit's Decision in Tyger Construction Co. v. Pensacola Construction Co.

Ensuring Factual Basis in Expert Testimony: Fourth Circuit's Decision in Tyger Construction Co. v. Pensacola Construction Co.

Date: Jul 9, 1994
Ensuring Factual Basis in Expert Testimony: Fourth Circuit's Decision in Tyger Construction Co. v. Pensacola Construction Co. Introduction Tyger Construction Company Incorporated, a South Carolina...
Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Excessive Force Context: Insights from McLenagan v. Karnes

Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Excessive Force Context: Insights from McLenagan v. Karnes

Date: Jul 1, 1994
Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Excessive Force Context: Insights from McLenagan v. Karnes Introduction McLenagan v. Karnes, 27 F.3d 1002 (4th Cir. 1994), is a pivotal case that addresses the complex...
Strict Exhaustion of State Remedies in Habeas Corpus: Mallory v. Smith Sets Precedent

Strict Exhaustion of State Remedies in Habeas Corpus: Mallory v. Smith Sets Precedent

Date: Jul 1, 1994
Strict Exhaustion of State Remedies in Habeas Corpus: Mallory v. Smith Sets Precedent Introduction The case of Thomas W. Mallory, Jr. v. David K. Smith, Warden; James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney...
Repressed Memory and Statute of Limitations: Insights from Roe v. Doe

Repressed Memory and Statute of Limitations: Insights from Roe v. Doe

Date: Jun 30, 1994
Repressed Memory and Statute of Limitations: Insights from Roe v. Doe Introduction The case of Jane Roe v. Jane Doe; John Doe, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert