Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Qualified Immunity and Jury Verdict Integrity in Figg v. Schroeder & Anthony

Qualified Immunity and Jury Verdict Integrity in Figg v. Schroeder & Anthony

Date: Dec 4, 2002
Qualified Immunity and Jury Verdict Integrity in Figg v. Schroeder & Anthony Introduction The case of Gayle W. Figg et al. v. John A. Schroeder, Sergeant; Michael J. Anthony, Sergeant was adjudicated...
EPlus Technology v. Aboud: Establishing Personal Jurisdiction and RICO Liability in Fraudulent Bust-Out Schemes

EPlus Technology v. Aboud: Establishing Personal Jurisdiction and RICO Liability in Fraudulent Bust-Out Schemes

Date: Dec 4, 2002
EPlus Technology v. Aboud: Establishing Personal Jurisdiction and RICO Liability in Fraudulent Bust-Out Schemes Introduction The case of EPlus Technology, Inc. v. Patricia Aboud explores the...
Setting Standards for Conspiracy Claims under the Sherman Act and Affirming the Indirect Purchaser Rule

Setting Standards for Conspiracy Claims under the Sherman Act and Affirming the Indirect Purchaser Rule

Date: Oct 29, 2002
Setting Standards for Conspiracy Claims under the Sherman Act and Affirming the Indirect Purchaser Rule Introduction The case of Mark H. Dickson et al. v. Microsoft Corporation et al. (309 F.3d 193,...
Fourth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Martin Becker v. Westinghouse Savannah River Company: Government Knowledge Negates FCA Violation

Fourth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Martin Becker v. Westinghouse Savannah River Company: Government Knowledge Negates FCA Violation

Date: Sep 28, 2002
Fourth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Martin Becker v. Westinghouse Savannah River Company: Government Knowledge Negates FCA Violation Introduction In the case of United States of America, ex...
Dow v. Jones: Standards for Legal Malpractice and the Necessity of Specificity in Actual Malice Claims

Dow v. Jones: Standards for Legal Malpractice and the Necessity of Specificity in Actual Malice Claims

Date: Sep 27, 2002
Dow v. Jones: Standards for Legal Malpractice and the Necessity of Specificity in Actual Malice Claims Introduction Dow v. Jones, 232 F. Supp. 2d 491 (D. Md. 2002), is a pivotal case that delves into...
Appealability of §1631 Transfer Orders in the Context of Personal Jurisdiction: Carefirst of Maryland, Inc. Decision

Appealability of §1631 Transfer Orders in the Context of Personal Jurisdiction: Carefirst of Maryland, Inc. Decision

Date: Sep 26, 2002
Appealability of §1631 Transfer Orders in the Context of Personal Jurisdiction: Carefirst of Maryland, Inc. v. Carefirst Urgent Care Center, LLC Introduction In the case of Carefirst of Maryland,...
De Novo Review Standard in ERISA Benefit Denials: Gallagher v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co.

De Novo Review Standard in ERISA Benefit Denials: Gallagher v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co.

Date: Sep 26, 2002
De Novo Review Standard in ERISA Benefit Denials: Gallagher v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co. Introduction Patrick L. Gallagher, a long-term employee of Goodwill Publishing, Inc. (GWP), filed a...
Requirement of Actual Damages for Statutory Recovery Under the Privacy Act

Requirement of Actual Damages for Statutory Recovery Under the Privacy Act

Date: Sep 21, 2002
Requirement of Actual Damages for Statutory Recovery Under the Privacy Act Introduction In the landmark case of Robert DOE, a/k/a Virginia Pri v. cy Litigation; Tays Doe, a/k/a Virginia Pri (306 F.3d...
Fourth Circuit Establishes Punitive Damages Admissible with Back Pay Alone in Title VII Gender Discrimination

Fourth Circuit Establishes Punitive Damages Admissible with Back Pay Alone in Title VII Gender Discrimination

Date: Sep 19, 2002
Fourth Circuit Establishes Punitive Damages Admissible with Back Pay Alone in Title VII Gender Discrimination Introduction The case of Adrienne C. Corti v. Storage Technology Corporation addresses...
Deference to Administrative Findings in IDEA Cases: Insights from MM v. School District of Greenville County

Deference to Administrative Findings in IDEA Cases: Insights from MM v. School District of Greenville County

Date: Sep 7, 2002
Deference to Administrative Findings in IDEA Cases: Insights from MM v. School District of Greenville County Introduction MM v. School District of Greenville County is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Overbreadth of Public Decency Regulations Confirmed by Fourth Circuit in Giovani Carandola, Ltd. v. Bason

Overbreadth of Public Decency Regulations Confirmed by Fourth Circuit in Giovani Carandola, Ltd. v. Bason

Date: Aug 31, 2002
Overbreadth of Public Decency Regulations Confirmed by Fourth Circuit in Giovani Carandola, Ltd. v. Bason Introduction Giovani Carandola, Ltd., a North Carolina corporation, along with dancer Janel...
Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements in Employment Contracts: Curtis M. Adkins v. Labor Ready, Inc.

Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements in Employment Contracts: Curtis M. Adkins v. Labor Ready, Inc.

Date: Aug 31, 2002
Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements in Employment Contracts: Curtis M. Adkins v. Labor Ready, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of Curtis M. Adkins v. Labor Ready, Inc., the United States...
Robles v. Prince George’s County: Fourth Circuit Defines Boundaries of Qualified Immunity and Punitive Damages in Civil Rights Cases

Robles v. Prince George’s County: Fourth Circuit Defines Boundaries of Qualified Immunity and Punitive Damages in Civil Rights Cases

Date: Aug 27, 2002
Robles v. Prince George’s County: Fourth Circuit Defines Boundaries of Qualified Immunity and Punitive Damages in Civil Rights Cases Introduction Nelson O. Robles v. Prince George's County, Maryland;...
Banks Do Not Owe Duty of Care to Noncustomers in Fraud Cases: Eisenberg v. Wachovia

Banks Do Not Owe Duty of Care to Noncustomers in Fraud Cases: Eisenberg v. Wachovia

Date: Aug 27, 2002
Banks Do Not Owe Duty of Care to Noncustomers in Fraud Cases: Eisenberg v. Wachovia Introduction The case of Eric Eisenberg v. Wachovia Bank, N.A. examined critical issues surrounding a bank's duty...
Establishing Jurisdictional Boundaries in Anticybersquatting Cases: Porsche Cars North America v. Porsche.net

Establishing Jurisdictional Boundaries in Anticybersquatting Cases: Porsche Cars North America v. Porsche.net

Date: Aug 24, 2002
Establishing Jurisdictional Boundaries in Anticybersquatting Cases: Porsche Cars North America v. Porsche.net Introduction The case of Porsche Cars North America, Incorporated; Dr. Ing. H.C.F....
Interpretation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d)(2): Extending In Rem Actions to Trademark Infringement and Dilution

Interpretation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d)(2): Extending In Rem Actions to Trademark Infringement and Dilution

Date: Aug 24, 2002
Interpretation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d)(2): Extending In Rem Actions to Trademark Infringement and Dilution Introduction The case HARRODS LIMITED v. SIXTY INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES addresses critical...
Strict Standards for EAJA Fee Awards in Hyatt v. Barnhart

Strict Standards for EAJA Fee Awards in Hyatt v. Barnhart

Date: Aug 23, 2002
Strict Standards for EAJA Fee Awards in Hyatt v. Barnhart Introduction Hyatt v. Barnhart, 315 F.3d 239, is a pivotal decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, rendered on...
Relation-Back Provision in EEOC Charges: Insights from EDELMAN v. LYNCHBURG COLLEGE

Relation-Back Provision in EEOC Charges: Insights from EDELMAN v. LYNCHBURG COLLEGE

Date: Aug 20, 2002
Relation-Back Provision in EEOC Charges: Insights from EDELMAN v. LYNCHBURG COLLEGE Introduction Elderman v. Lynchburg College, 300 F.3d 400 (4th Cir. 2002), is a pivotal case in employment...
Descriptive Use of "U.S. Search" in Executive Recruiting Declared Unprotectable Due to Lack of Secondary Meaning

Descriptive Use of "U.S. Search" in Executive Recruiting Declared Unprotectable Due to Lack of Secondary Meaning

Date: Aug 17, 2002
Descriptive Use of "U.S. Search" in Executive Recruiting Declared Unprotectable Due to Lack of Secondary Meaning Introduction The case of U.S. Search, LLC v. US Search.com Incorporated delves into...
Clarifying Jurisdictional Limits in Forcible Abduction Cases: Kasi v. Angelone

Clarifying Jurisdictional Limits in Forcible Abduction Cases: Kasi v. Angelone

Date: Aug 16, 2002
Clarifying Jurisdictional Limits in Forcible Abduction Cases: Kasi v. Angelone Introduction The case of Mir Aimal Kasi v. Ronald J. Angelone (300 F.3d 487, 4th Cir. 2002) presents a pivotal...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert