Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Res Judicata Bars Bankruptcy-Related Legal Malpractice Claims: Grausz v. Englander

Res Judicata Bars Bankruptcy-Related Legal Malpractice Claims: Grausz v. Englander

Date: Mar 7, 2003
Res Judicata Bars Bankruptcy-Related Legal Malpractice Claims: Grazuz v. Englander Case Citation: Henry GRAUSZ, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bradford F. ENGLANDER; Linowes and Blocher, L.L.P.,...
Affirmation of Conspiratorial Liability for Full Loss Under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act

Affirmation of Conspiratorial Liability for Full Loss Under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act

Date: Feb 28, 2003
Affirmation of Conspiratorial Liability for Full Loss Under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act Introduction In the case United States of America v. Dallas Newsome et al. (322 F.3d 328), the United...
Extension of Time for Service of Process in § 1983 Claims: Elkins v. Broome

Extension of Time for Service of Process in § 1983 Claims: Elkins v. Broome

Date: Feb 27, 2003
Extension of Time for Service of Process in § 1983 Claims: Elkins v. Broome Introduction The case of John Elkins v. J.A. Broome serves as a pivotal precedent in the realm of federal civil procedure,...
Affirmation of Standing Requirements under the Supremacy Clause and APA: Taubman Realty Group v. Mineta

Affirmation of Standing Requirements under the Supremacy Clause and APA: Taubman Realty Group v. Mineta

Date: Feb 22, 2003
Affirmation of Standing Requirements under the Supremacy Clause and APA: Taubman Realty Group v. Mineta Introduction In the appellate case Taubman Realty Group Limited Partnership v. Norman Y....
Abstention and Double Jeopardy in Drug Tax Prosecutions: Fourth Circuit Upholds Younger Principle in Nivens et al. v. Gilchrist

Abstention and Double Jeopardy in Drug Tax Prosecutions: Fourth Circuit Upholds Younger Principle in Nivens et al. v. Gilchrist

Date: Feb 12, 2003
Abstention and Double Jeopardy in Drug Tax Prosecutions: Fourth Circuit Upholds Younger Principle in Nivens et al. v. Gilchrist Introduction The case of Kenneth Scott Nivens, Glen Lance Maners, and...
Establishing Registry Authority to Cancel Infringing Domain Names under the ACPA

Establishing Registry Authority to Cancel Infringing Domain Names under the ACPA

Date: Feb 6, 2003
Establishing Registry Authority to Cancel Infringing Domain Names under the ACPA 1. Introduction The case of GlobalSantaFe Corporation v. GlobalSantaFe.com (250 F. Supp. 2d 610), adjudicated by the...
Admissibility of Subsequent Misconduct to Prove Willfulness under Rule 404(b): United States v. Mohr

Admissibility of Subsequent Misconduct to Prove Willfulness under Rule 404(b): United States v. Mohr

Date: Feb 4, 2003
Admissibility of Subsequent Misconduct to Prove Willfulness under Rule 404(b): United States v. Mohr Introduction The case of United States of America v. Stephanie Mohr addresses critical issues...
Exclusion of Expert Testimony Under Rule 37(c)(1): Southern States Rack and Fixture, Inc. v. Sherwin-Williams Company

Exclusion of Expert Testimony Under Rule 37(c)(1): Southern States Rack and Fixture, Inc. v. Sherwin-Williams Company

Date: Jan 31, 2003
Exclusion of Expert Testimony Under Rule 37(c)(1): Southern States Rack and Fixture, Inc. v. Sherwin-Williams Company Introduction The case of Southern States Rack and Fixture, Incorporated versus...
Denial of Certificate of Appealability in Lyons v. Lee: Implications for Habeas Corpus Petitions and Sentencing Enhancements

Denial of Certificate of Appealability in Lyons v. Lee: Implications for Habeas Corpus Petitions and Sentencing Enhancements

Date: Jan 22, 2003
Denial of Certificate of Appealability in Lyons v. Lee: Implications for Habeas Corpus Petitions and Sentencing Enhancements Introduction Robbie James Lyons, the petitioner-appellant, was convicted...
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Apprendi Constraints on Sentencing Enhancements in Drug Conspiracy Cases

Fourth Circuit Clarifies Apprendi Constraints on Sentencing Enhancements in Drug Conspiracy Cases

Date: Jan 18, 2003
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Apprendi Constraints on Sentencing Enhancements in Drug Conspiracy Cases Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Willie Jerome Mackins, adjudicated...
Rossignol v. Voorhaar: State Action in Suppression of Free Speech

Rossignol v. Voorhaar: State Action in Suppression of Free Speech

Date: Jan 17, 2003
State Action and First Amendment Suppression: Rossignol v. Voorhaar Establishes New Precedent Introduction Rossignol v. Voorhaar, 316 F.3d 516 (4th Cir. 2003), is a landmark case that addresses the...
Intended Loss Prevails in Sentencing Guidelines: United States v. Miller

Intended Loss Prevails in Sentencing Guidelines: United States v. Miller

Date: Jan 15, 2003
Intended Loss Prevails in Sentencing Guidelines: United States v. Miller Introduction In United States v. Robert B. Miller, 316 F.3d 495 (4th Cir. 2003), the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Fourth Circuit Reinforces AEDPA Standards in Death Penalty Appeal: Daniels v. Lee

Fourth Circuit Reinforces AEDPA Standards in Death Penalty Appeal: Daniels v. Lee

Date: Jan 11, 2003
Fourth Circuit Reinforces AEDPA Standards in Death Penalty Appeal: Daniels v. Lee Introduction The case of John Dennis Daniels v. R.C. Lee serves as a pivotal instance illustrating the stringent...
Applicability of PLRA Filing Fees to Released Prisoners: DeBlasio v. Ke Clarifies Fee Obligations

Applicability of PLRA Filing Fees to Released Prisoners: DeBlasio v. Ke Clarifies Fee Obligations

Date: Jan 8, 2003
Applicability of PLRA Filing Fees to Released Prisoners: DeBlasio v. Ke Clarifies Fee Obligations Introduction DeBlasio v. Ke, 315 F.3d 396 (4th Cir. 2003), addresses a pivotal issue under the Prison...
Fourth Circuit Sets Precedent on Preliminary Injunction Criteria in Lanham Act False Advertising: The Scotts Company v. United Industries Corp.

Fourth Circuit Sets Precedent on Preliminary Injunction Criteria in Lanham Act False Advertising: The Scotts Company v. United Industries Corp.

Date: Dec 24, 2002
Fourth Circuit Sets Precedent on Preliminary Injunction Criteria in Lanham Act False Advertising: The Scotts Company v. United Industries Corp. Introduction In the case of The Scotts Company,...
Intentional Targeting Required for Personal Jurisdiction in Internet Defamation Cases: Young v. New Haven Advocate and Hartford Courant

Intentional Targeting Required for Personal Jurisdiction in Internet Defamation Cases: Young v. New Haven Advocate and Hartford Courant

Date: Dec 14, 2002
Intentional Targeting Required for Personal Jurisdiction in Internet Defamation Cases: Young v. New Haven Advocate and Hartford Courant Introduction Young v. New Haven Advocate and Hartford Courant...
Affirmation of HCQIA’s Constitutionality and Hospital Credentialing Practices in Freilich v. Upper Chesapeake Health

Affirmation of HCQIA’s Constitutionality and Hospital Credentialing Practices in Freilich v. Upper Chesapeake Health

Date: Dec 14, 2002
Affirmation of HCQIA’s Constitutionality and Hospital Credentialing Practices in Freilich v. Upper Chesapeake Health Introduction In the landmark case of Freilich v. Upper Chesapeake Health, the...
Particularity in Civil Forfeiture Complaints: Upholding Rule E(2)(a) in United States v. Mondragon

Particularity in Civil Forfeiture Complaints: Upholding Rule E(2)(a) in United States v. Mondragon

Date: Dec 14, 2002
Particularity in Civil Forfeiture Complaints: Upholding Rule E(2)(a) in United States v. Mondragon Introduction The case of United States of America v. Lolita Mondragon, 313 F.3d 862 (4th Cir. 2002),...
Thompson v. Potomac Electric Power Company: Upholding Standards for Training Denial and Retaliation under Title VII and Section 1981

Thompson v. Potomac Electric Power Company: Upholding Standards for Training Denial and Retaliation under Title VII and Section 1981

Date: Dec 13, 2002
Thompson v. Potomac Electric Power Company: Upholding Standards for Training Denial and Retaliation under Title VII and Section 1981 Introduction In Thompson v. Potomac Electric Power Company...
Franks v. Ross: Fourth Circuit Clarifies Statute of Limitations and Upholds EX PARTE YOUNG in Environmental Discrimination Case

Franks v. Ross: Fourth Circuit Clarifies Statute of Limitations and Upholds EX PARTE YOUNG in Environmental Discrimination Case

Date: Dec 5, 2002
Franks v. Ross: Fourth Circuit Clarifies Statute of Limitations and Upholds EX PARTE YOUNG in Environmental Discrimination Case Introduction In the case of Jerry Franks; Laverne Cofield; Easton Acres...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert